The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Forests and Sustainable Development in the Brazilian Amazon: History, Trends, and Future Prospects
Open accessAbstract
Ongoing deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon is the outcome of an explicit federal project to occupy, integrate, and “modernize” the region. Although there have been isolated periods of deforestation control, most recently between 2004 and 2012, the overall trajectory of the region since the colonial period has been one of forest loss and degradation. Addressing this challenge is especially urgent in the context of adverse climate-ecology feedbacks and tipping points. Here we describe the trends and outcomes of deforestation and degradation in the Amazon. We then highlight how historical development paradigms and policies have helped to cement the land use activities and structural lock-ins that underpin deforestation and degradation. We emphasize how the grounds for establishing a more sustainable economy in the Amazon were never consolidated, leading to a situation where forest conservation and development remain dependent on external programs—punitive measures against deforestation and fire and public social programs. This situation makes progress toward a forest transition(arresting forest loss and degradation and restoring forest landscapes) highly vulnerable to changes in political leadership, private sector engagement, and global market signals. After summarizing these challenges, we present a suite of measures that collectively could be transformational to helping overcome destructive path dependencies in the region. These include innovations in agricultural management, improved forest governance through landscape approaches, developing a local forest economy, sustainable peri-urbanization, and the empowerment of women and youth. These initiatives must be inclusive and equitable, enabling the participation and empowerment of local communities, particularly indigenous groups who have faced numerous historical injustices and are increasingly under threat by current politics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The new value assemblage is one where women disproportionately lose, given their economic roles associated with the lost traditional livelihoods and that they find little opportunity in the cattle economy, whose jobs privilege men.
“Not the least, the new value assemblage is one where women disproportionately lose, given their economic roles associated with the lost traditional livelihoods and that they find little opportunity in the cattle economy, whose jobs privilege men (Garrett et al., 2021).”
From Beyond the “supply chain” framing: Cattle ranching as a vanishing mediator of deforestation and dispossession in the Brazilian and Colombian Amazon (2026) · cites this paper as Garrett et al., 2021
Section 6.2 says deforestation and forest degradation disproportionately harm women by reducing opportunities to gather medicinal plants and other nontimber forest products; Section 7.5 describes women's economic roles in collecting and selling them. The paper identifies cattle ranching as a major driver of deforestation, but the passages do not establish that cattle-economy jobs privilege men or offer women little opportunity. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Soares-Filho, B., Rajão, R., Macedo, M., Carneiro, A., Costa, W., Coe, M., Rodrigues, H., & Alencar, A. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1246663 · Cited by 1,133
Cropland expansion changes deforestation dynamics in the southern Brazilian Amazon
Morton, D. C., DeFries, R. S., Shimabukuro, Y. E., Anderson, L. O., Arai, E., del Bon Espirito-Santo, F., Freitas, R., & Morisette, J. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0606377103 · Cited by 1,081
Long-term forest degradation surpasses deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon
Matricardi, E. A. T., Skole, D. L., Costa, O. B., Pedlowski, M. A., Samek, J. H., & Miguel, E. P. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb3021 · Cited by 411
Bowman, M. S., Soares-Filho, B. S., Merry, F. D., Nepstad, D. C., Rodrigues, H., & Almeida, O. T. (2012) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.09.009 · Cited by 282
Garrett, R. D., Gardner, T. A., Morello, T. F., Marchand, S., Barlow, J., Ezzine de Blas, D., Ferreira, J., Lees, A. C., & Parry, L. (2017) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-09364-220327 · Cited by 140
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 142
- IBGE (Inst. Bras. Geogr. Estat.), 2020, Estimativas da População
- 10.1098/rspb.2015.0813 · DOI · Paper page
- FAO (UN Food Agric. Organ.), 2017, United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization
- INPE (Inst. Nac. Pesqui. Espac.), 2020, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais
- Valentim J, 2015, Caminhos para uma Agricultura Familiar sob Bases Ecológicas: Produzindo com Baixa Emissão de Carbono, 73
- 10.1111/gcb.15029 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1186925 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/gcb.12627 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature18326 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-017-02771-y · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.aam5962 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/sciadv.aay1632 · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.aat2340 · DOI · Paper page
- Vieira ICG., 2019, Anais Acad. Bras. Ciências, 91
- 10.1111/gcb.15352 · DOI
