Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,178

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social media influencer marketing: A systematic review, integrative framework and future research agenda

Open access
Vrontis, Demetris, Makrides, Anna, Christofi, Michael, Thrassou, Alkis·2021·International Journal of Consumer Studies

Abstract

Over the past few years, the popularity of social media influencers (SMIs) has been growing exponentially, making influencer marketing (IM) prevalent in firm strategies. Despite the mounting interest of researchers and practitioners, the resulting scholarly work remains divergent, partial and fragmented. In light of the pivotal role of SMIs on the consumer decision journey and as this research domain is still developing, a comprehensive and critical overview of extant research on this topic is sorely needed. In response, this paper is the first to consolidate the present state of research on IM within social media settings. More specifically, a systematic review of relevant studies published in peer‐reviewed academic journals across diverse fields was conducted in order to identify key themes and dominant concepts. The analysis of 68 articles from 29 Chartered Association of Business Schools‐ranked journals forges a robust understanding of this phenomenon, shedding light on the mechanisms underlying the appeal of SMIs and their influential power in shaping consumer attitudes and behaviour. Based on the analysis, an integrative multidimensional framework is presented that considers antecedents, mediators and moderators of potential outcomes, as well as contextual factors that translate into consumer behaviour. In so doing, various research gaps are identified and avenues for future research are proposed that reflect important emerging areas and unexplored realms with reference to theory, context and methodology. Conclusively, implications of this study for theory and practice are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ijcs.12647

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Research works printed but not linked: 111

  1. 10.1108/JRIM-02-2018-0031 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.intmar.2019.03.003 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106443 · DOI
  4. Audrezet A., 2019, Do influencers need to tell audiences they’re getting paid, Harvard Business Review
  5. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.008 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1002/mar.21182 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/02650487.2015.1137537 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.015 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.2501/JAR-2019-030 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/j.bushor.2020.03.003 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1108/IMR-03-2015-0100 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101625 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.026 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/13527266.2012.730543 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.05.001 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/ijmr.12156 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1080/00913367.2018.1539363 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.intmar.2020.03.003 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106342 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00067-7 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1080/02650487.2017.1348035 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1080/02650487.2019.1575108 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Digital Marketing Institute, 2019, 20 Influencer marketing statistics that will surprise you
  24. 10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.009 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1362/026725799784870379 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.030 · DOI
  27. Evans M., 2019, Forbes
  28. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.005 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1108/YC-12-2018-0896 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00217.x · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1080/0267257X.2018.1483960 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.181 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1108/IMR-01-2019-0028 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1509/jm.10.0088 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Hofstede G., 2001, Culture’s consequences, comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations
  36. Hosie R., 2019, Why brands are turning away from big Instagram influencers to work with people who have small followings instead, Business Insider
  37. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102169 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.026 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.07.009 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1057/s41262-019-00151-z · DOI
  41. 10.1108/MIP-09-2018-0375 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1108/JPBM-08-2018-1987 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102121 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.04.001 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1007/s11002-015-9363-0 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Katz E., 1955, Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications
  47. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102133 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.020 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106419 · DOI
  50. 10.1509/jm.15.0536 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.102027 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1177/0022243718824081 · DOI
  53. Lazarsfeld P. F., 1948, The people's choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign
  54. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.171 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.054 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1016/j.bushor.2018.01.010 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.007 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1016/j.respol.2006.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.01.007 · DOI
  60. 10.4018/978-1-5225-8575-6.ch015 · DOI
  61. 10.1080/0267257X.2020.1738525 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1086/669042 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1177/0022243718815429 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1111/deci.12206 · DOI
  65. 10.1111/ijcs.12617 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.004 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.014 · DOI · Paper page
  68. Newberry C., 2019, 37 Instagram Stats That Matter to Marketers in 2020
  69. 10.1016/S0167-9236(02)00212-9 · DOI
  70. O'Connor C., 2017, Forbes
  71. 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00233.x · DOI
  72. 10.1080/13602381.2017.1357316 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717 · DOI · Paper page
  74. 10.1016/j.jwb.2017.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1108/IMR-10-2018-0280 · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.1509/jmr.14.0643 · DOI
  77. 10.1016/j.jwb.2017.05.003 · DOI · Paper page
  78. Rahal A., 2020, Forbes
  79. 10.1086/208898 · DOI
  80. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.06.004 · DOI · Paper page
  81. Rebouças R., 2020, Voluntary simplicity: A literature review and research agenda, International Journal of Consumer Studies
  82. 10.1111/ijcs.12206 · DOI
  83. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.05.008 · DOI
  84. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.002 · DOI · Paper page
  85. 10.1080/02650487.2019.1634898 · DOI · Paper page
  86. 10.1016/j.chb.2019.106225 · DOI
  87. 10.1080/15332667.2019.1664872 · DOI
  88. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.039 · DOI · Paper page
  89. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.011 · DOI · Paper page
  90. 10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.001 · DOI
  91. 10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.024 · DOI
  92. 10.1108/JCOM-11-2018-0119 · DOI · Paper page
  93. Su Y., 2020, When abs do not sell: The impact of male influencers conspicuously displaying a muscular body on female followers, Psychology & Marketing, 1
  94. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.012 · DOI
  95. Tobin J., 2020, Forbes
  96. 10.1002/mar.21274 · DOI · Paper page
  97. 10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · DOI · Paper page
  98. 10.1080/15332861.2019.1700741 · DOI · Paper page
  99. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.04.007 · DOI · Paper page
  100. 10.1016/j.intmar.2019.09.001 · DOI
  101. 10.1080/00913367.2019.1588808 · DOI · Paper page
  102. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.031 · DOI · Paper page
  103. 10.1108/IMR-07-2019-0202 · DOI
  104. 10.1108/EMJB-03-2019-0044 · DOI
  105. 10.1111/ijmr.12007 · DOI · Paper page
  106. 10.1086/518527 · DOI · Paper page
  107. 10.1080/16522354.2018.1501146 · DOI · Paper page
  108. 10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.005 · DOI
  109. 10.1177/1069031X18809988 · DOI
  110. Young K., 2017, How celebrity endorsements influence young consumers, Global WebIndex
  111. 10.1509/jm.74.2.133 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,178

Metadata

Authors
Vrontis, D., Makrides, A., Christofi, M., & Thrassou, A.
Venue
International Journal of Consumer Studies
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-01-17
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
617-644
ISSN
  • 1470-6423 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-6431
OpenAlex
W3123158399
Cited by
1,178
References
20
FWCI
41.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social media influencer marketing: A systematic review, integrative framework and future research agenda. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ijcs.12647
The paper
Vrontis, D., Makrides, A., Christofi, M., & Thrassou, A. (2021). Social media influencer marketing: A systematic review, integrative framework and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12647

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.