The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Random Forests
Open accessAbstract
Random forests are a combination of tree predictors such that each tree depends on the values of a random vector sampled independently and with the same distribution for all trees in the forest. The generalization error for forests converges a.s. to a limit as the number of trees in the forest becomes large. The generalization error of a forest of tree classifiers depends on the strength of the individual trees in the forest and the correlation between them. Using a random selection of features to split each node yields error rates that compare favorably to Adaboost (Y. Freund & R. Schapire, Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International conference, ***, 148–156), but are more robust with respect to noise. Internal estimates monitor error, strength, and correlation and these are used to show the response to increasing the number of features used in the splitting. Internal estimates are also used to measure variable importance. These ideas are also applicable to regression.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“RF uses the principle of majority voting; the most common prediction from all decision trees is the final classification [17]”
From Application of predictive modeling tools for the identification of Ocimum spp. herbal products (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“RF is an ensemble approach that combines the predictive classifications of multiple decision trees.”
From Application of predictive modeling tools for the identification of Ocimum spp. herbal products (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“Random forests (rf) modify Breiman's ( 2001) traditional bagging approach.”
From Empirical asset pricing via machine learning: evidence from the European stock market (2021) · cites this paper as Breiman's (2001)
In the citing paper
“To overcome the black-box nature of GBM, (Breiman 2001; Friedman and Popescu 2008; Hastie et al. 2009) introduced two important tools to interpret the GBM model: (i) variable importance measures and (ii) partial dependence plots.”
From Modelling Motor Insurance Claim Frequency and Severity Using Gradient Boosting (2023) · cites this paper as Breiman 2001
In the citing paper
“We prioritised Random Forest (RF) [15] as our primary baseline due to its high interpretability and resistance to overfitting in high-dimensional feature spaces.”
From Safe Fall: Use of Predictive Modeling and Machine Vision Techniques for Fall Analysis and Fall Quality (2026) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“Combining the predictions of many different models is a very successful way to reduce test errors, 1, 3”
From ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks (2017) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“In order to improve the generalization performance of decision tree, the random forest [306] is further investigated by integrating decisions from multiply tree-based classifiers.”
From Applications of machine learning to machine fault diagnosis: A review and roadmap (2020) · cites this paper as [306]
In the citing paper
“RF is an ensemble method based on decision trees and uses bagging to reduce overfitting (Breiman, 2001).”
From Spatial Optimization Methods for Malaria Risk Mapping in Sub‐Saharan African Cities Using Demographic and Health Surveys (2023) · cites this paper as Breiman, 2001
In the citing paper
“RF is a robust algorithm for dealing with multicollinearity and allows for non‐linear relationships between the covariates and the dependent variable (Breiman, 2001).”
From Spatial Optimization Methods for Malaria Risk Mapping in Sub‐Saharan African Cities Using Demographic and Health Surveys (2023) · cites this paper as Breiman, 2001
In the citing paper
“Feature importance was reported from the fitted random forest as a relative measure of variable use and was not interpreted causally because known-site patterns may also reflect preservation, accessibility, survey history and reporting bias (Breiman 2001).”
From Archaeological prospectivity and terrace morphometry using open geospatial data: a reproducible GIS–machine-learning workflow for the cuyes river valley, ecuador (2026) · cites this paper as Breiman 2001
In the citing paper
“While RF limits overfitting when correctly parameterized [36,89,95], the near-perfect ensemble AUC score (0.999) suggests that it may be over-specified, with both calibration and validation influenced by the assumption that the absence data are true absences.”
From Advancing predictive modeling in archaeology: an evaluation of regression and machine learning methods on the grand staircase-escalante national monument (2020) · cites this paper as [89]
In the citing paper
“RF differs from GLM, GAM, and MaxEnt in that it has no underlying assumptions about distributions when model fitting [89].”
From Advancing predictive modeling in archaeology: an evaluation of regression and machine learning methods on the grand staircase-escalante national monument (2020) · cites this paper as [89]
In the citing paper
“It is the most powerful predictive model used in our analysis [89].”
