CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 260Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 109 of the 109 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 68 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Reduction in parvalbumin expression not loss of the parvalbumin-expressing GABA interneuron subpopulation in genetic parvalbumin and shank mouse models of autism

Open access
Filice, Federica, Vörckel, Karl Jakob, Sungur, Ayse Özge, Wöhr, Markus, Schwaller, Beat·2016·Molecular Brain
DOI 10.1186/s13041-016-0192-8PMC PMC4729132
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A reduction of the number of parvalbumin (PV)-immunoreactive (PV(+)) GABAergic interneurons or a decrease in PV immunoreactivity was reported in several mouse models of autism spectrum disorders (ASD). This includes Shank mutant mice, with SHANK being one of the most important gene families mutated in human ASD. Similar findings were obtained in heterozygous (PV+/-) mice for the Pvalb gene, which display a robust ASD-like phenotype. Here, we addressed the question whether the observed reduction in PV immunoreactivity was the result of a decrease in PV expression levels and/or loss of the PV-expressing GABA interneuron subpopulation hereafter called "Pvalb neurons". The two alternatives have important implications as they likely result in opposing effects on the excitation/inhibition balance, with decreased PV expression resulting in enhanced inhibition, but loss of the Pvalb neuron subpopulation in reduced inhibition. METHODS: Stereology was used to determine the number of Pvalb neurons in ASD-associated brain regions including the medial prefrontal cortex, somatosensory cortex and striatum of PV-/-, PV+/-, Shank1-/- and Shank3B-/- mice. As a second marker for the identification of Pvalb neurons, we used Vicia Villosa Agglutinin (VVA), a lectin recognizing the specific extracellular matrix enwrapping Pvalb neurons. PV protein and Pvalb mRNA levels were determined quantitatively by Western blot analyses and qRT-PCR, respectively. RESULTS: Our analyses of total cell numbers in different brain regions indicated that the observed "reduction of PV(+) neurons" was in all cases, i.e., in PV+/-, Shank1-/- and Shank3B-/- mice, due to a reduction in Pvalb mRNA and PV protein, without any indication of neuronal cell decrease/loss of Pvalb neurons evidenced by the unaltered numbers of VVA(+) neurons. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the PV system might represent a convergent downstream endpoint for some forms of ASD, with the excitation/inhibition balance shifted towards enhanced inhibition due to the down-regulation of PV being a promising target for future pharmacological interventions. Testing whether approaches aimed at restoring normal PV protein expression levels and/or Pvalb neuron function might reverse ASD-relevant phenotypes in mice appears therefore warranted and may pave the way for novel therapeutic treatment strategies.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In genetic mouse models of autism (PV+/-, PV-/-, Shank1-/-, Shank3B-/-), reduced PV immunoreactivity reflected lower Pvalb mRNA/PV protein rather than loss of Pvalb neurons, since VVA+ neuron numbers were unchanged. The authors conclude PV down-regulation may be a convergent ASD endpoint shifting excitation/inhibition balance toward enhanced inhibition.

Key findings

  • In PV+/- mice, PV+ cells were reduced to ~60% of WT across mPFC, SSC, and striatum, while VVA+ cell numbers were unchanged (average 98% of WT); PV-/- mice had essentially no PV+ cells but VVA+ numbers averaged 99% of WT.
  • In Shank1-/- SSC, PV+ cells were reduced to 62% of WT with unchanged VVA+ cells; in Shank3B-/- striatum, PV+ cells were reduced to ~58% of WT with unchanged VVA+ cells.
  • PV protein and Pvalb mRNA were reduced by ~50% in PV+/- mice; in Shank3B-/- striatum, mRNA was 53 ± 8% and protein 50 ± 9% of WT, with similar transcriptional down-regulation in Shank1-/-.
  • Co-localization showed ~70% double-labeled PV+/VVA+ cells in WT vs ~55% in PV+/-; ~75% of PV+ cells were VVA-surrounded in all regions with no WT vs PV+/- difference, while VVA+ cells expressing PV fell from ~68% in WT to ~45% in PV+/-.

