The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The nature of human altruism
Abstract
Some of the most fundamental questions concerning our evolutionary origins, our social relations, and the organization of society are centred around issues of altruism and selfishness. Experimental evidence indicates that human altruism is a powerful force and is unique in the animal world. However, there is much individual heterogeneity and the interaction between altruists and selfish individuals is vital to human cooperation. Depending on the environment, a minority of altruists can force a majority of selfish individuals to cooperate or, conversely, a few egoists can induce a large number of altruists to defect. Current gene-based evolutionary theories cannot explain important patterns of human altruism, pointing towards the importance of both theories of cultural evolution as well as gene-culture co-evolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Yet, when the PGG is repeated over multiple rounds, contributions tend to decline with the number of rounds; this is due to a few individuals who free ride in the first round, thereby triggering further free riding in subsequent rounds11,14,27.”
From Cooperation without punishment (2023) · cites this paper as [11]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The fact that costly punishment plays an undisputed role in other contexts, such as public goods games, ultimatum games and trust games 43-46 , shows that this form of discrimination is highly plausible.”
From Evolution of indirect reciprocity (2005) · cites this paper as [46]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“which theory and experimentation shows is a more effective means of preserving cooperation than individual-level punishment (Fehr & Gachter, 2002; Fehr & Fischbacher 2003)”
From The origins of language in teaching (2017) · cites this paper as Fehr & Fischbacher 2003
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Free riding poses a major challenge to self-governance, and a prominent solution to this challenge has been altruistic punishment.”
From Cooperation without punishment (2023) · cites this paper as [11]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Free riding poses a major challenge to self-governance, and a prominent solution to this challenge has been altruistic punishment.”
From Cooperation without punishment (2023) · cites this paper as [11]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Yet, when the PGG is repeated over multiple rounds, contributions tend to decline with the number of rounds; this is due to a few individuals who free ride in the first round, thereby triggering further free riding in subsequent rounds11,14,27.”
From Cooperation without punishment (2023) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Parametric regressors were not orthogonalized in the design matrix, ensuring that parameter estimates were not confounded by spurious correlations due to signals related to other regressors 59 .”
From Oxytocin modulates social value representations in the amygdala (2019) · cites this paper as [59]
In the citing paper
“It has been shown that people reward others for cooperative behaviour but punish violations of social fairness even at a personal cost15,16, an effect likely to be mediated by neural mechanisms that provide intrinsic motivation (that is, satisfaction) from punishing violators21.”
From Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others (2006) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“Many theories explaining various types of cooperation have been proposed in biology and economics (Fehr & Fischbacher, 2003; Gurven, 2004) but a theoretical explanation of unconditional altruism (de W ned as bene W ting others at a cost to oneself, Wilson, 1976) has remained elusive to date.”
From Altruistic behavior as a costly signal of general intelligence (2007) · cites this paper as Fehr & Fischbacher, 2003
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7466396 · Cited by 20,065
A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355399556151 · Cited by 11,264
Self-citationThe Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
Trivers, R. L. (1971) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/406755 · Cited by 11,010
Altruistic punishment in humans
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415137a · Cited by 5,616
Self-citationTrust, Reciprocity, and Social History
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1006/game.1995.1027 · Cited by 5,548
ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition
Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2000) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.90.1.166 · Cited by 5,399
An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining
Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7 · Cited by 4,868
Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment
Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S., & Fehr, E. (2001) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/s0165-1765(01)00394-9 · Cited by 2,780
Self-citationEvolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring
Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/31225 · Cited by 2,700
In Search of Homo Economicus: Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small-Scale Societies
Henrich, J., Boyd, R. T., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H. M., & McElreath, R. L. (2001) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.91.2.73 · Cited by 2,619
