Cited by 567Diabetes Treatment and ManagementMetabolism, Diabetes, and CancerDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 196 of the 196 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 12 of the 233 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Metformin: an old but still the best treatment for type 2 diabetes

Open access
Rojas, Lilian Beatriz Aguayo, Gomes, Marilia Brito·2013·Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome

Abstract

The management of T2DM requires aggressive treatment to achieve glycemic and cardiovascular risk factor goals. In this setting, metformin, an old and widely accepted first line agent, stands out not only for its antihyperglycemic properties but also for its effects beyond glycemic control such as improvements in endothelial dysfunction, hemostasis and oxidative stress, insulin resistance, lipid profiles, and fat redistribution. These properties may have contributed to the decrease of adverse cardiovascular outcomes otherwise not attributable to metformin's mere antihyperglycemic effects. Several other classes of oral antidiabetic agents have been recently launched, introducing the need to evaluate the role of metformin as initial therapy and in combination with these newer drugs. There is increasing evidence from in vivo and in vitro studies supporting its anti-proliferative role in cancer and possibly a neuroprotective effect. Metformin's negligible risk of hypoglycemia in monotherapy and few drug interactions of clinical relevance give this drug a high safety profile. The tolerability of metformin may be improved by using an appropiate dose titration, starting with low doses, so that side-effects can be minimized or by switching to an extended release form. We reviewed the role of metformin in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes and describe the additional benefits beyond its glycemic effect. We also discuss its potential role for a variety of insulin resistant and pre-diabetic states, obesity, metabolic abnormalities associated with HIV disease, gestational diabetes, cancer, and neuroprotection.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This narrative review argues that metformin remains the first-line oral agent for type 2 diabetes because of its glycemic efficacy, safety profile, and benefits extending beyond glucose lowering (vascular, inflammatory, oxidative, and possible anticancer and neuroprotective effects). It surveys evidence across pre-diabetes, combination therapy, pregnancy, pediatrics, obesity/NAFLD, heart failure, HIV lipodystrophy, cancer, and contraindications.

Key findings

  • In the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP), lifestyle intervention and metformin reduced diabetes incidence by 58% and 31% respectively versus placebo; after a 1–2 week washout, metformin still significantly reduced incidence (risk ratio 0.75, p = 0.005), with benefit concentrated in patients <60 years (RR 0.66) and BMI >35 kg/m² (RR 0.47).
  • In the UKPDS, the metformin-treated group had risk reductions of 32% (p = 0.002) for any diabetes-related endpoint, 42% for diabetes-related death (p = 0.017), and 36% for all-cause mortality (p = 0.011) versus control; post-trial follow-up showed persistent reductions for any diabetes-related endpoint (21%, p = 0.01), myocardial infarction (33%, p = 0.005), and death from any cause (27%, p = 0.002).
  • Observational studies report reduced cancer incidence and cancer-related mortality in metformin users, consistently in the range of 25% to 30%; one cohort found cancer incidence of 7.3% in metformin users versus 11.6% in controls (unadjusted hazard ratio 0.46, 95% CI 0.40–0.53).
  • Reported lactic acidosis incidence is 6.3 per 100,000 patient-years with metformin versus 40–64 per 100,000 patient-years with biguanides (mostly phenformin); gastrointestinal intolerance occurs frequently, and about 10–30% of patients show reduced vitamin B12 absorption.

Methods

  • Narrative (non-systematic) review of the literature on metformin in type 2 diabetes, covering its mechanism (LKB-1/AMPK activation, reduced hepatic glucose output, mitochondrial respiration inhibition), clinical trials, and observational studies.
  • Evidence summarized includes major randomized trials (DPP, DPPOS, IDPP, UKPDS, ADOPT, MiG, HOME, PRESTO), meta-analyses, and retrospective/observational cohorts, presented in narrative form plus two summary tables (diabetes prevention and vasculoprotection).
  • No stated search strategy, inclusion criteria, or formal quality appraisal is described.

Limitations

  • Stated in the paper: a meta-analysis suggesting smaller cardiovascular effects of metformin "must be interpreted with caution given the low number of randomized controlled trials included"; epidemiological comparisons of sulfonylureas versus metformin "are potentially affected by unmeasured confounding variables"; pediatric studies are few, of short duration, and heterogeneous in design; the effect of metformin on endothelial function is contradictory across studies and requires further study; whether increased cancer mortality with sulfonylureas/insulin reflects harm from those agents or protection from metformin "is not known."
  • Evident from the text: as a narrative review without a described systematic search or quality assessment, selection and interpretation of cited evidence may be subject to bias; several key claims (cancer, neuroprotection, heart failure safety) rest largely on observational or in vitro/in vivo data rather than randomized trials.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1758-5996-5-6

Cites

196 of 196 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

165 Not checked yet · 7 Own interpretation · 3 Supported · 2 Partly supported · 1 Supported so far · 1 No basis given · accuracy not yet measured

Verify all 221 references — free account

Show all 98 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 66
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 21
81 of 81
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Aggressive treatment is required in type 2 diabetes mellitus to achieve glycemic and cardiovascular risk factor goals.

    “The management of T2DM requires aggressive treatment to achieve glycemic and cardiovascular risk factor goals.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Lifestyle modifications such as diet and exercise and switching antiretroviral therapies are of limited value in reducing visceral abdominal fat.

    “Lifestyle modifications such as diet and exercise and switching antiretroviral therapies seems to be of limited value in reducing visceral abdominal fat (VAT).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Mitochondrial dysfunction has a pivotal role in oxidative stress.

    “Mitochondrial dysfunction has a pivotal role in oxidative stress.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Renal dysfunction is the most common risk factor associated with lactic acidosis in patients using metformin.

    “Renal dysfunction is the most common risk factor associated with lactic acidosis”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

4 of 4

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 194 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Donahue S, Marathe P, Guld T, Meeker J: The phamacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of extended-release metformin tablets vs immediate-release metformin in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2002, 51 (Suppl 2): A468-
  2. Raz I, Delaet I, Goyvaerts H: Safety and efficacy of novel extended-release formulation of metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2000, 49 (Suppl 1): A363-

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–109 of 109

Metadata

Authors
Rojas, L. B. A., & Gomes, M. B.
Affiliations
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Corresponding author
Rojas, Lilian Beatriz Aguayo
Venue
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
Published
2013-02-15
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
6-6
ISSN
1758-5996 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119008227
Cited by
567
References
194
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 10
FWCI
28.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
metformin, type 2 diabetes, first-line therapy, glycemic control, cardiovascular risk reduction, insulin resistance, endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, hemostasis, lipid profile, fat redistribution, oral antidiabetic drugs, drug interactions, hypoglycemia, dose titration, sustained drug release, prediabetes, obesity, gestational diabetes mellitus, cancer, neuroprotection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review