Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 17

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Advances in fetal and neonatal neuroimaging and everyday exposures

Lautarescu, Alexandra, Bonthrone, Alexandra F., Bos, Brendan, Barratt, Ben, Counsell, Serena J.·2024·Pediatric Research
DOI 10.1038/s41390-024-03294-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The complex, tightly regulated process of prenatal brain development may be adversely affected by “everyday exposures” such as stress and environmental pollutants. Researchers are only just beginning to understand the neural sequelae of such exposures, with advances in fetal and neonatal neuroimaging elucidating structural, microstructural, and functional correlates in the developing brain. This narrative review discusses the wide-ranging literature investigating the influence of parental stress on fetal and neonatal brain development as well as emerging literature assessing the impact of exposure to environmental toxicants such as lead and air pollution. These ‘everyday exposures’ can co-occur with other stressors such as social and financial deprivation, and therefore we include a brief discussion of neuroimaging studies assessing the effect of social disadvantage. Increased exposure to prenatal stressors is associated with alterations in the brain structure, microstructure and function, with some evidence these associations are moderated by factors such as infant sex. However, most studies examine only single exposures and the literature on the relationship between in utero exposure to pollutants and fetal or neonatal brain development is sparse. Large cohort studies are required that include evaluation of multiple co-occurring exposures in order to fully characterize their impact on early brain development. Impact: Increased prenatal exposure to parental stress and is associated with altered functional, macro and microstructural fetal and neonatal brain development. Exposure to air pollution and lead may also alter brain development in the fetal and neonatal period. Further research is needed to investigate the effect of multiple co-occurring exposures, including stress, environmental toxicants, and socioeconomic deprivation on early brain development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41390-024-03294-1

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Research works printed but not linked: 123

  1. Stiles, J. & Jernigan, T. L. The basics of brain development. Neuropsychol. Rev. 20, 327–348 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Barker, D. J. et al. Growth in utero and serum cholesterol concentrations in adult life. BMJ 307, 1524–1527 (1993). · DOI
  3. Iyengar, U., Jaiprakash, B., Haitsuka, H. & Kim, S. One year into the pandemic: a systematic review of perinatal mental health outcomes during COVID-19. Front Psychiatry 24, 674194 (2021).
  4. Scheinost, D. et al. Does prenatal stress alter the developing connectome? Pediatr. Res. 81, 214–226 (2017). · DOI
  5. Lautarescu, A., Craig, M. C. & Glover, V. Prenatal stress: effects on fetal and child brain development. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 150, 17–40 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Hughes, E. J. et al. A dedicated neonatal brain imaging system. Magn. Reson Med. 78, 794–804 (2017). · DOI
  7. Dubois, J. et al. MRI of the neonatal brain: a review of methodological challenges and neuroscientific advances. J. Magn. Reson Imaging 53, 1318–1343 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Zhang, H., Wang, Y. A literature review on fetus brain motion correction in MRI. arXiv preprint arXiv, 2401.16782. 2024 Jan 30. · arXiv
  9. Jarvis, D. A. & Griffiths, P. D. Current state of MRI of the fetal brain in utero. J. Magn. Reson Imaging 49, 632–646 (2019). · DOI
  10. Christiaens, D. et al. In utero diffusion MRI: challenges, advances, and applications. Top. Magn. Reson Imaging 28, 255–264 (2019). · DOI
  11. Makropoulos, A., Counsell, S. J. & Rueckert, D. A review on automatic fetal and neonatal brain MRI segmentation. Neuroimage 170, 231–248 (2018). · DOI
  12. Makropoulos, A. et al. The developing human connectome project: a minimal processing pipeline for neonatal cortical surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 173, 88–112 (2018). · DOI
  13. Wang, L. et al. iBEAT V2.0: a multisite-applicable, deep learning-based pipeline for infant cerebral cortical surface reconstruction. Nat. Protoc. 18, 1488–1509 (2023). · DOI
  14. Pecheva, D. et al. Recent advances in diffusion neuroimaging: applications in the developing preterm brain. F1000Res. 7, F1000 Faculty Rev-1326 (2018). · DOI