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. The Nature of Cultures (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, in the press)
- Batson, D. C. The Altruism Question (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1991)
- Fehr, F., Tougareva, E. & Fischbacher, U. Do High Stakes and Competition Undermine Fairness? Working Paper 125 (Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, Univ. Zurich, 2002)
- Roth, A., Prasnikar, V., Okuno-Fujiwara, M. & Zamir, S. Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh and Tokyo: An experimental study. Am. Econ. Rev. 81, 1068–1095 (1991)
- Sober, E. & Wilson, D. S. Unto Others—the Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998)
- Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. Third party punishment and social norms. Evol. Hum. Behav. (in the press)
- Messick, D. & Brewer, M. in Review of Personality and Social Psychology (ed. Wheeler, L.) (Sage Publ., Beverly Hills, 1983)
- Sethi, R. & Somanathan, E. The evolution of social norms in common property resource use. Am. Econ. Rev. 86, 766–788 (1996)
- Thibaut, J. W. & Kelley, H. H. The Social Psychology of Groups (Wiley, New York, 1959)
- Rabin, M. Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Am. Econ. Rev. 83, 1281–1302 (1993)
- Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. in The Adapted Mind (eds Barkow, J., Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J.) (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1992)
- Alexander, R. D. The Biology of Moral Systems (Aldine De Gruyter, New York, 1987)
- Williams, G. D. Adaption and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1966)
- Kelly, R. C. The Nuer Conquest: The Structure and Development of an Expansionist System (Univ. Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 1985)
- Bowles, S., Choi, J.-K. & Hopfensitz, A. The co-evolution of individual behaviours and social institutions. J. Theor. Biol. (in the press)
- Chaudhuri, A. & Graziano, S. Evolution of Conventions in an Experimental Public Goods Game with Private and Public Knowledge of Advice (Working Paper, Department of Economics, Univ. Auckland, 2003)
- Harbaugh, W. T., Krause, K. & Liday, S. Children's Bargaining Behavior: Differences by Age, Gender, and Height (Working Paper, Department of Economics, Univ. Oregon, 2000)
- Otterbein, K. F. The Evolution of War: A Cross-Cultural Study (Human Relations Area Files Press, New Haven, 1985)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,016
Collaboration encourages equal sharing in children but not in chimpanzees
Hamann, K., Warneken, F., Greenberg, J. R., & Tomasello, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10278 · Cited by 436
Tolerance for inequity may increase with social closeness in chimpanzees
Brosnan, S. F., Schiff, H. C., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2005) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2947 · Cited by 263
“Inequity aversion (IA) appears to have played a key role in the evolution of cooperation in humans (Fehr & Fischbacher 2003), yet little is known about how other species respond to unequal pay-offs.”
BackgroundThe Genetic Architecture of Selection at the Human Dopamine Receptor D4 (DRD4) Gene Locus
Wang, E., Ding, Y.-C., Flodman, P. L., Kidd, J. R., Kídd, K. K., Grady, D. L., Ryder, O. A., Spence, M. A., Swanson, J. M., & Moyzis, R. K. (2004) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/420854 · Cited by 406
“The evolutionary payoff of an individual’s behavior in complex human societies, obviously, will depend strongly on the reaction of others to that behavior (Betzig 1993; Buss 1999; Ding et al. 2002; Harpending and Cochran 2002; Fehr and Fischbacher 2003).”
BackgroundProsocial behavior and altruism: A review of concepts and definitions
Pfattheicher, S., Nielsen, Y. A., & Thielmann, I. (2022) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.021 · Cited by 493
Conflict and Cooperation in Wild Chimpanzees
Muller, M. N., & Mitani, J. C. (2005) · Advances in the study of behavior · doi:10.1016/s0065-3454(05)35007-8 · Cited by 394
“Thus, although chimpanzees may provide striking examples of cooperation, we see nothing in their behavior to challenge the idea that the extent of human cooperation is unique in the animal world (Fehr and Fischbacher, 2003).”
BackgroundEvolutionary Establishment of Moral and Double Moral Standards through Spatial Interactions
Helbing, D., Szolnoki, A., Perc, M., & Szabó, G. (2010) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000758 · Cited by 379
“goods dilemmas [2–8], and it is effective indeed [9–11].”
The emergence of human uniqueness: Characters underlying behavioral modernity
Hill, K., Barton, M., & Hurtado, A. M. (2009) · Evolutionary Anthropology Issues News and Reviews · doi:10.1002/evan.20224 · Cited by 387
Donald, J. N., Sahdra, B. K., Van Zanden, B., Duineveld, J. J., Atkins, P. W. B., Marshall, S. L., & Ciarrochi, J. (2019) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12338 · Cited by 371
Krüeger, F., McCabe, K., Moll, J., Kriegeskorte, N., Zahn, R., Strenziok, M., Heinecke, A., & Grafman, J. H. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0710103104 · Cited by 407
Monoamine oxidase A gene (MAOA) predicts behavioral aggression following provocation
McDermott, R., Tingley, D., Cowden, J., Frazzetto, G., & Johnson, D. D. P. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0808376106 · Cited by 384
A phylogenetic approach to cultural evolution
Mace, R. H., & Holden, C. J. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.12.002 · Cited by 390
Evolution, emotions, and emotional disorders.
