The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations
Open accessAbstract
This paper develops a new theoretical model with which to examine the interaction between technology and organizations. Early research studies assumed technology to be an objective, external force that would have deterministic impacts on organizational properties such as structure. Later researchers focused on the human aspect of technology, seeing it as the outcome of strategic choice and social action. This paper suggests that either view is incomplete, and proposes a reconceptualization of technology that takes both perspectives into account. A theoretical model—the structurational model of technology—is built on the basis of this new conceptualization, and its workings explored through discussion of a field study of information technology. The paper suggests that the reformulation of the technology concept and the structurational model of technology allow a deeper and more dialectical understanding of the interaction between technology and organizations. This understanding provides insight into the limits and opportunities of human choice, technology development and use, and organizational design. Implications for future research of the new concept of technology and the structurational model of technology are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Also highly relevant to the health and care environment is what Weick called “technology as equivoque” [103] and Orlikowski (drawing on earlier work on the social construction of technology) called “interpretive flexibility” [104]: a technology introduced into an organization is open to multiple interpretations; successful embedding will require opening up a space for dialogue, listening to”
In the citing paper
“In cases where impacts of public sector performance are difficult to measure, the feedback on new technologies depends heavily on stake-holders' value-based perceptions (e.g., seeing individual or collective gains; Taylor 2016) as well as on political, ideological or cognitive frameworks that these stakeholders apply when confronting or applying technologies (Orlikowski 1992).”
From Technological capacity in the public sector: the case of Estonia (2018) · cites this paper as Orlikowski 1992
In the citing paper
“Such a socio-technical structure facilitates collective intelligence (Orlikowski, 1992), in which social capital plays the facilitation role.”
From Smart tourism destinations: ecosystems for tourism destination competitiveness (2016) · cites this paper as Orlikowski, 1992
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631284014003004 · Cited by 3,890
A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Organizations
Perrow, C. (1967) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091811 · Cited by 2,509
Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication
Sproull, L. S., & Kiesler, S. B. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1492 · Cited by 2,377
Power, politics, and MIS implementation
Markus, M. L. (1983) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358141.358148 · Cited by 2,224
Information Technology and Organizational Change: Causal Structure in Theory and Research
Markus, M. L., & Robey, D. (1988) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.34.5.583 · Cited by 2,108
Crozier, M., & Friedberg, E. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315131092 · Cited by 1,863
Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century
Nielsen, R. P., & Edwards, R. (1980) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257476 · Cited by 1,853
The Structuring of Organizational Structures
Ranson, S., Hinings, B., & Greenwood, R. (1980) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392223 · Cited by 971
Social Analyses of Computing: Theoretical Perspectives in Recent Empirical Research
Kling, R. (1980) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/356802.356806 · Cited by 781
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600 · Cited by 4,760
Self-citationCase research in operations management
Voss, C., Tsikriktsis, N., & Frohlich, M. (2002) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443570210414329 · Cited by 2,963
Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change
Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556620 · Cited by 4,020
Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q., & Xue, Y. (2007) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148781 · Cited by 3,921
Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory
DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.2.121 · Cited by 3,879
Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L. (1999) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249751 · Cited by 3,833
The Nature of Theory in Information Systems1
Gregor, S. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148742 · Cited by 3,306
Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work
Orlikowski, W. J. (2007) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840607081138 · Cited by 3,248
Self-citationGreenhalgh, T., Wherton, J., Papoutsi, C., Lynch, J., Hughes, G., A'Court, C., Hinder, S., Fahy, N., Procter, R., & Shaw, S. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.8775 · Cited by 2,887
“Also highly relevant to the health and care environment is what Weick called “technology as equivoque” [103] and Orlikowski (drawing on earlier work on the social construction of technology) called “interpretive flexibility” [104]: a technology introduced into an organization is open to multiple interpretations; succe…”
Orlikowski, W. J., & Iacono, C. S. (2001) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.12.2.121.9700 · Cited by 2,751
Self-citationInstitutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links between Action and Institution
Barley, S. R., & Tolbert, P. S. (1997) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/017084069701800106 · Cited by 2,588
How Habit Limits the Predictive Power of Intention: The Case of Information Systems Continuance1
Limayem, M., Hirt, S. G., & Cheung, C. M. K. (2007) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148817 · Cited by 2,450
Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change
Feldman, M. S. (2000) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.11.6.611.12529 · Cited by 1,969
Service Innovation: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective1
