Blood–brain barrier breakdown is an early biomarker of human cognitive dysfunction
Open accessAbstract
Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment are increasingly recognized1–5 as shown by neuropathological6,7, neuroimaging4,8–11, and cerebrospinal fluid biomarker4,12 studies. Moreover, small vessel disease of the brain has been estimated to contribute to approximately 50% of all dementias worldwide, including those caused by Alzheimer’s disease (AD)3,4,13. Vascular changes in AD have been typically attributed to the vasoactive and/or vasculotoxic effects of amyloid-β (Aβ)3,11,14, and more recently tau15. Animal studies suggest that Aβ and tau lead to blood vessel abnormalities and blood–brain barrier (BBB) breakdown14–16. Although neurovascular dysfunction3,11 and BBB breakdown develop early in AD1,4,5,8–10,12,13, how they relate to changes in the AD classical biomarkers Aβ and tau, which also develop before dementia17, remains unknown. To address this question, we studied brain capillary damage using a novel cerebrospinal fluid biomarker of BBB-associated capillary mural cell pericyte, soluble platelet-derived growth factor receptor-β8,18, and regional BBB permeability using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging8–10. Our data show that individuals with early cognitive dysfunction develop brain capillary damage and BBB breakdown in the hippocampus irrespective of Alzheimer’s Aβ and/or tau biomarker changes, suggesting that BBB breakdown is an early biomarker of human cognitive dysfunction independent of Aβ and tau. Neuroimaging and cerebrospinal fluid analyses in humans reveal that loss of blood–brain barrier integrity and brain capillary pericyte damage are early biomarkers of cognitive impairment that occur independently of changes in amyloid-β and tau.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This study reports that older adults with early cognitive impairment show signs of brain capillary pericyte injury and blood-brain barrier leakage, especially in hippocampus and parahippocampal regions, even when amyloid and tau biomarkers are normal. The authors conclude that BBB breakdown may be an early biomarker of cognitive dysfunction independent of classic Alzheimer’s disease pathology.
Key findings
- CSF sPDGFRβ, a pericyte injury marker, increased with greater CDR impairment (CDR 1 > 0.5 > 0) and was higher in CDR 0.5 than CDR 0 regardless of Aβ1–42 or pTau status; it remained predictive after adjustment for Aβ/pTau, with partial eta squared values of .10–.12.
- DCE-MRI in 73 participants showed higher BBB permeability (Ktrans) in hippocampus, CA1, CA3, dentate gyrus, and parahippocampal gyrus in CDR 0.5 versus CDR 0, but not in frontal/temporal cortex, subcortical white matter, corpus callosum, internal capsule, thalamus, or striatum; effects were independent of Aβ/pTau and had partial eta squared values of .09–.28.
- Similar patterns appeared using neuropsychological domain impairment: elevated CSF sPDGFRβ and regional BBB permeability in medial temporal regions in impaired versus unimpaired participants, independent of Aβ/pTau and vascular risk factor burden; several glial, inflammatory, and neuronal degeneration CSF markers did not differ.
- Findings persisted after controlling for hippocampal/parahippocampal volumes and were not correlated with age; the authors interpret BBB breakdown as independent of Aβ/tau and normal aging.
Methods
- Observational biomarker study at two sites (USC/HMRI and Washington University) including 161 participants for CSF studies, 35 for PiB-PET, and 73 for DCE-MRI; participants were ≥45 years, stratified by CDR and neuropsychological domain impairment, and classified by CSF Aβ1–42 (<190 pg/mL positive) and pTau181 (>78 pg/mL positive) cutoffs.
- CSF sPDGFRβ was measured by quantitative Western blot; other CSF markers by ELISA/MSD; BBB permeability was measured by DCE-MRI Ktrans using Patlak modeling; hippocampal/parahippocampal volumes came from FreeSurfer; analyses used ANCOVA and hierarchical logistic regression with covariates and FDR correction.
Limitations
- The authors state that because vascular dementia, vascular cognitive impairment, and substantial cerebrovascular pathology were excluded, the independence from traditional vascular risk factors may not extend to populations with more severe vascular lesions; interactive or synergistic effects were not ruled out.
- The authors note uncertainty about whether medial temporal BBB pathology can explain impairment in cognitive domains supported by brain regions outside the medial temporal lobe, since those regions did not show BBB breakdown in this cohort.
- Evident from the text: DCE-MRI and PiB-PET findings come from smaller subsets (73 and 35), and the cross-sectional design cannot establish that BBB breakdown precedes or causes cognitive decline.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 26 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
CSF amyloid-beta and tau oligomer levels do not differ between CDR 0 and CDR 0.5 groups.
“we found no differences in CSF Aβ and tau oligomers levels between CDR 0 and CDR 0.5 groups”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CSF sPDGFRβ remains significantly increased in domain analysis after statistical control for CSF tau oligomers.
“CSF sPDGFRβ remained significantly increased in domain analysis after statistically controlling for CSF tau oligomers in ANCOVA models”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CSF sPDGFRβ increases remain significant after statistical control for hippocampal and parahippocampal gyrus volumes.
“CSF sPDGFRβ increases remained significant after controlling for HC and PHC volumes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CSF amyloid-beta and tau oligomer levels do not differ between participants with impairment in one or more cognitive domains and those without cognitive impairment.
“There was no difference in CSF Aβ and tau oligomers between participants with impairment in 1 or more cognitive domains and those without cognitive impairment”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Higher CSF sPDGFRβ remains a significant predictor of cognitive impairment after statistical control for CSF amyloid-beta 1-42 and pTau, with medium-to-large incremental effect sizes (partial eta squared .10-.12).
“Higher CSF sPDGFRβ remained a significant predictor of cognitive impairment after statistically controlling for CSF Aβ1–42 and pTau, as shown by estimated marginal means from ANCOVA models (Figure 1f) indicating medium-to-large incremental effect sizes with η2partial range = .10–.12”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Statistical control for amyloid-beta, pTau, vascular risk factors, and brain volumes adequately removes confounding, so remaining associations indicate independence.
- Findingown data
In the PiB-PET subset, participants with domain impairment have higher CSF sPDGFRβ than those without impairment after statistical control for amyloid levels.
“participants with domain impairment exhibited increased CSF sPDGFRβ relative to those without impairment, after statistically controlling for amyloid levels”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CSF sPDGFRβ remains increased when stratifying by CSF amyloid-beta 1-42 and pTau status in domain analysis.
“and also remained increased when stratifying by CSF Aβ1–42 and pTau status”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Hippocampal and parahippocampal gyrus blood-brain barrier permeability increases remain significant when stratifying by amyloid-beta 1-42 and pTau status in domain analysis.
“and when stratifying by Aβ1–42 and pTau status”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Hippocampal and parahippocampal gyrus blood-brain barrier permeability increases remain significant when stratifying by amyloid-beta 1-42 and pTau status.
“and when stratifying by Aβ1–42 and pTau status”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CSF sPDGFRβ remains elevated in CDR analysis after statistical control for CSF tau oligomers.
“CSF sPDGFRβ remained significantly elevated in CDR analysis after statistically controlling for CSF tau oligomers in ANCOVA models”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CSF sPDGFRβ increases remain significant after statistical control for hippocampal and parahippocampal gyrus volumes in domain analysis.
“CSF sPDGFRβ increases remained significant after controlling for HC and PHC volumes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CSF amyloid-beta 1-42 is lower in CDR 1 than in CDR 0.5 participants.
“we saw reduced CSF Aβ1–42 in CDR 1 relative to CDR 0.5 participants”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Higher regional blood-brain barrier permeability in hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus and hippocampal subfields remains a significant predictor of cognitive impairment after statistical control for CSF amyloid-beta 1-42 and pTau, with medium-to-large effect sizes (partial eta squared .09-.28).
“Increased regional BBB permeability in HC, PHC and HC subfields remained a significant predictor of cognitive impairment after statistically controlling for CSF Aβ1–42 and pTau, as shown by estimated marginal means from ANCOVA models (Figure 1k) indicating medium-to-large incremental effect sizes (η2partial range = .09–.28)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Statistical control for amyloid-beta, pTau, vascular risk factors, and brain volumes adequately removes confounding, so remaining associations indicate independence.
- Findingown data
CSF sPDGFRβ is increased in participants with one or more domains impaired regardless of vascular risk factor burden.
“or VRFs burden, as shown in the entire sample and confirmed by site-specific analysis”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CSF sPDGFRβ is elevated in participants with one cognitive domain impaired relative to those with no domains impaired.
“This analysis indicated elevated CSF sPDGFRβ in participants with one cognitive domain impaired relative to those with no domains impaired”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CSF sPDGFRβ rises with greater Clinical Dementia Rating impairment, with CDR 1 higher than CDR 0.5 higher than CDR 0.
“We found increased CSF sPDGFRβ with more advanced CDR impairment (CDR 1 > 0.5 > 0)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Findings in domain analysis after statistical control for hippocampal and parahippocampal gyrus volume have medium-to-large incremental effect sizes (partial eta squared .19-.25).
“These findings exhibited medium-to-large incremental effect sizes after controlling for HC and PHC volume (η2partial range = .19–.25)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among DCE-MRI participants, those with domain impairment versus no impairment exhibit blood-brain barrier breakdown in hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus and hippocampal subfields, but not in other studied brain regions.
“those with domain impairment relative to those without impairment exhibited BBB breakdown in the HC, PHC and HC subfields, but not in other studied brain regions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Blood-brain barrier breakdown does not mediate the relationship between Alzheimer's disease biomarkers and cognitive impairment.
“logistic regression models indicating that BBB breakdown is not mediating the relationship between AD biomarkers and cognitive impairment”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CSF biomarkers of glial and inflammatory response and neuronal degeneration do not differ between impaired and unimpaired individuals on CDR exams.
“there were no differences in CSF biomarkers of glial and inflammatory response, or neuronal degeneration28,29 between impaired and unimpaired individuals on CDR exams”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The selected CSF glial/inflammatory and neuronal markers are representative of glial/inflammatory response and neuronal degeneration, so no differences indicate no involvement.
- Findingown data
CSF amyloid-beta 1-42 and pTau levels do not differ significantly between CDR 0.5 and CDR 0 participants.
“There were no significant differences in CSF Aβ1–42 or pTau levels between CDR 0.5 and CDR 0 individuals”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Amyloid-beta and tau status does not affect blood-brain barrier integrity in other studied brain regions.