Nesse, R. M., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2009) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0013503 · Cited by 426
What's in it for me? Self-regard precludes altruism and spite in chimpanzees
Jensen, K., Hare, B. A., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2006) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3417 · Cited by 380
“Despite its benefits for cooperative group-living, altruism as exhibited by humans has been claimed to be unique in the animal kingdom (Fehr & Fischbacher 2003).”
BackgroundInfluentialRewards of kindness? A meta-analysis of the link between prosociality and well-being.
Hui, B. P. H., Ng, J. C. K., Berzaghi, E., Cunningham-Amos, L. A., & Kogan, A. (2020) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000298 · Cited by 430
IMAGING VALUATION MODELS IN HUMAN CHOICE
Montague, P. R., King‐Casas, B., & Cohen, J. D. (2006) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112903 · Cited by 382
“…is a fascinating evolutionary problem, which has been explained in terms of the value of reputation to the individual (Nowak & Sigmund 2005), as well as the value of altruistic punishment in stabilizing social cohesion against environmental challenges (Fehr & Simon 2000, Fehr & Fischbacher 2003).”
BackgroundThe origins of altruism in offspring care.
Preston, S. D. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0031755 · Cited by 368
Why Don't Trade Preferences Reflect Economic Self-Interest?
Rho, S., & Tomz, M. R. (2017) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818316000394 · Cited by 365
Other-regarding preferences in a non-human primate: common marmosets provision food altruistically
Burkart, J. M., Fehr, E., Efferson, C., & van Schaik, C. P. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0710310104 · Cited by 359
Self-citationHalevy, N., Bornstein, G., & Sagiv, L. (2008) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02100.x · Cited by 355
“People cooperate if they expect others to cooperate as well (Fehr & Fischbacher, 2003), and although they expect reciprocation from in-group members, they do not expect it frommembers of out-groups (e.g., Yamagishi & Kiyonari, 2000).”
BackgroundInfluentialVisualizing the Signatures of Social Roles in Online Discussion Groups
Welser, H. T., Gleave, E., Fisher, D., & Smith, M. A. (2007) · Cited by 354
Multilevel Selection 1: Quantitative Genetics of Inheritance and Response to Selection
Bijma, P., Muir, W. M., & van Arendonk, J. A. M. (2006) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.106.062711 · Cited by 360
“One of those issues is the evolution of altruism (Wilson 1985, 2005; Woodcock and Heath 2002; Fehr and Fischbacher 2003; Cooper and Wallace 2004; Hamilton and Taborsky 2005; Okasha 2005) and the importance of kin selection to this process (Hamilton 1964; Michod 1982; Day and Taylor 1997; Griffin…”
BackgroundSterling, P. (2004) · Allostasis, Homeostasis, and the Costs of Physiological Adaptation · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316257081.004 · Cited by 353
Multiple Intelligences, the Mozart Effect, and Emotional Intelligence: A Critical Review
Waterhouse, L. H. (2006) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4104_1 · Cited by 399
“Althoughhu - mans are unusual in their altruistic cooperation (Fehr & Fischbacher, 2003), human social cheating includes theft, sexual infidelity, and shirking group work.”
Research Issues in Social computing
Parameswaran, M., & Whinston, A. B. (2007) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00132 · Cited by 352
Measurement of Individual Social Capital
van der Gaag, M., & Webber, M. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-71311-3_2 · Cited by 362
The Formation of Prosociality: Causal Evidence on the Role of Social Environment
Kosse, F., Deckers, T., Pinger, P., Schildberg-Hörisch, H., & Falk, A. (2016) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/704386 · Cited by 416
The power of asking: How communication affects selfishness, empathy, and altruism
James Andreoni, A., & Rao, J. M. (2011) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.12.008 · Cited by 348
“Asking for more typically leads to a greater pass but with limits — subjects who requested more than an equal division were punished.”
BackgroundNeuronal reference frames for social decisions in primate frontal cortex
Chang, S. W. C., Gariépy, J.-F., & Platt, M. L. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3287 · Cited by 336
“Coefficients of variation were (1) np g © 2 01 3 N at ur e A m er ic a, In c.”
