The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 36 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Mapping copy number variation by population-scale genome sequencing
Open accessAbstract
Genomic structural variants (SVs) are abundant in humans, differing from other forms of variation in extent, origin and functional impact. Despite progress in SV characterization, the nucleotide resolution architecture of most SVs remains unknown. We constructed a map of unbalanced SVs (that is, copy number variants) based on whole genome DNA sequencing data from 185 human genomes, integrating evidence from complementary SV discovery approaches with extensive experimental validations. Our map encompassed 22,025 deletions and 6,000 additional SVs, including insertions and tandem duplications. Most SVs (53%) were mapped to nucleotide resolution, which facilitated analysing their origin and functional impact. We examined numerous whole and partial gene deletions with a genotyping approach and observed a depletion of gene disruptions amongst high frequency deletions. Furthermore, we observed differences in the size spectra of SVs originating from distinct formation mechanisms, and constructed a map of SV hotspots formed by common mechanisms. Our analytical framework and SV map serves as a resource for sequencing-based association studies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 36 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most SVs (53%) were mapped to nucleotide resolution, which facilitated analyzing their origin and functional impact.”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: The human reference genome assembly is a valid representation of the reference sequence for identifying structural variants.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“observed a depletion of gene disruptions amongst high frequency deletions”
- Also stated in: § Population genetic properties of deletions · plain
“we observed a depletion of high frequency alleles among deletions intersecting with protein-coding sequence compared to other deletions (P=1.1×10−11; KS test)”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Population genetic properties of deletions · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our map encompassed 22,025 deletions and 6,000 additional SVs, including insertions and tandem duplications.”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: The human reference genome assembly is a valid representation of the reference sequence for identifying structural variants.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“constructed a map constructed a map of SV hotspots formed by common mechanisms”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we observed differences in the size spectra of SVs originating from distinct formation mechanisms”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“TIGRA further enabled us to validate an additional 7,359 SVs discovered with RP or RD features by identifying the SVs’ breakpoints”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Extent and impact of our SV discovery set
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: The human reference genome assembly is a valid representation of the reference sequence for identifying structural variants.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We initially mapped the breakpoints of 7,066 deletions and 3,299 MEIs using SR and AS features.”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Extent and impact of our SV discovery set
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: The human reference genome assembly is a valid representation of the reference sequence for identifying structural variants.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“deletions in genomic regions accessible to short read sequencing display extensive linkage disequilibrium (LD) with SNPs.”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Population genetic properties of deletions
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: The 156 individuals genotyped are representative of the populations from which they were sampled, so allele-frequency patterns reflect population-level properties.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most SVs in the release set (61%) were contributed by individual methods meeting the pre-defined specificity threshold (FDR≤10%).”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Construction of a high-confidence SV discovery set
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“a common deletion, previously associated with body-mass index35 (BMI), that we identified with RP, RD, and SR methods”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Prediction of SV candidate loci and assessment of discovery methods
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [35] Willer, C. J. et al. Six new loci associated with body mass index highlight a neuronal influence on body weight regulation. Nature Genet. 41, 25–34 (2008)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 37
- Probably not a substantial claim. 10
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We constructed a map of unbalanced SVs (i.e., copy number variants) based on whole genome DNA sequencing data from 185 human genomes, integrating evidence from complementary SV discovery approaches with extensive experimental validations.”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The human reference genome assembly is a valid representation of the reference sequence for identifying structural variants.
In the paper
“The median SV size was 729 bp (mean=8 kb), approximately four times smaller than in a recent tiling CGH based study1”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Extent and impact of our SV discovery set
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Conrad, D. F. et al. Origins and functional impact of copy number variation in the human genome. Nature 464, 704–712 (2010) source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Seventeen hundred SVs affected coding sequences, resulting in full gene overlaps or exon disruptions (Table 2), many of which led to out-of-frame exons”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Extent and impact of our SV discovery set
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The human reference genome assembly is a valid representation of the reference sequence for identifying structural variants.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“70.8% of the deletions and 89.6% of the insertions exhibited breakpoint microhomology/homology ranging from 2-376 bp in size, with distribution modes of 2 bp (attributable to NH) and 15 bp (attributable to MEI), respectively”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > SV formation mechanism analysis
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The human reference genome assembly is a valid representation of the reference sequence for identifying structural variants.
In the paper
“NH and NAHR based mechanisms occurred across a wide size-range, whereas VNTR expansion/shrinkage, consistent with earlier findings1, led to relatively small SV sizes”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > SV formation mechanism analysis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Conrad, D. F. et al. Origins and functional impact of copy number variation in the human genome. Nature 464, 704–712 (2010) source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The human reference genome assembly is a valid representation of the reference sequence for identifying structural variants.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our map further enabled us to examine size spectra of SV formation mechanisms and led us to identify genomic SV hotspots that are commonly dominated by a single formation mechanism.”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Conclusions and discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most of these corresponded to NAHR hotspots, although hotspots dominated by NH and VNTR also were evident.”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > SV formation mechanism analysis
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The human reference genome assembly is a valid representation of the reference sequence for identifying structural variants.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of the remaining SVs, 60% were classified as deletions relative to ancestral sequence, whereas the ancestral state of 17% was undetermined.”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > SV formation mechanism analysis
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The human reference genome assembly is a valid representation of the reference sequence for identifying structural variants.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we classified 15,556 SVs in our set as novel, with an enrichment of low frequency SVs and small SVs amongst the novel variants”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Extent and impact of our SV discovery set
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“eight callsets (three deletion, four insertion, and one tandem duplication callset) met the pre-specified specificity threshold33 (FDR≤10%), whereas the other callsets yielded lower specificity (FDRs of 13%-89%).”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Prediction of SV candidate loci and assessment of discovery methods
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [33] The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium. A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature 467, 1061–1073 (2010) source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“out of 160 nucleotide-resolution SVs identified as tandem duplications relative to the reference genome, 91.6% were classified as duplications relative to the ancestral genome, whereas the ancestral state of 8.4% remained undetermined”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > SV formation mechanism analysis
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The human reference genome assembly is a valid representation of the reference sequence for identifying structural variants.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“common polymorphisms (minor allele frequency (MAF) >5%) were generally shared across populations, while rare alleles were frequently observed in only one population”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Population genetic properties of deletions
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The 156 individuals genotyped are representative of the populations from which they were sampled, so allele-frequency patterns reflect population-level properties.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“in the low-coverage data, the individual method with the greatest accuracy (FDR=3.7%) was the second most sensitive based on our gold standard (Fig. 2B), and the most sensitive when expanding the gold standard to a larger set of individuals”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Prediction of SV candidate loci and assessment of discovery methods
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we inferred NH as the dominating deletion mechanism, and MEI as the dominating insertion mechanism”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > SV formation mechanism analysis
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The human reference genome assembly is a valid representation of the reference sequence for identifying structural variants.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While most SVs intersecting with genes were deletions, several validated tandem duplications and MEIs also intersected with coding sequences”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Extent and impact of our SV discovery set
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The human reference genome assembly is a valid representation of the reference sequence for identifying structural variants.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“we also compared our set to a recent survey of SVs in an individual genome37 based on capillary sequencing and array-based analyses24, and observed a similar size distribution for deletions, but differences in the size distributions of other SV classes, reflecting underlying differences in SV ascertainment”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Extent and impact of our SV discovery set
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [37] Hasin-Brumshtein, Y., Lancet, D. & Olender, T. Human olfaction: from genomic variation to phenotypic diversity. Trends Genet. 25, 178–184 (2009) source
- Not checked yetcites [24] Pang, A. W. et al. Towards a comprehensive structural variation map of an individual human genome. Genome Biol. 11, R52 (2010) source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we observed marked insertion peaks for MEIs at 300 bp, corresponding to Alu elements, and at 6 kb, corresponding to L1/LINEs”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > SV formation mechanism analysis
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The human reference genome assembly is a valid representation of the reference sequence for identifying structural variants.
