Cited by 131Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementForest Management and PolicyAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Forests and Sustainable Development in the Brazilian Amazon: History, Trends, and Future Prospects

Open access

Abstract

Ongoing deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon is the outcome of an explicit federal project to occupy, integrate, and “modernize” the region. Although there have been isolated periods of deforestation control, most recently between 2004 and 2012, the overall trajectory of the region since the colonial period has been one of forest loss and degradation. Addressing this challenge is especially urgent in the context of adverse climate-ecology feedbacks and tipping points. Here we describe the trends and outcomes of deforestation and degradation in the Amazon. We then highlight how historical development paradigms and policies have helped to cement the land use activities and structural lock-ins that underpin deforestation and degradation. We emphasize how the grounds for establishing a more sustainable economy in the Amazon were never consolidated, leading to a situation where forest conservation and development remain dependent on external programs—punitive measures against deforestation and fire and public social programs. This situation makes progress toward a forest transition(arresting forest loss and degradation and restoring forest landscapes) highly vulnerable to changes in political leadership, private sector engagement, and global market signals. After summarizing these challenges, we present a suite of measures that collectively could be transformational to helping overcome destructive path dependencies in the region. These include innovations in agricultural management, improved forest governance through landscape approaches, developing a local forest economy, sustainable peri-urbanization, and the empowerment of women and youth. These initiatives must be inclusive and equitable, enabling the participation and empowerment of local communities, particularly indigenous groups who have faced numerous historical injustices and are increasingly under threat by current politics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-010228

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The new value assemblage is one where women disproportionately lose, given their economic roles associated with the lost traditional livelihoods and that they find little opportunity in the cattle economy, whose jobs privilege men.

    “Not the least, the new value assemblage is one where women disproportionately lose, given their economic roles associated with the lost traditional livelihoods and that they find little opportunity in the cattle economy, whose jobs privilege men (Garrett et al., 2021).”

    From Beyond the “supply chain” framing: Cattle ranching as a vanishing mediator of deforestation and dispossession in the Brazilian and Colombian Amazon (2026) · cites this paper as Garrett et al., 2021

    Section 6.2 says deforestation and forest degradation disproportionately harm women by reducing opportunities to gather medicinal plants and other nontimber forest products; Section 7.5 describes women's economic roles in collecting and selling them. The paper identifies cattle ranching as a major driver of deforestation, but the passages do not establish that cattle-economy jobs privilege men or offer women little opportunity. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 142