BackgroundMethodHeterogeneous networks do not promote cooperation when humans play a Prisoner’s Dilemma
Gracia-Lázaro, C., Ferrer, A., Ruiz, G., Tarancón, A., Cuesta, J. A., Sánchez, Á., & Moreno, Y. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1206681109 · Cited by 335
“T strong cooperative attitude of humans defies the paradigm of Homo economicus and poses an evolutionary conundrum (1, 2).”
BackgroundThe virtues of gossip: Reputational information sharing as prosocial behavior.
Feinberg, M., Willer, R., Stellar, J. E., & Keltner, D. J. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0026650 · Cited by 362
Xia, C., Wang, J., Perc, M., & Wang, Z. (2023) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2023.05.002 · Cited by 354
“Nevertheless, this type of altruistic punishment promotes the cooperation within the well-mixed population, which is also demonstrated to be plausible under other gaming scenarios including public goods game [84], ultimatum game [85] and trust game [86].”
BackgroundConformists and Mavericks: The Empirics of Frequency-Dependent Cultural Transmission
EFFERSON, C., LALIVE, R., RICHERSON, P., MCELREATH, R., & LUBELL, M. (2008) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.08.003 · Cited by 336
“…how prosocial tendencies could have evolved in humans via cultural group selection (Boyd, Gintis, Bowles, & Richerson, 2003; Boyd & Richerson, 1982; Fehr & Fischbacher, 2003, 2004; Fehr & Gaechter, 2002; Guererk, Irlenbusch, & Rockenback, 2006; Guzmán, RodríguezSickert, & Rowthorn, 2006; Henrich,…”
BackgroundCooperation in the noisy case: Prisoner’s dilemma game on two types of regular random graphs
Vukov, J., Szabó, G., & Szolnoki, A. (2006) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.73.067103 · Cited by 338
Evolutionary Context of Human Development: The Cooperative Breeding Model
Hrdy, S. B. (2007) · Family Relationships · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320510.003.0003 · Cited by 333
“And eventually too, so hyper-altruistic (e.g., Fehr and Fischbacher 2003)?”
BackgroundYoshida, W., Dolan, R. J., & Friston, K. J. (2008) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000254 · Cited by 342
“This ‘altruism’ [28] arises because ‘i has become context-sensitive, and depends on the other player’s payoff.”
BackgroundGenetics of Human Social Behavior
Ebstein, R. P., Israel, S., Chew, S. H., Zhong, S., & Knafo, A. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.02.020 · Cited by 323
Preferences for Truthfulness: Heterogeneity among and within Individuals
Gibson, R., Tanner, C., & Wagner, A. F. (2013) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.103.1.532 · Cited by 325
Johnson, D. D. P. (2005) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-005-1017-0 · Cited by 323
“Such “altruistic punishment” could have evolved via some form of cultural group selection (Boyd et al. 2003; Fehr and Fischbacher 2003 ).”
BackgroundA Neurocomputational Model of Altruistic Choice and Its Implications
Hutcherson, C. A., Bushong, B., & Rangel, A. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.06.031 · Cited by 299
“…by strategic considerations like reciprocity or cooperation (Dufwenberg and Kirchsteiger, 2004; Falk and Fischbacher, 2006; Nowak and Sigmund, 1998) but even in the absence of expectation for future benefit (e.g., fully anonymous, one-time generosity; Batson, 2011; Fehr and Fischbacher, 2003).”
BackgroundPublic Service Motivation Concepts and Theory: A Critique
Bozeman, B. L., & Su, X. (2014) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.12248 · Cited by 317
Tusche, A., Böckler, A., Kanske, P., Trautwein, F.-M., & Singer, T. (2016) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3392-15.2016 · Cited by 309
“Altruism, which involves costly other-regarding behavior, is a complex phenomenon resulting from numerous mental processes (Fehr and Fischbacher, 2003; Penner et al., 2005; Tankersley et al., 2007; Zaki and Mitchell, 2011; Hutcherson et al., 2015), such as fairness preferences (Fehr and Schmidt,…”
BackgroundThe essential role of ritual in the transmission and reinforcement of social norms.
