PreprintCited by 8Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsMemory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Meta-analysis: a quantitative model of adult neurogenesis in the rodent hippocampus

Open access
Arellano, Jon I., Rakic, Pasko·2024·Frontiers in Neuroscience

Preprint — published as 10.3389/fnins.2024.1416460 · Paper page

Abstract

Contrary to humans, adult neurogenesis in rodents is not controversial. And in the last three decades, multiple studies in rodents have deemed adult neurogenesis essential for most hippocampal functions. The functional relevance of new neurons relies on their distinct physiological properties during their maturation before they become indistinguishable from mature granule cells. Most functional studies have used very young animals with robust neurogenesis. However, this trait declines dramatically with age, questioning its functional relevance in aging animals, a caveat that has been mentioned repeatedly, but rarely analyzed quantitatively. In this meta-analysis, we use data from published studies to determine the critical functional window of new neurons and to model their numbers across age in both mice and rats. Our model shows that new neurons with distinct functional profile represent about 3% of the total granule cells in young adult 3-month-old rodents, and their number decline following a power function to reach less than 1% in middle aged animals and less than 0.5% in old mice and rats. These low ratios pose an important logical and computational caveat to the proposed essential role of new neurons in the dentate gyrus, particularly in middle aged and old animals, a factor that needs to be adequately addressed when defining the relevance of adult neurogenesis in hippocampal function.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.04.09.588728