Lusch, R. F., & Nambisan, S. (2015) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2015/39.1.07 · Cited by 1,949
The Impact of Technostress on Role Stress and Productivity
Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2007) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222240109 · Cited by 1,904
Leonardi, P. M. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/23043493 · Cited by 1,889
Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance
Meijer, A., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2016) · International Review of Administrative Sciences · doi:10.1177/0020852314564308 · Cited by 1,797
Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory
Feldman, M. S., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2011) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0612 · Cited by 1,753
Self-citationTechnological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations
Orlikowski, W. J., & Gash, D. C. (1994) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/196734.196745 · Cited by 1,736
Self-citationOrlikowski, W. J. (1993) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249774 · Cited by 1,512
Self-citationJasperson, J., Carter, & Zmud, R. W. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148694 · Cited by 1,433
Benbasat, I., Barki, H., & Montréal, H. (2007) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00126 · Cited by 1,456
Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward
Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., Raisch, S., & Smith, W. K. (2016) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1162422 · Cited by 1,385
When Innovations Meet Institutions: Edison and the Design of the Electric Light
Hargadon, A. B., & Douglas, Y. (2001) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3094872 · Cited by 1,381
Strategizing: The challenges of a practice perspective
Jarzabkowski, P. A., Balogun, J., & Seidl, D. N. (2007) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726707075703 · Cited by 1,379
Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W. J. (1992) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1992.4279545 · Cited by 1,391
Self-citationLu, Y., & Ramamurthy, K. (. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41409967 · Cited by 1,309
Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations
Orlikowski, W. J., & Robey, D. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.2.143 · Cited by 1,320
Self-citationLevina, N., & Vaast, E. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148682 · Cited by 1,311
Business Models and Technological Innovation
Baden‐Fuller, C. W. F., & Haefliger, S. (2013) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2013.08.023 · Cited by 1,167
The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational fit perspective
Hong, K.-K., & Kim, Y. (2002) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00134-3 · Cited by 1,194
Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for Marketing Science
Hauser, J., Tellis, G. J., & Griffin, A. (2006) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1050.0144 · Cited by 1,182
Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization
Zammuto, R. F., Griffith, T. L., Majchrzak, A., Dougherty, D. J., & Faraj, S. A. (2007) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0307 · Cited by 1,213
Windows of Opportunity: Temporal Patterns of Technological Adaptation in Organizations
Tyre, M. J., & Orlikowski, W. J. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.98 · Cited by 1,135
Self-citationBarley, S. R., & Kunda, G. (2001) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.12.1.76.10122 · Cited by 1,147
Lewis, Agarwal, & Sambamurthy, V. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036552 · Cited by 1,121
Tarafdar, M., Cooper, C. L., & Stich, J. (2019) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12169 · Cited by 1,085
Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective
Boudreau, M.-C., & Robey, D. (2005) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0103 · Cited by 1,071
Chin, W. W., Gopal, A., & Salisbury, W. D. (1997) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.8.4.342 · Cited by 1,060
The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research
Walsham, G. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.4.376 · Cited by 1,043
BEYOND DUALISM: STABILITY AND CHANGE AS A DUALITY.
Farjoun, M. (2010) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2010.48463331 · Cited by 1,030
A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness1
Zigurs, I., & Buckland, B. K. (1998) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249668 · Cited by 1,027
Out of Sight, Out of Sync: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams
Hinds, P. J., & Bailey, D. E. (2003) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.14.6.615.24872 · Cited by 974
The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering technology in management research
Orlikowski, W. J. (2009) · Cambridge Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/cje/bep058 · Cited by 1,038
Self-citationDigital Innovation as a Fundamental and Powerful Concept in the Information Systems Curriculum1
Fichman, R. G., Santos, B. L. D., & Zheng, Z. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.2.01 · Cited by 1,002
Chatterjee, D., Grewal, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (2002) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/4132321 · Cited by 945
Bentley University, U., Markus, M. L., Silver, M., & Fordham University (2008) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00176 · Cited by 927
Organizational routines as a unit of analysis
Pentland, B. T. (2005) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dth070 · Cited by 912
Technology Adaptation: The Case of a Computer-Supported Inter-Organizational Virtual Team1
Majchrzak, A., Rice, R. E., Malhotra, A., King, N. E., & Ba, S. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250948 · Cited by 912
The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap Between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility
Ackerman, M. S. (2000) · Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327051hci1523_5 · Cited by 892
Ghazawneh, A., & Henfridsson, O. (2013) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2012.00406.x · Cited by 854
Institutional Factors in Information Technology Innovation
King, J. L., Gurbaxani, V., Kraemer, K. L., McFarlan, F. W., Raman, K. S., & Yap, C. (1994) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.5.2.139 · Cited by 813
