The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor
Abstract
Almost two decades into the new millennium, it is unlikely that the use of digital technologies will slow in any significant way, particularly in the public sector. As local and regional public age...
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01405730 · Cited by 16,338 · cited 1×
“Public agencies in the United States have a history of simultaneously attempting to mitigate wicked problems (Rittel & Webber, 1973), while unfortunately perpetuating their existence.”
BackgroundStreet-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services
Lipsky, M. (1981) · Michigan Law Review · doi:10.2307/1288305 · Cited by 8,981
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 10.7758/9781610446631 · DOI
- O’Leary R, 2006, The ethics of dissent: Managing guerilla government
Cited by
Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control
Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0174 · Cited by 2,732
Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems
Selbst, A. D., Boyd, D., Friedler, S. A., Venkatasubramanian, S., & Vertesi, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287598 · Cited by 1,631
Potential Biases in Machine Learning Algorithms Using Electronic Health Record Data
Gianfrancesco, M. A., Tamang, S., Yazdany, J., & Schmajuk, G. (2018) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3763 · Cited by 1,395
What Do Platforms Do? Understanding the Gig Economy
Vallas, S., & Schor, J. B. (2020) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857 · Cited by 1,354
Consumers and artificial intelligence: An experiential perspective
Puntoni, S., Reczek, R. W., Giesler, M., & Botti, S. (2021) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/0022242920953847 · Cited by 1,547
When data is capital: Datafication, accumulation, and extraction
Sadowski, J. (2019) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951718820549 · Cited by 1,057
Decolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial Intelligence
Mohamed, S., Png, M.-T., & Isaac, W. (2020) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-020-00405-8 · Cited by 912
Transparency and the black box problem: why we do not trust AI
von Eschenbach, W. J. (2021) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-021-00477-0 · Cited by 786
Governing artificial intelligence: ethical, legal and technical opportunities and challenges
Cath, C. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2018.0080 · Cited by 745
Algorithmic injustice: A relational ethics approach
Birhane, A. (2021) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2021.100205 · Cited by 707
Algorithmic Fairness: Choices, Assumptions, and Definitions
Mitchell, S., Potash, E., Barocas, S., D'Amour, A., & Lum, K. (2021) · Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application · doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-042720-125902 · Cited by 687
Accountable Artificial Intelligence: Holding Algorithms to Account
Busuioc, M. (2021) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13293 · Cited by 652
“…drive innovation in this area—but are also widely relied upon by governments and public (regulatory) bodies (AI Now Institute NYU 2018; Citron 2008; Eubanks 2018; European Parliament Study 2019; O’Neil 2016; Richardson, Schultz, and Crawford 2019; Shark 2019; UK Government Office for Science…”
BackgroundInfluentialKuziemski, M., & Misuraca, G. (2020) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101976 · Cited by 610
Towards a standard for identifying and managing bias in artificial intelligence
Schwartz, R., Vassilev, A., Greene, K., Perine, L., Burt, A., & Hall, P. (2022) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.1270 · Cited by 548
Managing visibility on YouTube through algorithmic gossip
Bishop, S. (2019) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444819854731 · Cited by 535
Big Data from the South(s): Beyond Data Universalism
Milan, S., & Treré, E. (2019) · Television & New Media · doi:10.1177/1527476419837739 · Cited by 511
Four Responsibility Gaps with Artificial Intelligence: Why they Matter and How to Address them
Santoni de Sio, F., & Mecacci, G. (2021) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-021-00450-x · Cited by 490
“For example, in her book Automating Inequality , Virginia Eubanks (2018) tells the stories of private contractors not being able and/or willing of disclosing the reasons for the failures/mistakes in their digital systems used by some US states for welfare benefit allocation procedures.”
BackgroundAlon-Barkat, S., & Busuioc, M. (2023) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/muac007 · Cited by 469
“Such concerns become particularly relevant given welldocumented failures and malfunctioning of AI(-informed) systems (e.g., Benjamin 2019; Buolamwini and Gebru 2018; Ferguson 2017; Eubanks 2018; O’Neill 2016; Richardson, Schultz, and Crawford 2019; Rudin 2019).”
BackgroundInfluentialMadaio, M. A., Stark, L., Wortman Vaughan, J., & Wallach, H. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376445 · Cited by 436
Exploring artificial intelligence adoption in public organizations: a comparative case study
Neumann, O., Guirguis, K., & Steiner, R. (2024) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2022.2048685 · Cited by 451
“Lastly, Eubanks (2017) as well as Alon-Barkat and Busuioc (2022) explored how automated decision-making in public services may negatively impact already disad-vantaged groups and reinforce existing biases, while Bannister and Connolly (2020) provided a taxonomy of decision-making algorithms in…”
BackgroundInfluentialAlgorithmic bias in data-driven innovation in the age of AI
Akter, S., McCarthy, G., Sajib, S., Michael, K., Dwivedi, Y. K., D’Ambra, J., & Shen, K. N. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102387 · Cited by 440
Transparency in Algorithmic and Human Decision-Making: Is There a Double Standard?
