The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The nature of human altruism
Abstract
Some of the most fundamental questions concerning our evolutionary origins, our social relations, and the organization of society are centred around issues of altruism and selfishness. Experimental evidence indicates that human altruism is a powerful force and is unique in the animal world. However, there is much individual heterogeneity and the interaction between altruists and selfish individuals is vital to human cooperation. Depending on the environment, a minority of altruists can force a majority of selfish individuals to cooperate or, conversely, a few egoists can induce a large number of altruists to defect. Current gene-based evolutionary theories cannot explain important patterns of human altruism, pointing towards the importance of both theories of cultural evolution as well as gene-culture co-evolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Yet, when the PGG is repeated over multiple rounds, contributions tend to decline with the number of rounds; this is due to a few individuals who free ride in the first round, thereby triggering further free riding in subsequent rounds11,14,27.”
From Cooperation without punishment (2023) · cites this paper as [11]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The fact that costly punishment plays an undisputed role in other contexts, such as public goods games, ultimatum games and trust games 43-46 , shows that this form of discrimination is highly plausible.”
From Evolution of indirect reciprocity (2005) · cites this paper as [46]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“which theory and experimentation shows is a more effective means of preserving cooperation than individual-level punishment (Fehr & Gachter, 2002; Fehr & Fischbacher 2003)”
From The origins of language in teaching (2017) · cites this paper as Fehr & Fischbacher 2003
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Free riding poses a major challenge to self-governance, and a prominent solution to this challenge has been altruistic punishment.”
From Cooperation without punishment (2023) · cites this paper as [11]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Free riding poses a major challenge to self-governance, and a prominent solution to this challenge has been altruistic punishment.”
From Cooperation without punishment (2023) · cites this paper as [11]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Yet, when the PGG is repeated over multiple rounds, contributions tend to decline with the number of rounds; this is due to a few individuals who free ride in the first round, thereby triggering further free riding in subsequent rounds11,14,27.”
From Cooperation without punishment (2023) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Parametric regressors were not orthogonalized in the design matrix, ensuring that parameter estimates were not confounded by spurious correlations due to signals related to other regressors 59 .”
From Oxytocin modulates social value representations in the amygdala (2019) · cites this paper as [59]
In the citing paper
“It has been shown that people reward others for cooperative behaviour but punish violations of social fairness even at a personal cost15,16, an effect likely to be mediated by neural mechanisms that provide intrinsic motivation (that is, satisfaction) from punishing violators21.”
From Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others (2006) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“Many theories explaining various types of cooperation have been proposed in biology and economics (Fehr & Fischbacher, 2003; Gurven, 2004) but a theoretical explanation of unconditional altruism (de W ned as bene W ting others at a cost to oneself, Wilson, 1976) has remained elusive to date.”
From Altruistic behavior as a costly signal of general intelligence (2007) · cites this paper as Fehr & Fischbacher, 2003
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7466396 · Cited by 20,065
A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355399556151 · Cited by 11,264
Self-citationThe Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
Trivers, R. L. (1971) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/406755 · Cited by 11,010
Altruistic punishment in humans
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415137a · Cited by 5,616
Self-citationTrust, Reciprocity, and Social History
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1006/game.1995.1027 · Cited by 5,548
ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition
Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2000) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.90.1.166 · Cited by 5,399
An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining
Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7 · Cited by 4,868
Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment
Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S., & Fehr, E. (2001) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/s0165-1765(01)00394-9 · Cited by 2,780
Self-citationEvolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring
Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/31225 · Cited by 2,700
In Search of Homo Economicus: Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small-Scale Societies
Henrich, J., Boyd, R. T., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H. M., & McElreath, R. L. (2001) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.91.2.73 · Cited by 2,619