Methods

  • Stereology using the optical fractionator was used to estimate PV+ and VVA+ cell numbers in mPFC, SSC, and striatum of postnatal day 25 male PV+/+, PV+/-, PV-/-, Shank1-/-, and Shank3B-/- mice; an EGFP-Pvalb reporter line was also used.
  • PV protein levels were measured by Western blot with calbindin D-28k, GAPDH, or Ponceau Red normalization; Pvalb mRNA was measured by qRT-PCR normalized to 18S rRNA.
  • Five animals per genotype from heterozygous breedings were analyzed, including littermate controls; statistics used Student’s t-test for mRNA/protein and one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test for stereology.

Limitations

  • No dedicated limitations section is included; the authors note that VVA/PNN staining is developmentally and layer-dependent, activity-regulated, and altered under pathological conditions, and that PNN overlap with PV+ neurons is not absolute.
  • Evident from the text: only male mice were used, all analyses were at PND25, and stereological quantification focused on selected regions (mPFC, SSC, striatum), with some regional comparisons assessed only qualitatively.
  • Evident from the text: the study reports correlational down-regulation of PV and does not test whether restoring PV expression or Pvalb neuron function reverses ASD-relevant phenotypes.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13041-016-0192-8

Cites

109 of 109 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Fig. 1 Representative PV+ and VVA+ cells from PND25 mouse cortex. a, b Single channel acquisition of (a) PV+ (magenta) and (b) VVA+ (green) cells. (c, d) Merged images showing PV (magenta) and VVA (green) overlapping in the PND25 cortex of a WT mouse, in (d) additionally with DAPI (light blue) counterstaining. In PV+ cell bodies (magenta), where most of the cell including the nucleus evidenced by DAPI staining (blue) was within the thickness of the section, the PNN (green) surrounding the cell was clearly visible. a–d) Low magnification and e–h) High magnification images. Arrowheads indicate the PV+VVA+ double-positive neurons that are in focus. In the overlay image, the rim of the cells was lighting up in white, indicative for “co-localization” of PV and VVA. i–l) High magnification images of PV+ (magenta) and VVA+ (green) cells from PND25 PV-/- mouse cortex. The morphology of PNNs in PV-/- animals does not differ from the one of WT mice. Scale bar: 100 μm (a–d), 50 μm (e–l)
Fig. 1 Representative PV+ and VVA+ cells from PND25 mouse cortex. a, b Single channel acquisition of (a) PV+ (magenta) and (b) VVA+ (green) cells. (c, d) Merged images showing PV (magenta) and VVA (green) overlapping in the PND25 cortex of a WT mouse, in (d) additionally with DAPI (light blue) counterstaining. In PV+ cell bodies (magenta), where most of the cell including the nucleus evidenced by DAPI staining (blue) was within the thickness of the section, the PNN (green) surrounding the cell was clearly visible. a–d) Low magnification and e–h) High magnification images. Arrowheads indicate the PV+VVA+ double-positive neurons that are in focus. In the overlay image, the rim of the cells was lighting up in white, indicative for “co-localization” of PV and VVA. i–l) High magnification images of PV+ (magenta) and VVA+ (green) cells from PND25 PV-/- mouse cortex. The morphology of PNNs in PV-/- animals does not differ from the one of WT mice. Scale bar: 100 μm (a–d), 50 μm (e–l)CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 PV immunofluorescence images from mPFC of a PV+/- (a), SSC of a Shank1-/- (b) and striatum of a Shank3B-/- (c) mouse in comparison to the same regions of a WT mouse. PV expression levels (≈ signal intensity) varied considerably between individual PV+ neurons. Note the generally weaker somatic staining in the mutant mice (right panels), also evident by the fainter staining of the PV-ir neuropil. The weaker staining results in a lower number of neurons considered as positive for PV as shown in Figs. 3, 4 & 6. Scale bars: 100 μm in a, c; 200 μm in b
Fig. 2 PV immunofluorescence images from mPFC of a PV+/- (a), SSC of a Shank1-/- (b) and striatum of a Shank3B-/- (c) mouse in comparison to the same regions of a WT mouse. PV expression levels (≈ signal intensity) varied considerably between individual PV+ neurons. Note the generally weaker somatic staining in the mutant mice (right panels), also evident by the fainter staining of the PV-ir neuropil. The weaker staining results in a lower number of neurons considered as positive for PV as shown in Figs. 3, 4 & 6. Scale bars: 100 μm in a, c; 200 μm in bCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 a Left: Stereological estimations of PV+ (light gray) and VVA+ (dark gray) cells in mPFC (upper row), SSC (middle row) and striatum (lower row) of PND25 WT, PV+/- and PV-/- male mice. Significant differences are observed in PV+ cells between WT, PV+/- and PV-/- animals (p-value <0.05). *Significant vs. WT mice. Asterisks represent *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001, respectively. Middle: stereological estimation