The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: In the era of evidence based medicine, with systematic reviews as its cornerstone, adequate quality assessment tools should be available. There is currently a lack of a systematically developed and evaluated tool for the assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. The aim of this project was to combine empirical evidence and expert opinion in a formal consensus method to develop a tool to be used in systematic reviews to assess the quality of primary studies of diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: We conducted a Delphi procedure to develop the quality assessment tool by refining an initial list of items. Members of the Delphi panel were experts in the area of diagnostic research. The results of three previously conducted reviews of the diagnostic literature were used to generate a list of potential items for inclusion in the tool and to provide an evidence base upon which to develop the tool. RESULTS: A total of nine experts in the field of diagnostics took part in the Delphi procedure. The Delphi procedure consisted of four rounds, after which agreement was reached on the items to be included in the tool which we have called QUADAS. The initial list of 28 items was reduced to fourteen items in the final tool. Items included covered patient spectrum, reference standard, disease progression bias, verification bias, review bias, clinical review bias, incorporation bias, test execution, study withdrawals, and indeterminate results. The QUADAS tool is presented together with guidelines for scoring each of the items included in the tool. CONCLUSIONS: This project has produced an evidence based quality assessment tool to be used in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies. Further work to determine the usability and validity of the tool continues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The quality of the initially chosen studies was assessed and analyzed to support the inclusion / exclusion process. The used critical appraisal tool was a quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS) checklist.”
From Interoperability of heterogeneous health information systems: a systematic literature review (2023) · cites this paper as [12]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Firstly, according to QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) guidelines [15,16], samples should be collected at a consistent phase of the cycle and results should be corrected for the cycle phases.”
From A high sensitivity assay is more accurate than a classical assay for the measurement of plasma CRP levels in endometriosis (2011) · cites this paper as [16]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“In our study, samples were collected at a well defined phase of the cycle and results were corrected for cycle phase, as recommended by the QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) guidelines [15,16].”
From A high sensitivity assay is more accurate than a classical assay for the measurement of plasma CRP levels in endometriosis (2011) · cites this paper as [16]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Accepted guidelines are available to appraise the methodological quality of clinical trials (e.g., Delphi List [9]) or diagnostic studies (QUADAS [10]).”
From Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of health status measurement instruments (2009) · cites this paper as [10]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?
Jadad, A. R., Moore, R. A., Carroll, D., Jenkinson, C., Reynolds, D. J. M., Gavaghan, D. J., & McQuay, H. J. (1996) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4 · Cited by 17,582
Zhang, Q., Wang, C., Zheng, M., Li, Y., Li, J., Zhang, L., Shang, X., & Yan, C. (2014) · Cerebrovascular Diseases · doi:10.1159/000369778 · Cited by 11,609
Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use
Streiner, D. L., Norman, G. R., & Cairney, J. (1989) · Cited by 9,595
Schulz (1995) · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520290060030 · Cited by 5,634
Dong, Y., Hao, L., Shi, Z., Wang, G., Zhang, Z., & Han, C. (2013) · Urologia Internationalis · doi:10.1159/000351405 · Cited by 4,557
Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials
Jüni, P., Altman, D. G., & Egger, M. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7303.42 · Cited by 3,309
The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis
Jüni, P. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.11.1054 · Cited by 1,981
Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta‐analysis in Context
Pittler, M. (2010) · Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies · doi:10.1111/j.2042-7166.2002.tb05479.x · Cited by 1,639
Systematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-analysis in Context.