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. The Nature of Cultures (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, in the press)
- Batson, D. C. The Altruism Question (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1991)
- Fehr, F., Tougareva, E. & Fischbacher, U. Do High Stakes and Competition Undermine Fairness? Working Paper 125 (Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, Univ. Zurich, 2002)
- Roth, A., Prasnikar, V., Okuno-Fujiwara, M. & Zamir, S. Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh and Tokyo: An experimental study. Am. Econ. Rev. 81, 1068–1095 (1991)
- Sober, E. & Wilson, D. S. Unto Others—the Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998)
- Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. Third party punishment and social norms. Evol. Hum. Behav. (in the press)
- Messick, D. & Brewer, M. in Review of Personality and Social Psychology (ed. Wheeler, L.) (Sage Publ., Beverly Hills, 1983)
- Sethi, R. & Somanathan, E. The evolution of social norms in common property resource use. Am. Econ. Rev. 86, 766–788 (1996)
- Thibaut, J. W. & Kelley, H. H. The Social Psychology of Groups (Wiley, New York, 1959)
- Rabin, M. Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Am. Econ. Rev. 83, 1281–1302 (1993)
- Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. in The Adapted Mind (eds Barkow, J., Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J.) (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1992)
- Alexander, R. D. The Biology of Moral Systems (Aldine De Gruyter, New York, 1987)
- Williams, G. D. Adaption and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1966)
- Kelly, R. C. The Nuer Conquest: The Structure and Development of an Expansionist System (Univ. Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 1985)
- Bowles, S., Choi, J.-K. & Hopfensitz, A. The co-evolution of individual behaviours and social institutions. J. Theor. Biol. (in the press)
- Chaudhuri, A. & Graziano, S. Evolution of Conventions in an Experimental Public Goods Game with Private and Public Knowledge of Advice (Working Paper, Department of Economics, Univ. Auckland, 2003)
- Harbaugh, W. T., Krause, K. & Liday, S. Children's Bargaining Behavior: Differences by Age, Gender, and Height (Working Paper, Department of Economics, Univ. Oregon, 2000)
- Otterbein, K. F. The Evolution of War: A Cross-Cultural Study (Human Relations Area Files Press, New Haven, 1985)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,016
Pulcu, E., Zahn, R., & Elliott, R. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00310 · Cited by 61
“The unique interaction between cooperation and costly punishment is defined as “strong reciprocity,” a concept which incorporates costly cooperation and costly punishment (Fehr and Fischbacher, 2003).”
BackgroundWu, Y., Hu, J., van Dijk, E., Leliveld, M. C., & Zhou, X. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039627 · Cited by 54
“One of the prominent motivations for individuals rejecting disadvantageous unequal offers in asset distribution is to preserve self-image/self-esteem and/or to punish unfair behavior [47,48].”
BackgroundConcerns for Self or Family? Sources of and Responses to Altruistic Fear
Drakulich, K. (2014) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260514539842 · Cited by 54
“…for this, including a biological imperative, utility maximization, greater interest in concerns about generativity and leaving a lasting legacy, or the social 1172 Journal of Interpersonal Violence 30(7) norms regarding parental sacrifices for children (Becker, 1981; Erikson, 1963; Rader, 2009).”
BackgroundInforming others is associated with behavioral and neural signatures of value.
Tamir, D., Zaki, J., & Mitchell, J. P. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000122 · Cited by 59
“…that is not directly self-relevant as a means to signal their prosociality, trustworthiness, or investment in relationships (Camerer, 1988; Fehr & Fischbacher, 2003; Feinberg, Willer, & Schultz, 2014; Milinski, Semmann, & Krambeck, 2002); these signals may encourage others to believe that…”
BackgroundA causal role for right temporo-parietal junction in signaling moral conflict
Obeso, I., Moisa, M., Ruff, C. C., & Dreher, J. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.40671 · Cited by 61
Mindfulness Meditation Activates Altruism
Iwamoto, S. K., Alexander, M., Torres, M. P., Irwin, M. R., Christakis, N. A., & Nishi, A. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-62652-1 · Cited by 61
Why Are University Endowments Large and Risky?
Gilbert, T., & Hrdlicka, C. M. (2015) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhv031 · Cited by 54
Evolutionary dynamics of cooperation in the N-person stag hunt game
Luo, Q., Liu, L., & Chen, X. (2021) · Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/j.physd.2021.132943 · Cited by 54
Gribble, K. D. (2014) · Breastfeeding Medicine · doi:10.1089/bfm.2014.0009 · Cited by 54
“14 Donation as an empathic response was also evident in donors who described thinking processes where they had ‘‘put themselves in the shoes’’ of women who could not fully breastfeed.”
A Model of Fair Process and Its Limits
Wu, Y., Loch, C. H., & der Heyden, L. V. (2008) · Manufacturing & Service Operations Management · doi:10.1287/msom.1070.0189 · Cited by 52
“For a decision process to be seen as fair, the people affected must have the opportunity to give input and possibly to influence the decision, and the decision process and rationale must be transparent and clear.”