In the paper
“The genotypes displayed 99.1% concordance with CGH array1 based genotypes (available for 1,970 of the deletions), suggesting high genotyping accuracy.”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Population genetic properties of deletions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Conrad, D. F. et al. Origins and functional impact of copy number variation in the human genome. Nature 464, 704–712 (2010) source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The 156 individuals genotyped are representative of the populations from which they were sampled, so allele-frequency patterns reflect population-level properties.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A significant enrichment of NAHR near recombination hotspots (P=1.3e-15) and segmental duplications (P=3.1e-17) further contributed to the clustering”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > SV formation mechanism analysis
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The human reference genome assembly is a valid representation of the reference sequence for identifying structural variants.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the release set comprised 22,025 deletions, 501 tandem duplications, 5,371 MEIs, and 128 non-reference insertions”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Construction of a high-confidence SV discovery set
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Most of these occurred in regions annotated as segmental duplications, consistent with lessened evolutionary constraintin functionally redundant gene categories22.”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Population genetic properties of deletions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] Kidd, J. M. et al. Mapping and sequencing of structural variation from eight human genomes. Nature 453, 56–64 (2008) source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The 156 individuals genotyped are representative of the populations from which they were sampled, so allele-frequency patterns reflect population-level properties.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We observed several candidates for monomorphic deletions (i.e., genomic segments putatively deleted in all individuals), explainable by rare insertions present in the reference genome or by remaining genotyping inaccuracies”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Population genetic properties of deletions
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The 156 individuals genotyped are representative of the populations from which they were sampled, so allele-frequency patterns reflect population-level properties.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we observed notable differences between methods (Fig. 2ABC) in terms of genomic regions ascertained (Supplementary Fig. 1), accessible SV size-range (Fig. 2A), and breakpoint precision”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Prediction of SV candidate loci and assessment of discovery methods
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The human reference genome assembly is a valid representation of the reference sequence for identifying structural variants.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we estimated an overall sensitivity of deletion discovery of 82% in the trios, and 69% in low-coverage sequence (Fig. 2B) using a 1 bp overlap criterion.”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Construction of a high-confidence SV discovery set
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Altogether, we mapped ~15,000 SVs at nucleotide resolution, 48% of which were novel.”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Extent and impact of our SV discovery set
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The human reference genome assembly is a valid representation of the reference sequence for identifying structural variants.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“in the trios the highest sensitivities were achieved by RD and RP methods with FDR>10%”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Prediction of SV candidate loci and assessment of discovery methods
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“of the 11,254 nucleotide-resolution SVs discovered as deletions relative to a human reference, 21% actually represented insertion and 2% represented tandem duplications relative to the putative ancestral genome.”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > SV formation mechanism analysis
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The human reference genome assembly is a valid representation of the reference sequence for identifying structural variants.
In the paper
“The clustering was influenced by an abundance of VNTR near the centromeres43 and NAHR near the telomeres”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > SV formation mechanism analysis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [43] Lee, J. A., Carvalho, C. M. & Lupski, J. R. A. DNA replication mechanism for generating nonrecurrent rearrangements associated with genomic disorders. Cell 131, 1235–1247 (2007) source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The human reference genome assembly is a valid representation of the reference sequence for identifying structural variants.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“this alternative approach resulted in an increased number (by ~13%) of high-specificity (FDR<10%) calls compared to the release set (Supplementary Text), it overall resulted in fewer SV calls owing to its decreased sensitivity at the lower (<200bp) SV size range.”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Construction of a high-confidence SV discovery set
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“SVs have already been associated with diverse diseases, including autism2,3, schizophrenia4,5 and Crohn’s disease6,7.”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [2] Pinto, D. et al. Functional impact of global rare copy number variation in autism spectrum disorders. Nature 466, 368–372 (2010) source
- Not checked yetcites [3] Sebat, J. et al. Strong association of de novo copy number mutations with autism. Science 316, 445–449 (2007) source
- Not checked yetcites [4] Stefansson, H. et al. Large recurrent microdeletions associated with schizophrenia. Nature 455, 232–236 (2008) source
- Not checked yetcites [5] McCarthy, S. E. et al. Microduplications of 16p11.2 are associated with schizophrenia. Nature Genet. 41, 1223–1227 (2009) source
- Not checked yetcites [6] Craddock, N. et al. Genome-wide association study of CNVs in 16,000 cases of eight common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature 464, 713–720 (2010) source
- Not checked yetcites [7] McCarroll, S. A. et al. Deletion polymorphism upstream of IRGM associated with altered IRGM expression and Crohn’s disease. Nature Genet. 40, 1107–1112 (2008) source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“locus-specific studies suggest that diverse mechanisms may form SVs de novo, with some mechanisms involving complex rearrangements resulting in multiple chromosomal breakpoints8,9.”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8] Hastings, P. J., Lupski, J. R., Rosenberg, S. M. & Ira, G. Mechanisms of change in gene copy number. Nature Rev. Genet. 10, 551–564 (2009) source
- Not checked yetcites [9] Stankiewicz, P. & Lupski, J. R. Structural variation in the human genome and its role in disease. Annu. Rev. Med. 61, 437–455 (2010) source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This method, Genome STRiP (to be described elsewhere36), integrated both RP and RD features (PD), implying that considering different evidence types can improve SV discovery.”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Prediction of SV candidate loci and assessment of discovery methods
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [36] Levy, S. et al. The diploid genome sequence of an individual human. PLoS Biol. 5, e254 (2007) source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the LD properties of complex SVs (e.g., multiallelic SV) have not yet been fully ascertained as methods for genotyping such SVs with similar accuracy still being developed.”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Population genetic properties of deletions
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we carried out extensive validations (Methods), including PCRs for over 3,000 candidate loci, and microarray data analyses for 50,000 candidate loci”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Prediction of SV candidate loci and assessment of discovery methods
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our fine-scale map enabled us to examine the functional impact of SVs, as exemplified by our analysis of gene disruption variants, which will be of value for genome and exome sequencing studies.”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Conclusions and discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sequence-based SV discovery approaches have thus far been applied to a limited (<20) number of genomes, leaving the fine-scale architecture of most common SVs unknown.”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Introduction
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nucleotide resolution data allow the construction of reference datasets and make SVs readily assessable across different experimental platforms using genotyping approaches.”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Conclusions and discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“High levels of structural variation, including copy-number variation, were previously described for both processes15,22,39.”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Extent and impact of our SV discovery set