- Embrapa (Empresa Bras. Pesqui. Agropecu.), INPE (Inst. Nac. Pesqui. Espac.), 2014, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais
- 10.1111/gcb.14443 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0085725 · DOI
- 10.1088/2515-7620/abb0db · DOI
- Human Rights Watch, 2020, “O Ar é Insuportável” Os impactos das queimadas associadas ao desmatamento da Amazônia brasileira na saúde [“The Air is Unbearable” The impacts of fires associated with deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon on health]
- 10.1007/s10745-019-00096-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102096 · DOI
- Ellwanger JH, 2020, Anais Acad. Bras. Ciências, 92
- 10.1126/sciadv.1601047 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.12952/journal.elementa.000125 · DOI
- MapBiomas, 2020, MapBiomas
- Dias-Filho MB., 2014, Reclaiming the Brazilian Amazon: The Restoration and Management of Pasture Lands
- 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.09.022 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aaa0181 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1748-9326/6/2/024010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00267-020-01354-w · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41598-018-19358-2 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aba6646 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1260194 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.11.004 · DOI
- 10.1080/00330124.2018.1518721 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00267-005-0113-6 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2015636117 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1910853117 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abd6977 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-017-00557-w · DOI
- 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.08.008 · DOI
- 10.1088/1748-9326/10/1/014006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1289/ehp.1307864 · DOI
- 10.1525/elementa.427 · DOI
- RAISG (Rede Amazôn. Inf. Socioambient. Georref.), 2020, Rede Amazônica de Informação Socioambiental Georreferenciada
- 10.1126/science.1118051 · DOI
- 10.1016/0378-1127(91)90235-N · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1748-9326/ab195e · DOI
- 10.1111/gcb.14872 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/2015JG002914 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-earth-082517-010235 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0376892917000510 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tree.2006.03.007 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01224.x · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1516525113 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.aba7580 · DOI
- 10.1111/1365-2664.13028 · DOI
- 10.1111/rec.12489 · DOI
- 10.3390/f5071737 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102059 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.030 · DOI
- INCRA (Inst. Nac. Colon. Reforma Agrár.), 2019, Instituto Nacional de Colonização e Reforma Agrária
- MDA (Minist. Desenvolv. Agrár.), 2014, Ministério do Desenvolvimento Agrário
- 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104313 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104491 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104854 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.qref.2016.07.012 · DOI
- Valentim JF, 2005, Slash-and-Burn Agriculture: The Search for Alternatives, 265
- 10.1007/s11366-015-9359-x · DOI
- 10.1080/14747731.2017.1377374 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.05.006 · DOI
- MMA (Minst. Meio Amb.), 2020, Ministerio de Meio Ambiente
- Fed. Repub. Brasil, 2016, Gov. Doc., UN Framew. Conv. Clim. Change, Bonn, Ger.
- Maia H, 2011, Rep., Int. Pesqui. Econ. Apl.–Com. Econ. Nações Unidas Am. Lat. Caribe– Deutsche Ges. Int. Zs.
- 10.1073/pnas.0913048107 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acs.est.5b01300 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1355770X15000078 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106359 · DOI
- 10.1257/app.20160055 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pecon.2019.03.001 · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.aat1192 · DOI
- Santos de Lima L, 2020, PLOS ONE, 13, e0207855, 10.1371/journal.pone.0207855 · DOI
- Carvalho WD, 2019, Perspect. Ecol. Conserv., 17, 122
- 10.1016/j.forpol.2014.05.011 · DOI
- 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6497 · DOI
- 10.1038/s43016-020-00194-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.08.009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/eet.1720 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.08.002 · DOI
- 10.1177/194008291500800414 · DOI
- 10.1111/gove.12267 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pecon.2019.07.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.06.001 · DOI
- 10.1038/d41586-018-06917-w · DOI
- 10.1038/s41559-019-0855-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Fearnside PM., 2019, Sustentabilidade Int. Sci. J., 1, 38
- Araújo R, 2019, Sustain. Debate, 10, 366, 10.18472/SustDeb.v10n3.2019.27258 · DOI
- Acebes CM., 2019, Rainforest Mafias: How Violence and Impunity Fuel Deforestation in Brazil's Amazon
- Viola E, 2019, Rev. Bras. Polít. Int., 62, 10.1590/0034-7329201900210 · DOI
- Amaral AC, 2020, Folha de São Paulo
- Garrett R, 2020, Globe Post
- Lehmann J, 2007, Amazonian Dark Earths: Origin Properties Management
- 10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.12.002 · DOI
- Seixas MA., 2020, Rep. NT31, Sér. Diálogo. Estratég.