From Advancing predictive modeling in archaeology: an evaluation of regression and machine learning methods on the grand staircase-escalante national monument (2020) · cites this paper as [89]
In the citing paper
“Non-parametric ML techniques like Random Forest126 have been successfully used to predict species richness and have shown significant error reduction with respect to the traditional counterparts used in ecology, for example in the estimation of richness distributions of fishes127,128, spiders 129, and small mammals130.”
From Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation (2022) · cites this paper as [126]
In the citing paper
“The most celebrated theoretical result is that of Breiman (2001), which offers an upper bound on the generalization error of forests in terms of correlation and strength of the individual trees.”
From A random forest guided tour (2016) · cites this paper as Breiman (2001)
In the citing paper
“First of all, in Breiman's forests, the criterion (2) is evaluated over a subset M try of randomly selected coordinates, and not over the whole range { 1 , . . . , p } .”
From A random forest guided tour (2016) · cites this paper as Breiman's (2001)
In the citing paper
“Interestingly, picking a large M does not lead to overfitting.”
From A random forest guided tour (2016) · cites this paper as Breiman (2001)
In the citing paper
“As well as this, in Breiman's (2001) forests, each leaf (that is, a terminal node) of individual trees contains a small number of observations, typically between 1 and 5.”
From A random forest guided tour (2016) · cites this paper as Breiman's (2001)
In the citing paper
“At last, each tree is constructed on a subset of a n examples picked within the initial sample, not on the whole sample D n ; and only these a n observations are used to calculate the estimation.”
From A random forest guided tour (2016) · cites this paper as Breiman's (2001)
In the citing paper
“Scornet et al. (2015), who show that Breiman's (2001) forests are consistent in an additive regression framework.”
From A random forest guided tour (2016) · cites this paper as Breiman's (2001)
In the citing paper
“Besides, the individual trees are not pruned, and the final cells do not contain more than nodesize observations (unless all data points in the cell have the same X i ).”
From A random forest guided tour (2016) · cites this paper as Breiman's (2001)
In the citing paper
“In particular, the choice k ≈ log n corresponds to obtaining a small number of examples in the leaves, in accordance with Breiman's (2001) idea that the individual trees should not be pruned.”
From A random forest guided tour (2016) · cites this paper as Breiman's (2001)
In the citing paper
“A seminal result by Breiman (2001) shows that the error of the forest is small as soon as the predictive power of each tree is good and the correlation between the tree errors is low.”
From A random forest guided tour (2016) · cites this paper as Breiman (2001)
In the citing paper
“We note however that if Breiman's (2001) original algorithm is used in this example (that is, each cell contains exactly one data point) then one obtains a consistent classification rule.”
From A random forest guided tour (2016) · cites this paper as Breiman (2001)
In the citing paper
“More precisely, independently of the type of forest, one has”
From A random forest guided tour (2016) · cites this paper as Breiman (2001)
In the citing paper
“For activity classification we use random forests 50 which offer a powerful nonparametric discriminative method for multi-class classification that offers state-of-the-art performance 51 .”
