Cited by 79Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorSexual Differentiation and Disorders

A novel model for neuroendocrine toxicology: neurobehavioral effects of BPA exposure in a prosocial species, the prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster)

Open access
Sullivan, Alana W., Beach, Elsworth C., Stetzik, Lucas A., Perry, Amy, D'Addezio, Alyssa S., Cushing, Bruce S., Patisaul, Heather B.·2014·Endocrinology

Abstract

Impacts on brain and behavior have been reported in laboratory rodents after developmental exposure to bisphenol A (BPA), raising concerns about possible human effects. Epidemiological data suggest links between prenatal BPA exposure and altered affective behaviors in children, but potential mechanisms are unclear. Disruption of mesolimbic oxytocin (OT)/vasopressin (AVP) pathways have been proposed, but supporting evidence is minimal. To address these data gaps, we employed a novel animal model for neuroendocrine toxicology: the prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster), which are more prosocial than lab rats or mice. Male and female prairie vole pups were orally exposed to 5-μg/kg body weight (bw)/d, 50-μg/kg bw/d, or 50-mg/kg bw/d BPA or vehicle over postnatal days 8-14. Subjects were tested as juveniles in open field and novel social tests and for partner preference as adults. Brains were then collected and assessed for immunoreactive (ir) tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) (a dopamine marker) neurons in the principal bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (pBNST) and TH-ir, OT-ir, and AVP-ir neurons in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVN). Female open field activity indicated hyperactivity at the lowest dose and anxiety at the highest dose. Effects on social interactions were also observed, and partner preference formation was mildly inhibited at all dose levels. BPA masculinized principal bed nucleus of the stria terminalis TH-ir neuron numbers in females. Additionally, 5…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/en.2014-1379

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BPA exposure causes female-specific alteration of one-on-one social interactions in juvenile mice and prairie voles.

    “as well as female-specific alteration of one-on-one social interactions in juvenile mice (Wolstenholme, 2011) and prairie voles (Sullivan et al., 2014).”

    From The effects of prenatal PCBs on adult social behavior in rats (2015) · cites this paper as Sullivan et al., 2014

  • BPA alters AVP and OT neuron numbers and innervation of sexually dimorphic regions associated with social and aggressive behaviors in multiple species, and is anxiogenic in multiple species.

    “Altered AVP and OT neuron numbers and innervation of sexually dimorphic regions associated with social and aggressive behaviors in multiple species; anxiogenic in multiple species”
  • In prairie voles, females in the highest exposure group had fewer OT-ir neurons in the posterior PVN but more AVP-ir neurons in the anterior PVN.

    “Females in the highest exposure group had fewer OT-ir neurons in the posterior PVN but more AVP-ir neurons in the anterior PVN.”
  • Disruption of pBnST TH-ir neuron numbers occurred at the lowest dose, but not the higher two.

    “Disruption of pBnST TH-ir neuron numbers also occurred at the lowest dose, but not the higher two making that outcome somewhat more difficult to interpret.”
  • At the lower two doses, BPA eliminated the well-characterized sex difference in PVN TH-ir neuron numbers and reversed it at the highest dose.

    “At the lower two doses, BPA eliminated the well-characterized sex difference in PVN TH-ir neuron numbers and reversed it at the highest dose.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sullivan, A. W., Beach, E. C., Stetzik, L. A., Perry, A., D'Addezio, A. S., Cushing, B. S., & Patisaul, H. B.
Affiliations
  • North Carolina State University (US)
  • University of Akron (US)
Venue
Endocrinology
Published
2014-10-01
Volume
155
Issue
10
Pages
3867-3881
ISSN
  • 0013-7227 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7170
OpenAlex
W2131055849
Cited by
79
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7
FWCI
5.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • scholarworks - UTEP (The University of Texas at El Paso) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R21ES021233)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
Keywords
bisphenol A, Microtus ochrogaster, oxytocin, vasopressin, mesolimbic system, mate preferences, social behavior, anxiety, hyperactivity, paraventricular nucleus, dopaminergic neurons, sex differences, prenatal exposure, developmental neurotoxicity, emotional behavior
MeSH terms
Bisphenol A Compounds, Affect, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Benzhydryl Compounds, Arvicolinae, Defense Mechanisms, Environmental Exposure, Environmental Pollutants, Female, Male, Motor Activity, Neurosecretory Systems, Phenols, Social Behavior, Toxicity Tests, Models, Animal, Endocrine Disruptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review