“The regional BBB analysis indicated that Aβ and tau status does not affect BBB integrity in other studied brain regions”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
CSF sPDGFRβ remains elevated when stratifying by CSF amyloid-beta 1-42 and pTau status.
“remained increased when stratifying by CSF Aβ1–42 and pTau status”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Blood-brain barrier breakdown in hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus and hippocampal subfields in domain impairment occurs regardless of CSF amyloid-beta 1-42, pTau, or vascular risk factor status.
“regardless of CSF Aβ1–42 (Figure 3g-h; Extended Data Figure 9c) or pTau (Figure 3i-j; Extended Data Figure 9d) status, or VRF status”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CSF sPDGFRβ correlates positively with classical blood-brain barrier breakdown biomarkers, including CSF/plasma albumin ratio and CSF fibrinogen.
“There was a significant positive correlation between CSF sPDGFRβ with classical biomarkers of BBB breakdown including CSF/plasma albumin ratio and CSF fibrinogen”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CSF markers of glial and inflammatory response and neuronal degeneration do not differ between impaired and unimpaired participants on neuropsychological exams.
“There were no differences in CSF markers of glial and/or inflammatory response, or neuronal degeneration28,29 between impaired and unimpaired participants on neuropsychological exams”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The selected CSF glial/inflammatory and neuronal markers are representative of glial/inflammatory response and neuronal degeneration, so no differences indicate no involvement.
- Findingown data
Blood-brain barrier breakdown in the hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus and hippocampal subfields in CDR 0.5 versus CDR 0 participants occurs regardless of CSF amyloid-beta 1-42 or pTau status.
“individuals with CDR 0.5 compared to those who were cognitively normal (CDR 0) exhibited BBB breakdown in the HC, PHC and HC subfields regardless of CSF Aβ1–42 (Figure 1g-h), and pTau (Figure 1i-j) status”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CSF sPDGFRβ is increased in participants with one or more domains impaired regardless of CSF amyloid-beta 1-42 or pTau status.
“increased CSF sPDGFRβ in participants with one or more domain impaired regardless of CSF Aβ1–42 (Figure 3d) or pTau (Figure 3e) status”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Blood-brain barrier dysfunction in this sample is independent of traditional systemic vascular risk factors.
“BBB dysfunction in the present analysis was independent of traditional systemic VRFs”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the PiB-PET subset, CDR 0.5 participants have higher CSF sPDGFRβ than CDR 0 participants after statistical control for amyloid levels.
“Among the subset of 35 participants who underwent Pittsburgh compound B (PiB)-positron emission tomography (PET), those with CDR 0.5 exhibited increased CSF sPDGFRβ relative to those with CDR 0, after statistically controlling for amyloid levels”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CSF pTau is increased in participants with one domain impaired relative to those with no domains impaired.
“Participants with one domain impaired showed, however, increased CSF pTau relative to those with no domains impaired”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
All CDR and domain impairment group differences in CSF sPDGFRβ and hippocampal/parahippocampal gyrus blood-brain barrier permeability remain significant after age correction.
“Since all CDR and domain impairment group differences in CSF sPDGFRβ and in HC and PHC BBB permeability values were significant after age-corrections”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Hippocampal and parahippocampal gyrus blood-brain barrier permeability increases remain significant after statistical control for their respective volumes in domain analysis.
“HC and PHC BBB permeability increases remained significant after controlling for HC and PHC volumes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CSF sPDGFRβ is higher in CDR 0.5 than CDR 0 participants regardless of CSF amyloid-beta 1-42 or pTau status.
“sPDGFRβ was increased in participants with CDR 0.5 relative to CDR 0 regardless of CSF Aβ1–42 (Figure 1d) or pTau (Figure 1e) status”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Findings after statistical control for hippocampal and parahippocampal gyrus volume have medium-to-large incremental effect sizes (partial eta squared .09-.31).
“All findings exhibited medium-to-large incremental effect sizes after controlling for HC and PHC volume (η2partial range = .09–.31)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In older adults with early cognitive dysfunction, brain capillary damage and hippocampal blood-brain barrier breakdown occur regardless of Alzheimer's disease amyloid-beta and tau biomarker status.
“Our data show that individuals with early cognitive dysfunction develop brain capillary damage and BBB breakdown in the hippocampus irrespective of Alzheimer’s Aβ and/or tau biomarker changes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The study sample of older adults with CDR 0.5 or domain impairment is representative of the broader population with early cognitive dysfunction, so findings generalize.
- Findingown data
Higher CSF sPDGFRβ remains a significant predictor of cognitive impairment after statistical control for CSF amyloid-beta 1-42 and pTau in domain analysis, with medium-to-large effect sizes (partial eta squared .07-.14).
“Higher CSF sPDGFRβ levels remained a significant predictor of cognitive impairment after statistically controlling for CSF Aβ1–42 and pTau, as shown by estimated marginal means from ANCOVA models (Figure 3f) indicating medium-to-large incremental effect sizes (η2partial range = .07–.14)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Statistical control for amyloid-beta, pTau, vascular risk factors, and brain volumes adequately removes confounding, so remaining associations indicate independence.
- Findingown data
Hippocampal and parahippocampal gyrus blood-brain barrier permeability increases remain significant after statistical control for their respective volumes.
“HC and PHC BBB permeability increases remained significant after controlling for HC and PHC volumes, respectively”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Higher CSF sPDGFRβ in impaired individuals is independent of vascular risk factor burden.
“Increased CSF sPDGFRβ in impaired individuals was independent of vascular factors, as indicated by VRF burden analysis for the entire sample”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Higher regional blood-brain barrier permeability in hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus and hippocampal subfields remains a significant predictor of cognitive impairment after statistical control for CSF amyloid-beta 1-42 and pTau in domain analysis, with medium-to-large effect sizes (partial eta squared .07-.18).
“Increased regional BBB permeability in HC, PHC and HC subfields remained a significant predictor of cognitive impairment after statistically controlling for CSF Aβ1–42 and pTau, as shown by estimated marginal means from ANCOVA models (Figure 1k) indicating medium-to-large incremental effect sizes (η2partial range = .07–.18)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Statistical control for amyloid-beta, pTau, vascular risk factors, and brain volumes adequately removes confounding, so remaining associations indicate independence.
- Findingown data
CSF amyloid-beta 1-42 does not differ between participants with one domain impaired and those with no domains impaired.
“There was no difference, however, in CSF Aβ1–42 between participants with one domain impaired and those with no domains impaired”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
CSF sPDGFRβ correlates positively with the CSF:plasma albumin ratio (Qalb).
“CSF sPDGFRβ positively correlates with conventional biochemical biomarkers of BBB breakdown including CSF:plasma albumin ratio (Qalb) (e)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ktrans values in other brain regions did not change with CDR regardless of vascular risk factor burden.
“and no change in the Ktrans BBB permeability values in other brain regions (f)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The tracer diffuses across the blood-brain barrier in only one direction during the acquisition period.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Tissue tracer concentration follows the Patlak model equation with Ktrans and vp.
- Findingown data
CSF markers of glial, inflammatory, or neuronal injury (S100B, IL-6, TNFα, NSE) showed no significant differences between unimpaired and impaired individuals on neuropsychological exams in combined and site-specific analyses.
“CSF markers of glial, inflammatory, or neuronal injury exhibited no significant differences between unimpaired and impaired individuals on neuropsychological exams, including S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B), interleukin-6* (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α† (TNFα), or neuron-specific enolase† (NSE) in the combined site analysis (a) or in the site-specific analysis of individuals from USC (b)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In both independent sites, CSF sPDGFRβ increased with number of impaired cognitive domains independently of CSF Aβ42 and pTau status.
“Site-specific analysis of CSF sPDGFRβ indicates increases with the number of cognitive domains impaired, independent of CSF Aβ42 and pTau status in two independent sites, USC (c) and Washington University (d)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Other brain regions showed no significant Ktrans differences between individuals with 0 and 1+ impaired cognitive domains regardless of CSF Aβ42 and pTau status.
“Additional brain regions showed no significance difference in Ktrans BBB permeability in individuals with 0 and 1+ cognitive domains impaired, regardless of CSF Aβ42 (c) and pTau (d) status.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The tracer diffuses across the blood-brain barrier in only one direction during the acquisition period.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Tissue tracer concentration follows the Patlak model equation with Ktrans and vp.
- Findingown data
Ktrans increases with CDR in hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and CA1, CA3, and dentate gyrus subfields.
“An increase in Ktrans values in the hippocampus (HC), parahippocampal gyrus (PHC) and CA1, CA3 and dentate gyrus (DG) hippocampus subfields, with increasing CDR (a)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The tracer diffuses across the blood-brain barrier in only one direction during the acquisition period.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Tissue tracer concentration follows the Patlak model equation with Ktrans and vp.
- Findingown data
CSF Aβ oligomer levels did not differ between individuals with 0 and 1+ impaired cognitive domains.
“No differences were observed in CSF Aβ oligomer levels (b)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In CDR 0.5 individuals, age does not correlate with regional Ktrans in hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus.
“or regional Ktrans in the hippocampus (HC) (c) and parahippocampal gyrus (PHC) (e)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The tracer diffuses across the blood-brain barrier in only one direction during the acquisition period.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Tissue tracer concentration follows the Patlak model equation with Ktrans and vp.
- Findingown data
Ktrans does not increase with number of impaired cognitive domains in superior frontal and inferior temporal cortex, subcortical white matter fibers, corpus callosum, internal capsule, thalamus, caudate nucleus, or striatum.
“but not in other brain regions including superior frontal cortical gyrus (Sup Front) and inferior temporal cortical gyrus (Inf Temp), white matter regions including subcortical white matter fibers (white matter), corpus callosum (CC), and internal capsule (IC), and deep gray matter regions including thalamus (Thal), caudate nucleus (Caud) and striatum (b)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The tracer diffuses across the blood-brain barrier in only one direction during the acquisition period.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Tissue tracer concentration follows the Patlak model equation with Ktrans and vp.
- Findingown data
Ktrans does not increase with cognitive domain impairment in other brain regions.
“but not in other brain regions (f)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The tracer diffuses across the blood-brain barrier in only one direction during the acquisition period.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Tissue tracer concentration follows the Patlak model equation with Ktrans and vp.
- Findingown data
Ktrans increases with number of impaired cognitive domains in hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and CA1, CA3, and dentate gyrus subfields.