Rossano, M. J. (2012) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0027038 · Cited by 315
Justice at Work and Reduced Risk of Coronary Heart Disease Among Employees
Mika Kivimaki, B., Ferrie, J. E., Brunner, E. J., Head, J. A., Shipley, M. J., Vahtera, J., & Marmot, M. G. (2005) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.165.19.2245 · Cited by 318
“The following items were included: (1) Do you ever get criticized unfairly (reverse scored)? (2) Do you get consistent information from line management (your superior)? (3) Do you get sufficient information from line management (your superior)? (4) How often is your superior willing to listen to your problems? and (5)…”
BackgroundResultGächter, S., Starmer, C., & Tufano, F. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0129478 · Cited by 311
Cohen, J. D. (2005) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/089533005775196750 · Cited by 304
Moral expansiveness: Examining variability in the extension of the moral world.
Crimston, C. R., Bain, P. G., Hornsey, M. J., & Bastian, B. B. (2016) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000086 · Cited by 340
Giving leads to happiness in young children
Aknin, L. B., Hamlin, J. K., & Dunn, E. W. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039211 · Cited by 304
“Indeed, human survival and flourishing have depended on our species’ ability to work together to achieve feats that could not be achieved alone, such as hunting large prey and building shelter in inhospitable regions [1].”
BackgroundGiving is self-rewarding for monkeys
de Waal, F. Β. Μ., Leimgruber, K. L., & Greenberg, A. R. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0807060105 · Cited by 305
“Although humans are sometimes considered unique in that they cooperate with unrelated individuals within large groups (15), a comparison of wild chimpanzee behavior with genetic relatedness data confirmed similar tendencies (16).”
BackgroundDelton, A. W., Krasnow, M. M., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1102131108 · Cited by 305
Young Children Selectively Avoid Helping People With Harmful Intentions
Vaish, A., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2010) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01500.x · Cited by 321
Cooperation through interdependence
Roberts, G. (2005) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.02.006 · Cited by 310
“Current work stresses the potential role of cultural evolution in explaining this tendency to cooperate more than expected from reciprocity theory (Fehr & Fischbacher 2003).”
BackgroundDorsolateral and ventromedial prefrontal cortex orchestrate normative choice
Baumgärtner, T., Knoch, D., Hotz, P., Eisenegger, C., & Fehr, E. (2011) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2933 · Cited by 307
“This capacity is well documented and takes the form of costly behaviors such as voluntary participation in collective actions, helping strangers, reciprocating favors and punishing norm violators even though the actor receives no material benefits from these action”
BackgroundSelf-citationGame theory and neural basis of social decision making
Lee, D. (2008) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn2065 · Cited by 316
“Indeed, cooperation and altruistic behaviors abound in human societie”
BackgroundKnafo, A., Israel, S., Darvasi, A., Bachner‐Melman, R., Uzefovsky, F., Cohen, L., Feldman, E., Lerer, E., Laiba, E., Raz, Y., et al. (2007) · Genes Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1111/j.1601-183x.2007.00341.x · Cited by 302
“Deviations from profit maximization as observed in economic game playing in general and the dictator game in particular underscore the paradox of human altruism ( Fehr & Fischbacher 2003 ).”
BackgroundKnafo, A., & Plomin, R. (2006) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.5.771 · Cited by 295
Hand of God, Mind of Man: Punishment and Cognition in the Evolution of Cooperation
Johnson, D., & Bering, J. (2006) · Evolutionary Psychology · doi:10.1177/147470490600400119 · Cited by 294
“; (4) Some fraction of people altruistically punish defectors for the good of the group (Fehr and Gächter 2002; Fehr and Fischbacher 2003), and this trait is propagated by group selection (however, this requires that humans are genuinely altruistic, a claim that is problematic for a number of…”
BackgroundInfluentialSocial Justice: History, Theory, and Research
Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002030 · Cited by 298
Globalization and human cooperation
Buchan, N. R., Grimalda, G. F., Wilson, R. K., Brewer, M. B., Fatás, E., & Foddy, M. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0809522106 · Cited by 287
“Yet, we have little understanding of the patterns of large-scale cooperation in contemporary societies (15).”
BackgroundOpen source software development—Just another case of collective invention?
Osterloh, M., & Rota, S. (2007) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.10.004 · Cited by 281
“1 Blast furnaces in Britain’s Cleveland district (second half of the 19 century) Allen (1983) was the first to analyze what he called “collective invention”.”
O'Gorman, R., Henrich, J., & van Vugt, M. (2009) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.1082 · Cited by 287
“It is to state the obvious that humans can cooperate readily in extraordinary numbers (Smirnov et al. 2007) and that this cooperation often provides public goods, despite the risk of free riding (Andreoni 1988; Fehr & Fischbacher 2003).”