  15. Hajnal, J. V. et al. MR imaging of anisotropically restricted diffusion of water in the nervous system: technical, anatomic, and pathologic considerations. J. Comput Assist Tomogr. 15, 1–18 (1991). · DOI
  16. Moseley, M. E. et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of anisotropic water diffusion in cat central nervous system. Radiology 176, 439–445 (1990). · DOI
  17. Thomsen, C., Henriksen, O. & Ring, P. In vivo measurement of water self diffusion in the human brain by magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Radio. 28, 353–361 (1987). · DOI
  18. Basser, P. J., Mattiello, J. & LeBihan, D. Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin echo. J. Magn. Reson B 103, 247–254 (1994). · DOI
  19. Pierpaoli, C. & Basser, P. J. Toward a quantitative assessment of diffusion anisotropy. Magn. Reson Med 36, 893–906 (1996). · DOI
  20. Hutter, J. et al. Time-efficient and flexible design of optimized multishell HARDI diffusion. Magn. Reson Med 79, 1276–1292 (2018). · DOI
  21. Tournier, J. D., Calamante, F. & Connelly, A. Robust determination of the fibre orientation distribution in diffusion MRI: non-negativity constrained super-resolved spherical deconvolution. Neuroimage 35, 1459–1472 (2007). · DOI
  22. Smith, S. M. et al. Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage. 31, 1487–1505 (2006). · DOI
  23. Batalle, D. et al. Different patterns of cortical maturation before and after 38 weeks gestational age demonstrated by diffusion MRI in vivo. Neuroimage 185, 764–775 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  24. Ogawa, S., Lee, T. M., Kay, A. R. & Tank, D. W. Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 87, 9868–9872 (1990). · DOI · Paper page
  25. Biswal, B. et al. Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn. Reson Med. 34, 537–541 (1995). · DOI · Paper page
  26. Li, M. T. et al. The effect of seed location on functional connectivity: evidence from an image-based meta-analysis. Front. Neurosci. 17, 1120741 (2023).
  27. Craddock, R. C., James, G. A., Holtzheimer, P. E. 3rd, Hu, X. P. & Mayberg, H. S. A whole brain fMRI atlas generated via spatially constrained spectral clustering. Hum. Brain Mapp. 33, 1914–1928 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  28. Beckmann, C. F. & Smith, S. M. Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans. Med Imaging 23, 137–152 (2004). · DOI
  29. Cabral, J. et al. Cognitive performance in healthy older adults relates to spontaneous switching between states of functional connectivity during rest. Sci. Rep. 7, 5135 (2017).
  30. Batalle, D. et al. Early development of structural networks and the impact of prematurity on brain connectivity. Neuroimage 149, 379–392 (2017). · DOI
  31. Smith, R. E., Tournier, J. D., Calamante, F. & Connelly, A. SIFT2: Enabling dense quantitative assessment of brain white matter connectivity using streamlines tractography. Neuroimage 119, 338–351 (2015). · DOI
  32. Fornito, A., Zalesky, A. & Breakspear, M. Graph analysis of the human connectome: promise, progress, and pitfalls. Neuroimage 80, 426–444 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  33. Dufford, A. J., Spann, M. & Scheinost, D. How prenatal exposures shape the infant brain: Insights from infant neuroimaging studies. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 131, 47–58 (2021). · DOI
  34. Edwards, A. D. et al. The developing human connectome project neonatal data release. Front Neurosci. 16, 886772 (2022). · DOI
  35. Howell, B. R. et al. The UNC/UMN Baby Connectome Project (BCP): An overview of the study design and protocol development. Neuroimage 185, 891–905 (2019). · DOI
  36. Karlsson, L. et al. Cohort Profile: The FinnBrain Birth Cohort Study (FinnBrain). Int J. Epidemiol. 47, 15–16 (2018). · DOI
  37. Cox, J. L., Holden, J. M. & Sagovsky, R. Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br. J. Psychiatry 150, 782–786 (1987). · DOI · Paper page
  38. Hamilton, M. A rating scale for depression. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 23, 56–62 (1960). · DOI · Paper page
  39. Cohen, S., Kamarck, T. & Mermelstein, R. A global measure of perceived stress. J. Health Soc. Behav. 24, 385–396 (1983). · DOI · Paper page
  40. Groenewold, N. A. et al. Subcortical brain volumes in young infants exposed to antenatal maternal depression: findings from a South African birth cohort. NeuroImage Clin. 36, 103206 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  41. Lehtola, S. J. et al. Sex-specific associations between maternal pregnancy-specific anxiety and newborn amygdalar volumes - preliminary findings from the FinnBrain Birth Cohort Study. Stress 25, 213–226 (2022). · DOI
  42. Lehtola, S. J. et al. Newborn amygdalar volumes are associated with maternal prenatal psychological distress in a sex-dependent way. NeuroImage: Clin. 28, 102380 (2020).
