Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,013

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

SOCIAL SUPPORT AND MORTALITY IN AN ELDERLY COMMUNITY POPULATION1

BLAZER, DAN G.·1982·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

A community sample made in the fall of 1972 in Durham County, North Carolina, and that consisted of 331 persons 65 years of age and older was assessed for adequacy of social support along three parameters: roles and available attachments, perceived social support, and frequency of social interaction. This approach to the assessment of social support complements previous approaches to the measurement of social support which have not compared with the various components of the construct. Mortality status, the outcome variable, was determined 30 months after the initial assessment. The crude relative risks of mortality were 1.96 for impaired roles and available attachments, 3.86 for impaired perceived social support, and 2.72 for impaired frequency of social interaction. Ten potential confounding variables-age, sex, race, economic status, physical health status, self-care capacity, depressive symptoms, cognitive functioning, stressful life events, and cigarette smoking-were controlled using binary linear regression analysis. The estimates of relative mortality risk were 2.04, 3.40, and 1.88, respectively, for impaired roles and available attachments, impaired perceived social support, and impaired frequency of social interaction when the control variables were included in a regression model. Therefore, these three parameters of social support significantly predicted 30-month mortality in both crude and controlled analyses in a community sample of older adults.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113351

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
BLAZER, D. G.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1982-05
Volume
115
Issue
5
Pages
684-694
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2162699583
Cited by
1,013
References
0
FWCI
31.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.