Kleijnen, J., & Antes, G. (2002) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/31.3.697 · Cited by 1,374
Self-citationSystematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests
Deeks, J. J. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7305.157 · Cited by 1,345
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Whiting P, Rutjes A, Dinnes J, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt P, Kleijnen J: A systematic review of existing quality assessment tools used to assess the quality of diagnostic research. submitted
- Whiting P, Dinnes J, Rutjes AWS, Reitsma JB, M BP, Kleijnen J: A systematic review of how quality assessment has been handled in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests. submitted
- Kerr M: The Delphi Process. The Delphi Process 2002. 2001, City: Remote and Rural Areas Research Initiative, NHS in Scotland, avaliable online at http://www.rararibids.org.uk/documents/bid79-delphi.htm
Cited by
Sorted by citations
QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies
Whiting, P. F., Rutjes, A. W. S., Westwood, M. E., Mallett, S., Deeks, J. J., Reitsma, J. B., Leeflang, M. M. G., Sterne, J. A. C., Bossuyt, P. M. M., & the QUADAS-2 Group* (2011) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009 · Cited by 14,199
Self-citationShea, B. J., Reeves, B. C., Wells, G., Thuku, M., Hamel, C., Moran, J., Moher, D., Tugwell, P., Welch, V., Kristjansson, E., et al. (2017) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.j4008 · Cited by 10,636
SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies
Hooijmans, C. R., Rovers, M. M., de Vries, R. B., Leenaars, M., Ritskes-Hoitinga, M., & Langendam, M. W. (2014) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-43 · Cited by 4,415
ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
Whiting, P., Savović, J., Higgins, J. P. T., Caldwell, D. M., Reeves, B. C., Shea, B., Davies, P., Kleijnen, J., & Churchill, R. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005 · Cited by 2,272
Self-citationZeng, X., Zhang, Y., Kwong, J. S. W., Zhang, C., Li, S., Sun, F., Niu, Y., & Du, L. (2015) · Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine · doi:10.1111/jebm.12141 · Cited by 2,082
Moons, K. G. M., de Groot, J. A. H., Bouwmeester, W., Vergouwe, Y., Mallett, S., Altman, D. G., Reitsma, J. B., & Collins, G. S. (2014) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001744 · Cited by 2,018
Self-citationGrading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies
Schünemann, H. J., Oxman, A. D., Brozek, J., Glasziou, P., Jaeschke, R., Vist, G. E., Williams, J. W., Kunz, R., Craig, J., Montori, V. M., et al. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39500.677199.ae · Cited by 1,782
Self-citationNovak, I., Morgan, C., Adde, L., Blackman, J., Boyd, R. N., Brunstrom-Hernandez, J., Cioni, G., Damiano, D., Darrah, J., Eliasson, A.-C., et al. (2017) · JAMA Pediatrics · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1689 · Cited by 1,721
Prevalence of Cerebral Amyloid Pathology in Persons Without Dementia: A Meta-analysis
Jansen, W. J., Ossenkoppele, R., Knol, D. L., Tijms, B. M., Scheltens, P., Verhey, F. R. J., Visser, P. J., Aalten, P., Aarsland, D., Alcolea, D., et al. (2015) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2015.4668 · Cited by 1,610
Ma, L.-L., Wang, Y.-Y., Yang, Z.-H., Huang, D., Weng, H., & Zeng, X.-T. (2020) · Military Medical Research · doi:10.1186/s40779-020-00238-8 · Cited by 1,648
Sanderson, S., Tatt, I. D., & Higgins, J. P. (2007) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dym018 · Cited by 1,531
Salvagioni, D. A. J., Melanda, F. N., Mesas, A. E., González, A. D., Gabani, F. L., & Andrade, S. M. D. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0185781 · Cited by 1,508
The Diagnosis and Management of Acute Otitis Media
Lieberthal, A. S., Carroll, A. E., Chonmaitree, T., Ganiats, T. G., Hoberman, A., Jackson, M. A., Joffe, M. D., Miller, D. T., Rosenfeld, R. M., Sevilla, X. D., et al. (2013) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2012-3488 · Cited by 1,442
KDIGO 2020 Clinical practice guideline for diabetes management in chronic kidney disease
de Boer, I. H., Caramori, M. L., Chan, J. C. N., Heerspink, H. J. L., Hurst, C., Khunti, K., Liew, A., Michos, E. D., Navaneethan, S. D., Olowu, W. A., et al. (2020) · Kidney International · doi:10.1016/j.kint.2020.06.019 · Cited by 1,399
KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease
Rossing, P., Caramori, M. L., Chan, J. C. N., Heerspink, H. J. L., Hurst, C., Khunti, K., Liew, A., Michos, E. D., Navaneethan, S. D., Olowu, W. A., et al. (2022) · Kidney International · doi:10.1016/j.kint.2022.06.008 · Cited by 1,373
Procalcitonin as a diagnostic marker for sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wacker, C., Prkno, A., Brunkhorst, F. M., & Schlattmann, P. (2013) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(12)70323-7 · Cited by 1,198
Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy
Leeflang, M. M. G., Deeks, J. J., Gatsonis, C., & Bossuyt, P. M. M. (2008) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-149-12-200812160-00008 · Cited by 1,124
Self-citationLin, J. S., Bowles, E. J. A., Williams, S. B., & Morrison, C. C. (2017) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2017.0562 · Cited by 1,082
Cnossen, J. S., Morris, R. K., ter Riet, G., Mol, B. W. J., van der Post, J. A. M., Coomarasamy, A., Zwinderman, A. H., Robson, S. C., Bindels, P. J. E., Kleijnen, J., et al. (2008) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.070430 · Cited by 719
Self-citationSalameh, J.-P., Bossuyt, P. M., McGrath, T. A., Thombs, B. D., Hyde, C. J., Macaskill, P., Deeks, J. J., Leeflang, M., Korevaar, D. A., Whiting, P., et al. (2020) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.m2632 · Cited by 719
Self-citationWill this patient develop persistent disabling low back pain?
Chou, R. (2010) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2010.344 · Cited by 701
Cordonnier, C., Al-Shahi Salman, R., & Wardlaw, J. (2007) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awl387 · Cited by 703
Prevalence of Amyloid PET Positivity in Dementia Syndromes: A Meta-analysis
Ossenkoppele, R., Jansen, W. J., Rabinovici, G. D., Knol, D. L., van der Flier, W. M., van Berckel, B. N. M., Scheltens, P., Visser, P. J., Verfaillie, S. C. J., Zwan, M. D., et al. (2015) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2015.4669 · Cited by 677
A systematic review of rapid diagnostic tests for the detection of tuberculosis infection
Dinnes, J., Deeks, J., Kunst, H., Gibson, A., Cummins, E., Waugh, N., Drobniewski, F., & Lalvani, A. (2007) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta11030 · Cited by 666
Reporting and Methods in Clinical Prediction Research: A Systematic Review
Bouwmeester, W., Zuithoff, N. P. A., Mallett, S., Geerlings, M. I., Vergouwe, Y., Steyerberg, E. W., Altman, D. G., & Moons, K. G. M. (2012) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001221 · Cited by 600
Mental Health Conditions Among Patients Seeking and Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: A Meta-analysis
Dawes, A. J., Maggard-Gibbons, M., Maher, A. R., Booth, M. J., Miake-Lye, I., Beroes, J. M., & Shekelle, P. G. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2015.18118 · Cited by 579
-D-Glucan Assay for the Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Infections: A Meta-analysis
Karageorgopoulos, D. E., Vouloumanou, E. K., Ntziora, F., Michalopoulos, A., Rafailidis, P. I., & Falagas, M. E. (2011) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciq206 · Cited by 538
Diagnostic accuracy of the mood module of the patient health questionnaire: a systematic review
Wittkampf, K. A., Naeije, L., Schene, A. H., Huyser, J., & van Weert, H. C. (2007) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2007.06.004 · Cited by 493
Cytology versus HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in the general population
Koliopoulos, G., Nyaga, V. N., Santesso, N., Bryant, A., Martin-Hirsch, P. P., Mustafa, R. A., Schünemann, H., Paraskevaidis, E., & Arbyn, M. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008587.pub2 · Cited by 494
Diagnosing and Managing Common Food Allergies: A Systematic Review
Chafen, J. J. S., Newberry, S. J., Riedl, M. A., Bravata, D. M., Maglione, M., Suttorp, M. J., Sundaram, V., Paige, N. M., Towfigh, A., Hulley, B. J., et al. (2010) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2010.582 · Cited by 482
Malin, G. L., Morris, R. K., & Khan, K. S. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c1471 · Cited by 461
Wandersman, A., Chien, V. H., & Katz, J. (2012) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10464-012-9509-7 · Cited by 422
Merlin, T., Weston, A., & Tooher, R. (2009) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-9-34 · Cited by 435
Validity of diagnostic codes for acute stroke in administrative databases: a systematic review.