From Statistical machine learning of sleep and physical activity phenotypes from sensor data in 96,220 UK Biobank participants (2018) · cites this paper as [50]
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (1996) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00058655 · Cited by 16,325
Self-citationExperiments with a new boosting algorithm
Freund, Y., & Schapire, R. E. (1996) · Cited by 8,189
The random subspace method for constructing decision forests
Ho, T. K. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.709601 · Cited by 7,005
Dietterich, T. G. (2000) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1007607513941 · Cited by 2,996
An Empirical Comparison of Voting Classification Algorithms: Bagging, Boosting, and Variants
Bauer, E. J., & Kohavi, R. (1999) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1007515423169 · Cited by 2,662
Boosting the margin: a new explanation for the effectiveness of voting methods
Bartlett, P. L., Freund, Y., Lee, W. S., & Schapire, R. E. (1998) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1024691352 · Cited by 2,574
Shape Quantization and Recognition with Randomized Trees
Amit, Y., & Geman, D. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.7.1545 · Cited by 1,304
Arcing classifier (with discussion and a rejoinder by the author)
Breiman, L. (1998) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1024691079 · Cited by 1,124
Self-citationAcuña, A. I. G. (2012) · Cited by 304
Randomizing Outputs to Increase Prediction Accuracy
Breiman, L. (2000) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1007682208299 · Cited by 280
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Schapire, R., Freund, Y., Bartlett, P., & Lee,W. (1998). Boosting the margin:Anewexplanation for the effectiveness of voting methods. Annals of Statistics, 26(5), 1651–1686.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,101–1,200 of 1,868
Sakar, C. O., Polat, S. O., Katircioglu, M., & Kastro, Y. (2019) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-018-3523-0 · Cited by 259
Moustafa, N., Koroniotis, N., Keshk, M., Zomaya, A. Y., & Tari, Z. (2023) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2023.3280465 · Cited by 266
Early emergence of cortical interneuron diversity in the mouse embryo
Mi, D., Li, Z., Lim, L., Li, M., Moissidis, M., Yang, Y., Gao, T., Hu, T. X., Pratt, T., Price, D. J., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aar6821 · Cited by 259
A High-Resolution Enhancer Atlas of the Developing Telencephalon
Visel, A., Taher, L., Girgis, H., May, D., Golonzhka, O., Hoch, R. V., McKinsey, G. L., Pattabiraman, K., Silberberg, S. N., Blow, M. J., et al. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.041 · Cited by 257
Understanding ridesplitting behavior of on-demand ride services: An ensemble learning approach
Chen, X. (., Zahiri, M., & Zhang, S. (2017) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2016.12.018 · Cited by 252
Soldani, J., & Brogi, A. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3501297 · Cited by 256
Li, H., Leung, K., Wong, M., & Ballester, P. J. (2015) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.201400132 · Cited by 252
Kessler, R. C., Rose, S., Koenen, K. C., Karam, E. G., Stang, P. E., Stein, D. J., Heeringa, S. G., Hill, E. D., Liberzon, I., McLaughlin, K. A., et al. (2014) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20150 · Cited by 255
Pardakhti, M., Moharreri, E., Wanik, D., Suib, S. L., & Srivastava, R. (2017) · ACS Combinatorial Science · doi:10.1021/acscombsci.7b00056 · Cited by 254
Gur, R. E., Moore, T. M., Rosen, A. F. G., Barzilay, R., Roalf, D. R., Calkins, M. E., Ruparel, K., Scott, J. C., Almasy, L., Satterthwaite, T. D., et al. (2019) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.0943 · Cited by 239
Shung, D. L., Au, B., Taylor, R. A., Tay, J. K., Laursen, S. B., Stanley, A. J., Dalton, H. R., Ngu, J., Schultz, M., & Laine, L. (2020) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.09.009 · Cited by 227
Guidance for RNA-seq co-expression network construction and analysis: safety in numbers
Ballouz, S., Verleyen, W., & Gillis, J. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv118 · Cited by 215
An application of machine learning to haematological diagnosis
Gunčar, G., Kukar, M., Notar, M., Brvar, M., Černelč, P., Notar, M., & Notar, M. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-18564-8 · Cited by 237
Chiappini, F., Coilly, A., Kadar, H., Gual, P., Tran, A., Desterke, C., Samuel, D., Duclos-Vallée, J.-C., Touboul, D., Bertrand-Michel, J., et al. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep46658 · Cited by 246
Artificial intelligence for aging and longevity research: Recent advances and perspectives
Zhavoronkov, A., Mamoshina, P., Vanhaelen, Q., Scheibye-Knudsen, M., Moskalev, A., & Aliper, A. (2019) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2018.11.003 · Cited by 246
“…1967), support vector machines (SVM), also called support vector networks (Cortes and Vapnik, 1995), gradient boosting machines (GBM) (Mason et al., 1999; Friedman, 2001; Ayyadevara and Kishore Ayyadevara, 2018), and random forest (RF) (Ho, 1995; Breiman, 2001; Fratello and Tagliaferri, 2018).”