Young Children Share the Spoils After Collaboration
Warneken, F., Lohse, K., Melis, A. P., & Tomasello, M. (2010) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797610395392 · Cited by 295
What Makes Things Cool? How Autonomy Influences Perceived Coolness
Warren, C., & Campbell, M. C. (2014) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/676680 · Cited by 275
“Because they similarly require parting from the normative path, sexual permissiveness, hedonism, and detachment also indirectly suggest autonomy.”
BackgroundGiudici, G., Guerini, M., & Rossi‐Lamastra, C. (2017) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9830-x · Cited by 275
“We argue that mobilizing local backers is easier in areas where residents have altruistic tendencies, namely, in-clinations to undertake costly actions that confer economic benefits on other individuals to help them (Fehr and Fischbacher 2003).”
InfluentialYes, Managers Should Be Paid Like Bureaucrats
Frey, B. S., & Osterloh, M. (2005) · Journal of Management Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1056492604273757 · Cited by 281
“The least deterioration is realized if persons who are not prepared to punish others can themselves be punished; see Fehr and Fischbacher (2003).”
A Key Role for Similarity in Vicarious Reward
Mobbs, D., Yu, R., Meyer, M., Passamonti, L., Seymour, B., Calder, A. J., Schweizer, S., Frith, C. D., & Dalgleish, T. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1170539 · Cited by 270
The Development of Fairness Expectations and Prosocial Behavior in the Second Year of Life
Sommerville, J. A., Schmidt, M. F. H., Yun, J.-E. E., & Burns, M. P. (2012) · Infancy · doi:10.1111/j.1532-7078.2012.00129.x · Cited by 287
“Second, the authors sought to investigate a potential relation between fairness and altruism, as both have been hypothesized to rely on a more general regard or concern for others (Boehm, 1999; Fehr & Fischbacher, 2003).”
BackgroundCarpenter, J. P. (2006) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2005.05.004 · Cited by 270
“15 In 395 fact, the only regressor with any significant explanatory power is C(group total) −i,t−1, which 396 implies that increases in contributions in this experiment can be attributed to inertia, confor397 mity (Carpenter, 2004) , or conditional cooperation(Fehr and Fischbacher, 2003) .”
BackgroundCurrency value moderates equity preference among young children
Blake, P. R., & Rand, D. G. (2009) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.06.012 · Cited by 290
Prosocial primates: selfish and unselfish motivations
de Waal, F. Β. Μ., & Suchak, M. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0119 · Cited by 276
“…which often attributes non-human primate altruism and cooperation to kin selection, thus calling human cooperation with non-relatives a 'huge anomaly' in the animal kingdom (Fehr & Fischbacher 2003; Gintis et al. 2003; Boyd 2006; see Melis & Semmann 2010, for further discussion of this topic).”
BackgroundSpontaneous prosocial choice by chimpanzees
Horner, V., Carter, J. D., Suchak, M., & de Waal, F. Β. Μ. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1111088108 · Cited by 275
“H routinely help others, even in situations in which they derive no direct benefit themselves (1, 2).”
BackgroundHassin, R. R. (2013) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691612460684 · Cited by 281
“We used the priming procedure and the common resource dilemma described above, taking advantage of the fact that dilemmas of this sort put people in a conflict between the dominant goal of being selfish and the nondominant goal of being cooperative (Brewer & Kramer, 1986; Fehr & Fischbacher, 2003).”
Cooperation in Evolving Social Networks
Hanaki, N., Peterhansl, A., Dodds, P. S., & Watts, D. J. (2007) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0625 · Cited by 265
“…reciprocity over repeated interactions (Axelrod 1984); group selection (Boyd, Gintis et al. 2003) and so-called " strong reciprocity " (Bowles, Fehr et al. 2003; Bowles and Gintis 2004); altruism as an observable signal of (unobservable) fitness (Gintis, Smith et al. 2001); reinforcement via…”
BackgroundWill Farmers Trade Profits for Stewardship? Heterogeneous Motivations for Farm Practice Selection
Chouinard, H. H., Paterson, T., Wandschneider, P. R., & Ohler, A. (2008) · Land Economics · doi:10.3368/le.84.1.66 · Cited by 262
“Results from numerous experiments with the ‘‘ultimatum game’’ show that agents are prepared to personally sacrifice to punish non-cooperative, ‘‘unfair’’ behavior (Fehr and Fischbacher 2003). proposed by Etzioni (1986), and apply it to the systematic analysis of conservation decision-making.”
