Cited by 14Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsTelomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceAutophagy in Disease and Therapy

Recent advances in understanding the mechanisms determining longevity

Open access
Bayersdorf, Robert, Schumacher, Björn·2019·F1000Research

Abstract

The field of aging research has progressed significantly over the past decades. Exogenously and endogenously inflicted molecular damage ranging from genotoxic to organellar damage drives the aging process. Repair mechanisms and compensatory responses counteract the detrimental consequences of the various damage types. Here, we discuss recent progress in understanding cellular mechanisms and interconnections between signaling pathways that control longevity. We summarize cell-autonomous and non-cell-autonomous mechanisms that impact the cellular and organismal aging process.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12688/f1000research.19610.1

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many paradigms of life extension depend on autophagy in model organisms (yeast, Drosophila, Caenorhabditis elegans and mice).

    “It has been shown in model organisms (yeast, Drosophila, Caenorhabditis elegans and mice) that many paradigms of life extension depend on autophagy [34,130,135,136].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bayersdorf, R., & Schumacher, B.
Affiliations
University of Cologne (DE)
Corresponding author
Schumacher, Björn
Venue
F1000Research
Published
2019-08-09
Volume
8
Pages
1403
ISSN
2046-1402 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2967466257
Cited by
14
References
82
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • F1000Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Deutsche Krebshilfe (70112899)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SCHU2494/3-1, SCHU2494/7-1, CECAD, SFB829, SFB670, KFO286, KFO329, GRK2407)
  • European Cooperation in Science and Technology (BM1408)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
Keywords
aging, longevity, molecular damage, genetic damage, organelle damage, DNA repair, compensatory response, signaling pathways
MeSH terms
Aging, DNA Damage, Humans, Longevity, Signal Transduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review