Rhee, J., & Im, J. (2017) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.02.011 · Cited by 245
Prashanth, R., Dutta Roy, S., Mandal, P. K., & Ghosh, S. (2016) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.03.001 · Cited by 244
Computational Fact Checking from Knowledge Networks
Ciampaglia, G. L., Shiralkar, P., Rocha, L. M., Bollen, J., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128193 · Cited by 486
Shapley Effects for Global Sensitivity Analysis: Theory and Computation
Song, E., Nelson, B. L., & Staum, J. (2016) · SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification · doi:10.1137/15m1048070 · Cited by 244
The many flavours of photometric redshifts
Salvato, M., Ilbert, O., & Hoyle, B. (2018) · Nature Astronomy · doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0478-0 · Cited by 234
Decision tree classifiers for automated medical diagnosis
Azar, A. T., & El-Metwally, S. M. (2013) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-012-1196-7 · Cited by 242
Profiling cellular diversity in sponges informs animal cell type and nervous system evolution
Musser, J. M., Schippers, K. J., Nickel, M., Mizzon, G., Kohn, A. B., Pape, C., Ronchi, P., Papadopoulos, N., Tarashansky, A. J., Hammel, J. U., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abj2949 · Cited by 242
Muchlinski, D., Siroky, D., He, J., & Kocher, M. (2016) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpv024 · Cited by 234
Prediction of Employee Turnover in Organizations using Machine Learning Algorithms
Punnoose, R., & Ajit, P. (2016) · International Journal of Advanced Research in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.14569/ijarai.2016.050904 · Cited by 244
“This additional layer of randomness makes it robust against over-fitting [24].”
BackgroundWang, C.-W., Huang, C.-T., Hsieh, M.-C., Li, C.-H., Chang, S.-W., Li, W.-C., Vandaele, R., Maree, R., Jodogne, S., Geurts, P., et al. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2015.2412951 · Cited by 235
Chen, C., Zhang, Q., Yu, B., Yu, Z., Lawrence, P. J., Ma, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2020) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103899 · Cited by 238
Wearable sensors enable personalized predictions of clinical laboratory measurements
Dunn, J., Kidzinski, L., Runge, R., Witt, D., Hicks, J. L., Schüssler-Fiorenza Rose, S. M., Li, X., Bahmani, A., Delp, S. L., Hastie, T., et al. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01339-0 · Cited by 244
Precision nutrition: A systematic literature review
Kirk, D., Catal, C., & Tekinerdogan, B. (2021) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104365 · Cited by 238
Hooker, G., Mentch, L., & Zhou, S. (2021) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1007/s11222-021-10057-z · Cited by 264
Hopfield Networks is All You Need
Ramsauer, H., Schäfl, B., Lehner, J., Seidl, P., Widrich, M., Adler, T., Gruber, L., Holzleitner, M., Pavlović, M., Sandve, G. K., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.02217 · Cited by 236
Current Trends and Applications of Machine Learning in Tribology—A Review
Marian, M., & Tremmel, S. (2021) · Lubricants · doi:10.3390/lubricants9090086 · Cited by 238
A renaissance of neural networks in drug discovery
Baskin, I. I., Winkler, D., & Tetko, I. V. (2016) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1080/17460441.2016.1201262 · Cited by 235
Saphire, E. O., Schendel, S. L., Fusco, M. L., Gangavarapu, K., Gunn, B. M., Wec, A. Z., Halfmann, P. J., Brannan, J. M., Herbert, A. S., Qiu, X., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.033 · Cited by 212
Interpretation of Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Models: Past, Present, and Future
