Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 85

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The impact of neuroscience on society: cognitive enhancement in neuropsychiatric disorders and in healthy people

Sahakian, Barbara J., Bruhl, Annette B., Cook, Jennifer, Killikelly, Clare, Savulich, George, Piercy, Thomas, Hafizi, Sepehr, Perez, Jesus, Fernandez-Egea, Emilio, Suckling, John, Jones, Peter B.·2015·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2014.0214
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In addition to causing distress and disability to the individual, neuropsychiatric disorders are also extremely expensive to society and governments. These disorders are both common and debilitating and impact on cognition, functionality and wellbeing. Cognitive enhancing drugs, such as cholinesterase inhibitors and methylphenidate, are used to treat cognitive dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, respectively. Other cognitive enhancers include specific computerized cognitive training and devices. An example of a novel form of cognitive enhancement using the technological advancement of a game on an iPad that also acts to increase motivation is presented. Cognitive enhancing drugs, such as methylphenidate and modafinil, which were developed as treatments, are increasingly being used by healthy people. Modafinil not only affects ‘cold’ cognition, but also improves ‘hot’ cognition, such as emotion recognition and task-related motivation. The lifestyle use of ‘smart drugs' raises both safety concerns as well as ethical issues, including coercion and increasing disparity in society. As a society, we need to consider which forms of cognitive enhancement (e.g. pharmacological, exercise, lifelong learning) are acceptable and for which groups (e.g. military, doctors) under what conditions (e.g. war, shift work) and by what methods we would wish to improve and flourish.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2014.0214

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Research works printed but not linked: 113