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 130

  1. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07608.x · DOI
  2. 10.1126/science.1248903 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1002/hipo.20810 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07804.x · DOI
  5. 1965, Time of neuron origin in the hippocampal region. An autoradiographic study in the mouse, Exp Neurol Suppl:Suppl, 2, 1
  6. Arellano JI , Duque A , Rakic P (2024) A coming-of-age story: adult neurogenesis or adolescent neurogenesis in rodents? Front Neurosci 18 Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2024.1383728/full [Accessed March 5, 2024]. · DOI
  7. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3432-11.2011 · DOI
  8. 2021, Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis in Aging and Alzheimer’s Disease, Stem Cell Rep, 16, 681, 10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.01.019 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/cne.901900108 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.03.002 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.01.001 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/jnc.15501 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S0197-4580(03)00083-6 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/0006-8993(85)90257-4 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S1044-7431(03)00207-0 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/cne.10874 · DOI
  17. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0782-06.2006 · DOI
  18. 10.7554/eLife.03104 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0197-4580(98)00098-0 · DOI
  20. 10.1002/cne.1040 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/j.stem.2019.06.001 · DOI
  22. 10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014134 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1126/science.1173215 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1665-19.2020 · DOI
  25. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1665-19.2020 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.02.019 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1002/cne.10675 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3362-09.2009 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1002/hipo.20964 · DOI
  30. 10.1073/pnas.1218991110 · DOI
  31. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2289-13.2013 · DOI
  32. 10.1037/a0020081 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.stem.2011.03.010 · DOI
  34. 10.1002/hipo.20546 · DOI
  35. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3114-05.2005 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060246 · DOI
  37. 10.1073/pnas.0806658105 · DOI
  38. 2010, Dose-dependent long-term effects of Tat in the rat hippocampal formation: a design-based stereological study, Hippocampus, 20, 469, 10.1002/hipo.20648 · DOI
  39. Flurkey K , M. Currer J , Harrison DE (2007) Chapter 20 - Mouse Models in Aging Research. In: The Mouse in Biomedical Research (Second Edition) ( Fox JG , Davisson MT , Quimby FW , Barthold SW , Newcomer CE , Smith AL , eds), pp 637–672 American College of Laboratory Animal Medicine. Burlington: Academic Press.
  40. 10.1038/nature04404 · DOI
  41. 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.155655 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.05.002 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1038/nn.3260 · DOI
  44. 2004, Alteration of hippocampal cell proliferation in mice lacking the beta 2 subunit of the neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, Synap N Y N, 54, 200, 10.1002/syn.20081 · DOI
  45. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2007.00363.x · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.09.015 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/S0197-4580(03)00090-3 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.01.009 · DOI
  49. 10.1038/nn.2185 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2003.02986.x · DOI
  51. 10.1093/cercor/bht035 · DOI
  52. 10.1038/nn1847 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Kempermann G (2011) Adult Neurogenesis, 2nd edition. New York: Oxford University Press. · DOI
  54. 2022, What Is Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis Good for?, Front Neurosci, 16, 852680, 10.3389/fnins.2022.852680 · DOI
  55. 2003, Early determination and long-term persistence of adult-generated new neurons in the hippocampus of mice, Dev Camb Engl, 130, 391
  56. 10.1038/386493a0 · DOI
  57. 10.1073/pnas.94.19.10409 · DOI
  58. 10.1093/cercor/bhy224 · DOI
  59. 10.1038/nn.3262 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.07.012 · DOI
  61. 10.1002/cne.902360407 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.09.016 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-06-02027.1996 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.07.033 · DOI
  65. 10.1038/nn.3042 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040409 · DOI
  67. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05549.x · DOI
  68. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.03.008 · DOI
  69. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4731-11.2012 · DOI
  70. 10.1002/cne.903390204 · DOI
  71. 2017, Evolutionary Shaping of Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis in Mammals-Cognitive Gain or Developmental Priming of Personality Traits?, Front Neurosci, 11, 420, 10.3389/fnins.2017.00420 · DOI
  72. 10.1007/BF00227262 · DOI
  73. 10.1002/hipo.20175 · DOI
  74. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.02.021 · DOI
  75. 10.1016/S0306-4522(03)00199-4 · DOI
  76. 10.1126/science.1214956 · DOI
  77. 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.05.022 · DOI
  78. 10.1038/s41593-022-01176-5 · DOI
  79. 10.1371/journal.pone.0005320 · DOI
  80. 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.154807 · DOI · Paper page
  81. 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113086 · DOI
  82. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.046 · DOI
  83. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2572-07.2007 · DOI · Paper page
  84. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4111-05.2006 · DOI
  85. 10.1007/s00429-013-0660-1 · DOI
  86. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4785-12.2013 · DOI
  87. 2006, The timing of neuronal development in adult hippocampal neurogenesis, Neurosci Rev J Bringing Neurobiol Neurol Psychiatry, 12, 463
  88. 10.1126/science.aao5056 · DOI
  89. 10.1186/1471-2202-7-77 · DOI
  90. 10.1126/science.3975601 · DOI
  91. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4342-04.2005 · DOI
  92. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.03853.x · DOI
  93. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2006.00243.x · DOI · Paper page
  94. 10.1111/j.0953-816X.2003.03123.x · DOI
  95. 10.1111/j.1600-079X.2009.00716.x · DOI
  96. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3238-14.2015 · DOI
  97. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.012 · DOI · Paper page
  98. 10.1002/cne.901590202 · DOI
  99. 10.1038/nature02553 · DOI · Paper page
  100. 10.1002/jnr.10387 · DOI
  101. 10.1038/35066584 · DOI
  102. 10.1002/hipo.10103 · DOI · Paper page
  103. 10.1016/j.stem.2010.08.014 · DOI · Paper page
  104. 2019, The impact of age on number and distribution of proliferating cells in subgranular zone in adult mouse brain, IBRO Rep, 6, 18, 10.1016/j.ibror.2018.12.002 · DOI
  105. 2019, Recalibrating the Relevance of Adult Neurogenesis, Trends Neurosci, 42, 164, 10.1016/j.tins.2018.12.001 · DOI
  106. 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.06.024 · DOI
  107. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1768-09.2009 · DOI
  108. 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112470 · DOI
  109. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.10.009 · DOI · Paper page
  110. 10.1152/jn.2001.85.6.2423 · DOI
  111. 10.1371/journal.pone.0041029 · DOI
  112. 10.1002/hipo.20845 · DOI
  113. 2022, Physical exercise and mitochondrial function: New therapeutic interventions for psychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders, Front Neurol, 13, 929781, 10.3389/fneur.2022.929781 · DOI
  114. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4941-06.2007 · DOI
  115. 10.1038/nature05028 · DOI
  116. 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.11.023 · DOI
  117. 10.1038/nn.2156 · DOI · Paper page
  118. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07604.x · DOI
  119. 10.1038/nn1908 · DOI · Paper page
  120. 10.1073/pnas.0811054106 · DOI
  121. van Dijk RM , Huang S-H , Slomianka L , Amrein I (2016) Taxonomic Separation of Hippocampal Networks: Principal Cell Populations and Adult Neurogenesis. Front Neuroanat 10 Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnana.2016.00022 [Accessed October 30, 2023]. · DOI
  122. 10.1038/4151030a · DOI · Paper page
  123. 10.1038/ncomms2101 · DOI
  124. 10.3389/fncir.2013.00015 · DOI
  125. 2023, Enhanced excitability but mature action potential waveforms at mossy fiber terminals of young, adult-born hippocampal neurons in mice, Commun Biol, 6, 1
  126. 10.1002/ar.1092310411 · DOI · Paper page
  127. 10.1007/s00429-007-0148-y · DOI
  128. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1737-17.2018 · DOI
  129. 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2007.00928.x · DOI
  130. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3648-05.2006 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Arellano, J. I., & Rakic, P.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Arellano, Jon I.
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-04-13
Volume
18
Pages
1416460-1416460
ISSN
1662-453X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399290282
Cited by
8
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (DA023999)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA023999, DA023999, R37DA023999)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
adult hippocampal neurogenesis, aging, dentate gyrus, granule cells, power function model, mice, rats, hippocampal function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review