“An increase in Ktrans values in the hippocampus (HC), parahippocampal gyrus (PHC), and CA1, CA3 and dentate gyrus (DG) hippocampal subfields with increasing cognitive impairment measured by the number of cognitive domains impaired (a)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The tracer diffuses across the blood-brain barrier in only one direction during the acquisition period.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Tissue tracer concentration follows the Patlak model equation with Ktrans and vp.
- Findingown data
CSF sPDGFRβ increases with cognitive domain impairment independently of amyloid positivity on PiB-PET.
“CSF sPDGFRβ is increased with cognitive domains impaired, independent of amyloid positivity by (11)C-Pittsburgh compound B positron emission tomography (PiB-PET)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In CDR 0.5 individuals, age does not correlate with CSF sPDGFRβ.
“Similarly, in CDR 0.5 individuals, age does not correlate with CSF sPDGFRβ (a)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Other CSF neurovascular unit biomarkers are unchanged in cognitive domain impairment.
“Other CSF biomarkers of the neurovascular unit are not altered with cognitive domain impairment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Other brain regions showed no significant Ktrans differences between CDR 0 and CDR 0.5 individuals regardless of CSF Aβ42 or pTau status.
“Additional brain regions showed no significant differences in Ktrans BBB permeability values in individuals with CDR 0 and CDR 0.5, regardless of CSF Aβ42 (c) or pTau (d) status.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The tracer diffuses across the blood-brain barrier in only one direction during the acquisition period.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Tissue tracer concentration follows the Patlak model equation with Ktrans and vp.
- Findingown data
In CDR 0 individuals, age does not correlate with CSF sPDGFRβ.
“In CDR 0 individuals, age does not correlate with CSF sPDGFRβ.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ADAM10 is responsible for shedding soluble PDGFRβ from human brain pericytes in vitro.
“ADAM10 mediates soluble PDGFRβ (sPDGFRβ) shedding in human brain pericytes in vitro.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The regional BBB Ktrans increase in hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus in 1+ versus 0 impaired cognitive domains remained significant after controlling for CSF tau oligomers.
“Increases in CSF sPDGFRβ (d) and regional blood-brain barrier (BBB) Ktrans in the hippocampus (HC) and parahippocampal gyrus (PHC) (e) of individuals with 1+ versus 0 cognitive domain impairment remain significant after statistically controlling for the impact of CSF tau oligomers”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The tracer diffuses across the blood-brain barrier in only one direction during the acquisition period.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Tissue tracer concentration follows the Patlak model equation with Ktrans and vp.
- Findingown data
CSF tau oligomer levels did not differ between CDR 0 and CDR 0.5 individuals.
“and tau oligomer levels (i) in individuals with CDR 0 vs. CDR 0.5”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CSF sPDGFRβ correlates positively with CSF fibrinogen.
“and CSF fibrinogen (f)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In both independent sites, CSF sPDGFRβ increased with CDR independently of CSF Aβ42 and pTau status.
“Site-specific analysis of CSF sPDGFRβ increases with CDR, independent of CSF Aβ42 and pTau status in two independent sites, USC (c) and Washington University (d)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At USC, neither Aβ42 nor pTau changed.
“There were no changes in Aβ42 and pTau at USC site (a)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CSF sPDGFRβ increases with CDR independently of amyloid positivity on PiB-PET.
“CSF sPDGFRβ is increased with CDR, independent of amyloid positivity by (11)C-Pittsburgh compound B positron emission tomography (PiB-PET)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The CSF sPDGFRβ increase in 1+ versus 0 impaired cognitive domains remained significant after controlling for CSF tau oligomers.
“Increases in CSF sPDGFRβ (d) and regional blood-brain barrier (BBB) Ktrans in the hippocampus (HC) and parahippocampal gyrus (PHC) (e) of individuals with 1+ versus 0 cognitive domain impairment remain significant after statistically controlling for the impact of CSF tau oligomers”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CSF sPDGFRβ is associated with neuroimaging-measured BBB breakdown in hippocampal gray matter regions.
“CSF sPDGFRβ is associated with BBB breakdown measured by neuroimaging in hippocampal gray matter regions (g-h)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The tracer diffuses across the blood-brain barrier in only one direction during the acquisition period.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Tissue tracer concentration follows the Patlak model equation with Ktrans and vp.
- Findingown data
In both USC and Washington University cohorts, CSF sPDGFRβ rose early with increasing CDR.
“Site-specific analysis of CSF sPDGFRβ and standard AD biomarkers, Aβ42 and pTau, indicates an early increase in sPDGFRβ with increasing CDR in both independent clinical sites, USC (a) and Washington University (b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ktrans increases with cognitive domain impairment in hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and hippocampal subfields independently of vascular risk factor burden.
“Ktrans BBB permeability is increased with increasing cognitive domain impairment in the HC, PHC, and hippocampal subfields (i.e., CA1, CA3, DG), independent of VRFs burden (e)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The tracer diffuses across the blood-brain barrier in only one direction during the acquisition period.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Tissue tracer concentration follows the Patlak model equation with Ktrans and vp.
- Findingown data
CSF Aβ oligomer levels did not differ between CDR 0 and CDR 0.5 individuals.
“No differences were observed in CSF Aβ oligomer levels (h)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Vascular risk factor burden does not affect the Ktrans increase with CDR in hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and hippocampal subfields.
“VRFs burden does not influence an increase in the Ktrans BBB permeability values with increasing CDR in the HC, PHC, and hippocampus subfields (i.e., CA1, CA3, DG) (e)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The tracer diffuses across the blood-brain barrier in only one direction during the acquisition period.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Tissue tracer concentration follows the Patlak model equation with Ktrans and vp.
- Findingown data
In CDR 0 individuals, age does not correlate with regional Ktrans in hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus.
“or regional Ktrans in the hippocampus (HC) (c) and parahippocampal gyrus (PHC) (e)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The tracer diffuses across the blood-brain barrier in only one direction during the acquisition period.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Tissue tracer concentration follows the Patlak model equation with Ktrans and vp.
- Findingown data
Other CSF neurovascular unit biomarkers are unchanged in CDR cognitive impairment.
“Other CSF biomarkers of the neurovascular unit are not altered with CDR cognitive impairment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CSF sPDGFRβ is not associated with neuroimaging-measured BBB breakdown in white matter regions.
“but not in WM regions (i-j)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The tracer diffuses across the blood-brain barrier in only one direction during the acquisition period.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Tissue tracer concentration follows the Patlak model equation with Ktrans and vp.
- Findingown data
CSF tau oligomer levels did not differ between individuals with 0 and 1+ impaired cognitive domains.
“and tau oligomer levels (c) in individuals with 0 or 1+ cognitive domains impaired”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CSF sPDGFRβ increases with number of impaired cognitive domains independently of vascular risk factor burden in combined and both site-specific analyses.
“CSF sPDGFRβ is increased with increasing number of cognitive domains impaired, independent of VRFs burden in the combined site analysis (e) and in two independent clinical sites, USC (f) and Washington University (g).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CSF sPDGFRβ increases with CDR independently of vascular risk factor burden in combined and both site-specific analyses.
“CSF sPDGFRβ is increased with CDR, independent of VRFs burden in the combined site analysis (a) and in two independent clinical sites from USC (b) and Washington University (c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In both USC and Washington University cohorts, CSF sPDGFRβ rose early with increasing number of impaired cognitive domains.
“Site-specific analysis of CSF sPDGFRβ and standard AD biomarkers, Aβ42 and pTau, indicates an early increase in sPDGFRβ with increasing domains impaired in both independent clinical sites, USC (a) and Washington University (b)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The brain vasculature is an important new biomarker of cognitive dysfunction in individuals without and with amyloid-beta or pTau positivity.
“our findings point to the brain vasculature as an important new biomarker of cognitive dysfunction in both individuals without and with Aβ or pTau positivity”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Loss of pericytes in mice elevates CSF sPDGFRβ.
“Additionally, loss of pericytes in mice elevates CSF sPDGFRβ8.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Montagne, A. et al. Blood–brain barrier breakdown in the aging human hippocampus. Neuron 85, 296–302 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
sPDGFRβ is primarily a biomarker of brain capillary pericytes.
“supporting that sPDGFRβ is primarily a biomarker of brain capillary pericytes8,18.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [8] Montagne, A. et al. Blood–brain barrier breakdown in the aging human hippocampus. Neuron 85, 296–302 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [18] Sagare, A. P., Sweeney, M. D., Makshanoff, J. & Zlokovic, B. V. Shedding of soluble platelet-derived growth factor receptor-β from human brain pericytes. Neurosci. Lett. 607, 97–101 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
CSF sPDGFRβ and hippocampal/parahippocampal gyrus blood-brain barrier measures reflect cognitive impairment independent of normal aging.
“these data indicate that CSF sPDGFRβ and HC and PHC BBB measures reflect cognitive impairment independent of normal aging”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In individuals with mild cognitive impairment, increased CSF sPDGFRβ correlates with increased DCE-MRI measures of blood-brain barrier dysfunction.
“In individuals with mild cognitive impairment, increased CSF sPDGFRβ correlates with increased DCE-MRI measures of BBB dysfunction8.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Montagne, A. et al. Blood–brain barrier breakdown in the aging human hippocampus. Neuron 85, 296–302 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Neurovascular dysfunction may represent a previously underappreciated factor contributing to cognitive and functional decline independent of classic Alzheimer's disease hallmarks.
“Our present findings support that neurovascular dysfunction may represent a previously underappreciated factor contributing to cognitive and functional decline, independent of the classic pathophysiological hallmarks of AD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
PDGFRβ expression is higher in pericytes than in smooth muscle cells.
“PDGFRβ expression in pericytes is noticeably higher than in SMCs18,25,26.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [18] Sagare, A. P., Sweeney, M. D., Makshanoff, J. & Zlokovic, B. V. Shedding of soluble platelet-derived growth factor receptor-β from human brain pericytes. Neurosci. Lett. 607, 97–101 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [25] Vanlandewijck, M. et al. A molecular atlas of cell types and zonation in the brain vasculature. Nature 554, 475–480 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [26] Trost, A. et al. Brain and retinal pericytes: origin, function and role. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 10, 20 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
CSF sPDGFRβ and Ktrans changes reflect processes tied to cognitive impairment rather than normal aging.
“indicating that changes in CSF sPDGFRβ and Ktrans capture processes relating to cognitive impairment independent of normal aging.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The tracer diffuses across the blood-brain barrier in only one direction during the acquisition period.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Tissue tracer concentration follows the Patlak model equation with Ktrans and vp.
