Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling to Test for a Continuum Structure of Motivation

Howard, Joshua L., Gagné, Marylène, Morin, Alexandre J. S., Forest, Jacques·2018·Journal of Management

Abstract

This paper explores the nature of workplace motivation by testing the continuum structure of motivation proposed by self-determination theory through the application of relatively new and advanced methodological techniques. Specifically, we demonstrate the usefulness of the overarching bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework in organizational psychology and discuss implications of such models over more traditional confirmatory factor analyses. This framework is applied to responses obtained from 1,124 Canadian employees who completed a multidimensional measure of workplace motivation. The results support a continuum of self-regulation and illustrate the importance of accounting for quality of motivation in addition to its global quantity. Indeed, the results showed that specific types of motivation explained variance in covariates over and above the variance already explained by the global quantity of self-determination. The current study further demonstrates the limitation of the commonly used relative autonomy index and offers alternate conceptualizations of human motivation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0149206316645653

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Gignac G. E., 2008, Psychology Science Quarterly, 50, 21
  2. 10.1037/0022-3514.52.5.890 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Muthén L. K., 2014, Mplus user’s guide
  4. 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.68 · Paper page
  5. Stevenson S., 2008, Journal of Sport Behavior, 31, 389

Cited by

See all 258

Metadata

Authors
Howard, J. L., Gagné, M., Morin, A. J. S., & Forest, J.
Venue
Journal of Management
Published
2016-04-25
Volume
44
Issue
7
Pages
2638-2664
ISSN
  • 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1211
OpenAlex
W2344398625
Cited by
258
References
79
FWCI
25.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Funders
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
  • Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Société et la Culture
  • Australian Postgraduate Award
  • Australian Research Council

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.