BackgroundThe evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods game with conditional peer exclusion
Quan, J., Li, X., & Wang, X. (2019) · Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science · doi:10.1063/1.5119395 · Cited by 53
Group Size Effect on Cooperation in One-Shot Social Dilemmas II: Curvilinear Effect
Capraro, V., & Barcelo, H. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131419 · Cited by 58
“Here we shed light on this apparent contradiction by considering a novel class of public goods games inspired to the realistic scenario in which the natural output limits of the public good imply that the benefit of cooperation increases fast for early contributions and then decelerates.”
Looking while eating: The importance of social context to social attention
Wu, D. W. –., Bischof, W. F., & Kingstone, A. F. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep02356 · Cited by 58
Fitness increases with partner and neighbour allopreening
Lewis, S., Roberts, G., Harris, M., Prigmore, C., & Wanless, S. (2007) · Biology Letters · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2007.0258 · Cited by 53
“A fundamental question in sociobiology is the evolution of cooperation and altruism in humans and other species (Hamilton 1964; Trivers 1971; Axelrod & Hamilton 1981; Fehr & Fischbacher 2003).”
BackgroundIs Climate Change a Moral Issue? Effects of Egoism and Altruism on Pro-Environmental Behavior
Knez, I. (2016) · Current Urban Studies · doi:10.4236/cus.2016.42012 · Cited by 53
“…Dovidio, & Piliavin, 1995; Cialdini, Brown, Lewis, Luce, & Neuberg, 1997; Maner, Luce, Neuberg, Cialdinin, & Sagarin, 2002; Batson et al., 2003; Fehr & Fischbacher, 2003; Elster, 2005), Knez (2013) showed that egoistic individuals (rated “high” on egoism) were most concerned about…”
Cultural group selection and human cooperation: a conceptual and empirical review
Major‐Smith, D. (2020) · Evolutionary Human Sciences · doi:10.1017/ehs.2020.2 · Cited by 56
Are patients with schizophrenia rational maximizers? Evidence from an ultimatum game study
Csukly, G., Polgár, P., Tombor, L., Réthelyi, J., & Kéri, S. (2011) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2010.10.005 · Cited by 50
“The limit from which amount an offer is considered unfair is surprisingly stable in the different studies (70:30 and lower) (Fehr and Fischbacher, 2003; Chuah et al., 2007; Hack and Lammers, 2008) and seems to have genetic components (Wallace et al., 2007).”
Social reasoning in Tourette syndrome
Eddy, C., Mitchell, I., Beck, S. R., Cavanna, A., & Rickards, H. (2011) · Cognitive Neuropsychiatry · doi:10.1080/13546805.2010.538213 · Cited by 54
“Such ‘‘altruistic punishment’’ encourages the maintenance of social norms, and though it does not benefit the individual at the time, it does benefit a social group or society in the long term (Fehr & Fischbacher, 2003).”
BackgroundNeural responses to unfairness and fairness depend on self-contribution to the income
Guo, X., Zheng, L., Cheng, X. M., Chen, M., Zhu, L., Li, J., Chen, L., & Yang, Z. (2013) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nst131 · Cited by 54
“Empirical evidences demonstrated that individuals’ fairness considerations were not only determined by comparisons between self and others’ gains (Fehr and Fischbacher, 2003; Camerer, 2005) but also affected by some contextual factors, such as the intentions of the allocator (Falk et al.”
BackgroundBeyond Our Borders? Public Resistance to Global Genomic Data Sharing
Majumder, M. A., Cook-Deegan, R. M., & McGuire, A. L. (2016) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2000206 · Cited by 53
Taxing behavioral control diminishes sharing and costly punishment in childhood
Steinbeis, N. (2016) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.12492 · Cited by 54
“In the DG, altruism is indicated by the extent to which children give up a valuable resource and share out of 6 monetary units (MUs) with an anonymous child (Beneson, Pascoe, & Radmore, 2007; Fehr & Fischbacher, 2003; Gummerum, Hanoch, Keller, Parsons, & Hummel, 2010).”
BackgroundOur better nature: Does resource stress predict beyond-household sharing?