- Interpretationown data
CSF sPDGFRβ is linked to blood-brain barrier breakdown.
“CSF sPDGFRβ is associated with blood-brain barrier (BBB) breakdown.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 22
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 16
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn domain analysis, participants with one or more cognitive domains impaired versus zero domains impaired show no significant hippocampal volume change but a significant parahippocampal gyrus volume decrease.
“there were no significant changes in HC volume, but a significant decrease in PHC volume, in participants with 1+ cognitive domains impaired compared to 0 domains impaired”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataCSF sPDGFRβ increases correlate positively with DCE-MRI measures of blood-brain barrier permeability in hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus in all studied participants, but not in other studied brain regions.
“we also observed a significant positive correlation between increases in CSF sPDGFRβ and DCE-MRI measures of BBB permeability in the HC and PHC in all studied participants”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIncreased DCE-MRI blood-brain barrier permeability in medial temporal lobe structures is associated with worse CDR scores and impairment in multiple cognitive domains.
“An increase in DCE-MRI BBB permeability in several medial temporal lobe structures that sub serve episodic memory (e.g., HC, PHC, and CA1, CA3 and dentate gyrus HC subfields) was associated with worse CDR scores (CDR 0 vs. 0.5) and with impairment in multiple cognitive domains”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn CDR 0.5 versus CDR 0 participants, hippocampal volume does not change significantly, but parahippocampal gyrus volume decreases significantly.
“In participants with CDR 0.5 vs. CDR 0, we found no significant changes in HC volume, but a significant decrease in PHC volume”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataVascular risk factor burden does not influence blood-brain barrier permeability changes in hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus in CDR 0.5 versus CDR 0 participants, nor blood-brain barrier integrity in other studied brain regions.
“the VRF burden did not influence BBB permeability changes in the HC and PHC in individuals with CDR 0.5 compared to CDR 0, and also had no effect on BBB integrity in other studied brain regions”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDCE-MRI shows higher blood-brain barrier permeability to gadolinium in the hippocampus, its CA1, CA3 and dentate gyrus subfields, and parahippocampal gyrus in CDR 0.5 versus CDR 0 participants, but not in other studied brain regions.
“The DCE-MRI analysis of regional BBB permeability in a subset of 73 participants with CDR 0.5 compared to those with CDR 0, indicated increased BBB permeability to gadolinium-based contrast agent in the hippocampus (HC) and its CA1, CA3 and dentate gyrus subfields, and parahippocampal gyrus (PHC), but not in other studied brain regions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNeither CSF sPDGFRβ nor regional blood-brain barrier permeability in hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus correlates with age in either CDR 0 or CDR 0.5 groups.
“Neither CSF sPDGFRβ (Extended Data Figure 10a-b) nor regional BBB permeability HC and PHC values (Extended Data Figure 10c-f) were correlated with age in either the CDR 0 or CDR 0.5 groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataADAM10 mediates sPDGFRβ shedding in human pericytes but not smooth muscle cells.
“we found that ADAM10 mediates sPDGFRβ shedding in human pericytes but not SMCs (Extended Data Fig. 1)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHippocampal and parahippocampal gyrus volumes do not differ between CSF amyloid-beta-positive and -negative or pTau-positive and -negative participants in either CDR 0 or CDR 0.5 groups.
“HC or PHC volumes did not statistically differ between participants that were CSF Aβ+ vs. Aβ- (Figure 2c) or pTau+ vs. pTau- (Figure 2d) in either CDR 0 or CDR 0.5 groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataHippocampal and parahippocampal gyrus volumes do not differ between CSF amyloid-beta-positive and -negative or pTau-positive and -negative participants in domain analysis.
“which did not statistically differ between participants that were CSF Aβ+ vs. Aβ- or pTau+ vs. pTau-”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHuman brain vascular smooth muscle cells released very little sPDGFRβ, and ionomycin did not significantly raise it.
“Compared to pericytes, SMCs shed extremely low levels of sPDGFRβ, which was not significantly increased by IM.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMarimastat and ADAM10 siRNA each significantly decreased ionomycin-stimulated sPDGFRβ shedding, by over 90% and 75% respectively.
“Both pharmacologic (MM) and genetic (siRNA) inhibition of ADAM10 significantly reduced sPDGFRβ shedding activated by IM by > 90% and 75%, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataNo statistically significant between-subject variation was found in the measured vp.
“A statistically significant intersubject variability in the measurement of vp was not observed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Tissue tracer concentration follows the Patlak model equation with Ktrans and vp.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt Washington University, Aβ42 but not pTau changed.
“whereas Aβ42, but not pTau, was altered at Washington University site”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataKtrans does not increase with CDR in superior frontal and inferior temporal cortex, subcortical white matter fibers, corpus callosum, internal capsule, thalamus, caudate nucleus, or striatum.
“but not in other brain regions including superior frontal cortical gyrus (Sup Front) and inferior temporal cortical gyrus (Inf Temp), white matter regions including subcortical white matter fibers (white matter, WM), corpus callosum (CC), and internal capsule (IC), and deep gray matter regions including thalamus (Thal), caudate nucleus (Caud) and striatum (b)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The tracer diffuses across the blood-brain barrier in only one direction during the acquisition period.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Tissue tracer concentration follows the Patlak model equation with Ktrans and vp.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataHuman brain pericytes released high baseline sPDGFRβ, and ionomycin, which activates ADAM10, increased it more than fivefold.
“Pericytes shed high basal levels of sPDGFRβ that was significantly increased by > 5-fold by treatment with IM, which activated ADAM10.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataBlood-brain barrier breakdown is an independent, early biomarker of cognitive impairment unrelated to amyloid-beta and tau.
“suggesting that BBB breakdown is an independent, early biomarker of cognitive impairment unrelated to Aβ and tau”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The cross-sectional group differences reflect an early pathological process that precedes or is independent of cognitive dysfunction, rather than a consequence of it.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrior studies established improved sensitivity and specificity of the neuropsychological criteria relative to single-test-score criteria, and adaptability to various neuropsychological batteries.
“Prior studies have established improved sensitivity and specificity of these criteria relative to those employing a single test score, as well as adaptability of this diagnostic approach to various neuropsychological batteries21,41,42.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [21] Bondi, M. W. et al. Neuropsychological criteria for mild cognitive impairment improves diagnostic precision, biomarker associations, and progression rates. J. Alzheimers Dis. 42, 275–289 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [41] Jak, A. J. et al. Quantification of five neuropsychological approaches to defining mild cognitive impairment. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 17, 368–375 (2009). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [42] Jak, A. J. et al. Neuropsychological criteria for mild cognitive impairment and dementia risk in the Framingham Heart Study. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 22, 937–943 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHuman brain pericytes, but not smooth muscle cells, shed sPDGFRβ in culture, and shedding increases with hypoxia or injurious stimuli.
“Human brain pericytes, but not SMCs, shed sPDGFRβ in the culture media, which is increased by hypoxia or injurious stimuli8,18.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [8] Montagne, A. et al. Blood–brain barrier breakdown in the aging human hippocampus. Neuron 85, 296–302 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [18] Sagare, A. P., Sweeney, M. D., Makshanoff, J. & Zlokovic, B. V. Shedding of soluble platelet-derived growth factor receptor-β from human brain pericytes. Neurosci. Lett. 607, 97–101 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPDGFRβ is primarily expressed in the brain by vascular mural cells, capillary pericytes and smooth muscle cells, and not by neurons, astrocytes, endothelial cells, oligodendrocytes, or microglia.
“PDGFRβ is primarily expressed in brain by vascular mural cells – capillary pericytes and vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs), but not by neurons, astrocytes, endothelial cells, oligodendrocytes and/or microglia22–25.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [22] Bell, R. D. et al. Pericytes control key neurovascular functions and neuronal phenotype in the adult brain and during brain aging. Neuron 68, 409–427 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [23] Lindahl, P., Johansson, B. R., Levéen, P. & Betsholtz, C. Pericyte loss and microaneurysm formation in PDGF-B-deficient mice. Science 277, 242–245 (1997). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [24] Winkler, E. A., Bell, R. D. & Zlokovic, B. V. Pericyte-specific expression of PDGF beta receptor in mouse models with normal and deficient PDGF beta receptor signaling. Mol. Neurodegener. 5, 32 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [25] Vanlandewijck, M. et al. A molecular atlas of cell types and zonation in the brain vasculature. Nature 554, 475–480 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationThe imaging protocol was designed to identify subtle blood-brain barrier changes in cognitively impaired patients.
“The imaging protocol performed was developed to detect subtle BBB changes in patients with cognitive impairment and is detailed in Montagne et al. 20158.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Montagne et al. 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenIndividuals diagnosed with vascular dementia, vascular cognitive impairment, and other disorders that might account for cognitive impairment were excluded.
“Individuals diagnosed with vascular dementia and vascular cognitive impairment, and other disorders that might account for cognitive impairment were excluded”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe USC Institutional Review Board approved the study.
“The study was approved by the USC Institutional Review Board.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOlder adults with Alzheimer's disease and two or more vascular risk factors are more likely to have occult cerebrovascular disease at autopsy, whereas a single vascular risk factor is common and not necessarily associated with increased cerebrovascular disease.
“We have previously shown that older adults with AD exhibiting two or more VRFs are more likely to exhibit occult cerebrovascular disease at autopsy, whereas a single VRF is common and not necessarily associated with increased cerebrovascular disease in this population44,45.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [44] Nation, D. A. et al. Antemortem pulse pressure elevation predicts cerebrovascular disease in autopsy-confirmed Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimers Dis. 30, 595–603 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [45] Bangen, K. J. et al. Aggregate effects of vascular risk factors on cerebrovascular changes in autopsy-confirmed Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 11, 394–403.e1 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationParticipants were stratified using accepted cutoff values for CSF amyloid-beta 1-42 and pTau181.
“using the accepted cutoff values19–21”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [19] Pan, C. et al. Diagnostic values of cerebrospinal fluid t-tau and Aβ42 using meso scale discovery assays for Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimers Dis. 45, 709–719 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [20] Roe, C. M. et al. Amyloid imaging and CSF biomarkers in predicting cognitive impairment up to 7.5 years later. Neurology 80, 1784–1791 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [21] Bondi, M. W. et al. Neuropsychological criteria for mild cognitive impairment improves diagnostic precision, biomarker associations, and progression rates. J. Alzheimers Dis. 42, 275–289 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningAPOE-ε4 carrier status was omitted as a covariate from site-specific and interaction analyses to preserve statistical power.