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [15] Korbel, J. O. et al. Paired-end mapping reveals extensive structural variation in the human genome. Science 318, 420–426 (2007) source
- Not checked yetcites [22] Kidd, J. M. et al. Mapping and sequencing of structural variation from eight human genomes. Nature 453, 56–64 (2008) source
- Not checked yetcites [39] Altshuler, D. M. et al. Integrating common and rare genetic variation in diverse human populations. Nature 467, 52–58 (2010) source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a detailed SV characterization, including analyses of SV origin and impact, requires knowledge of precise SV sequences.”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Introduction
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“The 1000GP recently generated 4.1 Terabases of raw sequence in pilot projects targeting whole human genomes33”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [33] The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium. A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature 467, 1061–1073 (2010) source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Recurrent rearrangements, implicated in genomic disorders, are hypothesized to be associated with local genome architecture44, e.g., with segmental duplications that facilitate NAHR.”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Conclusions and discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [44] Harrow, J. et al. GENCODE: producing a reference annotation for ENCODE. Genome Biol. 7, (suppl. 1)S4 (2006) source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“DNA rearrangement in the absence of homology, i.e., MMBIR, has been implicated in recurrent SV formation8,45.”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Conclusions and discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8] Hastings, P. J., Lupski, J. R., Rosenberg, S. M. & Ira, G. Mechanisms of change in gene copy number. Nature Rev. Genet. 10, 551–564 (2009) source
- Not checked yetcites [45]
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Our study focused on characterizing deletions, which are often associated with disease9.”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Conclusions and discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [9] Stankiewicz, P. & Lupski, J. R. Structural variation in the human genome and its role in disease. Annu. Rev. Med. 61, 437–455 (2010) source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“our analysis revealed a map of SV hotspots that may constitute local centers of de novo SV formation, consistent with the concept that local genome architecture contributes to genomic instability44.”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Conclusions and discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [44] Harrow, J. et al. GENCODE: producing a reference annotation for ENCODE. Genome Biol. 7, (suppl. 1)S4 (2006) source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The human reference genome assembly is a valid representation of the reference sequence for identifying structural variants.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Systematic characterization of SVs in these genomes will benefit from the concepts and datasets presented here.”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Conclusions and discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“most SV discovery methods depend on mapping reads onto their genomic locus of origin, i.e., the ‘accessible’ fraction of the genome, a fraction lessened in segmental duplications”
§ Mapping copy number variation by population scale genome sequencing > Conclusions and discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Rests on an assumption: The human reference genome assembly is a valid representation of the reference sequence for identifying structural variants.
The paper relies on this without support.
The 156 individuals genotyped are representative of the populations from which they were sampled, so allele-frequency patterns reflect population-level properties.
“we generated genotypes for 13,826 autosomal deletions in 156 individuals”
The paper relies on this without support.
The human reference genome assembly is a valid representation of the reference sequence for identifying structural variants.
“identifying SVs as genomic differences relative to a human reference”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“On average, there are >1000 CNVs in the genome, accounting for ~4 million base pairs of genomic difference (Conrad et al., 2010; Mills et al., 2011).”
From CNVs: Harbingers of a Rare Variant Revolution in Psychiatric Genetics (2012) · cites this paper as Mills et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“In truth, structural variants come in many shapes, sizes and allele frequencies, and a majority of variants present in an individual genome are common alleles (Conrad et al., 2010; McCarroll et al., 2008; Mills et al., 2011; Sudmant et al., 2010).”
From CNVs: Harbingers of a Rare Variant Revolution in Psychiatric Genetics (2012) · cites this paper as Mills et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“Large deletions or duplications showed extensive stretches of sequence of >95% identity at breakpoints, suggesting that they were generated by NAHR.”
From CNVs: Harbingers of a Rare Variant Revolution in Psychiatric Genetics (2012) · cites this paper as Mills et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“Approximately 70.8% of the deletions were attributed to either a non homology based mechanism (i.e., NHEJ) or MMBIR.”
From CNVs: Harbingers of a Rare Variant Revolution in Psychiatric Genetics (2012) · cites this paper as Mills et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“Most tandem duplications displayed microhomology of 2–17 basepairs at breakpoints, indicating that they are likely formed by FoSTeS/MMBIR.”
From CNVs: Harbingers of a Rare Variant Revolution in Psychiatric Genetics (2012) · cites this paper as Mills et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“89.6% of small insertions were attributable to retrotransposition activity.”
From CNVs: Harbingers of a Rare Variant Revolution in Psychiatric Genetics (2012) · cites this paper as Mills et al., 2011
Citations
Cites
A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing.
The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09534 · Cited by 7,877
Genetics of Food Intake Self-Regulation in Childhood: Literature Review and Research Opportunities
Faith, M. S., Carnell, S., & Kral, T. V. E. (2013) · Human Heredity · doi:10.1159/000353879 · Cited by 7,633
ABySS: A parallel assembler for short read sequence dataPreprint
Simpson, J. T., Wong, K., Jackman, S. D., Schein, J. E., Jones, S. J. M., & Birol, İ. (2009) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.089532.108 · Cited by 3,658
Integrating common and rare genetic variation in diverse human populations
The International HapMap 3 Consortium (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09298 · Cited by 3,026
Detection of large-scale variation in the human genome
Iafrate, A. J., Feuk, L., Rivera, M. N., Listewnik, M. L., Donahoe, P. K., Qi, Y., Scherer, S. W., & Lee, C. (2004) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1416 · Cited by 2,892
Self-citationStrong association of de novo copy number mutations with autism
Sebat, J., Lakshmi, B., Malhotra, D., Troge, J., Lese-Martin, C., Walsh, T., Yamrom, B., Yoon, S., Krasnitz, A., Kendall, J., et al. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1138659 · Cited by 2,795
Self-citationLarge-scale copy number polymorphism in the human genome
Sebat, J., Lakshmi, B., Troge, J., Alexander, J., Young, J., Lundin, P., Månér, S., Massa, H., Walker, M., Chi, M., et al. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1098918 · Cited by 2,557
Self-citationYe, K., Schulz, M. H., Long, Q., Apweiler, R., & Ning, Z. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp394 · Cited by 2,029
Self-citationFunctional impact of global rare copy number variation in autism spectrum disorders
Pinto, D., Pagnamenta, A. T., Klei, L., Anney, R., Merico, D., Regan, R., Conroy, J., Magalhaes, T. R., Correia, C., Abrahams, B. S., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09146 · Cited by 2,013
Self-citationOrigins and functional impact of copy number variation in the human genome
The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, Conrad, D. F., Pinto, D., Redon, R., Feuk, L., Gokcumen, O., Zhang, Y., Aerts, J., Andrews, T. D., Barnes, C., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08516 · Cited by 1,970
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes
The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11632 · Cited by 7,711
“low-frequency variants in individuals from diverse, Recent efforts to map human 2–4 admixed, populations. origin, they exhibit increased levels of population differentiation 6– Characterizing such variants, for both point mutations and structural many variants of functional importance and is…”
BackgroundGenetic studies of body mass index yield new insights for obesity biology
Study, T. L. C., Locke, A. E., The ADIPOGen Consortium, The AGEN-BMI Working Group, The CARDIOGRAMplusC4D Consortium, The CKDGen Consortium, The, G. L. G. C., The, I. C. B. P., The MAGIC Investigators, The MuTHER Consortium, et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14177 · Cited by 4,534
Self-citationAncient Admixture in Human History
Patterson, N., Moorjani, P., Luo, Y., Mallick, S., Rohland, N., Zhan, Y., Genschoreck, T., Webster, T., & Reich, D. (2012) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.112.145037 · Cited by 2,848
“…in the analysis of northern European gene flow into Spain reported above, we filtered out two regions of the genome that have substantial structural variation that is not accurately modeled by rolloff, which assumes Poisson-distributed recombination events between two alleles (Mills et al. 2011).”