BackgroundArtificiality: The tension between internal and external validity in economic experiments
Schram, A. J. H. C. (2005) · Journal of Economic Methodology · doi:10.1080/13501780500086081 · Cited by 260
“For example, the recent surge in theories on equity, fairness and reciprocity (e.g., Charness and Rabin 2002; Fehr and Fischbacher 2003) is highly motivated by experimental results documenting non-selfish behavior.”
BackgroundConsumer Demand for Fair Trade: Evidence from a Multistore Field Experiment
Hainmueller, J., Hiscox, M., & Sequeira, S. (2014) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00467 · Cited by 316
“…Trade may have on their social status (Hollaender, 1990; Freeman, 1997; Cialdini, 2003; Goldstein, Cialdini, & Griskevicius, 2008), their self-image (Batson, 1998; Benabou & Tirole, 2006), or their reputation (Glazer & Konrad, 1996; Harbaugh, 1998; Fehr & Fischbacher, 2003; Benabou & Tirole, 2006).”
Cheng, X., Li, X., & Hu, Y. (2015) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22754 · Cited by 263
“Cooperation, defined as interactions with others that increase shared performance, is one of the most important human social behaviors [Fehr and Fischbacher, 2003].”
BackgroundChang, S. W. C., Barter, J. W., Ebitz, R. B., Watson, K. K., & Platt, M. L. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1114621109 · Cited by 252
“Such vicarious reward could motivate social interactions as well as underlie observational learning and mutualistic behaviors such as alliance formation, social grooming, and group cohesion (Fehr and Fischbacher, 2003; Takahashi et al., 2009).”
BackgroundSinger, T., Snozzi, R., Bird, G., Petrovic, P., Silani, G., Heinrichs, M., & Dolan, R. J. (2008) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0014195 · Cited by 248
“Prosocial behavior, or altruism, is then defined as costly acts that increase another person’s benefits (Fehr & Fischbacher, 2003).”
BackgroundWong, D. B. (2006) · doi:10.1093/0195305396.001.0001 · Cited by 353
Burnham, T. C., & Hare, B. A. (2007) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-007-9012-2 · Cited by 258
“Economic altruism and spite occur even under anonymous experimental conditions in which subjects cannot be rewarded for their acts in future interactions (Fehr and Fischbacher 2003).”
BackgroundBrown, S. L., & Brown, R. M. (2006) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1701_01 · Cited by 254
“…altruism theory have been proposed—indirect reciprocity (Alexander, 1987; Nowak & Sigmund, 1998), strong reciprocity (Fehr & Gächter, 2002; Fehr & Fischbacher, 2003; Gintis, 2000; Gintis, Bowles, Boyd, & Fehr, 2003), and costly signaling (Dessalles, 1999; Gintis, Smith, & Bowles, 2001;…”
Neuroeconomic Foundations of Trust and Social Preferences: Initial Evidence
Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U., & Kosfeld, M. (2005) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282805774669736 · Cited by 274
Self-citationEmotion Regulation Moderates the Association between Empathy and Prosocial Behavior
Lockwood, P. L., Seara‐Cardoso, A., & Viding, E. M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096555 · Cited by 297
“thinking or feeling without a necessary affective response [1].”
BackgroundCognitive consequences of cooperative breeding in primates?
Burkart, J. M., & van Schaik, C. P. (2009) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-009-0263-7 · Cited by 256
“behavioral outcomes that are not only motivated by the maximization of own beneWts but also increases beneWts to others (Fehr and Fischbacher 2003).”
Beyond revenge: Neural and genetic bases of altruistic punishment
Strobel, A., Zimmermann, J., Schmitz, A., Reuter, M., Lis, S., Windmann, S., & Kirsch, P. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.051 · Cited by 245
“Indeed, experimental and simulation studies have shown that cooperation can be maintained even in larger groups and in one-shot interactions, if there is the possibility to punish defectors (Fehr and Gächter, 2002; Boyd et al., 2003; Fehr and Fischbacher, 2004; see, however, Ohtsuki et al., 2009).”