  43. Lautarescu, A. et al. Exploring the relationship between maternal prenatal stress and brain structure in premature neonates. PloS One 16, e0250413 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  44. Bezanson, S., Nichols, E. S. & Duerden, E. G. Postnatal maternal distress, infant subcortical brain macrostructure and emotional regulation. Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging 328, 111577 (2023). · DOI
  45. Qiu, A. et al. Maternal anxiety and infants’ hippocampal development: timing matters. Transl. Psychiatry 3, e306 (2013).
  46. Lee, A. et al. Long-term influences of prenatal maternal depressive symptoms on the amygdala-prefrontal circuitry of the offspring from birth to early childhood. Biol. Psychiatry Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging 4, 940–947 (2019).
  47. Lu, Y. C. et al. Maternal psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic and structural changes of the human fetal brain. Commun. Med 2, 47 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  48. De Asis-Cruz, J. et al. Examining the relationship between fetal cortical thickness, gestational age, and maternal psychological distress. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 63, 101282 (2023). · DOI
  49. Hashempour, N. et al. Prenatal maternal depressive symptoms are associated with neonatal left amygdala microstructure in a sex‐dependent way. Eur. J. Neurosci. 57, 1671–1688 (2023). · DOI · Paper page
  50. Rifkin-Graboi, A. et al. Antenatal maternal anxiety predicts variations in neural structures implicated in anxiety disorders in newborns. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 54, 313–21.e2 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  51. Graham, R. M. et al. Maternal anxiety and depression during late pregnancy and newborn brain white matter development. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 41, 1908–1915 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  52. Demers, C. H. et al. Exposure to prenatal maternal distress and infant white matter neurodevelopment. Dev. Psychopathol. 33, 1526–1538 (2021). · DOI
  53. Donnici, C. et al. Prenatal depressive symptoms are associated with altered structural brain networks in infants and moderated by infant sleep. J. Affect. Disord. 339, 118–126 (2023). · DOI
  54. Lautarescu, A. et al. Maternal prenatal stress is associated with altered uncinate fasciculus microstructure in premature neonates. Biol. Psychiatry 87, 559–569 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  55. Wu, Y. et al. Association of maternal psychological distress with in utero brain development in fetuses with congenital heart disease. JAMA Pediatr. 174, e195316 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  56. Marr, M. C. et al. Maternal perinatal stress trajectories and negative affect and amygdala development in offspring. Am. J. Psychiatry 180, 766–777 (2023). · DOI
  57. Na, X. et al. Associations between mother’s depressive symptoms during pregnancy and newborn’s brain functional connectivity. Cereb. Cortex 33, 8980–8989 (2023). · DOI
  58. Scheinost, D. et al. Prenatal stress alters amygdala functional connectivity in preterm neonates. NeuroImage Clin. 12, 381–388 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  59. Tuulari, J. J. et al. Maternal prenatal distress exposure negatively associates with the stability of neonatal frontoparietal network. Stress 27, 2275207 (2024). · DOI