BackgroundMethodDELLY: structural variant discovery by integrated paired-end and split-read analysis
Rausch, T., Zichner, T., Schlattl, A., Stütz, A. M., Beneš, V., & Korbel, J. O. (2012) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts378 · Cited by 2,438
An integrated map of structural variation in 2,504 human genomes
Sudmant, P. H., Rausch, T., Gardner, E. J., Handsaker, R. E., Abyzov, A., Huddleston, J., Zhang, Y., Ye, K., Jun, G., Hsi-Yang Fritz, M., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15394 · Cited by 2,354
Self-citationOpportunities and challenges in long-read sequencing data analysis
Amarasinghe, S. L., Su, S., Dong, X., Zappia, L., Ritchie, M. E., & Gouil, Q. (2020) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-1935-5 · Cited by 2,530
Accurate detection of complex structural variations using single-molecule sequencing
Sedlazeck, F. J., Rescheneder, P., Smolka, M., Fang, H., Nattestad, M., von Haeseler, A., & Schatz, M. C. (2018) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-018-0001-7 · Cited by 1,601
Abyzov, A., Urban, A. E., Snyder, M., & Gerstein, M. (2011) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.114876.110 · Cited by 1,658
Self-citationLUMPY: a probabilistic framework for structural variant discovery
Layer, R. M., Chiang, C., Quinlan, A. R., & Hall, I. M. (2014) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-6-r84 · Cited by 1,544
“The read-pair module maps the output of a paired-end sequence alignment algorithm such as NOVOALIGN (C Hercus, unpublished) [8] or BWA [9], the split-read module maps the output of a split-read sequence alignment algorithm (for example, YAHA [10], BWA-SW [11], or BWA-MEM [5]), and the generic module allows users to in…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGenome structural variation discovery and genotyping
Alkan, C., Coe, B. P., & Eichler, E. E. (2011) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2958 · Cited by 1,630
Self-citationComparison of Next-Generation Sequencing Systems
Liu, L., Li, Y., Li, S., Hu, N., He, Y., Pong, R., Lin, D., Lü, L., & Law, M. (2012) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2012/251364 · Cited by 1,605
“[28] constructed a map of unbalanced SVs (genomic structural variants) based on whole genome DNA sequencing data from 185 human”
BackgroundInfluentialA Systematic Survey of Loss-of-Function Variants in Human Protein-Coding Genes
MacArthur, D. G., Balasubramanian, S., Frankish, A., Huang, N., Morris, J., Walter, K., Jostins, L., Habegger, L., Pickrell, J. K., Montgomery, S. B., et al. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1215040 · Cited by 1,272
Self-citationPersonal omics profiling reveals dynamic molecular and medical phenotypes
Chen, R., Mias, G. I., Li-Pook-Than, J., Jiang, L., Lam, H. Y. K., Chen, R., Miriami, E., Karczewski, K. J., Hariharan, M., Dewey, F. E., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.009 · Cited by 1,291
“SVs were called using: (1) paired-end mapping (Chen et al., 2009) (2) read depth (Abyzov et al., 2011), (3) split reads (Ye et al., 2009), and (4) junction mapping (Lam et al., 2010) to the breakpoint junction database from the 1000 G (Mills et al., 2011).”
MethodSelf-citationOxford Nanopore MinION Sequencing and Genome Assembly
Lu, H., Giordano, F., & Ning, Z. (2016) · Genomics Proteomics & Bioinformatics · doi:10.1016/j.gpb.2016.05.004 · Cited by 1,000
“Currently, variants of size P 50 bp in length are all considered as SVs [65–68].”
BackgroundA copy number variation map of the human genome
Zarrei, M., MacDonald, J. R., Merico, D., & Scherer, S. W. (2015) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3871 · Cited by 921
Resolving the complexity of the human genome using single-molecule sequencing
Chaisson, M., Huddleston, J., Dennis, M. Y., Sudmant, P. H., Malig, M., Hormozdiari, F., Antonacci, F., Surti, U., Sandstrom, R. S., Boitano, M., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13907 · Cited by 786
Self-citationCNVs: Harbingers of a Rare Variant Revolution in Psychiatric Genetics
Malhotra, D., & Sebat, J. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.039 · Cited by 854
Rausch, T., Jones, D. T. W., Zapatka, M., Stütz, A. M., Zichner, T., Weischenfeldt, J., Jäger, N., Remke, M., Shih, D., Northcott, P. A., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.12.013 · Cited by 865
“Rearrangement Formation Mechanism Analysis Rearrangement mechanisms were inferred with BreakSeq (Lam et al., 2010), using recently described classification parameters (Mills et al., 2011).”
Multi-platform discovery of haplotype-resolved structural variation in human genomes
Chaisson, M. J. P., Sanders, A. D., Zhao, X., Malhotra, A., Porubsky, D., Rausch, T., Gardner, E. J., Rodriguez, O. L., Guo, L., Collins, R. L., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-08148-z · Cited by 891
Self-citationStructural variant calling: the long and the short of it
Mahmoud, M., Gobet, N., Cruz-Dávalos, D. I., Mounier, N., Dessimoz, C., & Sedlazeck, F. J. (2019) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1828-7 · Cited by 725
“[60, 73, 84, 85] depending on the size and type of SVs.”