Polishchuk, P. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00274 · Cited by 236
Metabolomic machine learning predictor for diagnosis and prognosis of gastric cancer
Chen, Y., Wang, B., Zhao, Y., Shao, X., Wang, M., Ma, F., Yang, L., Nie, M., Jin, P., Yao, K., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-46043-y · Cited by 244
Prostate cancer detection using deep convolutional neural networks
Yoo, S., Gujrathi, I., Haider, M. A., & Khalvati, F. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-55972-4 · Cited by 230
modlAMP: Python for antimicrobial peptides
Müller, A. T., Gabernet, G., Hiss, J. A., & Schneider, G. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx285 · Cited by 215
Deep learning versus parametric and ensemble methods for genomic prediction of complex phenotypes
Abdollahi-Arpanahi, R., Gianola, D., & Peñagaricano, F. (2020) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/s12711-020-00531-z · Cited by 228
Enhancing CRISPR-Cas9 gRNA efficiency prediction by data integration and deep learning
Xiang, X., Corsi, G. I., Anthon, C., Qu, K., Pan, X., Liang, X., Han, P., Dong, Z., Liu, L., Zhong, J., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23576-0 · Cited by 209
Wang, H., & Yushkevich, P. A. (2013) · Frontiers in Neuroinformatics · doi:10.3389/fninf.2013.00027 · Cited by 218
Multimodal Language Analysis with Recurrent Multistage Fusion
Liang, P. P., Liu, Z., Bagher Zadeh, A., & Morency, L.-P. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1014 · Cited by 230
Choi, J., Jeong, B., Polcari, A., Rohan, M. L., & Teicher, M. H. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.033 · Cited by 215
Daily Stress Recognition from Mobile Phone Data, Weather Conditions and Individual Traits
Bogomolov, A., Lepri, B., Ferron, M., Pianesi, F., & Pentland, A. (. (2014) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Multimedia · doi:10.1145/2647868.2654933 · Cited by 217
Corey, K. M., Kashyap, S., Lorenzi, E., Lagoo-Deenadayalan, S. A., Heller, K., Whalen, K., Balu, S., Heflin, M. T., McDonald, S. R., Swaminathan, M., et al. (2018) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002701 · Cited by 204
Bat detective—Deep learning tools for bat acoustic signal detection
Mac Aodha, O., Gibb, R., Barlow, K. E., Browning, E., Firman, M., Freeman, R., Harder, B., Kinsey, L., Mead, G. R., Newson, S. E., et al. (2018) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005995 · Cited by 216
3D Convolutional Neural Networks for landing zone detection from LiDAR
Maturana, D., & Scherer, S. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra.2015.7139679 · Cited by 203
Bayer’s in silico ADMET platform: a journey of machine learning over the past two decades
Göller, A. H., Kuhnke, L., Montanari, F., Bonin, A., Schneckener, S., ter Laak, A., Wichard, J., Lobell, M., & Hillisch, A. (2020) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2020.07.001 · Cited by 215
Mobile Data Science and Intelligent Apps: Concepts, AI-Based Modeling and Research Directions
Sarker, I. H., Hoque, M. M., Uddin, M. K., & Alsanoosy, T. (2021) · Mobile Networks and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11036-020-01650-z · Cited by 207
eToxPred: a machine learning-based approach to estimate the toxicity of drug candidates
Pu, L., Naderi, M., Liu, T., Wu, H.-C., Mukhopadhyay, S., & Brylinski, M. (2019) · BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1186/s40360-018-0282-6 · Cited by 212
“DeepTox was reported to outperform deep neural networks (DNNs) [31], support vector machines (SVMs) [32], random forests (RF) [33], and elastic nets [34].”