Ember, C. R., Skoggard, I. A., Ringen, E. J., & Farrer, M. (2018) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.03.001 · Cited by 53
Lahusen, C., & Grasso, M. T. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73335-7 · Cited by 60
Neuroeconomic Foundations of Trust and Social PreferencesPreprint
Fehr, E., Kosfeld, M., & Fischbacher, U. (2005) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.747884 · Cited by 52
Self-citationThe cooperative nature of communicative acts
Reich, W. (2010) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.024 · Cited by 51
Mancini, A., Betti, V., Panasiti, M. S., Pavone, E. F., & Aglioti, S. M. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026008 · Cited by 50
“Experimental economic games provide a unique opportunity to elicit social preferences and measure how much players are willing to sacrifice their own economic payoff if this allows them to punish defectors [4,10].”
BackgroundHUMAN COOPERATION BASED ON PUNISHMENT REPUTATION
dos Santos, M., Rankin, D. J., & Wedekind, C. (2013) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.12108 · Cited by 52
“For example, humans playing an ultimatum game reject lower offers when they know that others will learn about their acceptance threshold (Fehr and Fischbacher 2003).”
BackgroundSpecialization and evolutionary branching within migratory populations
Torney, C. J., Levin, S. A., & Couzin, I. D. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1014316107 · Cited by 51
Leimar, O., & Hammerstein, P. (2006) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01156.x · Cited by 51
“In a sort of second wave, a series of groundbreaking experiments by Fehr and coworkers (Fehr & Gächter, 2002; Fehr & Fischbacher, 2003 ) increasingly challenged the notion that human altruism needs to be based on either direct or indirect reciprocity.”
BackgroundResultTryptophan supplementation modulates social behavior: A review
Steenbergen, L., Jongkees, B. J., Sellaro, R., & Colzato, L. S. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.02.022 · Cited by 55
Economics 2.0: The Natural Step towards a Self-Regulating, Participatory Market Society
Helbing, D. (2013) · Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review · doi:10.14441/eier.d2013002 · Cited by 51
“While there is empirical evidence for other-regarding behavior (G¨uth et al., 1982; Henrich et al., 2001; Fehr and Fischbacher, 2003; Frey, 2008) and some theoretical implications of this have been studied (Dufwenberg et al., 2011; Sobel, 2009), a good theoretical foundation of the “homo socialis”…”
InfluentialResilient cooperators stabilize long-run cooperation in the finitely repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma
Mao, A., Dworkin, L., Suri, S., & Watts, D. J. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms13800 · Cited by 51
Martin, J. S., Koski, S. E., Bugnyar, T., Jaeggi, A. V., & Massen, J. J. M. (2021) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.12.016 · Cited by 53
Meglino, B. M., & Korsgaard, M. A. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1253 · Cited by 50
Predicting human behavior toward members of different social groups
Jenkins, A. C., Karashchuk, P., Zhu, L., & Hsu, M. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1719452115 · Cited by 58
“Discussion Human social behavior is characterized by a concern for others’ welfare, a long-celebrated feature of human sociality that has been subject to intense study across the biological and social sciences (11, 36).”
BackgroundAltruismus aus evolutionstheoretischer Perspektive
Fetchenhauer, D., & Bierhoff, H. (2004) · Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie · doi:10.1024/0044-3514.35.3.131 · Cited by 51
Bearing the Unbearable: Exploring Women Entrepreneurs Resilience Building in Times of Crises
Bagheri, A., Javadian, G., Zakeri, P., & Arasti, Z. (2023) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-023-05577-9 · Cited by 61
“Altruism refers to an individual’s tendency to perform costly actions that confer benefits to others with the aim of helping them (Fehr & Fischbacher, 2003).”
The effect of altruistic tendency on fairness in third-party punishment
Lu, S., Tan, P., Cheng, Y., Chen, J., & Qu, C. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00820 · Cited by 48
“After observing the distribution and level of cooperation, the otherwise disinterested third party can determine whether to pay a cost to punish the individuals who violate the cooperation social norms (Fehr and Fischbacher, 2003).”
BackgroundBidder motives in cause-related auctions
Haruvy, E. E., & Leszczyc, P. T. L. P. (2009) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2009.07.001 · Cited by 50
“People (as well as animals) have been observed doing kind acts, giving to others, and helping others in need (see Fehr and Fischbacher, 2003, for overview).”