of double-labeled (PV+ VVA+) cells of PND25 WT and PV+/- mice (white bars); Right: percentage of PV+ cells surrounded by VVA (light gray) and VVA+ cells showing PV expression (dark gray) in WT and PV+/- mice. b Quantitative Western blot analysis of forebrain samples of P25 WT PV+/- and PV-/- mice. A representative Western blot (left) and the quantification of PV protein levels in WT and PV+/- forebrain are shown (right). No PV signal was detectable in PV-/- mice. The Ponceau Red-stained protein markers loaded on the same membrane as the brain extract samples are shown with their respective molecular mass on the left. Data are from three independent experiments and are shown as mean ± SEM. Results are expressed as a percentage of normalized PV levels measured in control (WT), defined as 100 %. GAPDH or calbindin D-28k (CB) signals served as loading controls and were used for the normalization of the PV signals. Both, CB and GAPDH expression levels were unchanged in PV+/- and Shank mutants compared to WT mice (data not shown). c qRT-PCR values from P25 PV+/- mice representing Pvalb mRNA levels were normalized to 18S mRNA levels and expressed as fold change compared to WT. Data from three independent experiments were pooled together and are shown as mean ± SD. In all graphs, asterisks indicate statistical significance vs. WT (p-value <0.05, p = 0.0003)
Fig. 3 a Left: Stereological estimations of PV+ (light gray) and VVA+ (dark gray) cells in mPFC (upper row), SSC (middle row) and striatum (lower row) of PND25 WT, PV+/- and PV-/- male mice. Significant differences are observed in PV+ cells between WT, PV+/- and PV-/- animals (p-value <0.05). *Significant vs. WT mice. Asterisks represent *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001, respectively. Middle: stereological estimation of double-labeled (PV+ VVA+) cells of PND25 WT and PV+/- mice (white bars); Right: percentage of PV+ cells surrounded by VVA (light gray) and VVA+ cells showing PV expression (dark gray) in WT and PV+/- mice. b Quantitative Western blot analysis of forebrain samples of P25 WT PV+/- and PV-/- mice. A representative Western blot (left) and the quantification of PV protein levels in WT and PV+/- forebrain are shown (right). No PV signal was detectable in PV-/- mice. The Ponceau Red-stained protein markers loaded on the same membrane as the brain extract samples are shown with their respective molecular mass on the left. Data are from three independent experiments and are shown as mean ± SEM. Results are expressed as a percentage of normalized PV levels measured in control (WT), defined as 100 %. GAPDH or calbindin D-28k (CB) signals served as loading controls and were used for the normalization of the PV signals. Both, CB and GAPDH expression levels were unchanged in PV+/- and Shank mutants compared to WT mice (data not shown). c qRT-PCR values from P25 PV+/- mice representing Pvalb mRNA levels were normalized to 18S mRNA levels and expressed as fold change compared to WT. Data from three independent experiments were pooled together and are shown as mean ± SD. In all graphs, asterisks indicate statistical significance vs. WT (p-value <0.05, p = 0.0003)CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 a Left: stereological estimations of PV+ (light gray) and VVA+ (dark gray) cells in SSC of WT and Shank1-/- PND25 male mice. Middle: estimation of double-labeled cells in SSC of PND25 WT and Shank1-/- mice. Right: percentage of PV+ cells surrounded by VVA (light gray) and percentage of VVA+ cells displaying PV expression and thus identified as PV+ cells (dark grey) in WT and Shank1-/- mice. b Representative Western blot and quantification of PV protein levels in Shank1-/- mice. CB signals were used as loading controls and served for the normalization of the PV signals. Data are from three independent experiments and are shown as mean ± SEM. Results are expressed as percentage of normalized PV levels measured in control (WT) samples, defined as 100 %. c Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of forebrain samples of Shank1-/- mice. PV (Pvalb) mRNA levels were normalized to 18S mRNA levels and expressed as fold change. Data from three independent experiments were pooled together and are shown as mean ± SD. In all graphs, asterisks indicate statistical significance vs. WT (p-value <0.05, p = 0.0006)
Fig. 4 a Left: stereological estimations of PV+ (light gray) and VVA+ (dark gray) cells in SSC of WT and Shank1-/- PND25 male mice. Middle: estimation of double-labeled cells in SSC of PND25 WT and Shank1-/- mice. Right: percentage of PV+ cells surrounded by VVA (light gray) and percentage of VVA+ cells displaying PV expression and thus identified as PV+ cells (dark grey) in WT and Shank1-/- mice. b Representative Western blot and quantification of PV protein levels in Shank1-/- mice. CB signals were used as loading controls and served for the normalization of the PV signals. Data are from three independent experiments and are shown as mean ± SEM. Results are expressed as percentage of normalized PV levels measured in control (WT) samples, defined as 100 %. c Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of forebrain samples of Shank1-/- mice. PV (Pvalb) mRNA levels were normalized to 18S mRNA levels and expressed as fold change. Data from three independent experiments were pooled together and are shown as mean ± SD. In all graphs, asterisks indicate statistical significance vs. WT (p-value <0.05, p = 0.0006)CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 5 Representative PV immunofluorescence images from the striatum of a WT and a Shank1-/- mouse. No qualitative differences in the number and signal intensities of PV+ neurons were observed between genotypes. Scale bar: 200 μm