McCormick, N., Bhole, V., Lacaille, D., & Avina-Zubieta, J. A. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135834 · Cited by 414
Taplitz, R. A., Kennedy, E. B., Bow, E. J., Crews, J., Gleason, C., Hawley, D. K., Langston, A. A., Nastoupil, L. J., Rajotte, M., Rolston, K., et al. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2017.77.6211 · Cited by 426
Peripheral biomarkers of endometriosis: a systematic review
May, K. E., Conduit-Hulbert, S. A., Villar, J., Kirtley, S., Kennedy, S. H., & Becker, C. M. (2010) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmq009 · Cited by 418
Kwok, R., Tse, Y. ‐., Wong, G. L. ‐., Ha, Y., Lee, A. U., Ngu, M. C., Chan, H. L. ‐., & Wong, V. W. ‐. (2014) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/apt.12569 · Cited by 405
Interoperability of heterogeneous health information systems: a systematic literature review
Torab-Miandoab, A., Samad-Soltani, T., Jodati, A., & Rezaei-Hachesu, P. (2023) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-023-02115-5 · Cited by 393
Cleveland, A. A., Farley, M. M., Harrison, L. H., Stein, B., Hollick, R., Lockhart, S. R., Magill, S. S., Derado, G., Park, B. J., & Chiller, T. M. (2012) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cis697 · Cited by 366
Hodgkinson, J., Mant, J., Martin, U., Guo, B., Hobbs, F. D. R., Deeks, J. J., Heneghan, C., Roberts, N., & McManus, R. J. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d3621 · Cited by 370
Coronary Atherosclerosis Imaging by Coronary CT Angiography
Voros, S., Rinehart, S., Qian, Z., Joshi, P., Vazquez, G., Fischer, C., Belur, P., Hulten, E., & Villines, T. C. (2011) · JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.03.006 · Cited by 362
Ford, A. C., Spiegel, B. M. R., Talley, N. J., & Moayyedi, P. (2009) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2009.06.031 · Cited by 351
Hewitt, C., Gilbody, S., Brealey, S., Paulden, M., Palmer, S., Mann, R., Green, J., Morrell, J., Barkham, M., Light, K., et al. (2009) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta13360 · Cited by 330
Anxiety measures validated in perinatal populations: A systematic review
Meades, R., & Ayers, S. (2011) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2010.10.009 · Cited by 329
Menke, J. (2010) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.10091938 · Cited by 319
Van den Bruel, A., Haj-Hassan, T., Thompson, M., Buntinx, F., & Mant, D. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)62000-6 · Cited by 317
Knorr, U., Vinberg, M., Kessing, L. V., & Wetterslev, J. (2010) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.04.001 · Cited by 317
Teledermatology for diagnosis and management of skin conditions: A systematic review
Warshaw, E. M., Hillman, Y. J., Greer, N. L., Hagel, E. M., MacDonald, R., Rutks, I. R., & Wilt, T. J. (2011) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2010.08.026 · Cited by 310
Diagnosis of the condition of the dental pulp: a systematic review
Mejàre, I. A., Axelsson, S., Davidson, T., Frisk, F., Hakeberg, M., Kvist, T., Norlund, A., Petersson, A., Portenier, I., Sandberg, H., et al. (2012) · International Endodontic Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02016.x · Cited by 296
Automating data extraction in systematic reviews: a systematic review
Jonnalagadda, S. R., Goyal, P., & Huffman, M. D. (2015) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-015-0066-7 · Cited by 287
Brożek, J. L., Akl, E. A., Jaeschke, R., Lang, D. M., Bossuyt, P., Glasziou, P., Helfand, M., Ueffing, E., Alonso‐Coello, P., Meerpohl, J., et al. (2009) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02083.x · Cited by 270
Self-citationEvennett, N. J., Petrov, M. S., Mittal, A., & Windsor, J. A. (2009) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-009-0074-7 · Cited by 270
Validity of myocardial infarction diagnoses in administrative databases: a systematic review.