A naturalistic theory of economic organization
Stoelhorst, J. W., & Richerson, P. J. (2012) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.012 · Cited by 52
“Trust Me”: Differences in expressed and perceived trust relations in an organization
Lusher, D., Robins, G. L., Pattison, P. E., & Lomi, A. (2012) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2012.01.004 · Cited by 55
“Studies have shown that trust in the existence of these preferences in others is an essential component of trust in these situations (Fehr and Fischbacher, 2003).”
BackgroundPseudocompetition among groups increases human cooperation in a public-goods game
Burton-Chellew, M. N., & West, S. A. (2012) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.07.019 · Cited by 51
“In contrast, the quantitative approach compares the quantitative level of behaviour within a specific game or treatment with that predicted by theoretical models (Levine 1998; Fehr & Fischbacher 2003; Camerer & Fehr 2006).”
BackgroundCooperation creates selection for tactical deception
McNally, L., & Jackson, A. L. (2013) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.0699 · Cited by 52
Increased costs reduce reciprocal helping behaviour of humans in a virtual evacuation experiment
Bode, N. W. F., Miller, J., O’Gorman, R., & Codling, E. A. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep15896 · Cited by 55
Bellucci, G., Hahn, T., Deshpande, G., & Krueger, F. (2019) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-018-00654-3 · Cited by 55
Rhoads, S. A., Cutler, J., & Marsh, A. A. (2021) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsab079 · Cited by 51
“, 2013), among groups and social networks (Fehr et al., 2002; Fehr and Fischbacher, 2003; Fehr and Camerer, 2007; de Waal, 2008; Fowler and Christakis, 2010; FeldmanHall, 2017) and within societies (Nowak, 2006).”
Backgroundİşler, O., Gächter, S., Maule, A. J., & Starmer, C. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-93412-4 · Cited by 50
Changes in Negative Reciprocity as a Function of Age
Bereby‐Meyer, Y., & Fiks, S. (2012) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1768 · Cited by 49
Every Man for Himself! Gender, Norms and Survival in Maritime Disasters
Elinder, M., & Erixson, O. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1207156109 · Cited by 64
Happy Little Benefactor: Prosocial Behaviors Promote Happiness in Young Children From Two Cultures
Song, Y., Broekhuizen, M. L., & Dubas, J. S. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01398 · Cited by 49
“, 2010) and maintaining large organizations in the modern world (Wilson, 1975; Fehr and Fischbacher, 2003), the question is what benefits are there, if any, for the individual who is sacrificing? While theories such as kin selection (Hamilton, 1964) or reciprocal altruism (Trivers, 1971) focus on the potential, long t…”
BackgroundMusic and the Meeting of Human Minds
Harvey, A. R. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00762 · Cited by 54
“In humans, reciprocal altruism, involving mutual cooperative advantage (Trivers, 1971; Fehr and Fischbacher, 2003), has a beneficial impact not only on the viability and welfare of individuals but can also lead to better cooperation with kin as well as promote pro-social attitudes within larger groups of culturally co…”
BackgroundAnthropomorphization of artificial agents leads to fair and strategic, but not altruistic behavior
de Kleijn, R., van Es, L., Kachergis, G., & Hommel, B. (2018) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.09.008 · Cited by 49
“The opponent was programmed (or, in the case of the confederate, instructed) to decline o ff ers lower than 30% of the stake, similar to human behavior (Fehr and Fischbacher, 2003).”
Gomes, J., Sabino, A., & Antunes, V. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15032190 · Cited by 55
“The altruistic value is based on the assumption that individuals’ actions may affect the welfare of others; thus, today’s decisions may be based on the possible consequences for future generations [69].”
BackgroundBrock, G., & Atkinson, Q. D. (2007) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-007-9087-1 · Cited by 48
“As we mentioned above, Fehr and Fischbacher (2003) review experimental evidence showing that humans have a strong drive to behave altruistically in a group.”
The Role of Other Orientation in Reactions to Job Characteristics
Meglino, B. M., & Korsgaard, M. A. (2007) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206306295308 · Cited by 48
“…that suggest that persons who are predisposed to engage in self-sacrificing acts are less likely to screen information in a rational manner and are more likely to internalize, adhere to, and enforce societal norms even if doing so is personally costly (Fehr & Fischbacher, 2003; Simon, 1990, 1993).”