BackgroundFlicek, P., Amode, M. R., Barrell, D. G., Beal, K. M., Brent, S., Carvalho‐Silva, D., Clapham, P., Coates, G. M. P., Fairley, S., Fitzgerald, S. F., et al. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr991 · Cited by 842
Haplotyping germline and cancer genomes with high-throughput linked-read sequencing
Zheng, G. X. Y., Lau, B. T., Schnall-Levin, M., Jarosz, M. V., Bell, J., Hindson, C. M., Kyriazopoulou-Panagiotopoulou, S., Masquelier, D. A., Merrill, L., Terry, J. M., et al. (2016) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3432 · Cited by 674
Phenotypic impact of genomic structural variation: insights from and for human disease
Weischenfeldt, J., Symmons, O., Spitz, F., & Korbel, J. O. (2013) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3373 · Cited by 674
De novo assembly and genotyping of variants using colored de Bruijn graphs
Iqbal, Z., Cáccamo, M., Turner, I., Flicek, P., & McVean, G. (2012) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.1028 · Cited by 652
Self-citationStructural variation in the sequencing era
Ho, S. S., Urban, A. E., & Mills, R. E. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0180-9 · Cited by 630
“Bg | Breakpoint confidence intervals were estimated by local reassembly in the 1000 Genomes Project phase 1 (ref.(4)) and by comparisons with highquality longread SVs(39).”
MethodSelf-citationHuang, W., Massouras, A., Inoue, Y., Peiffer, J., Ràmia, M., Tarone, A. M., Turlapati, L., Zichner, T., Zhu, D., Lyman, R. F., et al. (2014) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.171546.113 · Cited by 661
“Methods combining several approaches to generate a consensus variant list give a lower false positive rate than individual methods (Mills et al., 2011; Zichner et al., 2013).”
MethodHaplotype-resolved diverse human genomes and integrated analysis of structural variation
Ebert, P., Audano, P. A., Zhu, Q., Rodriguez-Martin, B., Porubsky, D., Bonder, M. J., Sulovari, A., Ebler, J., Zhou, W., Serra Mari, R., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abf7117 · Cited by 702
“%) now assigned to homology-based (>50 bp) mu-tationmechanisms,includingHDR,NAHR,and VNTR. Breakpointcharacterizationwithshort-readdataapparentlybiasedearlyreportstowardspecificregions,concludingthat<30%ofSVs weredrivenbyhomology-basedmutational mechanisms( 25 – 27 ).”
BackgroundSelf-citationDeininger, P. L. (2011) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2011-12-12-236 · Cited by 677
Fu, J. M., Satterstrom, F. K., Peng, M., Brand, H., Collins, R. L., Dong, S., Wamsley, B., Klei, L., Wang, L., Hao, S. P., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01104-0 · Cited by 640
Dynamic interactions between transposable elements and their hosts
Levin, H. L., & Moran, J. V. (2011) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3030 · Cited by 621
Leary, R. J., Sausen, M., Kinde, I., Papadopoulos, N., Carpten, J. D., Craig, D. W., O’Shaughnessy, J., Kinzler, K. W., Parmigiani, G., Vogelstein, B., et al. (2012) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3004742 · Cited by 633
A survey of tools for variant analysis of next-generation genome sequencing data
Pabinger, S., Dander, A., Fischer, M., Snajder, R., Sperk, M., Efremova, M., Krabichler, B., Speicher, M. R., Zschocke, J., & Trajanoski, Z. (2013) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbs086 · Cited by 631
“number of independent variant callers) [145].”
Active human retrotransposons: variation and disease
Hancks, D. C., & Kazazian, H. H. (2012) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2012.02.006 · Cited by 592
“, 1000 genomes project [85,86,104,105]) it becomes possible to update previous estimates of germline retrotransposition frequencies (L1 ~1/100, Alu ~1/20, and SVA ~1/916) [100,103,126,127,128] and the number of insertions within the human population (3,000–10,000 L1 insertions with gene frequencies >.”
BackgroundLINE-1 elements in structural variation and disease
Beck, C. R., Garcia-Perez, J. L., Badge, R. M., & Moran, J. V. (2011) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-082509-141802 · Cited by 615
Zhao, M., Wang, Q., Wang, Q., Jia, P., & Zhao, Z. (2013) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-14-s11-s1 · Cited by 597
“Systematic comparison showed that only small overlapping SVs/CNVs are identified based on different tools in population-scale genome sequencing [59].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDiscovery and Statistical Genotyping of Copy-Number Variation from Whole-Exome Sequencing Depth
Fromer, M., Moran, J. L., Chambert, K., Banks, E., Bergen, S. E., Ruderfer, D. M., Handsaker, R. E., McCarroll, S. A., O’Donovan, M. C., Owen, M. J., et al. (2012) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.08.005 · Cited by 578
Self-citationComprehensive evaluation of structural variation detection algorithms for whole genome sequencing
Kosugi, S., Momozawa, Y., Liu, X., Terao, C., Kubo, M., & Kamatani, Y. (2019) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1720-5 · Cited by 516
“Mills et al. examined the accuracy of over-lapping calls between five methods and demonstrated that combining algorithms based on the same method increased precision, but the increase was lower than when combining algorithms based on different methods [14].”
BackgroundMethodThe pangenome of an agronomically important crop plant Brassica oleracea
Golicz, A. A., Bayer, P. E., Barker, G. C., Edger, P. P., Kim, H. R., Martinez, P. A., Chan, C. K., Severn‐Ellis, A. A., McCombie, W. R., Parkin, I. A. P., et al. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms13390 · Cited by 553
Characterizing the Major Structural Variant Alleles of the Human Genome
Audano, P. A., Sulovari, A., Graves-Lindsay, T. A., Cantsilieris, S., Sorensen, M., Welch, A. E., Dougherty, M. L., Nelson, B. J., Shah, A., Dutcher, S. K., et al. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.019 · Cited by 492
Self-citationCriteria for Inference of Chromothripsis in Cancer Genomes
Korbel, J. O., & Campbell, P. J. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.023 · Cited by 519
Assembly and diploid architecture of an individual human genome via single-molecule technologies
Pendleton, M., Sebra, R., Pang, A. W. C., Ummat, A., Franzén, O., Rausch, T., Stütz, A. M., Stedman, W., Anantharaman, T., Hastie, A. R., et al. (2015) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3454 · Cited by 474
Roberts, A. M., Ware, J. S., Herman, D. S., Schäfer, S., Baksi, J. A., Bick, A. G., Buchan, R. J., Walsh, R., John, S., Wilkinson, S., et al. (2015) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3010134 · Cited by 502
CREST maps somatic structural variation in cancer genomes with base-pair resolution
Wang, J., Mullighan, C. G., Easton, J. B., Roberts, S., Heatley, S. L., Ma, J., Rusch, M., Chen, K., Harris, C. C., Ding, L., et al. (2011) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1628 · Cited by 489
Self-citationDefining the genetic, genomic, cellular, and diagnostic architectures of psychiatric disorders
Sullivan, P. F., & Geschwind, D. H. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.015 · Cited by 452
Cameron, D., Schröder, J., Penington, J. S., Do, H., Molania, R., Dobrovic, A., Speed, T. P., & Papenfuss, A. T. (2017) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.222109.117 · Cited by 377
“When compared to the Mills et al. (2011) call set, GRIDSS was able to identify the first 1000 true positives with a false discovery rate of 7% (3% using long-read validation data), compared to the next closest method, LUMPY, at 11% (7%).”