Zerilli, J., Knott, A., Maclaurin, J., & Gavaghan, C. (2019) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-018-0330-6 · Cited by 420
To be or not to be algorithm aware: a question of a new digital divide?
Gran, A.-B., Booth, P., & Bucher, T. (2021) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2020.1736124 · Cited by 410
Greene, D., Hoffmann, A. L., & Stark, L. (2019) · Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.24251/hicss.2019.258 · Cited by 386
Assessing risk, automating racism
Benjamin, R. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaz3873 · Cited by 378
The ethics of algorithms: key problems and solutions
Tsamados, A., Aggarwal, N., Cowls, J., Morley, J., Roberts, H., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2022) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-021-01154-8 · Cited by 384
Artificial Intelligence, Discretion, and Bureaucracy
Bullock, J. B. (2019) · The American Review of Public Administration · doi:10.1177/0275074019856123 · Cited by 346
Predict and Surveil: Data, Discretion, and the Future of Policing
Brayne, S. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190684099.001.0001 · Cited by 334
Wieringa, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372833 · Cited by 321
Trusted strangers: Carework platforms’ cultural entrepreneurship in the on-demand economy
Ticona, J., & Mateescu, A. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444818773727 · Cited by 320
Fairness perceptions of algorithmic decision-making: A systematic review of the empirical literature
Starke, C., Baleis, J., Keller, B., & Marcinkowski, F. (2022) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517221115189 · Cited by 316
Improving public services using artificial intelligence: possibilities, pitfalls, governance
Henman, P. (2020) · Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/23276665.2020.1816188 · Cited by 310
Sendak, M. P., Ratliff, W., Sarro, D., Alderton, E., Futoma, J., Gao, M., Nichols, M., Revoir, M., Yashar, F., Miller, C., et al. (2020) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/15182 · Cited by 287
Cave, S., & Dihal, K. (2020) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-020-00415-6 · Cited by 279
Technologies of Crime Prediction: The Reception of Algorithms in Policing and Criminal Courts
Brayne, S., & Christin, A. (2021) · Social Problems · doi:10.1093/socpro/spaa004 · Cited by 279
A review of Earth Artificial Intelligence
Sun, Z., Sandoval, L., Crystal-Ornelas, R., Mousavi, S. M., Wang, J., Lin, C., Cristea, N., Tong, D., Carande, W. H., Ma, X., et al. (2022) · Computers & Geosciences · doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2022.105034 · Cited by 271
The Flaws of Policies Requiring Human Oversight of Government Algorithms
Green, B. (2021) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3921216 · Cited by 259
Knox, J., Williamson, B., & Bayne, S. (2020) · Learning Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2019.1623251 · Cited by 261
The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Practices, Challenges, and Debates
Holmes, W., & Porayska-Pomsta, K. (2022) · doi:10.4324/9780429329067 · Cited by 258
Large image datasets: A pyrrhic win for computer vision?
Birhane, A., & Prabhu, V. U. (2021) · 2021 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · doi:10.1109/wacv48630.2021.00158 · Cited by 257
Young, M. M., Bullock, J. B., & Lecy, J. D. (2019) · Perspectives on Public Management and Governance · doi:10.1093/ppmgov/gvz014 · Cited by 255
Enchanted Determinism: Power without Responsibility in Artificial Intelligence
Campolo, A., & Crawford, K. (2020) · Engaging Science, Technology, and Society · doi:10.17351/ests2020.277 · Cited by 254
Putting AI ethics to work: are the tools fit for purpose?