  60. van den Heuvel, M. I. et al. Maternal stress during pregnancy alters fetal cortico-cerebellar connectivity in utero and increases child sleep problems after birth. Sci. Rep. 11, 2228 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  61. Wang, C. et al. FKBP5 moderates the association between antenatal maternal depressive symptoms and neonatal brain morphology. Neuropsychopharmacol 43, 564–570 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  62. Qiu, A. et al. Effects of antenatal maternal depressive symptoms and socio-economic status on neonatal brain development are modulated by genetic risk. Cereb. Cortex 27, 3080–3092 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  63. Acosta, H. et al. Partial support for an interaction between a polygenic risk score for major depressive disorder and prenatal maternal depressive symptoms on infant right amygdalar volumes. Cereb. Cortex 30, 6121–6134 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  64. Acosta, H. et al. A variation in the infant oxytocin receptor gene modulates infant hippocampal volumes in association with sex and prenatal maternal anxiety. Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging 307, 111207 (2021). · DOI
  65. Stoye, D. Q. et al. Maternal cortisol is associated with neonatal amygdala microstructure and connectivity in a sexually dimorphic manner. Elife 9, e60729 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  66. Rasmussen, J. M. et al. Maternal Interleukin-6 concentration during pregnancy is associated with variation in frontolimbic white matter and cognitive development in early life. Neuroimage 185, 825–835 (2019). · DOI
  67. Rudolph, M. D. et al. Maternal IL-6 during pregnancy can be estimated from newborn brain connectivity and predicts future working memory in offspring. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 765–772 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  68. Spann, M. N., Monk, C., Scheinost, D. & Peterson, B. S. Maternal immune activation during the third trimester is associated with neonatal functional connectivity of the salience network and fetal to toddler behavior. J. Neurosci. 38, 2877–2886 (2018). · DOI
  69. Hendrix, C. L. et al. Maternal childhood adversity associates with frontoamygdala connectivity in neonates. Biol. Psychiatry. Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging 6, 470–478 (2021).
  70. van den Heuvel, M. I. et al. Intergenerational transmission of maternal childhood maltreatment prior to birth: effects on human fetal amygdala functional connectivity. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 62, 1134–1146 (2023). · DOI · Paper page
  71. Lyons-Ruth, K. et al. Maternal childhood abuse versus neglect associated with differential patterns of infant brain development. Res Child Adolesc. Psychopathol. 51, 1919–1932 (2023). · DOI
  72. Lugo-Candelas, C. et al. Maternal childhood maltreatment: associations to offspring brain volume and white matter connectivity. J. Dev. Orig. Health Dis. 14, 591–601 (2023). · DOI
  73. Bowers, M. E. & Yehuda, R. Intergenerational transmission of stress in humans. Neuropsychopharmacology 41, 232–244 (2016). · DOI
  74. Karlsson, H. et al. Association of cumulative paternal early life stress with white matter maturation in newborns. JAMA Netw. Open 3, e2024832 (2020). · DOI
  75. Tuulari, J. J. et al. Parental childhood maltreatment associates with offspring left amygdala volume at early infancy. bioRxiv. 2023-02 (2023). · DOI
  76. Grandjean, P. & Landrigan, P. J. Neurobehavioural effects of developmental toxicity. Lancet Neurol. 13, 330–338 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  77. Garí, M. et al. Prenatal exposure to neurotoxic metals and micronutrients and neurodevelopmental outcomes in early school age children from Poland. Environ. Res. 204, 112049 (2022). · DOI
  78. Heng, Y. Y. et al. Heavy metals and neurodevelopment of children in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review. PLoS One 17, e0265536 (2022). · DOI
  79. Morgan, Z. E. M. et al. Prenatal exposure to ambient air pollution is associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age. Environ. Health 22, 11 (2023).