  1. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00107 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.04.002 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.015 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.10.007 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/s40519-014-0119-2 · DOI
  6. 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.06.042 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1017/S0033291710001042 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/j.jad.2006.02.016 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/j.schres.2010.08.007 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/schbul/sbq077 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2012.01011.x · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1002/da.22063 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13081075 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.2217/ahe.11.92 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/0140-6736(91)92656-M · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.03.037 · DOI
  18. Blackwell AD, 2005, Dementia, 45
  19. 10.1016/j.jalz.2010.07.001 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1002/mds.22786 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/mds.23884 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1002/mds.21656 · DOI
  23. 10.1097/WNF.0b013e3181aa916a · DOI
  24. 10.1007/s00415-009-5351-8 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s00429-011-0314-0 · DOI
  26. 10.1002/ana.22029 · DOI
  27. 10.1093/brain/awu117 · DOI
  28. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00707.x · DOI
  29. 10.1093/brain/awf049 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.01.024 · DOI
  31. 10.1002/mds.22307 · DOI
  32. 10.1007/s00787-010-0097-5 · DOI
  33. 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32835f19c3 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Kessler RC, 2011, ADHD in adults: characterization, diagnosis, and treatment, 9, 10.1017/CBO9780511780752.003 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.06.006 · DOI
  36. Spencer T, 2011, ADHD in adults: characterization, diagnosis, and treatment, 191, 10.1017/CBO9780511780752.018 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/0165-0173(86)90002-0 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00221.x · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1017/S0033291799008338 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1017/S0033291703001296 · DOI
  41. 10.1007/s00213-004-1993-5 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1007/s00213-008-1337-y · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.10.005 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.02.008 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09091379 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1007/s00213-011-2472-4 · DOI
  47. Harvey PD, 2003, The course of functional decline in geriatric patients with schizophrenia: cognitive-functional and clinical symptoms as determinants of change, Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry, 11, 610
  48. 10.1016/0920-9964(95)00037-M · DOI
  49. 10.1007/s001270050301 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/0920-9964(95)00025-H · DOI
  51. 10.1177/0269881113495118 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.01.012 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.09.043 · DOI
  54. 10.1038/sj.npp.1300457 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1192/bjp.bp.105.017335 · DOI
  56. 10.1097/00002826-200401000-00011 · DOI
  57. 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.12.2184 · DOI
  58. Barch DM, 2010, Behavioral neurobiology of schizophrenia and its treatment, 43, 10.1007/7854_2010_39 · DOI
  59. 10.1192/bjp.154.6.797 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1038/483269a · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.03.022 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10060855 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07060906 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1016/S0920-9964(01)00402-9 · DOI
  65. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.024 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.3371/CSRP.SAFI.012513 · DOI
  67. 10.1176/ajp.2007.164.3.437 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.06.027 · DOI
  69. 10.1017/S0033291704004301 · DOI
  70. Sahakian BJ, 2011, Brain waves module 1: neuroscience, society and policy, 61
  71. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60817-3 · DOI
  72. 10.1038/483024a · DOI
  73. 10.1093/schbul/sbn170 · DOI
  74. 10.1080/17522439.2013.791876 · DOI
  75. 10.1038/mp.2013.120 · DOI · Paper page
  76. First MB, 2002, Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR axis I disorders, research version, patient edition. (SCID-I/P)
  77. American, 2013, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Fifth edition (DSM-5), 991
  78. Nelson HE, 1982, National adult reading test (NART): test manual
  79. 10.2466/pr0.1962.10.3.799 · DOI · Paper page
  80. 10.1016/0920-9964(94)00088-P · DOI
  81. 10.1037/a0023825 · DOI · Paper page
  82. 10.1016/j.phrs.2010.04.002 · DOI · Paper page
  83. 10.1007/s00213-002-1250-8 · DOI · Paper page
  84. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.07.009 · DOI
  85. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182306c99 · DOI
  86. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.10.018 · DOI
  87. 10.1016/S0165-1781(99)00092-X · DOI · Paper page
  88. 10.4088/JCP.v65n0608 · DOI
  89. 10.1212/WNL.58.8.1288 · DOI · Paper page
  90. Höppner J, 2003, Antidepressant efficacy of two different rTMS procedures: high frequency over left versus low frequency over right prefrontal cortex compared with sham stimulation, Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci., 253, 103, 10.1007/s00406-003-0416-7 · DOI
  91. 10.1016/j.schres.2007.03.016 · DOI
  92. 10.4088/JCP.08m04872gre · DOI · Paper page
  93. 10.1017/S0033291711003059 · DOI · Paper page
  94. Schretlen DJ, Can transcranial direct current stimulation improve cognitive functioning in adults with schizophrenia?, Clin. Schizophr. Relat. Psychoses, 1
  95. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.083 · DOI · Paper page
  96. 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.01.008 · DOI · Paper page
  97. 10.1016/j.brs.2014.04.008 · DOI
  98. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00002 · DOI · Paper page
  99. 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00600 · DOI
  100. 10.1038/501167b · DOI
  101. 10.1371/journal.pone.0105969 · DOI
  102. Webb JR, 2013, Prevalence of stimulant use in a sample of US medical students, Ann. Clin. Psychiatry, 25, 27
  103. 10.1007/s11606-012-2249-4 · DOI
  104. 10.1002/phar.1166 · DOI
  105. 10.1371/journal.pone.0077967 · DOI
  106. 10.1080/13548500220139386 · DOI · Paper page
  107. 10.1007/s00406-008-5022-2 · DOI
  108. 10.1001/jama.291.2.167 · DOI
  109. 10.1126/science.325_147a · DOI
  110. 10.1177/0269881109106926 · DOI
  111. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.012 · DOI
  112. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00131 · DOI
  113. Academy of Medical Sciences. 2012 Human enhancement and the future of work. Report from a joint workshop hosted by the Academy of Medical Sciences the British Academy the Royal Academy of Engineering and the Royal Society (ed. Academy of Medical Sciences). London UK: The Academy of Medical Sciences. See https://royalsociety.org/~/media/policy/projects/human-enhancement/2012–11–06-human-enhancement.pdf (15.12.2014).

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Sahakian, B. J., Bruhl, A. B., Cook, J., Killikelly, C., Savulich, G., Piercy, T., Hafizi, S., Perez, J., Fernandez-Egea, E., Suckling, J., & Jones, P. B.
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Publisher
The Royal Society
Published
2015-09-19
Volume
370
Issue
1677
Pages
20140214
ISSN
  • 0962-8436
  • 1471-2970
DOI
10.1098/rstb.2014.0214
Cited by
85
References
31
Language
en
Licence
royalsociety.org/journals/ethics-policies/data-sharing-mining/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.