“Site-specific analyses and interaction effect analyses did not include APOE-ε4 carrier status as a covariate to conserve statistical power.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataMissing data for all other CSF biomarkers and clinical measures was limited to less than 10%.
“the extent of missing data was capped at < 10% for all other CSF biomarkers and clinical measures”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe siRNA knockdown of ADAM10 achieved 85% efficiency in this study.
“The siRNA ADAM10 knockdown efficiency in this study was 85% as shown by Western analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningAll ANCOVA omnibus p-values were corrected for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate method.
“false discovery rate (FDR)-correction was applied to all ANCOVA omnibus p-values using the Benjamini-Hochberg method60.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [60] Glickman, M. E., Rao, S. R. & Schultz, M. R. False discovery rate control is a recommended alternative to Bonferroni-type adjustments in health studies. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 67, 850–857 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationPatlak linearized regression produced Ktrans maps with high spatial and temporal resolution, enabling simultaneous regional permeability measurements in white and gray matter and accurate values in small structures like hippocampal subdivisions.
“The Patlak linearized regression mathematical analysis was used to generate the BBB permeability Ktrans maps8,49,50 with high spatial and temporal resolutions allowing not only simultaneous measurements of the regional BBB permeability in different white (WM) and gray matter (GM) regions, but also accurate calculations of the Ktrans values in anatomical regions as small as the subdivisions of the”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [8] Montagne, A. et al. Blood–brain barrier breakdown in the aging human hippocampus. Neuron 85, 296–302 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [49] Barnes, S. R. et al. ROCKETSHIP: a flexible and modular software tool for the planning, processing and analysis of dynamic MRI studies. BMC Med. Imaging 15, 19 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [50] Patlak, C. S. & Blasberg, R. G. Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants from multiple-time uptake data. Generalizations. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 5, 584–590 (1985). source
Not checked in the free run.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The tracer diffuses across the blood-brain barrier in only one direction during the acquisition period.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Tissue tracer concentration follows the Patlak model equation with Ktrans and vp.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenAll biomarker assays and quantitative MRI scans were conducted by investigators blinded to participant clinical status.
“All biomarker assays and quantitative MRI scans were conducted by investigators blinded to the clinical status of the participant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenContinuous variables were screened for outliers and non-normality, and log10 transformations were applied when distributions departed from normality before parametric testing.
“All continuous variables were screened for outliers (+/− 3 SDs from mean) and evaluated for departures from normality through quantitative examination of skewness and kurtosis, as well as visual inspection of frequency distributions. Where departures of normality were identified, log10-transformations were applied, and distribution normalization was confirmed prior to parametric analyses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataEvery participant had complete primary outcome data for CSF sPDGFRβ and DCE-MRI.
“all participants had complete data for primary outcomes (CSF sPDGFRβ and DCE-MRI)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The cross-sectional group differences reflect an early pathological process that precedes or is independent of cognitive dysfunction, rather than a consequence of it.
“suggesting that BBB breakdown is an early biomarker of human cognitive dysfunction independent of Aβ and tau”
The paper relies on this without support.
The study sample of older adults with CDR 0.5 or domain impairment is representative of the broader population with early cognitive dysfunction, so findings generalize.
“older adults with early cognitive dysfunction develop brain capillary damage associated with mural cell pericyte injury and BBB breakdown in the HC irrespective of Aβ and/or tau changes”
The paper relies on this without support.
The selected CSF glial/inflammatory and neuronal markers are representative of glial/inflammatory response and neuronal degeneration, so no differences indicate no involvement.
“as illustrated with a few representative biomarkers out of 20 studied”
The paper relies on this without support.
Statistical control for amyloid-beta, pTau, vascular risk factors, and brain volumes adequately removes confounding, so remaining associations indicate independence.
“after statistically controlling for CSF Aβ1–42 and pTau”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The tracer diffuses across the blood-brain barrier in only one direction during the acquisition period.
“The present analysis requires that the tracer’s diffusion across the BBB remains unidirectional during the acquisition time.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Individual arterial input function measurements are important when the population varies by age because blood volume and flow changes can affect AIF and Ktrans values.
“Individual AIF measurements are important particularly if the studied population diverges by age as changes in blood volume and flow may affect AIF and the Ktrans measurements.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Tissue tracer concentration follows the Patlak model equation with Ktrans and vp.
“The total tracer concentration in the tissue, Ctissue (t), can be described as a function of the blood concentration, CAIF (t), the intravascular blood volume, vp, and a blood-to-brain transfer constant, Ktrans, that represents the flow from the intravascular to the extravascular extracellular space using equation below: Ctissue(t)=Ktrans∫0tCAIF(u)du+vpAIF(t)”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cerebrovascular dysfunction is an early pathological event in Alzheimer's disease and contributes significantly to permanent loss of neuronal function.
“Increasing evidence demonstrates that cerebrovascular dysfunction is an early pathological event in AD and contributes significantly to the permanent loss of neuronal function.[ 3 ]”
From Multifunctional Nanostructure RAP‐RL Rescues Alzheimer's Cognitive Deficits through Remodeling the Neurovascular Unit (2021) · cites this paper as [3]
The Introduction says neurovascular dysfunction and blood–brain barrier breakdown develop early in AD, and suggests they may contribute to cognitive and functional decline. It does not establish a significant contribution to permanent loss of neuronal function; the study reports no detectable neuronal degeneration associated with the early damage it observed. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAltered morphology of cerebral vasculature and reduced CBF are critical pathological changes in Alzheimer's disease.
“Altered morphology of cerebral vasculature and reduced CBF are critical pathological changes in AD.[ 3 , 30 ]”
From Multifunctional Nanostructure RAP‐RL Rescues Alzheimer's Cognitive Deficits through Remodeling the Neurovascular Unit (2021) · cites this paper as [3]
The Introduction describes vascular changes and early neurovascular dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease, and reports brain capillary damage and blood–brain barrier breakdown in people with early cognitive dysfunction. It does not establish altered cerebral vessel morphology or reduced cerebral blood flow as the two critical pathological changes claimed; the paper’s cited reference on blood-flow regulation is not evidence that this study found reduced flow. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredBreakdown of the blood-brain barrier plays a critical role in the progression of Alzheimer's disease.
“The breakdown of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) plays a critical role in the progression of AD [29].”
From Oral Microbially-Induced Small Extracellular Vesicles Cross the Blood–Brain Barrier (2024) · cites this paper as [29]
The Introduction (page unavailable) reports that BBB breakdown develops early in AD and is associated with early cognitive dysfunction, including in people with AD biomarker positivity. It describes neurovascular dysfunction as a possible contributor to decline, but does not establish that BBB breakdown plays a critical causal role in AD progression. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn patients and mouse models of AD, fibrinogen extravasates in the brain at sites of impaired blood-brain barrier integrity and cerebrovascular dysfunction, which are early features of AD pathogenesis.
“In patients and mouse models of AD, fibrinogen extravasates in the brain at sites of impaired blood-brain barrier integrity and cerebrovascular dysfunction, which are early features of AD pathogenesis.21,39-42”
From Machine learning reveals prominent spontaneous behavioral changes and treatment efficacy in humanized and transgenic Alzheimer's disease models (2024) · cites this paper as [40]
The Introduction describes neurovascular dysfunction and BBB breakdown as early features of AD. It also reports that CSF fibrinogen correlates with a marker of BBB breakdown, as shown in Extended Data Figure 2 (no page number provided). Neither passage establishes fibrinogen extravasation at impaired brain sites in AD patients or mouse models. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIncreasing evidence shows BBB breakdown is among early markers in AD development.
“Actually, there are increasing evidence showing that BBB breakdown is among the early markers in AD development.140,141”
From Role of neuroinflammation in neurodegeneration development (2023) · cites this paper as [141]
Early blood-brain barrier alterations in Alzheimer's disease occur independently of classical biomarkers such as Aβ and tau.
“These alterations occur independently of classical AD biomarkers such as Aβ and tau [52].”
From Targeted Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery Across the Blood–Brain Barrier in Early and Late Stages of Alzheimer's Disease: A Review (2026) · cites this paper as [52]
Breakdown of the blood-brain barrier is an early biomarker of human cognitive decline.
“Breakdown of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is an early biomarker of human cognitive decline”
From ApoE4 reduction: An emerging and promising therapeutic strategy for Alzheimer's disease (2022) · cites this paper as Nation et al 2019
Chronic inflammation-induced disruption of BBB is an early biomarker of human cognitive dysfunction and often leads to dementia.
“Chronic inflammation‐induced disruption of the BBB is an early biomarker of human cognitive dysfunction and often leads to dementia, 113 and both Aβ deposits and tau pathology aggravate vascular damage. 114 , 115”
From Senescence, brain inflammation, and oligomeric tau drive cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease: Evidence from clinical and preclinical studies (2024) · cites this paper as [113]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
DCE-MRI voxel dimensions do not match the stated field of view and matrix
MinorDividing the stated 188 × 180 mm field of view by the 160 × 160 matrix gives in-plane dimensions of 1.175 × 1.125 mm, not 0.625 × 0.625 mm. No reconstruction or resampling step is stated to account for the difference.