  1. IBGE (Inst. Bras. Geogr. Estat.), 2020, Estimativas da População
  2. 10.1098/rspb.2015.0813 · DOI · Paper page
  3. FAO (UN Food Agric. Organ.), 2017, United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization
  4. INPE (Inst. Nac. Pesqui. Espac.), 2020, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais
  5. Valentim J, 2015, Caminhos para uma Agricultura Familiar sob Bases Ecológicas: Produzindo com Baixa Emissão de Carbono, 73
  6. 10.1111/gcb.15029 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1126/science.1186925 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1111/gcb.12627 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/nature18326 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/s41467-017-02771-y · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1126/science.aam5962 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1126/sciadv.aay1632 · DOI
  13. 10.1126/sciadv.aat2340 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Vieira ICG., 2019, Anais Acad. Bras. Ciências, 91
  15. 10.1111/gcb.15352 · DOI
  16. Embrapa (Empresa Bras. Pesqui. Agropecu.), INPE (Inst. Nac. Pesqui. Espac.), 2014, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais
  17. 10.1111/gcb.14443 · DOI
  18. 10.1371/journal.pone.0085725 · DOI
  19. 10.1088/2515-7620/abb0db · DOI
  20. Human Rights Watch, 2020, “O Ar é Insuportável” Os impactos das queimadas associadas ao desmatamento da Amazônia brasileira na saúde [“The Air is Unbearable” The impacts of fires associated with deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon on health]
  21. 10.1007/s10745-019-00096-6 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102096 · DOI
  23. Ellwanger JH, 2020, Anais Acad. Bras. Ciências, 92
  24. 10.1126/sciadv.1601047 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.12952/journal.elementa.000125 · DOI
  26. MapBiomas, 2020, MapBiomas
  27. Dias-Filho MB., 2014, Reclaiming the Brazilian Amazon: The Restoration and Management of Pasture Lands
  28. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.09.022 · DOI
  29. 10.1126/science.aaa0181 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1088/1748-9326/6/2/024010 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1007/s00267-020-01354-w · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1038/s41598-018-19358-2 · DOI
  33. 10.1126/science.aba6646 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1126/science.1260194 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.11.004 · DOI
  36. 10.1080/00330124.2018.1518721 · DOI
  37. 10.1007/s00267-005-0113-6 · DOI
  38. 10.1073/pnas.2015636117 · DOI
  39. 10.1073/pnas.1910853117 · DOI
  40. 10.1126/science.abd6977 · DOI
  41. 10.1038/s41467-017-00557-w · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.08.008 · DOI
  43. 10.1088/1748-9326/10/1/014006 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1289/ehp.1307864 · DOI
  45. 10.1525/elementa.427 · DOI
  46. RAISG (Rede Amazôn. Inf. Socioambient. Georref.), 2020, Rede Amazônica de Informação Socioambiental Georreferenciada
  47. 10.1126/science.1118051 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/0378-1127(91)90235-N · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab195e · DOI
  50. 10.1111/gcb.14872 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1002/2015JG002914 · DOI
  52. 10.1146/annurev-earth-082517-010235 · DOI
  53. 10.1017/S0376892917000510 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.tree.2006.03.007 · DOI
  55. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01224.x · DOI
  56. 10.1073/pnas.1516525113 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1126/science.aba7580 · DOI
  58. 10.1111/1365-2664.13028 · DOI
  59. 10.1111/rec.12489 · DOI
  60. 10.3390/f5071737 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102059 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.030 · DOI
  63. INCRA (Inst. Nac. Colon. Reforma Agrár.), 2019, Instituto Nacional de Colonização e Reforma Agrária
  64. MDA (Minist. Desenvolv. Agrár.), 2014, Ministério do Desenvolvimento Agrário
  65. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104313 · DOI
  66. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104491 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.005 · DOI
  68. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104854 · DOI
  69. 10.1016/j.qref.2016.07.012 · DOI
  70. Valentim JF, 2005, Slash-and-Burn Agriculture: The Search for Alternatives, 265
  71. 10.1007/s11366-015-9359-x · DOI
  72. 10.1080/14747731.2017.1377374 · DOI
  73. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.05.006 · DOI
  74. MMA (Minst. Meio Amb.), 2020, Ministerio de Meio Ambiente
  75. Fed. Repub. Brasil, 2016, Gov. Doc., UN Framew. Conv. Clim. Change, Bonn, Ger.
  76. Maia H, 2011, Rep., Int. Pesqui. Econ. Apl.–Com. Econ. Nações Unidas Am. Lat. Caribe– Deutsche Ges. Int. Zs.
  77. 10.1073/pnas.0913048107 · DOI · Paper page
  78. 10.1021/acs.est.5b01300 · DOI