- 10.5751/ES-02526-130202 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-1-4020-4948-4_17 · DOI
- 10.12952/journal.elementa.000133 · DOI
- 10.1177/0094582X08326012 · DOI
- Barbieri AF, 2009, Urban Population-Environment Dynamics in the Developing World: Case Studies and Lessons Learned, 247
- 10.4025/bolgeogr.v37i2.41229 · DOI
- MDR (Minist. Desenvolv. Reg.), 2018, Ministério do Desenvolvimento Regional
- 10.3390/ijerph15010015 · DOI
- 10.18764/2178-2865.v19n1p173-185 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.wsif.2016.11.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.07.005 · DOI
- Slinger VAV., 2000, Geogr. Rev., 90, 177
- 10.1073/pnas.1614499114 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10745-017-9934-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2011.05.008 · DOI
- 10.3390/su11051425 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.001 · DOI
- 10.3390/su10041301 · DOI
- Valentim J, 2004, Reunião Annu. Soc. Bras. Zootecnia, 40, 142
- 10.1088/1748-9326/aac4d1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.09.011 · DOI
- 10.1088/1748-9326/ab4f57 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104822 · DOI
- Sills EO, 2014, Jawa Barat, Indones.: Cent. Int. For. Res.
- 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.029 · DOI · Paper page
- Boyd W, 2018, Jurisdictional approaches to REDD+ and low emissions development: progress and prospects
- 10.1590/S0103-40142000000100019 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2014.12027.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11111-010-0127-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.24302/drd.v8i2.1416 · DOI
- Schmink M, 2015, Occas. Pap., 121
- 10.1525/cag.2003.25.1.35 · DOI
- Zanotti L., 2016, Radical Territories in the Brazilian Amazon: The Kayapó’s Fight for Just Livelihoods
- 10.1007/s10745-017-9919-0 · DOI
- Baqui P, 2020, Lancet, 8, e1018
- 10.1038/s41893-020-0492-y · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Levy, S. A., Cammelli, F., Munger, J., Gibbs, H. K., & Garrett, R. D. (2023) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102671 · Cited by 50
Self-citationNorris, D., Sabadini Carvalho, T., Guerrero, A. M., Sobral Escada, M. I., Alencar, A., Kimbrough, L., & Butler, R. A. (2022) · Tropical Conservation Science · doi:10.1177/19400829221132193 · Cited by 6
Bastos Lima, M. G., & López, J. (2026) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2026.107532
Metadata
- Authors
- Garrett, R. D., Cammelli, F., Ferreira, J., Levy, S. A., Valentim, J., & Vieira, I.
- Affiliations
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Embrapa Amazônia Oriental (BR)
- Embrapa Acre (BR)
- Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi (BR)
- Venue
- Annual Review of Environment and Resources
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2021-10-18
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 625-652
- ISSN
- 1543-5938 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2050
- OpenAlex
- W3158052844
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 1.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Annual Review of Environment and Resources (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- ETH Zürich Research Collection (cc-by)
- Funders
- University of South Florida
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Management and Policy
- Social Sciences › Development › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Keywords
- deforestation, forest degradation, Brazilian Amazon, sustainable development, forest transition, structural lock-in, land use history, forest governance, landscape approach, periurbanization, indigenous peoples, climate tipping points, forest conservation policy, women and youth empowerment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review