Cited by 2,622Mental Health Treatment and AccessChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentGender Roles and Identity Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 272 of the 276 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 13 of the 92 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Gender Differences in Depression in Representative National Samples: Meta-Analyses of Diagnoses and Symptoms

Open access
Salk, Rachel H., Hyde, Janet S., Abramson, Lyn Y.·2017·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

In 2 meta-analyses on gender differences in depression in nationally representative samples, we advance previous work by including studies of depression diagnoses and symptoms to (a) estimate the magnitude of the gender difference in depression across a wide array of nations and ages; (b) use a developmental perspective to elucidate patterns of gender differences across the life span; and (c) incorporate additional theory-driven moderators (e.g., gender equity). For major depression diagnoses and depression symptoms, respectively, we meta-analyzed data from 65 and 95 articles and their corresponding national data sets, representing data from 1,716,195 and 1,922,064 people in over 90 different nations. Overall, odds ratio (OR) = 1.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.88, 2.03], and d = 0.27 [0.26, 0.29]. Age was the strongest predictor of effect size. The gender difference for diagnoses emerged earlier than previously thought, with OR = 2.37 at age 12. For both meta-analyses, the gender difference peaked in adolescence (OR = 3.02 for ages 13-15, and d = 0.47 for age 16) but then declined and remained stable in adulthood. Cross-national analyses indicated that larger gender differences were found in nations with greater gender equity, for major depression, but not depression symptoms. The gender difference in depression represents a health disparity, especially in adolescence, yet the magnitude of the difference indicates that depression in men should not be overlooked. (PsycINFO Database Record

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/bul0000102

Cites

272 of 272 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

13 of 92 cited sources checked · 9 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 107 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 72
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 101
  • Borderline: one of the tests for a substantial claim is unclear. 1
  • Not yet classified. 1
146 of 146
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The existing literature on gender differences in depression had not been meta-analytically synthesized before this study.

    “this large body of sometimes inconsistent research has yet to be synthesized meta-analytically.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The domain-specific gender equity indicators chosen are theoretically linked to gender differences in depression.

    “We selected domain-specific indicators of gender equity (rather than composite indicators) that should, theoretically, be tied to gender differences in depression”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The mixed-effects model used for moderator analyses assumes that variability among effect sizes beyond subject-level sampling error has both systematic components (accounted for by moderator variables) and random components (error variance).

    “The mixed-effects model assumes that variability among effects sizes beyond subject-level sampling error has both systematic components (accounted for by moderator variables) and random components (i.e., error variance).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The nationally representative samples included in the meta-analyses accurately represent their target national populations.

    “By synthesizing nationally representative studies with data from over 1.7 million participants spanning the globe in each of the two meta-analyses, we have provided a comprehensive quantitative review of data on gender differences in major depression diagnoses and depression symptoms across the lifespan.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The nation-level indicators of gender equity and national wealth validly measure those constructs.

    “For major depression diagnoses, variability in the gender difference in depression was linked to measures of national wealth and gender equity.”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Consistentt(299) = 1961.63reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(299) = 1961.63, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(412) = 9542.5reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(412) = 9542.50, p < .001”

2 of 2

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Conflicting percentages for researcher-supplied symptom data

    Minor

    The results state that 357 of 413 symptom effect sizes (86%) came from data obtained from authors, but the limitations section gives 76% for the same category.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 276 references

4 of the 276 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 2,611

Metadata

Authors
Salk, R. H., Hyde, J. S., & Abramson, L. Y.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
2017-08
Volume
143
Issue
8
Pages
783-822
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W2609632515
Cited by
2,622
References
276
Citations by year
2026: 352 · 2025: 420 · 2024: 403 · 2023: 354 · 2022: 388 · 2021: 308 · 2020: 261 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 8
FWCI
153.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (DGE-071823; DRL 1138114)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32 MH018269-30)
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
Keywords
gender differences, depression, depressive symptoms, adolescence, lifespan development, gender equity, cross-national comparison, health disparities, men's mental health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Depression, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review