Cited by 133Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesNeuroscience and Neural Engineering

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intrinsic network architecture predicts the effects elicited by intracranial electrical stimulation of the human brain

Open access

Abstract

Intracranial electrical stimulation (iES) of the human brain has long been known to elicit a remarkable variety of perceptual, motor and cognitive effects, but the functional-anatomical basis of this heterogeneity remains poorly understood. We conducted a whole-brain mapping of iES-elicited effects, collecting first-person reports following iES at 1,537 cortical sites in 67 participants implanted with intracranial electrodes. We found that intrinsic network membership and the principal gradient of functional connectivity strongly predicted the type and frequency of iES-elicited effects in a given brain region. While iES in unimodal brain networks at the base of the cortical hierarchy elicited frequent and simple effects, effects became increasingly rare, heterogeneous and complex in heteromodal and transmodal networks higher in the hierarchy. Our study provides a comprehensive exploration of the relationship between the hierarchical organization of intrinsic functional networks and the causal modulation of human behaviour and experience with iES.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41562-020-0910-1

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Damasio, A. R. & Damasio, H. in Large-Scale Neuronal Theories of the Brain (eds Koch, C. & Davis, J. L.) 61–74 (MIT Press, 1994).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 133

Metadata

Authors
Fox, K. C. R., Shi, L., Baek, S., Raccah, O., Foster, B. L., Saha, S., Margulies, D. S., Kucyi, A., & Parvizi, J.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Capital Medical University (CN)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
  • Fox, Kieran C. R.
  • Parvizi, Josef
Venue
Nature Human Behaviour
Published
2020-07-06
Volume
4
Issue
10
Pages
1039-1052
ISSN
2397-3374 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3039362686
Cited by
133
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 5
FWCI
11.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Human Behaviour (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • China Scholarship Council (201708110057)
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (R00MH103479, 1P50MH109429)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Keywords
intracranial electrical stimulation, cortical hierarchy, functional connectivity gradients, network membership, first-person reports, perceptual effects, motor effects, cognitive effects
MeSH terms
Drug Resistant Epilepsy, Electrocorticography, Adult, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Electric Stimulation, Epilepsies, Partial, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Middle Aged, Nerve Net, Connectome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review