Cited by 11Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringTactile and Sensory InteractionsPain Management and Treatment

Virtual reality validation of naturalistic modulation strategies to counteract fading in retinal stimulation

Open access
Thorn, Jacob Thomas, Chenais, Naïg Aurelia Ludmilla, Hinrichs, Sandrine, Chatelain, Marion, Ghezzi, Diego·2022·Journal of Neural Engineering

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract Objective . Temporal resolution is a key challenge in artificial vision. Several prosthetic approaches are limited by the perceptual fading of evoked phosphenes upon repeated stimulation from the same electrode. Therefore, implanted patients are forced to perform active scanning, via head movements, to refresh the visual field viewed by the camera. However, active scanning is a draining task, and it is crucial to find compensatory strategies to reduce it. Approach . To address this question, we implemented perceptual fading in simulated prosthetic vision using virtual reality. Then, we quantified the effect of fading on two indicators: the time to complete a reading task and the head rotation during the task. We also tested if stimulation strategies previously proposed to increase the persistence of responses in retinal ganglion cells to electrical stimulation could improve these indicators. Main results . This study shows that stimulation strategies based on interrupted pulse trains and randomisation of the pulse duration allows significant reduction of both the time to complete the task and the head rotation during the task. Significance . The stimulation strategy used in retinal implants is crucial to counteract perceptual fading and to reduce active head scanning during prosthetic vision. In turn, less active scanning might improve the patient’s comfort in artificial vision.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2552/ac5a5c

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thorn, J. T., Chenais, N. A. L., Hinrichs, S., Chatelain, M., & Ghezzi, D.
Affiliations
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Corresponding author
Ghezzi, Diego
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2022-03-29
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
026016
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W4220828149
Cited by
11
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
  • Foundation E. et G. Gelbert
  • Marie Skłodowska-Curie (861423)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
retinal prosthesis, perceptual fading, phosphenes, stimulation strategies, prosthetic vision, reading tasks, retinal ganglion cells, temporal resolution, virtual reality simulation
MeSH terms
Virtual Reality, Electric Stimulation, Humans, Phosphenes, Retina, Retinal Ganglion Cells, Vision, Ocular, Visual Prosthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review