The DOI matches its Crossref record; 204 of the 205 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“All tests of intelligence or cognitive aptitude are optimal performance assessments, whereas measures of thinking dispositions are often assessed under typical performance conditions (Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997;Cacioppo, Petty, Feinstein, & Jarvis, 1996;Norris & Ennis, 1989;Perkins, 1995;Sternberg, 2003;Zeidner & Matthews, 2000).”
From The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks (2011) · cites this paper as Cacioppo, Petty, Feinstein, & Jarvis, 1996
Citations
Cites
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
Rosenberg, M. (1965) · doi:10.1515/9781400876136 · Cited by 30,126
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
Rotter, J. B. (1966) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0092976 · Cited by 21,937
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317
Levels of processing: A framework for memory research
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(72)80001-x · Cited by 9,566
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2 · Cited by 8,822
Self-citationThe measurement of psychological androgyny
Bem, S. L. (1974) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0036215 · Cited by 8,522
Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.127 · Cited by 7,335
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,004 of 1,004
Assessing efficiency of prompts based on learner characteristics
Backhaus, J., Jeske, D., Poinstingl, H., & Koenig, S. (2017) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers6010007 · Cited by 18
“Greater need for cognition means the learner is motivated to try to understand new information [8], while those with lower scores are not driven to learn for the sake of gaining new insight—in which case a prompt may be helpful.”
Wiklund-Hörnqvist, C., Stillesjö, S., Andersson, M., Jonsson, B., & Nyberg, L. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.797395 · Cited by 12
“, the testing effect), less is known about its effect related to individual variations in need for cognition (NFC; Cacioppo et al., 1996).”
BackgroundStenlund, T., & Jonsson, B. (2017) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2017.00002 · Cited by 10
“org February 2017 | Volume 2 | Article 2 also find this process more enjoyable when compared to those with low scores on the NFC-scale (Cacioppo and Petty, 1982; Cacioppo et al., 1996).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialMandel, D. R., Collins, R. N., Walker, A. C., Fugelsang, J. A., & Risko, E. F. (2022) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500009475 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 197-253
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2023292494
- Semantic Scholar
- d13228e21efe9e9e7dac888d5b41e0d705f924df
- Cited by
- 2,517
- References
- 205
- Citations by year
- 2026: 78 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 116 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 127 · 2020: 153 · 2019: 150 · 2018: 125 · 2017: 136 · 2016: 118 · 2015: 115 · 2014: 106 · 2013: 115 · 2012: 129
- FWCI
- 30.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- need for cognition, cognitive motivation, individual differences, personality traits, cognitive effort
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