Reported 0.625 · recomputed 1.175
“FOV 188 × 180 mm, matrix size 160 × 160, voxel size was 0.625 × 0.625 × 5 mm3”
Cites
Desikan, R. S., Ségonne, F., Fischl, B., Quinn, B. T., Dickerson, B. C., Blacker, D., Buckner, R. L., Dale, A. M., Maguire, R. P., Hyman, B. T., et al. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021 · Cited by 13,324 · see citing works
NIA‐AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease
Jack, C. R., Bennett, D. A., Blennow, K., Carrillo, M. C., Dunn, B., Haeberlein, S. B., Holtzman, D. M., Jagust, W., Jessen, F., Karlawish, J., et al. (2018) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018 · Cited by 10,537 · see citing works
Fischl, B. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021 · Cited by 9,526 · see citing works
Fischl, B., Salat, D. H., Busa, E., Albert, M., Dieterich, M., Haselgrove, C., van der Kouwe, A., Killiany, R., Kennedy, D., Klaveness, S., et al. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00569-x · Cited by 8,610 · see citing works
Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images
Fischl, B. R., & Dale, A. M. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.200033797 · Cited by 5,789 · see citing works
Wardlaw, J. M., Smith, E. E., Biessels, G. J., Cordonnier, C., Fazekas, F., Frayne, R., Lindley, R. I., O'Brien, J. T., Barkhof, F., Benavente, O. R., et al. (2013) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(13)70124-8 · Cited by 5,560 · see citing works
Blood–brain barrier breakdown in Alzheimer disease and other neurodegenerative disorders
Sweeney, M. D., Sagare, A. P., & Zlokovic, B. V. (2018) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2017.188 · Cited by 3,076 · see citing works
Self-citationNeurovascular pathways to neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease and other disorders
Zlokovic, B. V. (2011) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3114 · Cited by 2,969 · see citing works
Pericytes regulate the blood–brain barrier
Armulik, A., Genové, G., Mäe, M., Nisancioglu, M. H., Wallgard, E., Niaudet, C., He, L., Norlin, J., Lindblom, P., Strittmatter, K., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09522 · Cited by 2,843 · see citing works
The Neurovascular Unit Coming of Age: A Journey through Neurovascular Coupling in Health and Disease
Iadecola, C. (2017) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.07.030 · Cited by 2,480 · see citing works
Pericyte Loss and Microaneurysm Formation in PDGF-B-Deficient Mice
Lindahl, P., Johansson, B. R., Levéen, P., & Betsholtz, C. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5323.242 · Cited by 2,226 · see citing works
Pericytes are required for blood–brain barrier integrity during embryogenesis
Daneman, R., Zhou, L., Kebede, A. A., & Barres, B. A. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09513 · Cited by 2,128 · see citing works
Blood-brain barrier breakdown in the aging human hippocampus
Montagne, A., Barnes, S. R., Sweeney, M. D., Halliday, M. R., Sagare, A. P., Zhao, Z., Toga, A. W., Jacobs, R. E., Liu, C. Y., Amezcua, L., et al. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.032 · Cited by 2,102 · see citing works
Self-citationA molecular atlas of cell types and zonation in the brain vasculature
Vanlandewijck, M., He, L., Mäe, M. A., Andrae, J., Ando, K., Del Gaudio, F., Nahar, K., Lebouvier, T., Laviña, B., Gouveia, L., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25739 · Cited by 2,074 · see citing works
Patlak, C. S., & Blasberg, R. G. (1985) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1038/jcbfm.1985.87 · Cited by 1,673 · see citing works
Glickman, M. E., Rao, S. R., & Schultz, M. R. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.012 · Cited by 1,561 · see citing works
Bell, R. D., Winkler, E. A., Sagare, A. P., Singh, I., LaRue, B., Deane, R., & Zlokovic, B. V. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.043 · Cited by 1,448 · see citing works
Self-citationCerebral blood flow regulation and neurovascular dysfunction in Alzheimer disease
Kisler, K., Nelson, A. R., Montagne, A., & Zlokovic, B. V. (2017) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2017.48 · Cited by 1,243 · see citing works
Self-citationIturria-Medina, Y., Sotero, R. C., Toussaint, P. J., Mateos-Pérez, J. M., Evans, A. C., Initiative, T. A. D. N., Weiner, M. W., Aisen, P., Petersen, R., Jack, C. R., et al. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11934 · Cited by 1,202 · see citing works
Self-citationThe cognitive functions of the caudate nucleus
Grahn, J. A., Parkinson, J. A., & Owen, A. M. (2008) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2008.09.004 · Cited by 942 · see citing works
Toledo, J. B., Arnold, S. E., Raible, K., Brettschneider, J., Xie, S. X., Grossman, M., Monsell, S. E., Kukull, W. A., & Trojanowski, J. Q. (2013) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awt188 · Cited by 849 · see citing works
Quantification of Five Neuropsychological Approaches to Defining Mild Cognitive Impairment
Jak, A. J., Bondi, M. W., Delano-Wood, L., Wierenga, C., Corey-Bloom, J., Salmon, D. P., & Delis, D. C. (2009) · The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/jgp.0b013e31819431d5 · Cited by 823 · see citing works
Bondi, M. W., Initiative, F. T. A. D. N., Edmonds, E. C., Jak, A. J., Clark, L. R., Delano-Wood, L., McDonald, C. R., Nation, D. A., Libon, D. J., Au, R., et al. (2014) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-140276 · Cited by 750 · see citing works
Self-citationHippocampal–prefrontal input supports spatial encoding in working memory
Spellman, T., Rigotti, M., Ahmari, S. E., Fusi, S., Gogos, J. A., & Gordon, J. A. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14445 · Cited by 693 · see citing works
Alzheimer’s disease: A matter of blood–brain barrier dysfunction?
Montagne, A., Zhao, Z., & Zlokovic, B. V. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20171406 · Cited by 672 · see citing works
Self-citationAssociation Between Midlife Vascular Risk Factors and Estimated Brain Amyloid Deposition
Gottesman, R. F., Schneider, A. L. C., Zhou, Y., Coresh, J., Green, E., Gupta, N., Knopman, D. S., Mintz, A., Rahmim, A., Sharrett, A. R., et al. (2017) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2017.3090 · Cited by 650 · see citing works
Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia including Alzheimer's disease
Snyder, H. M., Corriveau, R. A., Craft, S., Faber, J. E., Greenberg, S. M., Knopman, D., Lamb, B. T., Montine, T. J., Nedergaard, M., Schaffer, C. B., et al. (2015) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2014.10.008 · Cited by 603 · see citing works
Self-citationBlood-Brain Barrier Leakage in Patients with Early Alzheimer Disease
van de Haar, H. J., Burgmans, S., Jansen, J. F. A., van Osch, M. J. P., van Buchem, M. A., Muller, M., Hofman, P. A. M., Verhey, F. R. J., & Backes, W. H. (2016) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2016152244 · Cited by 601 · see citing works
Arvanitakis, Z., Capuano, A. W., Leurgans, S. E., Bennett, D. A., & Schneider, J. A. (2016) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(16)30029-1 · Cited by 581 · see citing works
Croxson, P. L., Johansen-Berg, H., Behrens, T. E. J., Robson, M. D., Pinsk, M. A., Gross, C. G., Richter, W., Richter, M. C., Kastner, S., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1311-05.2005 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Winkler, E. A., Bell, R. D., & Zloković, B. V. (2010) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/1750-1326-5-32 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Bennett, R. E., Robbins, A. B., Hu, M., Cao, X., Betensky, R. A., Clark, T., Das, S., & Hyman, B. T. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1710329115 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Quantitative Analysis of PiB-PET with FreeSurfer ROIs
Su, Y., D'Angelo, G. M., Vlassenko, A. G., Zhou, G., Snyder, A. Z., Marcus, D. S., Blazey, T. M., Christensen, J. J., Vora, S., Morris, J. C., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073377 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Self-citationBrain and Retinal Pericytes: Origin, Function and Role
Trost, A., Lange, S., Schroedl, F., Bruckner, D., Motloch, K. A., Bogner, B., Kaser-Eichberger, A., Strohmaier, C., Runge, C., Aigner, L., et al. (2016) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2016.00020 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Cognitive Aging and the Hippocampus in Older Adults
O’Shea, A. M., Cohen, R. A., Porges, E. C., Nissim, N. R., & Woods, A. J. (2016) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2016.00298 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Drachman, D. A. (2014) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2013.11.003 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Amyloid imaging and CSF biomarkers in predicting cognitive impairment up to 7.5 years later
Roe, C. M., Fagan, A. M., Grant, E. A., Hassenstab, J., Moulder, K. L., Maue Dreyfus, D., Sutphen, C. L., Benzinger, T. L. S., Mintun, M. A., Holtzman, D. M., et al. (2013) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182918ca6 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Self-citationNeurovascular unit impairment in early Alzheimer's disease measured with magnetic resonance imaging
van de Haar, H. J., Jansen, J. F. A., van Osch, M. J. P., van Buchem, M. A., Muller, M., Wong, S. M., Hofman, P. A. M., Burgmans, S., Verhey, F. R. J., & Backes, W. H. (2016) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.06.006 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Tau depletion prevents progressive blood-brain barrier damage in a mouse model of tauopathy
Blair, L. J., Frauen, H. D., Zhang, B., Nordhues, B. A., Bijan, S., Lin, Y.-C., Zamudio, F., Hernandez, L. D., Sabbagh, J. J., Selenica, M.-L. B., et al. (2015) · Acta Neuropathologica Communications · doi:10.1186/s40478-015-0186-2 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Verbeek, M. M., Otte‐Höller, I., Wesseling, P., Ruiter, D. J., & de Waal, R. M. W. (1994) · PubMed Central · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Jak, A. J., Preis, S. R., Beiser, A., Seshadri, S. S., Wolf, P. A., Bondi, M. W., & Au, R. (2016) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617716000199 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Evaluating Amyloid-β Oligomers in Cerebrospinal Fluid as a Biomarker for Alzheimer’s Disease
Hölttä, M., Hansson, O., Andréasson, U., Hertze, J., Minthon, L., Nägga, K., Andreasen, N., Zetterberg, H., & Blennow, K. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066381 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Shedding of soluble platelet-derived growth factor receptor-β from human brain pericytes
Sagare, A. P., Sweeney, M. D., Makshanoff, J., & Zlokovic, B. V. (2015) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2015.09.025 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Self-citationNeuroimaging Study Designs, Computational Analyses and Data Provenance Using the LONI Pipeline
