Cited by 2,799AI in cancer detectionRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical-grade computational pathology using weakly supervised deep learning on whole slide images

Open access

Abstract

The development of decision support systems for pathology and their deployment in clinical practice have been hindered by the need for large manually annotated datasets. To overcome this problem, we present a multiple instance learning-based deep learning system that uses only the reported diagnoses as labels for training, thereby avoiding expensive and time-consuming pixel-wise manual annotations. We evaluated this framework at scale on a dataset of 44,732 whole slide images from 15,187 patients without any form of data curation. Tests on prostate cancer, basal cell carcinoma and breast cancer metastases to axillary lymph nodes resulted in areas under the curve above 0.98 for all cancer types. Its clinical application would allow pathologists to exclude 65-75% of slides while retaining 100% sensitivity. Our results show that this system has the ability to train accurate classification models at unprecedented scale, laying the foundation for the deployment of computational decision support systems in clinical practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41591-019-0508-1

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ball, C. S. The early history of the compound microscope. Bios 37, 51–60 (1966).
  2. Hajdu, S. I. Microscopic contributions of pioneer pathologists. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 41, 201–206 (2011).
  3. LeBoit, P. E. et al. Pathology and Genetics of Skin Tumours (IARC Press, 2006).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Campanella, G., Hanna, M. G., Geneslaw, L., Miraflor, A., Werneck Krauss Silva, V., Busam, K. J., Brogi, E., Reuter, V. E., Klimstra, D. S., & Fuchs, T. J.
Affiliations
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Fuchs, Thomas J.
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2019-07-15
Volume
25
Issue
8
Pages
1301-1309
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W2956228567
Cited by
2,799
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 585 · 2025: 457 · 2024: 435 · 2023: 400 · 2022: 366 · 2021: 304 · 2020: 216 · 2019: 29
FWCI
104.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P30CA008748)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
computational pathology, weakly supervised learning, multiple instance learning, whole slide images, cancer diagnosis, prostate cancer, basal cell carcinoma, breast cancer metastasis, axillary lymph nodes, decision support system, annotation-free training, clinical implementation
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Breast Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Basal Cell, Basal Cell Carcinoma, Female, Humans, Male, Prostatic Neoplasms, Decision Support Systems, Clinical, Neoplasm Grading

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review