BackgroundArtificial Intelligence, Predictive Policing, and Risk Assessment for Law Enforcement
Berk, R. A. (2021) · Annual Review of Criminology · doi:10.1146/annurev-criminol-051520-012342 · Cited by 213
The microbiome in posttraumatic stress disorder and trauma-exposed controls: an exploratory study
Hemmings, S. M. J., Malan-Müller, S., van den Heuvel, L. L., Demmitt, B. A., Stanislawski, M. A., Smith, D. G., Bohr, A. D., Stamper, C. E., Hyde, E. R., Morton, J. T., et al. (2017) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/psy.0000000000000512 · Cited by 208
Lonini, L., Dai, A., Shawen, N., Simuni, T., Poon, C., Shimanovich, L., Daeschler, M., Ghaffari, R., Rogers, J. A., & Jayaraman, A. (2018) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-018-0071-z · Cited by 209
Kessler, R. C., Hwang, I., Hoffmire, C. A., McCarthy, J. F., Petukhova, M. V., Rosellini, A. J., Sampson, N. A., Schneider, A. L., Bradley, P. A., Katz, I. R., et al. (2017) · International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1002/mpr.1575 · Cited by 209
Early Detection of Depression: Social Network Analysis and Random Forest Techniques
Cacheda, F., Fernandez, D., Novoa, F. J., & Carneiro, V. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/12554 · Cited by 206
Automatic detection of solar photovoltaic arrays in high resolution aerial imagery
Malof, J. M., Bradbury, K., Collins, L. M., & Newell, R. G. (2016) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.191 · Cited by 196
Large-scale comparative metagenomics of Blastocystis, a common member of the human gut microbiome
Beghini, F., Pasolli, E., Truong, T. D., Putignani, L., Cacciò, S. M., & Segata, N. (2017) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2017.139 · Cited by 201
PHOTOMETRIC SUPERNOVA CLASSIFICATION WITH MACHINE LEARNING
Lochner, M., McEwen, J. D., Peiris, H. V., Lahav, O., & Winter, M. K. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/0067-0049/225/2/31 · Cited by 200
Quantitative forecasting of PTSD from early trauma responses: A Machine Learning application
Galatzer-Levy, I. R., Karstoft, K.-I., Statnikov, A., & Shalev, A. Y. (2014) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.08.017 · Cited by 195
Improving propensity score estimators’ robustness to model misspecification using super learner.
Pirracchio, R., Petersen, M. L., & van der Laan, M. (2015) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwu253 · Cited by 186
Nandy, A., Duan, C., & Kulik, H. J. (2021) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.1c07217 · Cited by 200
Chu, L. C., Park, S., Kawamoto, S., Fouladi, D. F., Shayesteh, S., Zinreich, E. S., Graves, J. S., Horton, K. M., Hruban, R. H., Yuille, A. L., et al. (2019) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.18.20901 · Cited by 193
Cho, C.-H., Lee, T., Kim, M.-G., In, H. P., Kim, L., & Lee, H.-J. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/11029 · Cited by 183
Generative AI in Higher Education: The ChatGPT Effect
Chan, C. K. Y., & Colloton, T. (2024) · Routledge · doi:10.4324/9781003459026 · Cited by 203
SMAC3: A Versatile Bayesian Optimization Package for Hyperparameter Optimization
Lindauer, M., Eggensperger, K., Feurer, M., Biedenkapp, A., Deng, D., Benjamins, C., Ruhopf, T., Sass, R., & Hutter, F. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.09831 · Cited by 195
The global distribution of known and undiscovered ant biodiversity
Kass, J. M., Guénard, B., Dudley, K. L., Jenkins, C. N., Azuma, F., Fisher, B. L., Parr, C. L., Gibb, H., Longino, J. T., Ward, P. S., et al. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abp9908 · Cited by 194
Cumulative stress in childhood is associated with blunted reward-related brain activity in adulthood
Hanson, J. L., Albert, D., Iselin, A.-M. R., Carré, J. M., Dodge, K. A., & Hariri, A. R. (2016) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsv124 · Cited by 185
Wu, Y., & Wang, G. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms19082358 · Cited by 193
Mortality Risk Score Prediction in an Elderly Population Using Machine Learning
Rose, S. (2013) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kws241 · Cited by 193
Zhang, J., Liu, M., & Shen, D. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2017.2721106 · Cited by 192
Analyzing Data Granularity Levels for Insider Threat Detection Using Machine Learning
Le, D. C., Zincir-Heywood, N., & Heywood, M. I. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2020.2967721 · Cited by 191
Subrahmanyam, P. B., Dong, Z., Gusenleitner, D., Giobbie-Hurder, A., Severgnini, M., Zhou, J., Manos, M., Eastman, L. M., Maecker, H. T., & Hodi, F. S. (2018) · Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer · doi:10.1186/s40425-018-0328-8 · Cited by 190
Tomoda, A., Polcari, A., Anderson, C. M., & Teicher, M. H. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052528 · Cited by 190
Post-drought decline of the Amazon carbon sink.