Dinov, I. D., Lozev, K., Petrosyan, P., Liu, Z., Eggert, P., Pierce, J., Zamanyan, A., Chakrapani, S., Horn, J. D. V., Parker, D. S., et al. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013070 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Self-citationCerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers of Neurovascular Dysfunction in Mild Dementia and Alzheimer'S Disease
Sweeney, M. D., Sagare, A. P., & Zlokovic, B. V. (2015) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2015.76 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Self-citationBangen, K. J., Nation, D. A., Delano‐Wood, L., Weissberger, G. H., Hansen, L. A., Galasko, D. R., Salmon, D. P., & Bondi, M. W. (2014) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2013.12.025 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Self-citationGordon, B. A., Blazey, T., Su, Y., Fagan, A. M., Holtzman, D. M., Morris, J. C., & Benzinger, T. L. S. (2016) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.2642 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Self-citationBarnes, S. R., Ng, T. S. C., Santa-Maria, N., Montagne, A., Zlokovic, B. V., & Jacobs, R. E. (2015) · BMC Medical Imaging · doi:10.1186/s12880-015-0062-3 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Self-citationNeuroanatomical morphometric characterization of sex differences in youth using statistical learning
Sepehrband, F., Lynch, K. M., Cabeen, R. P., González-Zacarías, C., Zhao, L., D'Arcy, M., Kesselman, C., Herting, M., Dinov, I., Toga, A., et al. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.065 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Self-citationNeuroimaging studies of the striatum in cognition Part I: healthy individuals
Provost, J., Hanganu, A., & Monchi, O. (2015) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2015.00140 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Dynamic ErbB4 Activity in Hippocampal-Prefrontal Synchrony and Top-Down Attention in Rodents
Tan, Z., Robinson, H. L., Yin, D., Liu, Y., Liu, F., Wang, H., Lin, T. W., Xing, G., Gan, L., Xiong, W., et al. (2018) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.03.018 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Tau oligomers in cerebrospinal fluid in Alzheimer's disease
Sengupta, U., Portelius, E., Hansson, O., Farmer, K., Castillo‐Carranza, D., Woltjer, R., Zetterberg, H., Galasko, D., Blennow, K., & Kayed, R. (2017) · Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology · doi:10.1002/acn3.382 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Distinct functional connectivity of the hippocampus during semantic and phonemic fluency
Glikmann‐Johnston, Y., Oren, N., Hendler, T., & Shapira‐Lichter, I. (2015) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.031 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Mendelson, K., Swendeman, S. L., Säftig, P., & Blobel, C. (2010) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m110.102566 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Neuroanatomical correlates of verbal fluency in early Alzheimer’s disease and normal aging
Rodríguez‐Aranda, C., Waterloo, K. K., Johnsen, S. H., Eldevik, P., Sparr, S., Wikran, G., Herder, M., & Vangberg, T. R. (2016) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2016.03.001 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Nation, D. A., Delano‐Wood, L., Bangen, K. J., Wierenga, C. E., Jak, A. J., Hansen, L. A., Galasko, D. R., Salmon, D. P., & Bondi, M. W. (2012) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-2012-111697 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationWallin, A., Blennow, K., & Rosengren, L. (1999) · Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders · doi:10.1097/00002093-199912001-00015 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Pan, C., Korff, A., Galasko, D. R., Ginghină, C., Peskind, E. R., Li, G., Quinn, J. F., Montine, T. J., Cain, K. C., Shi, M. Y., et al. (2015) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-143099 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface
Fischl, B., Sereno, M. I., Tootell, R. B. H., & Dale, A. M. (1999) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(1999)8:4
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Scheltens, P., De Strooper, B., Kivipelto, M., Holstege, H., Chételat, G., Teunissen, C. E., Cummings, J., & van der Flier, W. M. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32205-4 · Cited by 5,465 · see citing works
Small vessel disease: mechanisms and clinical implications
Wardlaw, J. M., Smith, C., & Dichgans, M. (2019) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(19)30079-1 · Cited by 1,777 · see citing works
Role of neuroinflammation in neurodegeneration development
Zhang, W., Xiao, D., Mao, Q., & Xia, H. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01486-5 · Cited by 1,668 · see citing works
“Actually, there are increasing evidence showing that BBB breakdown is among the early markers in AD development.(140,141) Recently, using LPS stimulated mouse model, Zhao et al.”
BackgroundApolipoprotein E and Alzheimer disease: pathobiology and targeting strategies
Yamazaki, Y., Zhao, N., Caulfield, T. R., Liu, C.-C., & Bu, G. (2019) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-019-0228-7 · Cited by 1,425 · see citing works
APOE4 leads to blood–brain barrier dysfunction predicting cognitive decline
Montagne, A., Nation, D. A., Sagare, A. P., Barisano, G., Sweeney, M. D., Chakhoyan, A., Pachicano, M., Joe, E., Nelson, A. R., D’Orazio, L. M., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2247-3 · Cited by 1,281 · see citing works
Self-citationSynergy between amyloid-β and tau in Alzheimer’s disease
Busche, M. A., & Hyman, B. T. (2020) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-020-0687-6 · Cited by 1,242 · see citing works
Biomarkers for neurodegenerative diseases
Hansson, O. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01382-x · Cited by 1,159 · see citing works
Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Xia, Y., Zhang, J., & Chen, L. (2024) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01911-3 · Cited by 1,138 · see citing works
Perivascular spaces in the brain: anatomy, physiology and pathology
Wardlaw, J. M., Benveniste, H., Nedergaard, M., Zlokovic, B. V., Mestre, H., Lee, H., Doubal, F. N., Brown, R., Ramirez, J., MacIntosh, B. J., et al. (2020) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-020-0312-z · Cited by 870 · see citing works
Self-citationMou, Y., Du, Y., Zhou, L., Yue, J., Hu, X., Liu, Y., Chen, S., Lin, X., Zhang, G., Xiao, H., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.796288 · Cited by 432 · see citing works
Pericytes and Neurovascular Function in the Healthy and Diseased Brain
Brown, L. S., Foster, C. G., Courtney, J.-M., King, N. E., Howells, D. W., & Sutherland, B. A. (2019) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2019.00282 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
Ronaldson, P. T., & Davis, T. P. (2020) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1177/0271678x20951995 · Cited by 392 · see citing works
Molecular adaptations of the blood–brain barrier promote stress resilience vs. depression
Dudek, K. A., Dion-Albert, L., Lebel, M., LeClair, K., Labrecque, S., Tuck, E., Ferrer Perez, C., Golden, S. A., Tamminga, C., Turecki, G., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1914655117 · Cited by 361 · see citing works
De Schepper, S., Ge, J. Z., Sierksma, A., Crowley, G., Ferreira, L. S. S., Garceau, D., Toomey, C. E., Sokolova, D., Rueda-Carrasco, J., Shin, S.-H., et al. (2023) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-023-01257-z · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Restoring Wnt/β-catenin signaling is a promising therapeutic strategy for Alzheimer’s disease
Jia, L., Piña-Crespo, J., & Li, Y. (2019) · Molecular Brain · doi:10.1186/s13041-019-0525-5 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Wang, Q., Davis, P. B., Gurney, M. E., & Xu, R. (2021) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.12296 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Senatorov, V. V., Friedman, A. R., Milikovsky, D. Z., Ofer, J., Saar-Ashkenazy, R., Charbash, A., Jahan, N., Chin, G., Mihaly, E., Lin, J. M., et al. (2019) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaw8283 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Prevention of dementia in an ageing world: Evidence and biological rationale
Grande, G., Qiu, C., & Fratiglioni, L. (2020) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2020.101045 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1: A Focus on Neurodegenerative Diseases
Grieco, M., Giorgi, A., Gentile, M. C., d’Erme, M., Morano, S., Maras, B., & Filardi, T. (2019) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.01112 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Blood–Brain Barrier Breakdown in Alzheimer’s Disease: Mechanisms and Targeted Strategies
Alkhalifa, A. E., Al-Ghraiybah, N. F., Odum, J., Shunnarah, J. G., Austin, N., & Kaddoumi, A. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms242216288 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Lipoprotein‐associated phospholipase A2: The story continues
Huang, F., Wang, K., & Shen, J. (2020) · Medicinal Research Reviews · doi:10.1002/med.21597 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Modeling Sporadic Alzheimer's Disease in Human Brain Organoids under Serum Exposure
Chen, X., Sun, G., Tian, E., Zhang, M., Davtyan, H., Beach, T. G., Reiman, E. M., Blurton‐Jones, M., Holtzman, D. M., & Shi, Y. (2021) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202101462 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Systemic factors as mediators of brain homeostasis, ageing and neurodegeneration
Pluvinage, J. V., & Wyss-Coray, T. (2020) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-019-0255-9 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Mithaiwala, M. N., Santana-Coelho, D., Porter, G. A., & O’Connor, J. C. (2021) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells10061548 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Dysfunction of the blood–brain barrier in Alzheimer's disease: Evidence from human studies
Kurz, C., Walker, L., Rauchmann, B., & Perneczky, R. (2022) · Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology · doi:10.1111/nan.12782 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
“While in histopathology, BBB breakdown was detected in patients with advanced AD,(38) brain imaging studies observed BBB breakdown already present at early stages, particularly in the hippocampus.(80,81,87) This discrepancy is partly explained by the nature of autopsy, mainly being performed in advanced cases.”
BackgroundThe use of neuroimaging techniques in the early and differential diagnosis of dementia
Chouliaras, L., & O’Brien, J. T. (2023) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-023-02215-8 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
“…dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with temporal and spatial resolutions to measure BBB permeability have shown a breakdown of the BBB in the hippocampus of patients with early cognitive dysfunction, independent of their amyloid and tau biomarker status and this also occurs in normal aging [73, 74].”