Ayling, J., & Chapman, A. (2022) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-021-00084-x · Cited by 253
Hutchinson, B., Smart, A., Hanna, A., Denton, R., Greer, C., Kjartansson, O., Barnes, P., & Mitchell, M. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445918 · Cited by 279
The Fallacy of AI Functionality
Raji, I. D., Kumar, I. E., Horowitz, A., & Selbst, A. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533158 · Cited by 251
Sociotechnical Harms of Algorithmic Systems: Scoping a Taxonomy for Harm Reduction
Shelby, R., Rismani, S., Henne, K., Moon, A., Rostamzadeh, N., Nicholas, P., Yilla-Akbari, N., Gallegos, J., Smart, A., Garcia, E., et al. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3600211.3604673 · Cited by 279
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2023) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13483 · Cited by 259
Nechushtai, E., & Lewis, S. C. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.043 · Cited by 237
Hannah-Moffat, K. (2019) · Theoretical Criminology · doi:10.1177/1362480618763582 · Cited by 236
Explicating AI Literacy of Employees at Digital Workplaces
Cetindamar, D., Kitto, K., Wu, M., Zhang, Y., Abedin, B., & Knight, S. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2021.3138503 · Cited by 239
AI hyped? A horizon scan of discourse on artificial intelligence in education (AIED) and development
Nemorin, S., Vlachidis, A., Ayerakwa, H. M., & Andriotis, P. (2023) · Learning, Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2022.2095568 · Cited by 229
On the genealogy of machine learning datasets: A critical history of ImageNet
Denton, E., Hanna, A., Amironesei, R., Smart, A., & Nicole, H. (2021) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517211035955 · Cited by 221
The flaws of policies requiring human oversight of government algorithms
Green, B. (2022) · Computer Law & Security Review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105681 · Cited by 263
“On the other hand, the use of algorithms by governments has been a source of numerous injustices (Angwin et al., 2016; Calo & Citron, 2021; Eubanks, 2018; Green, 2019; Henley & Booth, 2020).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTo chat or bot to chat: Ethical issues with using chatbots in mental health
Coghlan, S., Leins, K., Sheldrick, S., Cheong, M., Gooding, P., & D'Alfonso, S. (2023) · DIGITAL HEALTH · doi:10.1177/20552076231183542 · Cited by 215
Brown, A., Chouldechova, A., Putnam-Hornstein, E., Tobin, A., & Vaithianathan, R. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300271 · Cited by 207
The algorithm audit: Scoring the algorithms that score us
Brown, S., Davidovic, J., & Hasan, A. (2021) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951720983865 · Cited by 204
Algorithmic Impact Assessments and Accountability: The Co-construction of Impacts
Metcalf, J., Moss, E., Watkins, E. A., Singh, R., & Elish, M. C. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445935 · Cited by 195
Giovanola, B., & Tiribelli, S. (2023) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01455-6 · Cited by 193
Who Audits the Auditors? Recommendations from a field scan of the algorithmic auditing ecosystem
Costanza-Chock, S., Raji, I. D., & Buolamwini, J. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533213 · Cited by 277
Problematic Machine Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review of Algorithm Audits
Bandy, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3449148 · Cited by 193
Street-Level Algorithms: A Theory at the Gaps Between Policy and Decisions
Alkhatib, A., & Bernstein, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300760 · Cited by 188
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Meijer, A. (2022) · Perspectives on Public Management and Governance · doi:10.1093/ppmgov/gvac008 · Cited by 189
Robotics and automation in the city: a research agenda
Macrorie, R., Marvin, S., & While, A. (2021) · Urban Geography · doi:10.1080/02723638.2019.1698868 · Cited by 177
Meijer, A., Lorenz, L., & Wessels, M. (2021) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13391 · Cited by 174
Lessons learned from AI ethics principles for future actions
Hickok, M. (2021) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-020-00008-1 · Cited by 168
User trust in artificial intelligence: A comprehensive conceptual framework
Yang, R., & Wibowo, S. (2022) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-022-00592-6 · Cited by 170
Algorithmic realism: expanding the boundaries of algorithmic thought
Green, B., & Viljoen, S. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372840 · Cited by 161
Parviainen, J., & Rantala, J. (2022) · Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-021-10049-w · Cited by 146
AI auditing: The Broken Bus on the Road to AI Accountability
Birhane, A., Steed, R., Ojewale, V., Vecchione, B., & Raji, I. D. (2024) · 2024 IEEE Conference on Secure and Trustworthy Machine Learning (SaTML) · doi:10.1109/satml59370.2024.00037 · Cited by 158
Putting the data before the algorithm in big data addressing personalized healthcare
Cahan, E. M., Hernandez-Boussard, T., Thadaney-Israni, S., & Rubin, D. L. (2019) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-019-0157-2 · Cited by 149
The Rhetoric and Reality of Anthropomorphism in Artificial Intelligence
Watson, D. (2019) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-019-09506-6 · Cited by 148
Marda, V. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2018.0087 · Cited by 161
Ethical machines: The human-centric use of artificial intelligence
