Cited by 166Social and Intergroup PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Demystifying Values-Affirmation Interventions: Writing About Social Belonging Is a Key to Buffering Against Identity Threat

Shnabel, Nurit, Purdie-Vaughns, Valerie, Cook, Jonathan E., Garcia, Julio, Cohen, Geoffrey L.·2013·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

Two experiments examined for the first time whether the specific content of participant-generated affirmation essays-in particular, writing about social belonging-facilitated an affirmation intervention's ability to reduce identity threat among negatively stereotyped students. Study 1, a field experiment, revealed that seventh graders assigned to a values-affirmation condition wrote about social belonging more than those assigned to a control condition. Writing about belonging, in turn, improved the grade point average (GPA) of Black, but not White students. In Study 2, using a modified "belonging-affirmation" intervention, we directly manipulated writing about social belonging before a math test described as diagnostic of math ability. The more female participants wrote about belonging, the better they performed, while there was no effect of writing about belonging for males. Writing about social belonging improved performance only for members of negatively stereotyped groups. Implications for self-affirmation theory and practice are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167213480816

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. 10.1037/0033-295X.109.4.619 · DOI
  2. Aron A., 2001, Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes, 2, 478
  3. 10.1037/10318-006 · DOI
  4. 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.817 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1111/1467-9280.00340 · DOI
  7. Bowlby J., 1988, A secure base: Clinical applications of attachment theory
  8. 10.1177/0146167291175001 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.481 · DOI
  10. 10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.566 · DOI
  11. 10.1126/science.1128317 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Cohen G. L., 2012, Stereotype threat: Theory, process, and application, 280
  13. 10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02150.x · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.791 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1080/01650250344000226 · DOI
  17. 10.1086/443996 · DOI
  18. 10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.91 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00270.x · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1177/0146167209346860 · DOI
  22. 10.2307/2529310 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/S0065-2601(00)80003-9 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Leary M. R., 2008, Handbook of motivation science, 27
  25. 10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1080/15298860600805325 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Mikulincer M., 2007, Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change
  28. Pohlmann J. T., 2003, Ohio Journal of Science, 103, 118
  29. 10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38003-3 · DOI
  30. 10.1037/a0014663 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38004-5 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Sherman D. K., 2011, Handbook of self-enhancement and self-protection, 128
  33. 10.1006/jesp.1998.1373 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1177/014616702237648 · DOI
  36. 10.1177/1094428107300342 · DOI
  37. 10.1111/1467-8721.00117 · DOI
  38. 10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.606 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.05.002 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.82 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02417.x · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1080/14616730600856016 · DOI
  43. 10.1002/cne.920180503 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–122 of 122

Metadata

Authors
Shnabel, N., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Cook, J. E., Garcia, J., & Cohen, G. L.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2013-03-10
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
663-676
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W1982130740
Cited by
166
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5
FWCI
39.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Yale University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
self-affirmation theory, social belonging, identity threat, Black students, gender differences, mathematics achievement, stereotype threat
MeSH terms
Black or African American, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Male, Self Concept, Social Identification, Social Perception, Socioeconomic Factors, Stereotyping, Students, Writing, Logistic Models, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review