BackgroundSocial neuroscience in psychiatry: unravelling the neural mechanisms of social dysfunction
Fett, A.-K. J., Shergill, S. S., & Krabbendam, L. (2014) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291714002487 · Cited by 50
“…a human tendency to trust and to reciprocate trust, and shows that trusting behaviour is influenced by the rewarding effects of social cooperation and knowledge about the interaction partner (Bowles & Gintis, 2002; Fehr & Gachter, 2002; Fehr & Fischbacher, 2003; Delgado et al. 2005; Fehr, 2009).”
BackgroundSOCIAL DISCOUNTING AND THE PRISONER'S DILEMMA GAME
Locey, M. L., Safin, V., & Rachlin, H. C. (2012) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1002/jeab.3 · Cited by 49
van Zomeren, M. (2015) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2015.04.001 · Cited by 58
“Humans are an ultra-social species (e.g., Fehr & Fischbacher, 2003).”
BackgroundResultGreen, S., Ralph, M. A. L., Moll, J., Stamatakis, E. A., Grafman, J. H., & Zahn, R. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.038 · Cited by 47
“The ability to be motivated by moral values is uniquely human (Fehr and Fischbacher, 2003).”
BackgroundComputational substrates of social norm enforcement by unaffected third parties
Zhong, S., Chark, R., Hsu, M., & Chew, S. H. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.040 · Cited by 47
“In particular, the ability to develop norms and enforce them through the use of sanctions is thought by many to be one of the distinguishing characteristics of the human species (Boyd, 1988; Fehr and Fischbacher, 2003).”
BackgroundA dynamic and cyclical model of bounded ethicality
Chugh, D., & Kern, M. C. (2016) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2016.07.002 · Cited by 54
Cooperation in Microbial Populations: Theory and Experimental Model Systems
Cremer, J., Melbinger, A., Wienand, K., Henríquez, T., Jung, H., & Frey, E. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2019.09.023 · Cited by 50
Reciprocity: Different behavioural strategies, cognitive mechanisms and psychological processes
Schweinfurth, M. K., & Call, J. (2019) · Learning & Behavior · doi:10.3758/s13420-019-00394-5 · Cited by 50
“Cooperation is such a widespread phenomenon that we find evidence across the animal kingdom, ranging from bacteria (Crespi, 2001) to humans (Fehr & Fischbacher, 2003).”
BackgroundCredible communication and cooperation: Experimental evidence from multi-stage Games
Andersson, O., & Wengström, E. (2011) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.10.002 · Cited by 48
“24 Consistent with this line of reasoning, Houser and Xiao (2005) report that the threat of verbal punishments increases offers in ultimatum games.”
BackgroundInfluentialOpen Source Software Development - Just Another Case of Collective Invention?Preprint
Osterloh, M., & Rota, S. (2004) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.561744 · Cited by 48
The role of institutional incentives and the exemplar in promoting cooperation
Wu, J., Li, C., Zhang, B., Cressman, R., & Tao, Y. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep06421 · Cited by 47
Cooperation and punishment in an adversarial game: How defectors pave the way to a peaceful society
Short, M. B., Brantingham, P. J., & D'Orsogna, M. R. (2010) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.82.066114 · Cited by 46
R.Kleiman, M. A., & Kilmer, B. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0905513106 · Cited by 51
“H cooperate; the extent of cooperation among humans marks them out from all other species (1, 2).”
Darwin's invisible hand: Market competition, evolution and the firm
JOHNSON, D. D. P., Price, M. E., & van Vugt, M. (2012) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.016 · Cited by 50
How Natural Selection Can Create Both Self- and Other-Regarding Preferences and Networked Minds
Grund, T., Waloszek, C., & Helbing, D. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep01480 · Cited by 47
“Science and Culture76(9-10), 399-417 (2010).”
Lucca, K., Yuen, F. L., Wang, Y., Alessandroni, N., Allison, O., Alvarez, M., Axelsson, E. L., Baumer, J., Baumgartner, H. A., Bertels, J., et al. (2024) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.13581 · Cited by 78
“Humans readily judge individuals on the basis of the prosocial and antisocial actions they direct toward unrelated third parties, and even incur personal costs to punish those who behave antisocially (Fehr and Fischbacher 2003).”