Yang, Y., Saatchi, S. S., Xu, L., Yu, Y., Choi, S., Phillips, N., Kennedy, R., Keller, M., Knyazikhin, Y., & Myneni, R. B. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05668-6 · Cited by 189
Real time hand pose estimation using depth sensors
Keskin, C., Kirac, F., Kara, Y. E., & Akarun, L. (2011) · 2011 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops) · doi:10.1109/iccvw.2011.6130391 · Cited by 190
Predicting mild cognitive impairment from spontaneous spoken utterances
Asgari, M., Kaye, J., & Dodge, H. (2017) · Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.trci.2017.01.006 · Cited by 185
The influence of relative humidity on adaptive thermal comfort
Vellei, M., Herrera, M., Fosas, D., & Natarajan, S. (2017) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.08.005 · Cited by 188
Trinh, A., Trumpi, K., De Sousa E Melo, F., Wang, X., de Jong, J. H., Fessler, E., Kuppen, P. J. K., Reimers, M. S., Swets, M., Koopman, M., et al. (2017) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-0680 · Cited by 180
Subtyping cognitive profiles in Autism Spectrum Disorder using a Functional Random Forest algorithm
Feczko, E., Balba, N. M., Miranda-Dominguez, O., Cordova, M., Karalunas, S. L., Irwin, L., Demeter, D. V., Hill, A. P., Langhorst, B. H., Grieser Painter, J., et al. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.044 · Cited by 173
Ecological constraints increase the climatic debt in forests
Bertrand, R., Riofrío-Dillon, G., Lenoir, J., Drapier, J., de Ruffray, P., Gégout, J.-C., & Loreau, M. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12643 · Cited by 185
How machine learning can help select capping layers to suppress perovskite degradation
Hartono, N. T. P., Thapa, J., Tiihonen, A., Oviedo, F., Batali, C., Yoo, J. J., Liu, Z., Li, R., Marrón, D. F., Bawendi, M. G., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17945-4 · Cited by 189
TweepFake: about detecting deepfake tweets
Fagni, T., Falchi, F., Gambini, M., Martella, A., & Tesconi, M. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0251415 · Cited by 185
White matter damage in frontotemporal lobar degeneration spectrum
Agosta, F., Scola, E., Canu, E., Marcone, A., Magnani, G., Sarro, L., Copetti, M., Caso, F., Cerami, C., Comi, G., et al. (2012) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr288 · Cited by 180
Detecting Clusters of Fake Accounts in Online Social Networks
Xiao, C., Freeman, D. M., & Hwa, T. (2015) · Proceedings of the 8th ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security · doi:10.1145/2808769.2808779 · Cited by 184
Hip and Wrist Accelerometer Algorithms for Free-Living Behavior Classification
ELLIS, K., KERR, J., GODBOLE, S., STAUDENMAYER, J., & LANCKRIET, G. (2016) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000000840 · Cited by 186
Park, C., Ha, J., & Park, S. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112873 · Cited by 184
Forkel, M., Andela, N., Harrison, S. P., Lasslop, G., van Marle, M., Chuvieco, E., Dorigo, W., Forrest, M., Hantson, S., Heil, A., et al. (2019) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-16-57-2019 · Cited by 184
“…between potential drivers of fire in satellite data and fire-enabled DGVMs, we applied the random forest (RF) machine-learning algorithm to predict monthly burned area (response variable) from climate, trees that are built based on the training data set (Breiman, 2001; Cutler et al., 2012 .”