O'Rawe, J., Jiang, T., Sun, G., Wu, Y., Wang, W., Hu, J., Bodily, P., Tian, L., Hakonarson, H. H., Johnson, W. E., et al. (2013) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/gm432 · Cited by 443
“Although the focus of most variant-calling software has been on detecting SNVs, it is the case that large-scale structural copy number variants and small indels are known to also be a biologically relevant and prevalent form of genetic variation [40,41].”
BackgroundLarge multiallelic copy number variations in humans
Handsaker, R. E., Doren, V. V., Berman, J. R., Genovese, G., Kashin, S., Boettger, L. M., & McCarroll, S. A. (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3200 · Cited by 388
Self-citationDiscovery and genotyping of structural variation from long-read haploid genome sequence dataPreprint
Huddleston, J., Chaisson, M., Steinberg, K. M., Warren, W., Hoekzema, K., Gordon, D., Graves-Lindsay, T. A., Munson, K. M., Kronenberg, Z. N., Vives, L., et al. (2016) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.214007.116 · Cited by 376
“…of 2-bp increments across the genome and multiples of 3 bp within genes, con-sistentwithexpectedpatternsofdinucleotideshorttandemrepeats (STRs) and selection operating within protein-coding regions, respectively (Weber et al. 2002; Bhangale et al. 2005; Gymrek et al. 2012; Montgomery et al. 2013).”
Pinto, D., Darvishi, K., Shi, X. M., Rajan, D., Rigler, D., Fitzgerald, T. W., Lionel, A. C., Thiruvahindrapuram, B., MacDonald, J. R., Mills, R. E., et al. (2011) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1852 · Cited by 415
Self-citationIntegrative Annotation of Variants from 1092 Humans: Application to Cancer Genomics
Khurana, E., Fu, Y., Colonna, V., Mu, X. J., Kang, H. M., Lappalainen, T., Sboner, A., Lochovsky, L., Chen, J., Harmanci, A. O., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1235587 · Cited by 368
“Besides single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the human genome also contains other variants, including small insertions and deletions (indels) and larger structural variants (SVs) (22).”
BackgroundSelf-citationHuman Copy Number Variation and Complex Genetic Disease
Girirajan, S., Campbell, C. D., & Eichler, E. E. (2011) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-102209-163544 · Cited by 378
“Furthermore, there are new methods to obtain breakpoint resolution from sequencing read data (59, 63, 84).”
Cameron, D., Stefano, L. D., & Papenfuss, A. T. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11146-4 · Cited by 339
“…were considered: despite NA12878 being the de facto standard sample for benchmarking and the publication of multiple reference call sets 7,65 – 67 , a comprehensive ‘ gold standard ’ exists only for high-con fi dence single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), indels and homozygous reference…”
BackgroundSomatic copy number mosaicism in human skin revealed by induced pluripotent stem cells
Abyzov, A. S., Mariani, J., Palejev, D., Zhang, Y., Haney, M. S., Tomasini, L., Ferrandino, A. F., Belmaker, L. R., Szekely, A. M., Wilson, M., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11629 · Cited by 385
Self-citationMahmood, T., Khalid, S., Abdullah, M., Ahmed, Z., Shah, M. K. N., Ghafoor, A., & Du, X. (2019) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells9010105 · Cited by 389
Discovery and genotyping of genome structural polymorphism by sequencing on a population scale
Handsaker, R. E., Korn, J. M., Nemesh, J. C., & McCarroll, S. A. (2011) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.768 · Cited by 352
Self-citationDiverse Mechanisms of Somatic Structural Variations in Human Cancer Genomes
Yang, L., Luquette, L. J., Gehlenborg, N., Xi, R., Haseley, P. S., Hsieh, C.-H., Zhang, C., Ren, X., Protopopov, A. I., Chin, L., et al. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.010 · Cited by 329
“A recent assessment of SV formation (mostly focusing on deletions) in a normal human population by the 1000 Genomes Project (Mills et al., 2011) did not address the role of replication-based mechanisms.”
Genetic variation and the de novo assembly of human genomes
Chaisson, M., Wilson, R. K., & Eichler, E. E. (2015) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3933 · Cited by 346
Mapping and characterization of structural variation in 17,795 human genomes
Genomics, N. C. F. C. D., Abel, H. J., Larson, D. E., Regier, A. A., Chiang, C., Das, I., Kanchi, K. L., Layer, R. M., Neale, B. M., Salerno, W. J., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2371-0 · Cited by 310
AlleleSeq: analysis of allele-specific expression and binding in a network framework.
Rozowsky, J., Abyzov, A., Wang, J., Alves, P., Raha, D., Harmanci, A., Leng, J., Bjornson, R., Kong, Y., Kitabayashi, N., et al. (2011) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb.2011.54 · Cited by 316
“We observe that by allowing up to two mismatches more reads (0.3% for paternal and 0.4% for maternal) align to the correct NA12878 as compared with the reference genome sequence (NCBI36).”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationExtrachromosomal MicroDNAs and Chromosomal Microdeletions in Normal Tissues
Shibata, Y., Kumar, P., Layer, R. M., Willcox, S., Gagan, J., Griffith, J. D., & Dutta, A. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1213307 · Cited by 325
Mechanisms for recurrent and complex human genomic rearrangements
Liu, P., Carvalho, C. M. B., Hastings, P., & Lupski, J. R. (2012) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2012.02.012 · Cited by 359
“9 (76%) 2–30 [70 ] 8 (52%) 2–30 [71 ] 9 (30%) 2–20 [72 ] 6 (66%) 2–50 [3 ]”
Global diversity, population stratification, and selection of human copy-number variation
Sudmant, P. H., Mallick, S., Nelson, B. J., Hormozdiari, F., Krumm, N., Huddleston, J., Coe, B. P., Baker, C., Nordenfelt, S., Bamshad, M., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aab3761 · Cited by 345
“Furthermore, comparing our dataset with other studies of CNVs (21, 27) 67-73% of calls we report are unique to our study while we capture 68-77% of previously identified CNVs (24).”
ResultSelf-citationNew Gene Evolution: Little Did We Know
Long, M., VanKuren, N. W., Chen, S., & Vibranovski, M. D. (2013) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-111212-133301 · Cited by 307
“In addition, next-generation sequencing and microarrays have identified more than 1,200 partial and 600 complete gene duplications/deletions in 179 individual human genomes relative to the reference genome (101, 125).”
BackgroundCopy number variation of individual cattle genomes using next-generation sequencingPreprint
Bickhart, D. M., Hou, Y., Schroeder, S., Alkan, C., Mf, C., Matukumalli, L. K., Song, J., Schnabel, R., Ventura, M., Taylor, J. F., et al. (2012) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.133967.111 · Cited by 317
“As detected in previous simulations of increasing coverage (Alkan et al. 2009; Waszak et al. 2010; Mills et al. 2011), a genome coverage greater than fourfold is sufficient for the RD detections of CNVs.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationRecombination initiation maps of individual human genomes
Pratto, F., Brick, K., Khil, P., Smagulova, F., Petukhova, G. V., & Camerini-Otero, R. D. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1256442 · Cited by 295
“Meiotic recombination has been implicated as a potential source of gross structural variants (SVs) (55) therefore we examined the association between meiotic DSBs and SVs.”