Economic Drivers of Corporate Responsibility Activities
Amalric, F., & Hauser, J. (2005) · Journal of Corporate Citizenship · doi:10.9774/gleaf.4700.2005.wi.00006 · Cited by 46
A neural trait approach to exploring individual differences in social preferences
Nash, K. A., Gianotti, L. R. R., & Knoch, D. (2015) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00458 · Cited by 46
“Defined broadly as behavior that benefits another individual or group at a personal cost to the actor (Camerer, 2003; Fehr and Fischbacher, 2003; Henrich et al., 2006), altruism has been found to have significant, yet difficult to explain individual differences.”
BackgroundInfluentialExplaining Self-Interested Behavior of Public-Spirited Policymakers
Zamir, E., & Sulitzeanu‐Kenan, R. (2016) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.12825 · Cited by 50
Gerfo, E. L., Gallucci, A., Morese, R., Vergallito, A., Ottone, S., Ponzano, F., Locatelli, G., Bosco, F. M., & Lauro, L. J. R. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.047 · Cited by 46
Exposure to the COVID-19 pandemic environment and generosity
Brañas‐Garza, P., Jorrat, D., Alfonso, A., Espín, A. M., Muñoz, T. G., & Kovářík, J. (2022) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.210919 · Cited by 51
“Nevertheless, since we cannot effectively track the behaviour of most people and reputation is often at stake due to the public nature of many actions [8,9], one cannot make precise inferences about the impact of the pandemic on ‘pure’ prosociality on the basis of mere observation and such anecdotal evidence.”
Empathy, sympathy, and prosocial preferences in primates
Silk, J. B. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198568308.013.0010 · Cited by 46
Preschool children fail primate prosocial game because of attentional task demands
Burkart, J. M., & Rueth, K. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068440 · Cited by 45
“A prosocial effect is detected if subjects choose the prosocial option (in this case, [1,1]) more often when a partner is present than when it is absent.”
BackgroundInfluentialQuan, J., Liu, W., Chu, Y., & Wang, X. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-16140-8 · Cited by 45
“( ) ( ) l N M N c B l c j M N k 1 1 1 ( ) 1 ( 1) ( 0); (3) P i j k l ( , , , ) π σ αγ = − − − + − Φ − − − ≠”
Aimone, J. A., & Houser, D. E. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017725 · Cited by 50
“In this respect, betrayal aversion is unlike socially ‘‘beneficial’’ preferences including altruism[9], fairness[10,11] and inequity aversion[11,12], all of which encourage cooperation and exchange.”
BackgroundOxytocin Receptor Gene Relates to Theory of Mind and Prosocial Behavior in Children
Wu, N., & Su, Y. (2013) · Journal of Cognition and Development · doi:10.1080/15248372.2013.858042 · Cited by 48
“Among the most distinguishing human idiosyncrasies are helping, sharing, comforting, and cooperation behaviors (Fehr & Fischbacher, 2003).”
BackgroundRecidivism and Rehabilitation of Criminal Offenders: A Carrot and Stick Evolutionary Game
Berenji, B., Chou, T., & D'Orsogna, M. R. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085531 · Cited by 52
“Some of the current hypotheses to explain large scale cooperation are based on player reciprocity, status, or altruistic and tit–for–tat behaviors between two actors [1–4].”
BackgroundRadke, S., Güroğlu, B., & de Bruijn, E. R. A. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031491 · Cited by 45
“Participants’ increased tendency to reject these unfair offers can be regarded as a form of altruistic punishment – punishing proposers for the norm violation at a cost to themselves [25].”
Happiness and altruism within the extended family
Schwarze, J., & Winkelmann, R. (2010) · Journal of Population Economics · doi:10.1007/s00148-010-0326-8 · Cited by 45
“More recently, evidence on widespread pro-social behavior in laboratory experiments has led to renewed interest in altruism and challenged the view that economic agents mostly behave selfishly (Fehr and Fischbacher 2003).”
BackgroundInfluentialBishop, C. P., Shumway, C. R., & Wandschneider, P. R. (2010) · Land Economics · doi:10.3368/le.86.3.585 · Cited by 45
“Table 2 lists primary and aggregate variables organized by the categories noted in equation [5] and discussed below.”