McCormick, N., Lacaille, D., Bhole, V., & Avina-Zubieta, J. A. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092286 · Cited by 262
Dave, M., Elmunzer, B. J., Dwamena, B. A., & Higgins, P. D. R. (2010) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.10091953 · Cited by 265
Sakushima, K., Hayashino, Y., Kawaguchi, T., Jackson, J. L., & Fukuhara, S. (2011) · Journal of Infection · doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2011.02.010 · Cited by 246
O’Connor, E. A., Perdue, L. A., Senger, C. A., Rushkin, M., Patnode, C. D., Bean, S. I., & Jonas, D. E. (2018) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.12086 · Cited by 249
Fusar‐Poli, P., Cappucciati, M., Rutigliano, G., Schultze‐Lutter, F., Bonoldi, I., Borgwardt, S., Riecher‐Rössler, A., Addington, J., Perkins, D., Woods, S. W., et al. (2015) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20250 · Cited by 234
El Shayeb, M., Topfer, L.-A., Stafinski, T., Pawluk, L., & Menon, D. (2014) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.130952 · Cited by 237
Endometrial alterations in endometriosis: a systematic review of putative biomarkers
May, K. E., Villar, J., Kirtley, S., Kennedy, S. H., & Becker, C. M. (2011) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmr013 · Cited by 237
Chang, S.-S., Hsieh, W.-H., Liu, T.-S., Lee, S.-H., Wang, C.-H., Chou, H.-C., Yeo, Y. H., Tseng, C.-P., & Lee, C.-C. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062323 · Cited by 224
Accuracy of Diagnostic Tests for Cushing’s Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Metaanalyses
Elamin, M. B., Murad, M. H., Mullan, R., Erickson, D., Harris, K., Nadeem, S., Ennis, R., Erwin, P. J., & Montori, V. M. (2008) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2008-0139 · Cited by 222
Trikudanathan, G., Navaneethan, U., Njei, B., Vargo, J. J., & Parsi, M. A. (2014) · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · doi:10.1016/j.gie.2013.09.015 · Cited by 203
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Stratford, P. W., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., Riphagen, I., Knol, D. L., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2009) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-009-9451-9 · Cited by 186
O'Connor, E., Gaynes, B. N., Burda, B. U., Soh, C., & Whitlock, E. P. (2013) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-10-201305210-00642 · Cited by 193
Leone Roberti Maggiore, U., Ferrero, S., Candiani, M., Somigliana, E., Viganò, P., & Vercellini, P. (2017) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.12.015 · Cited by 187
Evaluation of a panel of 28 biomarkers for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis
Vodolazkaia, A., El-Aalamat, Y., Popovic, D., Mihalyi, A., Bossuyt, X., Kyama, C. M., Fassbender, A., Bokor, A., Schols, D., Huskens, D., et al. (2012) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/des234 · Cited by 189
Manchikanti, L. (2009) · Pain Physician · doi:10.36076/ppj.2009/12/819 · Cited by 168
Surveillance for ocular hypertension: an evidence synthesis and economic evaluation.