BackgrounddbVar and DGVa: public archives for genomic structural variation
Lappalainen, I., Lopez, J. R., Skipper, L. M., Hefferon, T. W., Spalding, D., Garner, J., Chen, C., Maguire, M., Corbett, M., Zhou, G., et al. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks1213 · Cited by 310
Genomic Analysis in the Age of Human Genome Sequencing
Lappalainen, T., Scott, A. J., Brandt, M. K., & Hall, I. M. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.032 · Cited by 319
A comprehensive map of mobile element insertion polymorphisms in humans
Stewart, C., Kural, D., Strömberg, M. P., Walker, J. A., Konkel, M. K., Stütz, A. M., Urban, A. E., Grubert, F., Lam, H. Y. K., Lee, W.-P., et al. (2011) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002236 · Cited by 307
Self-citationDetection of Genomic Structural Variants from Next-Generation Sequencing Data
Tattini, L., D’Aurizio, R., & Magi, A. (2015) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2015.00092 · Cited by 283
“…Genomes Project applied methods based on all of the four approaches available for the detection of SVs, reporting false discovery rates ranging from 10 to 89%, remarkable differences in terms of genomic regions discovered, size range, and breakpoint precision (Mills et al., 2011; Teo et al., 2012).”
BackgroundMethodSequence-based characterization of structural variation in the mouse genome
Yalcin, B., Wong, K., Agam, A., Goodson, M., Keane, T. M., Gan, X., Nellåker, C., Goodstadt, L., Nicod, J., Bhomra, A., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10432 · Cited by 301
Recent advances of genome mapping and marker‐assisted selection in aquaculture
Yue, G. H. (2013) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12020 · Cited by 293
“Next-generation sequencing enables the rapid identification of CNVs (Mills et al. 2011).”
BackgroundProperties and rates of germline mutations in humans
Campbell, C. D., & Eichler, E. E. (2013) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2013.04.005 · Cited by 292
Human Structural Variation: Mechanisms of Chromosome Rearrangements
Weckselblatt, B., & Rudd, M. K. (2015) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2015.05.010 · Cited by 261
Natural genetic variation caused by small insertions and deletions in the human genomePreprint
Mills, R. E., Pittard, W. S., Mullaney, J. M., Farooq, U., Creasy, T. H., Mahurkar, A., Kemeza, D. M., Strassler, D. S., Ponting, C. P., Webber, C., et al. (2011) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.115907.110 · Cited by 275
“We compared these 7245 variants to: (1) SVs in the Database of Genomic Variants (Iafrate et al. 2004), (2) SVs that were reported recently by Conrad et al. (2010a,b), and (3) SVs that were reported recently by The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium (2010) (Mills et al. 2011).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationWatson, C. T., Steinberg, K. M., Huddleston, J., Warren, R. M., Malig, M., Schein, J. E., Willsey, A. J., Joy, J. B., Scott, J. K., Graves, T., et al. (2013) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.03.004 · Cited by 229
Chiang, C., Jacobsen, J. C., Ernst, C., Hanscom, C., Heilbut, A. M., Blumenthal, I., Mills, R. E., Kirby, A. W., Lindgren, A. M., Rudiger, S. R., et al. (2012) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2202 · Cited by 261
Self-citationKoren, A., Polak, P. P., Nemesh, J. C., Michaelson, J. J., Sebat, J. L., Sunyaev, S. R., & McCarroll, S. A. (2012) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.10.018 · Cited by 235
Teo, S. M., Yudi Pawitan, Y., Ku, C., Chia, K. S., & Salim, A. (2012) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts535 · Cited by 246
Genetic and epigenetic stability of human pluripotent stem cells
Lund, R., Närvä, E., & Lahesmaa, R. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3271 · Cited by 258
Freeling, M., Woodhouse, M. R., Subramaniam, S., Turco, G., Lisch, D., & Schnable, J. C. (2012) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2012.01.015 · Cited by 198
Collins, R. L., Brand, H., Redin, C. E., Hanscom, C., Antolik, C. W., Stone, M. R., Glessner, J., Mason, T., Pregno, G., Dorrani, N., et al. (2017) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1158-6 · Cited by 208
“Routine detection of large inversion variation has historically been a challenge for high-throughput technologies, including siWGS [1, 50, 55 – 57].”
Xi, R., Hadjipanayis, A. G., Luquette, L. J., Kim, T., Lee, E., Zhang, J., Johnson, M. D., Muzny, D. M., Wheeler, D. A., Gibbs, R. A., et al. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1110574108 · Cited by 221
An Evaluation of Copy Number Variation Detection Tools from Whole-Exome Sequencing Data
Tan, R., Wang, Y., Kleinstein, S. E., Liu, Y., Zhu, X., Guo, H., Jiang, Q., Allen, A. S., & Zhu, M. (2014) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.22537 · Cited by 224
“In recent years, next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology has been widely employed to detect CNVs in large-scale genetic research studies [Medvedev et al., 2009; Mills et al., 2011].”
BackgroundMethodCopy number polymorphism in plant genomes
Żmieńko, A., Samelak-Czajka, A., Kozłowski, P., & Figlerowicz, M. (2013) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-013-2177-7 · Cited by 209
“The NGS approach has been proven effective for the discovery and mapping of structural variants at nucleotide-resolution in plants, animals and humans (Daines et al. 2009; Yoon et al. 2009; Mills et al. 2011; Cao et al. 2011; Bickhart et al. 2012).”
BackgroundMethodMetAMOS: a modular and open source metagenomic assembly and analysis pipeline
Treangen, T. J., Koren, S., Sommer, D. D., Liu, B., Astrovskaya, I., Ondov, B., Darling, A. E., Phillippy, A. M., & Pop, M. (2013) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-1-r2 · Cited by 232
“These studies have been made possible by dramatic recent advances in high-throughput sequencing technologies, the same technologies that have revolutionized the study of individual genomes, such as recent efforts to reconstruct the genomes of thousands of humans [12].”
BackgroundLow-pass whole-genome sequencing in clinical cytogenetics: a validated approach
Dong, Z., Zhang, J., Hu, P., Chen, H., Xu, J., Tian, Q., Meng, L., Ye, Y., Wang, J., Zhang, M., et al. (2016) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/gim.2015.199 · Cited by 210
Copy number variations in neurodevelopmental disorders
Grayton, H. M., Fernandes, C., Rujescu, D., & Collier, D. A. (2012) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.07.005 · Cited by 217
Whole-genome sequencing of Oryza brachyantha reveals mechanisms underlying Oryza genome evolution
Chen, J., Huang, Q., Gao, D., Wang, J., Lang, Y., Li, B., Li, B., Bai, Z., Goicoechea, J. L., Liang, C., et al. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2596 · Cited by 214
“The mechanisms of repair of double-strand breaks through non-homologous recombination or non-allelic homologous recombination had important roles in structure variations of human genomes 37,38 .”
