Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 90

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ethnic discrimination in hiring: comparing groups across contexts. Results from a cross-national field experiment

Lancee, Bram·2021·Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
DOI 10.1080/1369183x.2019.1622744
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Existing field experimental research unequivocally shows the existence of ethnic discrimination in the labour market. Furthermore, studies have documented considerable variation in discrimination rates across countries. However, while the field of discrimination research is rapidly expanding, there are at present no harmonised comparative studies. This is unfortunate, as we do not know why there are cross-national differences in discrimination. In this paper, I present the GEMM study (N = 19,181), a harmonised cross-national field experiment on hiring discrimination. The GEMM study contains 53 ethnic minority groups and is carried out in six countries: Germany, Norway, The Netherlands, Spain, United Kingdom and the United States. Furthermore, I discuss the need and potential for a comparative analysis of discrimination and outline the methodological challenges of carrying out a cross-national field experiment. The special issue presents results for the major ethnic minority groups in six countries and compares discrimination rates across national contexts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1369183x.2019.1622744

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 10.31235/osf.io/2qzus · DOI
  2. Bogardus, E. S. 1925. “Measuring Social Distance.” Journal of Applied Sociology 9: 299–308.

Cited by

See all 90

Metadata

Authors
Lancee, B.
Affiliations
Department of Sociology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Venue
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2019-06-24
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
1181-1200
ISSN
  • 1369-183X
  • 1469-9451
DOI
10.1080/1369183x.2019.1622744
Cited by
90
References
70
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.