BackgroundDepression in Alzheimer’s Disease: Epidemiology, Mechanisms, and Treatment
Huang, Y.-Y., Gan, Y.-H., Yang, L., Cheng, W., & Yu, J.-T. (2024) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.10.008 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
FDG-PET as an independent biomarker for Alzheimer’s biological diagnosis: A longitudinal study
Initiative, O. B. O. A. D. N., Ou, Y.-N., Xu, W., Li, J.-Q., Guo, Y., Cui, M., Chen, K.-L., Huang, Y.-Y., Dong, Q., Tan, L., et al. (2019) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-019-0512-1 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Time to test antibacterial therapy in Alzheimer’s disease
Panza, F., Lozupone, M., Solfrizzi, V., Watling, M., & Imbimbo, B. P. (2019) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awz244 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Blood-to-brain communication in aging and rejuvenation
Bieri, G., Schroer, A. B., & Villeda, S. A. (2023) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-022-01238-8 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Biomarkers used in Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis, treatment, and prevention
Mahaman, Y. A. R., Embaye, K. S., Huang, F., Li, L., Zhu, F., Wang, J.-Z., Liu, R., Feng, J., & Wang, X. (2022) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2021.101544 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Blood-brain barrier leakage in Alzheimer’s disease: From discovery to clinical relevance
Nehra, G., Bauer, B., & Hartz, A. M. S. (2022) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2022.108119 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Implicating endothelial cell senescence to dysfunction in the ageing and diseased brain
Graves, S. I., & Baker, D. J. (2020) · Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology · doi:10.1111/bcpt.13403 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Gaikwad, S., Senapati, S., Haque, M. A., & Kayed, R. (2024) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.13490 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
He, L., Mäe, M. A., Muhl, L., Sun, Y., Pietilä, R., Nahar, K., Liébanas, E. V., Fagerlund, M. J., Oldner, A., Liu, J., et al. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.05.11.088500 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Tsartsalis, S., Sleven, H., Fancy, N., Wessely, F., Smith, A. M., Willumsen, N., Cheung, T. K. D., Rokicki, M. J., Chau, V., Ifie, E., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-46630-z · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Self-citationMatrix Metalloproteinases as New Targets in Alzheimer’s Disease: Opportunities and Challenges
Zipfel, P., Rochais, C., Baranger, K., Rivera, S., & Dallemagne, P. (2020) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00352 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Yamazaki, Y., Shinohara, M., Yamazaki, A., Ren, Y., Asmann, Y. W., Kanekiyo, T., & Bu, G. (2020) · Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology · doi:10.1161/atvbaha.119.313169 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Nelson, A. R., Sagare, M. A., Wang, Y., Kisler, K., Zhao, Z., & Zlokovic, B. V. (2020) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2020.00108 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Self-citationAPOE2 is associated with longevity independent of Alzheimer’s disease
Shinohara, M., Kanekiyo, T., Tachibana, M., Kurti, A., Shinohara, M., Fu, Y., Zhao, J., Han, X., Sullivan, P. M., Rebeck, G. W., et al. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.62199 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Cerebrovascular Senescence Is Associated With Tau Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease
Bryant, A. G., Hu, M., Carlyle, B. C., Arnold, S. E., Frosch, M. P., Das, S., Hyman, B. T., & Bennett, R. E. (2020) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.575953 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Jeon, M.-T., Kim, K.-S., Kim, E. S., Lee, S., Kim, J., Hoe, H.-S., & Kim, D.-G. (2021) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2021.101333 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Basal lamina changes in neurodegenerative disorders
Nguyen, B., Bix, G., & Yao, Y. (2021) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-021-00502-y · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Munawara, U., Catanzaro, M., Xu, W., Tan, C., Hirokawa, K., Bosco, N., Dumoulin, D., Khalil, A., Larbi, A., Lévesque, S., et al. (2021) · Immunity & Ageing · doi:10.1186/s12979-021-00236-x · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Emerging Roles of Endothelial Nitric Oxide in Preservation of Cognitive Health
Katusic, Z. S., d’Uscio, L. V., & He, T. (2023) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.122.041444 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Shi, L., Rocha, M., Zhang, W., Jiang, M., Li, S., Ye, Q., Hassan, S. H., Liu, L., Adair, M. N., Xu, J., et al. (2020) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1177/0271678x20925655 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Kiss, T., Nyúl-Tóth, Á., DelFavero, J., Balasubramanian, P., Tarantini, S., Faakye, J., Gulej, R., Ahire, C., Ungvari, A., Yabluchanskiy, A., et al. (2022) · GeroScience · doi:10.1007/s11357-022-00521-7 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
ApoE4 reduction: An emerging and promising therapeutic strategy for Alzheimer's disease
Li, Y., Macyczko, J. R., Liu, C.-C., & Bu, G. (2022) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2022.03.011 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
A New Hypothesis for Alzheimer’s Disease: The Lipid Invasion Model
Rudge, J. D. (2022) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Reports · doi:10.3233/adr-210299 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Kong, F., Wu, T., Dai, J., Zhai, Z., Cai, J., Zhu, Z., Xu, Y., & Sun, T. (2023) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2023.1205207 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Kochman, U., Sitka, H., Kuźniar, J., Czaja, M., Kozubek, P., Beszłej, J. A., & Leszek, J. (2026) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/s12035-025-05417-z · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Impact of cardiovascular hemodynamics on cognitive aging
Moore, E. E., & Jefferson, A. L. (2021) · Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology · doi:10.1161/atvbaha.120.311909 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Omega-3 fatty acids are associated with blood-brain barrier integrity in a healthy aging population
Barnes, S., Chowdhury, S., Gatto, N. M., Fraser, G. E., & Lee, G. J. (2021) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.2273 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Pericytes: Problems and Promises for CNS Repair
Laredo, F., Plebanski, J., & Tedeschi, A. (2019) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2019.00546 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“The cognitive deficits that AD patients experience have been recently attributed to the breakdown in the BBB (Nation et al., 2019).”
BackgroundInfluentialKempuraj, D., Ahmed, M. E., Selvakumar, G. P., Thangavel, R., Raikwar, S. P., Zaheer, S. A., Iyer, S. S., Govindarajan, R., Nattanmai Chandrasekaran, P., Burton, C., et al. (2021) · Neurotoxicity Research · doi:10.1007/s12640-020-00288-9 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Jana, A., Wang, X., Leasure, J. W., Magana, L., Wang, L., Kim, Y.-M., Dodiya, H., Toth, P. T., Sisodia, S. S., & Rehman, J. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-20889-y · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Bony, B. A., Tarudji, A. W., Miller, H. A., Gowrikumar, S., Roy, S., Curtis, E. T., Gee, C. C., Vecchio, A., Dhawan, P., & Kievit, F. M. (2021) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.1c08432 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Diagnostic biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease
Andersen, E., Casteigne, B., Chapman, W. D., Creed, A., Foster, F., Lapins, A., Shatz, R., & Sawyer, R. P. (2021) · Biomarkers in Neuropsychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.bionps.2021.100041 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Albrecht, D. S., Sagare, A., Pachicano, M., Sweeney, M. D., Toga, A., Zlokovic, B., Chui, H., Joe, E., Schneider, L., Morris, J. C., et al. (2021) · Brain, Behavior, and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2021.01.010 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationWhen the infectious environment meets the AD brain
Ganz, T., Fainstein, N., & Ben-Hur, T. (2022) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-022-00559-3 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Jones, L., Kumar, J., Mistry, A., Sankar Chittoor Mana, T., Perry, G., Reddy, V. P., & Obrenovich, M. (2019) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines7020024 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Versatile nanomaterials for Alzheimer’s disease: Pathogenesis inspired disease-modifying therapy
Xi, Y., Chen, Y., Jin, Y., Han, G., Song, M., Song, T., Shi, Y., Tao, L., Huang, Z., Zhou, J., et al. (2022) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.02.034 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Miller, S. R., Luxem, K., Lauderdale, K., Nambiar, P., Honma, P. S., Ly, K. K., Bangera, S., Bullock, M., Shin, J., Kaliss, N., et al. (2024) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114870 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Li, X., Tang, X., Zeng, J., Duan, L., Hou, Z., Li, L., Guo, Y., Chai, C., Liu, J., Wang, Y., et al. (2026) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2025.12.020 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Oral Microbially-Induced Small Extracellular Vesicles Cross the Blood–Brain Barrier
Elashiry, M., Carroll, A., Yuan, J., Liu, Y., Hamrick, M., Cutler, C. W., Wang, Q., & Elsayed, R. (2024) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms25084509 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Garbarino, V. R., Palavicini, J. P., Melendez, J., Barthelemy, N. R., He, Y., Kautz, T. F., Lopez-Cruzan, M., Mathews, J. J., Xu, P., Zhang, B., et al. (2025) · Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.neurot.2025.e00591 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“Additionally, the inclusion of measures more directly informative about BBB integrity may be considered in future trials, including dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCA-MRI) imaging analysis [67,68] or CSF biomarkers such as PDGFR β [69].”
Zhang, Q., Song, Q., Gu, X., Zheng, M., Wang, A., Jiang, G., Huang, M., Chen, H., Qiu, Y., Bo, B., et al. (2021) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202001918 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Liao, K., Niu, F., Hu, G., & Buch, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2022.984375 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Sachdev, P. S. (2020) · Current Opinion in Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/yco.0000000000000577 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Use of the MicroSiM (&#181;SiM) Barrier Tissue Platform for Modeling the Blood-Brain Barrier
McCloskey, M. C., Kasap, P., Trempel, M., Widom, L. P., Kuebel, J., Chen, K., Gaborski, T. R., Engelhardt, B., & McGrath, J. L. (2024) · Journal of Visualized Experiments · doi:10.3791/65258 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Hernandez Torres, L. D., Rezende, F., Peschke, E., Will, O., Hövener, J.-B., Spiecker, F., Özorhan, Ü., Lampe, J., Stölting, I., Aherrahrou, Z., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2024.1338458 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Cai, M., Chen, S., Du, Y., Li, S., Dong, P., Wang, L., Yang, R., Hu, J., & Zhu, L. (2022) · Journal of Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s12031-022-02052-4 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Yin, H., Lu, Z., Deng, Y., Tian, X., & Gong, Q. (2026) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2025.102952 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Primary Cilia and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Alzheimer's Disease
Sunderman, C. L., Forero, K. V., Alorjani, Q., Buqaileh, R., Gallagher, G. M., Ventresca, S. M., Messer, W. S., & AbouAlaiwi, W. A. (2025) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci15091004 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“One study looked at brain capillary damage using PDGFR β as a CSF biomarker and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI [121].”
Influential
- Authors
- Nation, D. A., Sweeney, M. D., Montagne, A., Sagare, A. P., D’Orazio, L. M., Pachicano, M., Sepehrband, F., Nelson, A. R., Buennagel, D. P., Harrington, M. G., Benzinger, T. L. S., Fagan, A. M., Ringman, J. M., Schneider, L. S., Morris, J. C., Chui, H. C., Law, M., Toga, A. W., & Zlokovic, B. V.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Huntington Medical Research Institutes (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Medicine
- Published
- 2019-01-14
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 270-276
- ISSN
- 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-170X
- PMC
- PMC6367058
- OpenAlex
- W2911147760
- Semantic Scholar
- 2d4c2320820f57ab71715ec28ba9a3be66d05e1e
- Cited by
- 1,728
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 212 · 2025: 256 · 2024: 257 · 2023: 241 · 2022: 203 · 2021: 230 · 2020: 231 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 83.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG023084, R01AG039452, R21AG055034, R01AG055770, P50AG005681, P50AG005142, K99AG058780, P01AG003991, RF1AG039452, R00AG058780, R01AG054434, P01AG052350, P01AG026276)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS100459, R01NS090904, R01NS034467)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- blood-brain barrier disruption, cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, PDGFRβ, pericytes, blood-brain barrier permeability, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, amyloid-beta, tau protein, hippocampus
- MeSH terms
- Blood-Brain Barrier, Humans, Biomarkers, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Receptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor beta, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Cognitive Dysfunction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review