The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reducing the Influence of Extrapersonal Associations on the Implicit Association Test: Personalizing the IAT.
Abstract
The authors argue that the Implicit Association Test (IAT; A.G. Greenwald, D.E. McGhee, & J.L.K. Schwartz, 1998) can be contaminated by associations that do not contribute to one's evaluation of an attitude object and thus do not become activated when one encounters the object but that are nevertheless available in memory. The authors propose a variant of the IAT that reduces the contamination of these "extrapersonal associations." Consistent with the notion that the traditional version of the IAT is affected by society's negative portrayal of minority groups, the "personalized" IAT revealed relatively less racial prejudice among Whites in Experiments 1 and 2. In Experiments 3 and 4, the personalized IAT correlated more strongly with explicit measures of attitudes and behavioral intentions than did the traditional IAT. The feasibility of disentangling personal and extrapersonal associations is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 · Cited by 9,210
(2013) · Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0 · Cited by 7,486
Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.
Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197 · Cited by 5,815
Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components
Devine, P. G. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5 · Cited by 5,673
The Functional Approach to the Study of Attitudes
Katz, D. (1960) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/266945 · Cited by 2,928
Menaghan, E. G. (2004) · Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.1177/009430610403300625 · Cited by 2,772
On the automatic activation of attitudes.
Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229 · Cited by 2,584
Self-citationWilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.107.1.101 · Cited by 2,112 · cited 1×
“However, one would be hard-pressed to dispute the face validity of a question like “how much do you like apples?” to tap into one’s evaluation of apples.1 Finally, the IAT and explicit measures may be tapping two different attitudes (or two different components of the same attitude) toward the same object ( Wilson, Li…”
Background(2003) · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225 · Cited by 1,829
Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1013 · Cited by 1,793 · cited 3×
“Relatedly, and surprisingly, Blacks do not show an in-group preference on the IAT (Nosek et al., 2002a), a pattern that stands in stark contrast to what has been repeatedly observed on both implicit and explicit measures (Blair, 2001; Dovidio et al., 2001; Fazio et al., 1995).”
BackgroundResultSelf-citation
Cited by
Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity.
Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015575 · Cited by 3,257
The Social Psychology of Stigma
Major, B., & O'Brien, L. T. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070137 · Cited by 3,114
Sensitive questions in surveys.
Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T. (2007) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859 · Cited by 3,057
Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692 · Cited by 2,587
Hall, W. J., Chapman, M. V., Lee, K. M., Merino, Y. M., Thomas, T. W., Payne, B. K., Eng, E., Day, S. H., & Coyne-Beasley, T. (2015) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2015.302903 · Cited by 2,176
The Advantages of an Inclusive Definition of Attitude
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (2007) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.582 · Cited by 1,258
The Single Category Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit social cognition.
Karpinski, A., & Steinman, R. B. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.16 · Cited by 1,108
Performance on Indirect Measures of Race Evaluation Predicts Amygdala Activation
Phelps, E. A., O'Connor, K. J., Cunningham, W. A., Funayama, E. S., Gatenby, J. C., Gore, J. C., & Banaji, M. R. (2000) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892900562552 · Cited by 1,001
Not yet human: Implicit knowledge, historical dehumanization, and contemporary consequences.
Goff, P. A., Eberhardt, J. L., Williams, M. J., & Jackson, M. C. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.292 · Cited by 880
Attitudes as Object–Evaluation Associations of Varying Strength
Fazio, R. H. (2007) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.603 · Cited by 798
Self-citationModerators of the Relationship Between Implicit and Explicit Evaluation.
Nosek, B. A. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.565 · Cited by 701
Hofmann, W., Friese, M., & Wiers, R. W. (2008) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437190802617668 · Cited by 656
Implicit cognition and addiction: a tool for explaining paradoxical behavior
Stacy, A. W., & Wiers, R. W. (2010) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131444 · Cited by 607
Implicit social cognition: from measures to mechanisms
Nosek, B. A., Hawkins, C. B., & Frazier, R. S. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.005 · Cited by 578
Why do implicit and explicit attitude tests diverge? The role of structural fit.
Payne, B. K., Burkley, M. A., & Stokes, M. B. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.16 · Cited by 401
Arkes, H. R., & Tetlock, P. E. (2004) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1504_01 · Cited by 396
Alief in Action (and Reaction)
GENDLER, T. S. (2008) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2008.00352.x · Cited by 384
Greenwald, A. G., & Lai, C. K. (2020) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050837 · Cited by 364
Jost, J. T., Rudman, L. A., Blair, I. V., Carney, D. R., Dasgupta, N., Glaser, J., & Hardin, C. D. (2009) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2009.10.001 · Cited by 353
Cameron, C. D., Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., & Payne, B. K. (2012) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868312440047 · Cited by 352
Milyavskaya, M., Inzlicht, M., Hope, N., & Koestner, R. (2015) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000045 · Cited by 313
Friese, M., Hofmann, W., & Schmitt, M. (2008) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463280802556958 · Cited by 254
Unconscious Bias in Citizens’ Evaluations of Public Sector Performance
Marvel, J. D. (2015) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/muu053 · Cited by 252
Best research practices for using the Implicit Association Test
Greenwald, A. G., Brendl, M., Cai, H., Cvencek, D., Dovidio, J. F., Friese, M., Hahn, A., Hehman, E., Hofmann, W., Hughes, S., et al. (2022) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-021-01624-3 · Cited by 209
Tam, T., Hewstone, M., Harwood, J., Voci, A., & Kenworthy, J. (2006) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430206064642 · Cited by 198
(2009) · doi:10.1126/science.1178358 · Cited by 144
Forbes, C. E., & Schmader, T. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0020971 · Cited by 132
Eberhardt, J. L. (2005) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.60.2.181 · Cited by 131
Gawronski, B., Peters, K. R., & LeBel, E. P. (2008) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00085.x · Cited by 59
Policy Implications of Implicit Social Cognition
Nosek, B. A., & Riskind, R. G. (2012) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/j.1751-2409.2011.01037.x · Cited by 55
Duque (2015) · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.04.003 · Cited by 30
Conceptualizing Personal and Extrapersonal Associations
Olson, M. A., Fazio, R. H., & Han, H. A. (2009) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00164.x · Cited by 29
Self-citationAre Ideal Litigators White? Measuring the Myth of Colorblindness
Kang, J., Dasgupta, N., Yogeeswaran, K., & Blasi, G. (2010) · Journal of Empirical Legal Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1740-1461.2010.01199.x · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 653-667
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W1974083637
- Cited by
- 531
- References
- 71
- FWCI
- 96.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