Internal and External Validity
McDermott, R. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511921452.003 · Cited by 246
Cooperation in Primates and Humans
Kappeler, P. M., & van Schaik, C. P. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/3-540-28277-7 · Cited by 353
Anti-social punishment can prevent the co-evolution of punishment and cooperation
Rand, D. G., Armao IV, J. J., Nakamaru, M., & Ohtsuki, H. (2010) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.06.010 · Cited by 233
“For example, a CP-strategist cooperates in the first stage and punishes defectors in the second stage (therefore deemed as a 'strong reciprocator' (Fehr and Fischbacher, 2003; Bowles and Gintis, 2004)).”
Finding social roles in Wikipedia
Welser, H. T., Cosley, D., Kossinets, G., Lin, A., Dokshin, F. A., Gay, G. K., & Smith, M. A. (2011) · iConference · doi:10.1145/1940761.1940778 · Cited by 248
Moral economy: What’s in a name
Carrier, J. (2018) · Anthropological Theory · doi:10.1177/1463499617735259 · Cited by 156
“The idea that people who interact with each other are likely to be obliged to interact with each other in the future resembles work by economists on what is called co-operation and altruism (some of this work is reviewed and put in an evolutionary frame in Fehr and Fischbacher, 2003).”
BackgroundThe Neural Circuitry of a Broken Promise
Baumgärtner, T., Fischbacher, U., Feierabend, A., Lutz, K., & Fehr, E. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.11.017 · Cited by 244
Self-citationBlood donation is an act of benevolence rather than altruism.
Ferguson, E., Farrell, K., & Lawrence, C. (2008) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.27.3.327 · Cited by 240
Haski‐Leventhal, D. (2009) · Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.2009.00405.x · Cited by 236
Rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game is no evidence of strong reciprocity
Yamagishi, T., Horita, Y., Mifune, N., Hashimoto, H., Li, Y., Shinada, M., Miura, A., Inukai, K., Takagishi, H., & Šimunović, D. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1212126109 · Cited by 236
“For example, in a third-party punishment experiment (8), a dictator makes an unfair allocation to another person who is not the participant.”
BackgroundWisdom, bias, and balance: Toward a process-sensitive measurement of wisdom-related cognition.
Brienza, J. P., Kung, F. Y. H., Santos, H. C., Bobocel, D. R., & Grossmann, I. (2018) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000171 · Cited by 235
“…participation in these tasks, we characterize responses as generalized cooperative intentions (i.e., cooperative intentions that are not related specifically to kinship, reciprocity, reputation, or threat of punishment; for reviews, see Fehr & Fischbacher, 2003; Jordan, Peysakhovich, & Rand, 2014).”
BackgroundCognitive adaptations forn‐person exchange: the evolutionary roots of organizational behavior
Tooby, J., Cosmides, L., & Price, M. E. (2006) · Managerial and Decision Economics · doi:10.1002/mde.1287 · Cited by 232
“…to manifest a distaste for exploitation or unfairness by others to oneself, as well as by others to family members, to a friend or ally, to an ingroup member, or (through putting a group into the agent slot) to personally valued groups (see, Fehr and Fischbacher, 2003, for a different view).”
BackgroundXu, Y., Anpalagan, A., Wu, Q., Shen, L. Z., Gao, Z., & Wang, J. (2013) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2013.030713.00189 · Cited by 229
“, biological systems [73], human society [74] and engineering [75].”
BackgroundThe neurobiology of social decision-making
Rilling, J. K., King‐Casas, B., & Sanfey, A. G. (2008) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2008.06.003 · Cited by 239
Partner switching stabilizes cooperation in coevolutionary prisoner’s dilemma
Fu, F., Wu, T., & Wang, L. (2009) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.79.036101 · Cited by 220
Enhancement of cooperation in highly clustered scale-free networks
Assenza, S., Gómez‐Gardeñes, J., & Latora, V. (2008) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.78.017101 · Cited by 222
Metadata
- Authors
- Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U.
- Affiliations
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Fehr, Ernst
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 425
- Issue
- 6960
- Pages
- 785-791
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1481402319
- Cited by
- 3,475
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 142 · 2025: 177 · 2024: 166 · 2023: 161 · 2022: 189 · 2021: 232 · 2020: 144 · 2019: 162 · 2018: 186 · 2017: 136 · 2016: 179 · 2015: 202 · 2014: 159 · 2013: 173 · 2012: 157
- FWCI
- 38.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
- Keywords
- selfishness, cooperation, individual heterogeneity, cultural evolution, gene-culture coevolution, social evolution
- MeSH terms
- Altruism, Cooperative Behavior, Culture, Biological Evolution, Humans, Punishment, Reward
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review