InfluentialChen, C. P., Keown, C. L., Jahedi, A., Nair, A., Pflieger, M. E., Bailey, B. A., & Müller, R.-A. (2015) · NeuroImage: Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2015.04.002 · Cited by 183
Satellite observations document trends consistent with a boreal forest biome shift
Berner, L. T., & Goetz, S. J. (2022) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.16121 · Cited by 182
A Universal Machine Learning Algorithm for Large-Scale Screening of Materials
Fanourgakis, G. S., Gkagkas, K., Tylianakis, E., & Froudakis, G. E. (2020) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.9b11084 · Cited by 180
Berk, R., Sherman, L., Barnes, G., Kurtz, E., & Ahlman, L. (2009) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2008.00556.x · Cited by 178
Using machine learning methods to predict in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients in the ICU
Kong, G., Lin, K., & Hu, Y. (2020) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-020-01271-2 · Cited by 180
Menke, A., Arloth, J., Pütz, B., Weber, P., Klengel, T., Mehta, D., Gonik, M., Rex-Haffner, M., Rubel, J., Uhr, M., et al. (2012) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2011.331 · Cited by 177
van Westen, G. J. P., Wegner, J. K., IJzerman, A. P., van Vlijmen, H. W. T., & Bender, A. (2011) · MedChemComm · doi:10.1039/c0md00165a · Cited by 176
User-Guided Segmentation of Multi-modality Medical Imaging Datasets with ITK-SNAP
Yushkevich, P. A., Pashchinskiy, A., Oguz, I., Mohan, S., Schmitt, J. E., Stein, J. M., Zukić, D., Vicory, J., McCormick, M., Yushkevich, N., et al. (2019) · Neuroinformatics · doi:10.1007/s12021-018-9385-x · Cited by 175
Min, X., Yu, B., & Wang, F. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-39071-y · Cited by 170
Field evaluation of a random forest activity classifier for wrist-worn accelerometer data
Pavey, T. G., Gilson, N. D., Gomersall, S. R., Clark, B., & Trost, S. G. (2017) · Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport · doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2016.06.003 · Cited by 174
Wolfe, F., & Michaud, K. (2009) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/art.24428 · Cited by 171
Uddin, L. Q., Dajani, D. R., Voorhies, W., Bednarz, H., & Kana, R. K. (2017) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/tp.2017.164 · Cited by 173
ViEWS: A political violence early-warning system
Hegre, H., Allansson, M., Basedau, M., Colaresi, M., Croicu, M., Fjelde, H., Hoyles, F., Hultman, L., Högbladh, S., Jansen, R., et al. (2019) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343319823860 · Cited by 173
Gagne, D. J., McGovern, A., Haupt, S. E., Sobash, R. A., Williams, J. K., & Xue, M. (2017) · Weather and Forecasting · doi:10.1175/waf-d-17-0010.1 · Cited by 169
Metadata
- Authors
- Breiman, L.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Breiman, Leo
- Venue
- Machine Learning
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-32
- ISSN
- 0885-6125 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0565
- OpenAlex
- W2911964244
- Cited by
- 133,538
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18528 · 2025: 16751 · 2024: 14088 · 2023: 12732 · 2022: 11712 · 2021: 11577 · 2020: 9483 · 2019: 7661 · 2018: 6275 · 2017: 4956 · 2016: 4152 · 2015: 3623 · 2014: 2944 · 2013: 2268 · 2012: 1761
- FWCI
- 74.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ine.es
- Licence
- Locations
- Machine Learning (publishedVersion)
- Repository of Digital Objects for Teaching Research and Culture (University of Valencia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
- Keywords
- random forest, ensemble learning, classification trees, generalization error, asymptotic convergence, feature selection, node splitting, AdaBoost comparison, noise robustness, feature importance, regression forests
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
