Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3,496

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

3D Object Representations for Fine-Grained Categorization

Krause, Jonathan, Stark, Michael, Deng, Jia, Fei-Fei, Li·2013·2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops
DOI 10.1109/iccvw.2013.77
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

While 3D object representations are being revived in the context of multi-view object class detection and scene understanding, they have not yet attained wide-spread use in fine-grained categorization. State-of-the-art approaches achieve remarkable performance when training data is plentiful, but they are typically tied to flat, 2D representations that model objects as a collection of unconnected views, limiting their ability to generalize across viewpoints. In this paper, we therefore lift two state-of-the-art 2D object representations to 3D, on the level of both local feature appearance and location. In extensive experiments on existing and newly proposed datasets, we show our 3D object representations outperform their state-of-the-art 2D counterparts for fine-grained categorization and demonstrate their efficacy for estimating 3D geometry from images via ultra-wide baseline matching and 3D reconstruction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccvw.2013.77

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. liu, 2012, Dog breed classification using part localization, ECCV
  2. zauner, 0, Implementation and benchmarking of perceptual image hash functions, Master's Thesis Austria
  3. zhang, 2012, Pose pooling kernels for subcategory recognition, CVPR
  4. 10.1109/CVPR.2010.5539836 · DOI · Paper page
  5. yao, 0, A codebook- and annotation-free approach for fine-grained image categorization, CVPR'12
  6. 10.1145/1837885.1837906 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995368 · DOI · Paper page
  8. kumar, 2012, Leafsnap: A computer vision system for automatic plant species identification, ECCV
  9. 10.1007/s11263-008-0137-5 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1109/ICCVW.2011.6130294 · DOI
  11. gupta, 0, Blocks world revisited: Image understanding using qualitative geometry and mechanics, ECCV'10
  12. 10.1109/ICCV.2009.5459373 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/ICCV.2011.6126398 · DOI
  14. 10.1007/978-3-642-33783-3_26 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/CVPR.2012.6248087 · DOI
  16. 10.1109/ICCV.2007.4408987 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.5244/C.26.36 · DOI
  18. su, 2012, Crowdsourcing annotations for visual object detection, AAAI-WS
  19. 10.1109/ICCV.2011.6126539 · DOI · Paper page
  20. bo, 2010, Kernel descriptors for visual recognition, NIPS
  21. bar-hillel, 2006, Subordinate class recognition using relational object models, NIPS
  22. 10.1109/CVPR.2012.6248018 · DOI · Paper page
  23. csurka, 2004, Visual categorization with bags of keypoints, ECCV
  24. xiang, 2012, Estimating the aspect layout of object categories, CVPR
  25. 10.1111/j.1467-8659.2009.01499.x · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2009.01499.x
  26. 10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995552 · DOI · Paper page
  27. bourdev, 2009, Poselets: Body part detectors trained using 3d human pose annotations, ICCV
  28. 10.1109/ICCV.2011.6126238 · DOI
  29. 10.1109/CVPR.2013.81 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Krause, J., Stark, M., Deng, J., & Fei-Fei, L.
Venue
2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2013-12
Pages
554-561
ISSN
2473-9936 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1109/iccvw.2013.77
OpenAlex
W2138011018
Cited by
3,496
References
8
FWCI
11.31
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.