Fig. 5 Representative PV immunofluorescence images from the striatum of a WT and a Shank1-/- mouse. No qualitative differences in the number and signal intensities of PV+ neurons were observed between genotypes. Scale bar: 200 μmCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 6 a) Left: stereological estimations of PV+ (light gray) and VVA+ (dark gray) cells in the striatum of WT and Shank3B-/- PND25 male mice. Middle: estimation of double-labeled cells in SSC of PND25 WT and Shank3B-/- mice. Right: percentage of PV+ cells surrounded by VVA (light gray) and VVA+ cells with PV expression (dark grey) in WT and Shank3B-/- mice. b) Representative Western blot and quantification of PV protein levels in Shank3B-/- mice. CB was used as loading control for the normalization of the PV signal, since CB expression levels were unchanged in Shank3B-/- mice (data not shown). Data are from three independent experiments and are shown as mean ± SEM. Results are expressed as a percentage of normalized PV levels measured in control (WT), defined as 100 %. c) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of forebrain samples of Shank3B-/- mice. PV (Pvalb) mRNA levels were normalized to 18S mRNA levels and expressed as fold change. Data from three independent experiments were pooled together and are shown as mean ± SD. In all graphs, asterisks indicate statistical significance vs. WT (p-value <0.05, p = 0.0002)
Fig. 6 a) Left: stereological estimations of PV+ (light gray) and VVA+ (dark gray) cells in the striatum of WT and Shank3B-/- PND25 male mice. Middle: estimation of double-labeled cells in SSC of PND25 WT and Shank3B-/- mice. Right: percentage of PV+ cells surrounded by VVA (light gray) and VVA+ cells with PV expression (dark grey) in WT and Shank3B-/- mice. b) Representative Western blot and quantification of PV protein levels in Shank3B-/- mice. CB was used as loading control for the normalization of the PV signal, since CB expression levels were unchanged in Shank3B-/- mice (data not shown). Data are from three independent experiments and are shown as mean ± SEM. Results are expressed as a percentage of normalized PV levels measured in control (WT), defined as 100 %. c) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of forebrain samples of Shank3B-/- mice. PV (Pvalb) mRNA levels were normalized to 18S mRNA levels and expressed as fold change. Data from three independent experiments were pooled together and are shown as mean ± SD. In all graphs, asterisks indicate statistical significance vs. WT (p-value <0.05, p = 0.0002)CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 7 Representative PV immunofluorescence images (a–d) and Western blot analyses (e) from cortex and hippocampus of WT (a, c) and Shank3B-/- (b, d) mice. No apparent differences in the number or signal intensity of PV+ neurons in both brain regions were evident between WT and Shank3B-/- mice. Scale bars in a and b: 100 μm; in c and d: 200 μm. e) Western blot signals from brain homogenates containing cortex and hippocampus showed relatively high signal variability independent of the genotype. For the normalization of the PV signal either the GAPDH Western blot signal (upper part) or the intensity of the Ponceau Red-stained membrane (PR) was used. Results from 3 WT and 3 Shank3B-/-mice are depicted. The positions of the molecular weight markers are indicated. Due to the large difference in signal intensities for GAPDH and PV, the membrane was cut and exposed individually
Fig. 7 Representative PV immunofluorescence images (a–d) and Western blot analyses (e) from cortex and hippocampus of WT (a, c) and Shank3B-/- (b, d) mice. No apparent differences in the number or signal intensity of PV+ neurons in both brain regions were evident between WT and Shank3B-/- mice. Scale bars in a and b: 100 μm; in c and d: 200 μm. e) Western blot signals from brain homogenates containing cortex and hippocampus showed relatively high signal variability independent of the genotype. For the normalization of the PV signal either the GAPDH Western blot signal (upper part) or the intensity of the Ponceau Red-stained membrane (PR) was used. Results from 3 WT and 3 Shank3B-/-mice are depicted. The positions of the molecular weight markers are indicated. Due to the large difference in signal intensities for GAPDH and PV, the membrane was cut and exposed individuallyCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