Lepri, B., Oliver, N., & Pentland, A. (2021) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.102249 · Cited by 149
Algorithmic Decision-Making and the Control Problem
Zerilli, J., Knott, A., Maclaurin, J., & Gavaghan, C. (2019) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-019-09513-7 · Cited by 145
Kawakami, A., Sivaraman, V., Cheng, H.-F., Stapleton, L., Cheng, Y., Qing, D., Perer, A., Wu, Z. S., Zhu, H., & Holstein, K. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517439 · Cited by 143
Public engagement and AI: A values analysis of national strategies
Wilson, C. (2022) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2021.101652 · Cited by 140
AI Empire: Unraveling the interlocking systems of oppression in generative AI's global order
Tacheva, J., & Ramasubramanian, S. (2023) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517231219241 · Cited by 138
Fit for purpose? The GDPR and the governance of European digital health
Marelli, L., Lievevrouw, E., & Van Hoyweghen, I. (2020) · Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/01442872.2020.1724929 · Cited by 137
Ageism in the era of digital platforms
Rosales, A., & Fernández-Ardèvol, M. (2020) · Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies · doi:10.1177/1354856520930905 · Cited by 137
Bodó, B. (2021) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444820939922 · Cited by 137
Artificial intelligence in fiction: between narratives and metaphors
Hermann, I. (2023) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-021-01299-6 · Cited by 134
Z-Inspection ® : A Process to Assess Trustworthy AI
Zicari, R. V., Brodersen, J., Brusseau, J., Dudder, B., Eichhorn, T., Ivanov, T., Kararigas, G., Kringen, P., McCullough, M., Moslein, F., et al. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society · doi:10.1109/tts.2021.3066209 · Cited by 134
Representative Bureaucracy and Attitudes Toward Automated Decision Making
Miller, S. M., & Keiser, L. R. (2021) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/muaa019 · Cited by 127
Generative AI and the politics of visibility
Gillespie, T. (2024) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517241252131 · Cited by 122
The Ethics of Algorithms: Key Problems and Solutions
Tsamados, A., Aggarwal, N., Cowls, J., Morley, J., Roberts, H., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2021) · Philosophical Studies Series · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-81907-1_8 · Cited by 121
Tuning EU equality law to algorithmic discrimination: Three pathways to resilience
Xenidis, R. (2020) · Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law · doi:10.1177/1023263x20982173 · Cited by 123
How Different Groups Prioritize Ethical Values for Responsible AI
Jakesch, M., Buçinca, Z., Amershi, S., & Olteanu, A. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533097 · Cited by 116
Artificial intelligence and clinical anatomical education: Promises and perils
Lazarus, M. D., Truong, M., Douglas, P., & Selwyn, N. (2024) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.2221 · Cited by 116
This Thing Called Fairness: Disciplinary Confusion Realizing a Value in Technology
Mulligan, D. K., Kroll, J. A., Kohli, N., & Wong, R. Y. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3359221 · Cited by 111
Self-Sovereignty for Refugees? The Contested Horizons of Digital Identity
Cheesman, M. (2022) · Geopolitics · doi:10.1080/14650045.2020.1823836 · Cited by 109
The Distance Cure: A History of Teletherapy
Zeavin, H. (2021) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/12823.001.0001 · Cited by 109
The Biometric Assemblage: Surveillance, Experimentation, Profit, and the Measuring of Refugee Bodies
Madianou, M. (2019) · Television & New Media · doi:10.1177/1527476419857682 · Cited by 107
Cobbe, J. (2019) · Legal Studies · doi:10.1017/lst.2019.9 · Cited by 174
Bell, A., Solano-Kamaiko, I., Nov, O., & Stoyanovich, J. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533090 · Cited by 103
Datafying anti-poverty programmes: implications for data justice
Masiero, S., & Das, S. (2019) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2019.1575448 · Cited by 103
Deng, W. H., Guo, B., Devrio, A., Shen, H., Eslami, M., & Holstein, K. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581026 · Cited by 103
Digital welfare fraud detection and the Dutch SyRI judgment
van Bekkum, M., & Borgesius, F. Z. (2021) · European Journal of Social Security · doi:10.1177/13882627211031257 · Cited by 108
“Indeed, large-scale data processing for fraud detection creates a risk of discriminating against certain groups (see, from a US perspective, (Eubanks, 2018).”
Kaun, A. (2022) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2021.1924827 · Cited by 97
Shifting Concepts of Value: Designing Algorithmic Decision-Support Systems for Public Services
Holten Møller, N., Shklovski, I., & Hildebrandt, T. T. (2020) · Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society · doi:10.1145/3419249.3420149 · Cited by 97
Nonhuman humanitarianism: when 'AI for good' can be harmful
Madianou, M. (2021) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2021.1909100 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Lebovits, H.
- Venue
- Public Integrity
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-10-15
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 448-452
- ISSN
- 1099-9922 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2897702578
- Cited by
- 3,279
- References
- 2
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