  80. Newbury, J. B. et al. Association of air pollution exposure with psychotic experiences during adolescence. JAMA Psychiatry 76, 614–623 (2019). · DOI
  81. Peterson, B. S. et al. Effects of prenatal exposure to air pollutants (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) on the development of brain white matter, cognition, and behavior in later childhood. JAMA Psychiatry 72, 531–540 (2015). · DOI
  82. Chang, Y. C. et al. Prenatal and early life diesel exhaust exposure disrupts cortical lamina organization: evidence for a reelin-related pathogenic pathway induced by interleukin-6. Brain Behav. Immun. 78, 105–115 (2019). · DOI
  83. Klocke, C. et al. Exposure to fine and ultrafine particulate matter during gestation alters postnatal oligodendrocyte maturation, proliferation capacity, and myelination. Neurotoxicology 65, 196–206 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  84. Verina, T., Rohde, C. A. & Guilarte, T. R. Environmental lead exposure during early life alters granule cell neurogenesis and morphology in the hippocampus of young adult rats. Neuroscience 145, 1037–1047 (2007). · DOI
  85. Wang, Z. et al. Early-life lead exposure induces long-term toxicity in the central nervous system: From zebrafish larvae to juveniles and adults. Sci. Total Environ. 804, 150185 (2022). · DOI
  86. Rai, A., Maurya, S. K., Khare, P., Srivastava, A. & Bandyopadhyay, S. Characterization of developmental neurotoxicity of As, Cd, and Pb mixture: synergistic action of metal mixture in glial and neuronal functions. Toxicol. Sci. 118, 586–601 (2010). · DOI
  87. Fowler, C. H., Bagdasarov, A., Camacho, N. L., Reuben, A. & Gaffrey, M. S. Toxicant exposure and the developing brain: a systematic review of the structural and functional MRI literature. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 144, 105006 (2023). · DOI
  88. Bos, B. et al. Prenatal exposure to air pollution is associated with structural changes in the neonatal brain. Environ. Int. 174, 107921 (2023).
  89. Wylie, A. C. et al. Maternal prenatal lead levels and neonatal brain volumes: testing moderations by maternal depressive symptoms and family income. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 102, 107322 (2024). · DOI
  90. Thomason, M. E. et al. Prenatal lead exposure impacts cross-hemispheric and long-range connectivity in the human fetal brain. Neuroimage 191, 186–192 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  91. O’Sullivan, A. & Monk, C. Maternal and environmental influences on perinatal and infant development. Future Child. 30, 11–34 (2020). · DOI
  92. Vanes, L. et al. Longitudinal neonatal brain development and socio-demographic correlates of infant outcomes following preterm birth. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 61, 101250 (2023). · DOI
  93. Wong, H. S. & Edwards, P. Nature or nurture: a systematic review of the effect of socio-economic status on the developmental and cognitive outcomes of children born preterm. Matern Child Health J. 17, 1689–1700 (2013). · DOI
  94. Potijk, M. R. et al. Developmental delay in moderately preterm-born children with low socioeconomic status: risks multiply. J. Pediatr. 163, 1289–1295 (2013). · DOI
  95. Ene, D. et al. Associations of socioeconomic deprivation and preterm birth with speech, language, and communication concerns among children aged 27 to 30 months. JAMA Netw. Open 2, e1911027 (2019). · DOI
  96. Xiao, Y. et al. Patterns of social determinants of health and child mental health, cognition, and physical health. JAMA Pediatr. 177, 1294–1305 (2023). · DOI
  97. Neukomm, A. et al. Perioperative brain injury in relation to early neurodevelopment among children with severe congenital heart disease: results from a European collaboration. J. Pediatr. 266, 113838 (2023).
  98. Benavente-Fernandez, I. et al. Association of socioeconomic status and brain injury with neurodevelopmental outcomes of very preterm children. JAMA Netw. Open 2, e192914 (2019). · DOI
  99. Spann, M. N. et al. Prenatal socioeconomic status and social support are associated with neonatal brain morphology, toddler language and psychiatric symptoms. Child Neuropsychol. 26, 170–188 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  100. Triplett, R. L. et al. Association of prenatal exposure to early-life adversity with neonatal brain volumes at birth. JAMA Netw. Open 5, e227045 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  101. Betancourt, L. M. et al. Effect of socioeconomic status (SES) disparity on neural development in female African-American infants at age 1 month. Dev. Sci. 19, 947–956 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  102. Lean, R. E. et al. Prenatal exposure to maternal social disadvantage and psychosocial stress and neonatal white matter connectivity at birth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 119, e2204135119 (2022).