Burr, J., Botello-Pinzon, P., Takwoingi, Y., Hernández, R., Vazquez-Montes, M., Elders, A., Asaoka, R., Banister, K., van der Schoot, J., Fraser, C., et al. (2012) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta16290 · Cited by 180
Zhao, X., Han, Q., Liu, Y., Sun, C., Gang, X., & Wang, G. (2016) · Journal of Diabetes Research · doi:10.1155/2016/2794591 · Cited by 174
The validity of upper-limb neurodynamic tests for detecting peripheral neuropathic pain.
Nee, R. J., Jull, G. A., Vicenzino, B., & Coppieters, M. W. (2012) · Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.3988 · Cited by 171
Clinical Features Suggestive of Meningitis in Children: A Systematic Review of Prospective Data
Curtis, S., Stobart, K., Vandermeer, B., Simel, D. L., & Klassen, T. (2010) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2010-0277 · Cited by 147
Navaneethan, U., Njei, B., Venkatesh, P. G. K., Vargo, J. J., & Parsi, M. A. (2014) · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · doi:10.1016/j.gie.2013.11.001 · Cited by 146
Treskes, N., Persoon, A. M., & van Zanten, A. R. H. (2017) · Internal and Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11739-017-1668-y · Cited by 135
Kattenberg, J. H., Ochodo, E. A., Boer, K. R., Schallig, H. D., Mens, P. F., & Leeflang, M. M. (2011) · Malaria Journal · doi:10.1186/1475-2875-10-321 · Cited by 138
Metabolomic analysis in inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review
Gallagher, K., Catesson, A., Griffin, J. L., Holmes, E., & Williams, H. R. T. (2021) · Journal of Crohn's and Colitis · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaa227 · Cited by 133
Wu, Y., Li, P., Zhang, H., Shi, Y., Wu, H., Zhang, J., Qian, Y., Li, C., & Yang, J. (2013) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.27779 · Cited by 129
A proposed framework for developing quality assessment tools
Whiting, P., Wolff, R., Mallett, S., Simera, I., & Savović, J. (2017) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0604-6 · Cited by 121
Self-citationMartin-Calvo, N., Moreno-Galarraga, L., & Martinez-Gonzalez, M. (2016) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu8080512 · Cited by 122
Stevenson, S. F., Doubal, F. N., Shuler, K., & Wardlaw, J. M. (2010) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.109.569855 · Cited by 112
Heynsbergh, N., Heckel, L., Botti, M., & Livingston, P. M. (2018) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-018-4160-9 · Cited by 109
Mitchell, A. J., Meader, N., Davies, E., Clover, K., Carter, G. L., Loscalzo, M. J., Linden, W., Grassi, L., Johansen, C., Carlson, L. E., et al. (2012) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2011.12.043 · Cited by 107
Shen, C.-J., Wu, M.-S., Lin, K.-H., Lin, W.-L., Chen, H.-C., Wu, J.-Y., Lee, M. C.-H., & Lee, C.-C. (2013) · European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1007/s10096-012-1812-6 · Cited by 105
Jayakumar, S., Sounderajah, V., Normahani, P., Harling, L., Markar, S. R., Ashrafian, H., & Darzi, A. (2022) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-021-00544-y · Cited by 110
Can chemokines be used as biomarkers for endometriosis? A systematic review
Borrelli, G. M., Abrao, M. S., & Mechsner, S. (2014) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/det401 · Cited by 102
Late-night salivary cortisol for the diagnosis of Cushing syndrome: a meta-analysis
Carroll, T., Raff, H., & Findling, J. W. (2009) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep09023or · Cited by 100
Pitfalls of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Imaging Research
McInnes, M. D. F., & Bossuyt, P. M. M. (2015) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2015142779 · Cited by 99
Self-citationFassbender, A., Verbeeck, N., Börnigen, D., Kyama, C. M., Bokor, A., Vodolazkaia, A., Peeraer, K., Tomassetti, C., Meuleman, C., Gevaert, O., et al. (2012) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/des127 · Cited by 87
Robson, R. C., Pham, B., Hwee, J., Thomas, S. M., Rios, P., Page, M. J., & Tricco, A. C. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.10.003 · Cited by 86