Chromothripsis: A New Mechanism for Rapid Karyotype Evolution
Leibowitz, M. L., Zhang, C., & Pellman, D. S. (2015) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-120213-092228 · Cited by 205
Genetic Variation, Comparative Genomics, and the Diagnosis of Disease
Eichler, E. E. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1809315 · Cited by 191
The role of microhomology in genomic structural variation
Ottaviani, D., LeCain, M., & Sheer, D. (2014) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2014.01.001 · Cited by 192
Watson, C. T., & Breden, F. J. (2012) · Genes and Immunity · doi:10.1038/gene.2012.12 · Cited by 175
Wilson, T. E., Arlt, M. F., Park, S. H., Rajendran, S., Paulsen, M. T., Ljungman, M. E., & Glover, T. W. (2014) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.177121.114 · Cited by 191
“…germline, predominant alterations are kb- toMb-scale copy number variants (CNVs), including simple deletions and tandem duplications, as well as inversions and more complex intrachromosomal rearrangements with multiple breakpoint junctions (Conrad et al. 2010b; Mills et al. 2011; Liu et al. 2012).”
BackgroundNovel variation and de novo mutation rates in population-wide de novo assembled Danish trios
Besenbacher, S., Liu, S. M., Izarzugaza, J. M. G., Grove, J., Belling, K., Bork‐Jensen, J., Huang, S., Als, T. D., Li, S., Yadav, R., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6969 · Cited by 169
“(5) contig building where we remove tips and merge bubbles whenever the difference between the two paths is o3 bp, resolve repeats in the de Bruijn graph and output the consensus sequence.”
InfluentialNewman, S., Hermetz, K. E., Weckselblatt, B., & Rudd, M. K. (2015) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.12.017 · Cited by 191
Prevalence and properties of intragenic copy-number variation in Mendelian disease genes
Truty, R., Paul, J. S., Kennemer, M. I., Lincoln, S. E., Olivares, E. C., Nussbaum, R. L., & Aradhya, S. (2018) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41436-018-0033-5 · Cited by 188
Clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA for molecular assessment in pancreatic cancer
Takai, E., Totoki, Y., Nakamura, H. K., Morizane, C., Nara, S., Hama, N., Suzuki, M., Furukawa, E., Kato, M., Hayashi, H., et al. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep18425 · Cited by 196
BreakDancer: Identification of Genomic Structural Variation from Paired‐End Read Mapping
Fan, X., Abbott, T. E., Larson, D. E., & Chen, K. (2014) · Current Protocols in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/0471250953.bi1506s45 · Cited by 181
“It has been widely used in various projects, including the 1000 Genomes Project and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) (Ding et al., 2010; Mills et al., 2011; Welch et al., 2012).”
MethodSelf-citationA decade of structural variants: description, history and methods to detect structural variation
Escaramís, G., Docampo, E., & Rabionet, R. (2015) · Briefings in Functional Genomics · doi:10.1093/bfgp/elv014 · Cited by 184
“the 1000 Genomes project undertook a thorough evaluation [44] of several SVs detection methods and found a wide variability in sensitivity and specificity.”
BackgroundInfluentialMa, Z.-Y., Zhang, Y., Wu, L.-Q., Zhang, G.-Y., Sun, Z.-W., Li, Z.-K., Jiang, Y., Ke, H., Chen, B., Liu, Z.-W., et al. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00910-2 · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- 1000 Genomes Project, Mills, R. E., Walter, K., Stewart, C., Handsaker, R. E., Chen, K., Alkan, C., Abyzov, A., Yoon, S. C., Ye, K., Cheetham, R. K., Chinwalla, A., Conrad, D. F., Fu, Y., Grubert, F., Hajirasouliha, I., Hormozdiari, F., Iakoucheva, L. M., Iqbal, Z., Kang, S., Kidd, J. M., Konkel, M. K., Korn, J., Khurana, E., Kural, D., Lam, H. Y. K., Leng, J., Li, R., Li, Y., Lin, C.-Y., Luo, R., Mu, X. J., Nemesh, J., Peckham, H. E., Rausch, T., Scally, A., Shi, X., Stromberg, M. P., Stütz, A. M., Urban, A. E., Walker, J. A., Wu, J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Z. D., Batzer, M. A., Ding, L., Marth, G. T., McVean, G., Sebat, J., Snyder, M., Wang, J., Ye, K., Eichler, E. E., Gerstein, M. B., Hurles, M. E., Lee, C., McCarroll, S. A., & Korbel, J. O.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Boston College (US)
- Broad Institute (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
- Stanford University (US)
- Simon Fraser University (CA)
- Centre for Human Genetics (GB)
- Louisiana State University (US)
- BGI Group (China) (CN)
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Korbel, Jan O.
- ORCID
- Mills, Ryan E.
- Walter, Klaudia
- Stewart, Chip
- Handsaker, Robert E.
- Chen, Ken
- Alkan, Can
- Abyzov, Alexej
- Ye, Kai
- Chinwalla, Asif
- Conrad, Donald F.
- Hajirasouliha, Iman
- Hormozdiari, Fereydoun
- Iakoucheva, Lilia M.
- Iqbal, Zamin
- Kidd, Jeffrey M.
- Konkel, Miriam K.
- Korn, Joshua
- Khurana, Ekta
- Kural, Deniz
- Lam, Hugo Y. K.
- Leng, Jing
- Li, Ruiqiang
- Li, Yingrui
- Lin, Chang-Yun
- Luo, Ruibang
- Mu, Xinmeng Jasmine
- Rausch, Tobias
- Scally, Aylwyn
- Shi, Xinghua
- Stütz, Adrian M.
- Urban, Alexander Eckehart
- Zhang, Zhengdong D.
- Batzer, Mark A.
- Ding, Li
- McVean, Gil
- Sebat, Jonathan
- Snyder, Michael
- Wang, Jun
- Ye, Kenny
- Eichler, Evan E.
- Gerstein, Mark B.
- Hurles, Matthew E.
- Lee, Charles
- McCarroll, Steven A.
- Korbel, Jan O.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 470
- Issue
- 7332
- Pages
- 59-65
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC3077050
- OpenAlex
- W2116126626
- Cited by
- 1,140
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 81 · 2015: 113 · 2014: 117 · 2013: 117 · 2012: 128
- FWCI
- 88.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
- The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- PMC
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (085532, 062023, 077009, 077192, 077014)
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0508-10212)
- National Institutes of Health (5p41hg004221-03)
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R21AA022707)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH091350)
- National Human Genome Research Institute (U54HG003067, U54HG003273, R01HG004719, U01HG005209, RC2HG005552, P41-HG004221)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM059290, R01GM081533)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Keywords
- copy number variation, structural variants, deletion mapping, tandem duplication, insertion, gene deletion, human genetic variation
- MeSH terms
- Genetics, Population, Genotype, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Genome, Human, Mutagenesis, Insertional, Sequence Deletion, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Gene Duplication, Genomics, DNA Copy Number Variations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