BackgroundAltruistic traits are predicted by neural responses to monetary outcomes for selfvscharity
Martín, R. S., Kwak, Y., Pearson, J. M., Woldorff, M. G., & Huettel, S. A. (2016) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsw026 · Cited by 50
Social observation increases deontological judgments in moral dilemmas
Lee, M., Sul, S., & Kim, H. (2018) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.06.004 · Cited by 48
Developmental Differences in Prosocial Behavior Between Preschool and Late Elementary School
Flook, L., Zahn‐Waxler, C., & Davidson, R. J. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00876 · Cited by 51
“Prosocial behaviors are a powerful force for promoting group cohesion and acceptance, and one individual who acts generously has the ability to influence others to behave more generously (Fehr and Fischbacher, 2003; Klapwijk and Van Lange, 2009; Fowler and Christakis, 2010; Layous et al., 2012).”
BackgroundTipping pro-environmental norm diffusion at scale: opportunities and limitations
Berger, J. L., Efferson, C. M., & Vogt, S. (2021) · Behavioural Public Policy · doi:10.1017/bpp.2021.36 · Cited by 46
“…of social preference, conditional cooperation, is a major driver of cooperation in experimental public goods games (Henrich et al., 2001; Fehr & Fischbacher, 2003; of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2021.36 Downloaded from…”
BackgroundInfluentialVerplaetse, J., Schrijver, J. D., Vanneste, S., & Braeckman, J. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6287-2 · Cited by 49
Punitive sentiment among the Shuar and in industrialized societies: cross-cultural similarities
Price, M. E. (2005) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.08.009 · Cited by 44
“…biological group selectionist explanations for punishment (Gintis, 2000; Sober & Wilson, 1998), but theoretical difficulties associated with such selection have led many to agree that some gene–culture coevolutionary scenario is more plausible (e.g., Boyd et al., 2003; Fehr & Fischbacher, 2003).”
BackgroundThe role of the justice motive in economic decision making
Dalbert, C., & Umlauft, S. (2008) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2008.07.006 · Cited by 46
A Unified Empirical Account of Responsibility Judgments*
Björnsson, G., & Persson, K. (2012) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2012.00603.x · Cited by 44
Hamilton's rule predicts anticipated social support in humans
Burton-Chellew, M. N., & Dunbar, R. (2014) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/aru165 · Cited by 45
“The benefits went to known individuals ranging in relatedness to the actor, in contrast to the typical experimental situation whereby benefits go to anonymous strangers (Fehr and Fischbacher 2003).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialLetki, N., & Steen, T. P. S. (2020) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13340 · Cited by 47
The 9-SRA Scale: A Simplified 9-Items Version of the SRA Scale to Assess Altruism
Enrique Manzur, M., & Sergio Olavarrieta, S. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13136999 · Cited by 53
“Altruism is considered a particularly human characteristic that differentiates us from other species [34].”
BackgroundInfluentialWhy stress and hunger both increase and decrease prosocial behaviour
Faber, N. S., & Häusser, J. A. (2021) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.023 · Cited by 44
In consilium apparatus: Artificial intelligence, stakeholder reciprocity, and firm performance
Bosse, D. A., Thompson, S. M., & Ekman, P. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113402 · Cited by 55
When selection pays: Structured public goods game with a generalized interaction mode
Han, J., Chen, X., & Szolnoki, A. (2024) · Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science · doi:10.1063/5.0201582 · Cited by 46
When to cooperate and when to compete: Emotional intelligence in interpersonal decision-making
Fernández‐Berrocal, P., Extremera, N., Lopes, P. N., & Ruiz-Aranda, D. (2014) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.12.005 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U.
- Affiliations
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Fehr, Ernst
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 425
- Issue
- 6960
- Pages
- 785-791
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1481402319
- Cited by
- 3,475
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 142 · 2025: 177 · 2024: 166 · 2023: 161 · 2022: 189 · 2021: 232 · 2020: 144 · 2019: 162 · 2018: 186 · 2017: 136 · 2016: 179 · 2015: 202 · 2014: 159 · 2013: 173 · 2012: 157
- FWCI
- 38.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
- Keywords
- selfishness, cooperation, individual heterogeneity, cultural evolution, gene-culture coevolution, social evolution
- MeSH terms
- Altruism, Cooperative Behavior, Culture, Biological Evolution, Humans, Punishment, Reward
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review