  79. 10.1017/S1355770X15000078 · DOI · Paper page
  80. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106359 · DOI
  81. 10.1257/app.20160055 · DOI
  82. 10.1016/j.pecon.2019.03.001 · DOI
  83. 10.1126/sciadv.aat1192 · DOI
  84. Santos de Lima L, 2020, PLOS ONE, 13, e0207855, 10.1371/journal.pone.0207855 · DOI
  85. Carvalho WD, 2019, Perspect. Ecol. Conserv., 17, 122
  86. 10.1016/j.forpol.2014.05.011 · DOI
  87. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6497 · DOI
  88. 10.1038/s43016-020-00194-5 · DOI · Paper page
  89. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.08.009 · DOI · Paper page
  90. 10.1002/eet.1720 · DOI
  91. 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.08.002 · DOI
  92. 10.1177/194008291500800414 · DOI
  93. 10.1111/gove.12267 · DOI
  94. 10.1016/j.pecon.2019.07.002 · DOI
  95. 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.06.001 · DOI
  96. 10.1038/d41586-018-06917-w · DOI
  97. 10.1038/s41559-019-0855-9 · DOI · Paper page
  98. Fearnside PM., 2019, Sustentabilidade Int. Sci. J., 1, 38
  99. Araújo R, 2019, Sustain. Debate, 10, 366, 10.18472/SustDeb.v10n3.2019.27258 · DOI
  100. Acebes CM., 2019, Rainforest Mafias: How Violence and Impunity Fuel Deforestation in Brazil's Amazon
  101. Viola E, 2019, Rev. Bras. Polít. Int., 62, 10.1590/0034-7329201900210 · DOI
  102. Amaral AC, 2020, Folha de São Paulo
  103. Garrett R, 2020, Globe Post
  104. Lehmann J, 2007, Amazonian Dark Earths: Origin Properties Management
  105. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.12.002 · DOI
  106. Seixas MA., 2020, Rep. NT31, Sér. Diálogo. Estratég.
  107. 10.5751/ES-02526-130202 · DOI · Paper page
  108. 10.1007/978-1-4020-4948-4_17 · DOI
  109. 10.12952/journal.elementa.000133 · DOI
  110. 10.1177/0094582X08326012 · DOI
  111. Barbieri AF, 2009, Urban Population-Environment Dynamics in the Developing World: Case Studies and Lessons Learned, 247
  112. 10.4025/bolgeogr.v37i2.41229 · DOI
  113. MDR (Minist. Desenvolv. Reg.), 2018, Ministério do Desenvolvimento Regional
  114. 10.3390/ijerph15010015 · DOI
  115. 10.18764/2178-2865.v19n1p173-185 · DOI
  116. 10.1016/j.wsif.2016.11.008 · DOI
  117. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.07.005 · DOI
  118. Slinger VAV., 2000, Geogr. Rev., 90, 177
  119. 10.1073/pnas.1614499114 · DOI
  120. 10.1007/s10745-017-9934-1 · DOI
  121. 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2011.05.008 · DOI
  122. 10.3390/su11051425 · DOI
  123. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.001 · DOI
  124. 10.3390/su10041301 · DOI
  125. Valentim J, 2004, Reunião Annu. Soc. Bras. Zootecnia, 40, 142
  126. 10.1088/1748-9326/aac4d1 · DOI
  127. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.09.011 · DOI
  128. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab4f57 · DOI
  129. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104822 · DOI
  130. Sills EO, 2014, Jawa Barat, Indones.: Cent. Int. For. Res.
  131. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.029 · DOI · Paper page
  132. Boyd W, 2018, Jurisdictional approaches to REDD+ and low emissions development: progress and prospects
  133. 10.1590/S0103-40142000000100019 · DOI
  134. 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2014.12027.x · DOI · Paper page
  135. 10.1007/s11111-010-0127-8 · DOI · Paper page
  136. 10.24302/drd.v8i2.1416 · DOI
  137. Schmink M, 2015, Occas. Pap., 121
  138. 10.1525/cag.2003.25.1.35 · DOI
  139. Zanotti L., 2016, Radical Territories in the Brazilian Amazon: The Kayapó’s Fight for Just Livelihoods
  140. 10.1007/s10745-017-9919-0 · DOI
  141. Baqui P, 2020, Lancet, 8, e1018
  142. 10.1038/s41893-020-0492-y · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Garrett, R. D., Cammelli, F., Ferreira, J., Levy, S. A., Valentim, J., & Vieira, I.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Embrapa Amazônia Oriental (BR)
  • Embrapa Acre (BR)
  • Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi (BR)
Venue
Annual Review of Environment and Resources
Published
2021-10-18
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
625-652
ISSN
  • 1543-5938 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2050
OpenAlex
W3158052844
Cited by
131
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Environment and Resources (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection (cc-by)
Funders
University of South Florida
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Management and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Development › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Keywords
deforestation, forest degradation, Brazilian Amazon, sustainable development, forest transition, structural lock-in, land use history, forest governance, landscape approach, periurbanization, indigenous peoples, climate tipping points, forest conservation policy, women and youth empowerment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review