40 Not checked yet · 35 Own result · 17 Own interpretation · 5 No basis given · 2 Own method · 1 Supported so far

Verify all 65 references — free account

Show all 52 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 22
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 29
48 of 48

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    CB expression levels were unchanged in Shank3B-/- mice.

    “CB was used as loading control for the normalization of the PV signal, since CB expression levels were unchanged in Shank3B-/- mice (data not shown).”
1 of 1

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 260

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Filice, F., Vörckel, K. J., Sungur, A. Ö., Wöhr, M., & Schwaller, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Fribourg (CH)
  • Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Schwaller, Beat
ORCID
Venue
Molecular Brain
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-01-27
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
10-10
ISSN
1756-6606 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1186/s13041-016-0192-8
PMC
PMC4729132
OpenAlex
W2276586942
Cited by
240
References
109
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 6
FWCI
15.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Molecular Brain (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (155952, 130680)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) (DFG WO 17327/1-1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
parvalbumin, autism spectrum disorder, Shank1, Shank3B, GABAergic interneurons, excitation-inhibition balance, medial prefrontal cortex, somatosensory cortex, striatum, mouse models of autism
MeSH terms
Animals, Autistic Disorder, Cell Count, Cerebral Cortex, Disease Models, Animal, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Interneurons, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Mutant Strains, Microfilament Proteins, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Parvalbumins, Prefrontal Cortex, GABAergic Neurons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review