  103. Hiscox, L. V. et al. Antenatal maternal intimate partner violence exposure is associated with sex-specific alterations in brain structure among young infants: evidence from a South African birth cohort. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 60, 101210 (2023). · DOI
  104. Spann, M. N. et al. The effects of experience of discrimination and acculturation during pregnancy on the developing offspring brain. Neuropsychopharmacology 49, 476–485 (2024). · DOI · Paper page
  105. Rutherford, S. et al. The normative modeling framework for computational psychiatry. Nat. Protoc. 17, 1711–1734 (2022). · DOI
  106. Dimitrova, R. et al. Heterogeneity in brain microstructural development following preterm birth. Cereb. Cortex 30, 4800–4810 (2020). · DOI
  107. Dimitrova, R. et al. Preterm birth alters the development of cortical microstructure and morphology at term-equivalent age. Neuroimage 243, 118488 (2021). · DOI
  108. Dimitrova, R. et al. Phenotyping the preterm brain: characterizing individual deviations from normative volumetric development in two large infant cohorts. Cereb. Cortex 31, 3665–3677 (2021). · DOI
  109. Bonthrone, A. F. et al. Individualized brain development and cognitive outcome in infants with congenital heart disease. Brain Commun. 3, fcab046 (2021). · DOI
  110. Behura, S. K. et al. The brain-placental axis: therapeutic and pharmacological relevancy to pregnancy. Pharm. Res. 149, 104468 (2019). · DOI
  111. Lapehn, S. & Paquette, A. G. The placental epigenome as a molecular link between prenatal exposures and fetal health outcomes through the DOHaD hypothesis. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 9, 490–501 (2022). · DOI
  112. Cleal, J. K., Poore, K. R. & Lewis, R. M. The placental exposome, placental epigenetic adaptations and lifelong cardio-metabolic health. Mol. Asp. Med 87, 101095 (2022). · DOI
  113. Colwell, M. L., Townsel, C., Petroff, R. L., Goodrich, J. M. & Dolinoy, D. C. Epigenetics and the exposome: DNA methylation as a proxy for health impacts of prenatal environmental exposures. Exposome 3, osad001 (2023). · DOI
  114. Saeed, H. et al. Influence of maternal psychological distress during COVID-19 pandemic on placental morphometry and texture. Sci. Rep. 13, 7374 (2023).
  115. Aviles Verdera, J. et al. Reliability and feasibility of low-field-strength fetal MRI at 0.55 T during pregnancy. Radiology 309, e223050 (2023). · DOI
  116. Cawley, P. et al. Development of neonatal-specific sequences for portable ultralow field magnetic resonance brain imaging: a prospective, single-centre, cohort study. EClinicalMedicine 65, 102253 (2023). · DOI
  117. Bridgen, P. et al. High resolution and contrast 7 tesla MR brain imaging of the neonate. Front Radio. 3, 1327075 (2024). · DOI
  118. Bonthrone, A. F. et al. Neonatal frontal-limbic connectivity is associated with externalizing behaviours in toddlers with Congenital Heart Disease. NeuroImage Clin. 36, 103153 (2022). · DOI
  119. Fitzgibbon, S. P. et al. The developing Human Connectome Project (dHCP) automated resting-state functional processing framework for newborn infants. Neuroimage 223, 117303 (2020). · DOI
  120. Ciarrusta, J. et al. Emerging functional connectivity differences in newborn infants vulnerable to autism spectrum disorders. Transl. Psychiatry 10, 131 (2020). · DOI
  121. Taoudi-Benchekroun, Y. et al. Predicting age and clinical risk from the neonatal connectome. NeuroImage 257, 119319 (2022). · DOI
  122. Ciarrusta, J. et al. Social brain functional maturation in newborn infants with and without a family history of autism spectrum disorder. JAMA Netw. Open 2, e191868 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  123. Kwon, S. H. et al. Functional magnetic resonance connectivity studies in infants born preterm: suggestions of proximate and long‐lasting changes in language organization. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 58, 28–34 (2016). · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lautarescu, A., Bonthrone, A. F., Bos, B., Barratt, B., & Counsell, S. J.
Venue
Pediatric Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2024-06-14
Volume
96
Issue
6
Pages
1404-1416
ISSN
  • 0031-3998
  • 1530-0447
DOI
10.1038/s41390-024-03294-1
Cited by
17
References
29
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.