Connolly, M. J., McInnes, M. D. F., El-Khodary, M., McGrath, T. A., & Schieda, N. (2017) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-017-4785-0 · Cited by 78
PCR Using Blood for Diagnosis of Invasive Pneumococcal Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Avni, T., Mansur, N., Leibovici, L., & Paul, M. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.01636-09 · Cited by 72
Systematic review and meta-analysis of middle cerebral artery Doppler to predict perinatal wellbeing
Morris, R. K., Say, R., Robson, S. C., Kleijnen, J., & Khan, K. S. (2012) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.07.027 · Cited by 70
Self-citationFantoni, E. R., Chalkidou, A., O’ Brien, J. T., Farrar, G., & Hammers, A. (2018) · Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-171093 · Cited by 68
Arbyn, M., Xu, L., Verdoodt, F., Cuzick, J., Szarewski, A., Belinson, J. L., Wentzensen, N., Gage, J. C., & Khan, M. J. (2017) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m15-2735 · Cited by 68
Overinterpretation of Clinical Applicability in Molecular Diagnostic Research
Lumbreras, B., Parker, L. A., Porta, M., Pollán, M., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Hernández-Aguado, I. (2009) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2008.121517 · Cited by 65
Wirsching, J., Graßmann, S., Eichelmann, F., Harms, L. M., Schenk, M., Barth, E., Berndzen, A., Olalekan, M., Sarmini, L., Zuberer, H., et al. (2018) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0583-x · Cited by 63
Coleman, J. J., Frymark, T., Franceschini, N. M., & Theodoros, D. G. (2015) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2015_ajslp-14-0028 · Cited by 63
QUADAS-3: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies
Whiting, P. F., Tomlinson, E., Rutjes, A. W. S., Davenport, C. F., Yang, B., Westwood, M. E., Takwoingi, Y., Reitsma, J. B., Hyde, C., Bossuyt, P. M. M., et al. (2026) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/annals-25-02104 · Cited by 60
Self-citationHerwanto, V., Shetty, A., Nalos, M., Chakraborty, M., McLean, A., Eslick, G. D., & Tang, B. (2019) · Critical Care Explorations · doi:10.1097/cce.0000000000000043 · Cited by 58
Noninvasive biomarkers of endometriosis: myth or reality?
Lanišnik Rižner, T. (2014) · Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics · doi:10.1586/14737159.2014.899905 · Cited by 52
Lefebvre, C., Glanville, J., Beale, S., Boachie, C., Duffy, S., Fraser, C., Harbour, J., McCool, R., & Smith, L. (2017) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta21690 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Whiting, P., Rutjes, A. W., Reitsma, J. B., Bossuyt, P. M., & Kleijnen, J.
- Affiliations
- University of York (GB)
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Whiting, Penny
- Venue
- BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Published
- 2003-11-10
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-25
- ISSN
- 1471-2288 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC305345
- OpenAlex
- W2147493587
- Cited by
- 3,592
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 109 · 2021: 123 · 2020: 146 · 2019: 127 · 2018: 183 · 2017: 202 · 2016: 202 · 2015: 281 · 2014: 289 · 2013: 337 · 2012: 338
- FWCI
- 11.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMC Medical Research Methodology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Health Technology Assessment Programme
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Keywords
- QUADAS, quality assessment tools, diagnostic accuracy studies, systematic reviews, Delphi consensus, verification bias, review bias, reference materials, study withdrawal, indeterminate results, test execution
- MeSH terms
- Diagnosis, Humans, Quality Control, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reference Standards, Review Literature as Topic, Reproducibility of Results, Bias, Evidence-Based Medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review