The role of leadership in a digitalized world: a review
Cortellazzo, L., Bruni, E., & Zampieri, R. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01938 · Cited by 808
Turkopticon: interrupting worker invisibility in amazon mechanical turk
Irani, L. C., & Silberman, M. S. (2013) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2470654.2470742 · Cited by 798
Dirani, K. M., Abadi, M., Alizadeh, A., Barhate, B., Garza, R. C., Gunasekara, N., Ibrahim, G., & Majzun, Z. (2020) · Human Resource Development International · doi:10.1080/13678868.2020.1780078 · Cited by 788
Patient care information systems and health care work: a sociotechnical approach
Berg, M. (1999) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/s1386-5056(99)00011-8 · Cited by 786
Innovation through institutionalization: A service ecosystems perspective
Vargo, S. L., Wieland, H., & Akaka, M. A. (2014) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.10.008 · Cited by 844
The Coevolution of New Organizational Forms
Lewin, A. Y., Long, C. P., & Carroll, T. N. (1999) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.10.5.535 · Cited by 806
Materiality and change: Challenges to building better theory about technology and organizing
Leonardi, P. M., & Barley, S. R. (2008) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2008.03.001 · Cited by 822
Avolio (2000) · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(00)00062-x · Cited by 767
Trenerry, B., Chng, S., Wang, Y., Suhaila, Z. S., Lim, S. S., Lu, H. Y., & Oh, P. H. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620766 · Cited by 930
1 Constitutional Amendments: “Materializing” Organizational Communication
Ashcraft, K. L., Kuhn, T. R., & Cooren, F. (2009) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520903047186 · Cited by 731
Human factors systems approach to healthcare quality and patient safety
Carayon, P., Wetterneck, T. B., Rivera-Rodriguez, A. J., Hundt, A. S., Hoonakker, P., Holden, R., & Gürses, A. P. (2013) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2013.04.023 · Cited by 814
Research Approaches to Mobile Use in the Developing World: A Review of the Literature
Donner, J. (2008) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972240802019970 · Cited by 743
Smart tourism destinations: ecosystems for tourism destination competitiveness
Boes, K., Buhalis, D., & Inversini, A. (2016) · International Journal of Tourism Cities · doi:10.1108/ijtc-12-2015-0032 · Cited by 734
Leonardi, P. M., & Barley, S. R. (2010) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416521003654160 · Cited by 733
Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use
Orlikowski, W. J., Yates, J., Okamura, K., & Fujimoto, M. (1995) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.6.4.423 · Cited by 682
Self-citationYoo, Y., & Alavi, M. (2001) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250922 · Cited by 694
The Assimilation of Knowledge Platforms in Organizations: An Empirical Investigation
Purvis, R. L., Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R. W. (2001) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.12.2.117.10115 · Cited by 693
Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality
Leonardi, P. M. (2013) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.02.002 · Cited by 668
Temporal Work in Strategy Making
Kaplan, S., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0792 · Cited by 701
Self-citationInfrastructuring: Toward an Integrated Perspective on the Design and Use of Information Technology
Siegen, U., Pipek, V., Wulf, V., & Siegen, F.-I. F. A. I. F. A. U. (2009) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00195 · Cited by 638
E-mail as a source and symbol of stress
Barley, S. R., Meyerson, D. E., & Grodal, S. (2011) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0573 · Cited by 637
Lebovitz, S., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., & Levina, N. (2022) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2021.1549 · Cited by 632
Technological Opportunism and Radical Technology Adoption: An Application to E-Business
Srinivasan, R., Lilien, G. L., & Rangaswamy, A. (2002) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.66.3.47.18508 · Cited by 637
A theoretical framework of a BIM-based multi-disciplinary collaboration platform
Singh, V., Gu, N., & Wang, X. (2010) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.011 · Cited by 625
Entrepreneurship as the nexus of individual and opportunity: A structuration view
Sarason, Y., Dean, T., & Dillard, J. (2005) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.02.007 · Cited by 648
The impact of digital technology on relationships in a business network
Pagani, M., & Pardo, C. (2017) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.08.009 · Cited by 618
How do we understand smart cities? An evolutionary perspective
Kummitha, R. K. R., & Crutzen, N. (2017) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2017.04.010 · Cited by 601
Leonardi, P. M. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199664054.003.0002 · Cited by 634
Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action
Pentland, B. T., & Feldman, M. S. (2008) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2008.08.001 · Cited by 594
Fichman, R. G. (2004) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00054 · Cited by 602
The Persistence of Flexible Organizational Routines: The Role of Agency and Organizational Context
Howard-Grenville, J. A. (2005) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0150 · Cited by 585
It's all about attitude: revisiting the technology acceptance model
Yang, H.-D., & Yoo, Y. (2004) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/s0167-9236(03)00062-9 · Cited by 578
Sarker, S., Chatterjee, S., Xiao, X., & Elbanna, A. (2019) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2019/13747 · Cited by 576
Pawlowski, S. D., & Robey, D. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148658 · Cited by 590
Giddens's structuration theory and information systems research
Jones, M., & Karsten, H. (2008) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.5555/2017378.2017385 · Cited by 570
Collaboration Engineering with ThinkLets to Pursue Sustained Success with Group Support Systems
Briggs, R. O., de Vreede, G., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2003) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2003.11045743 · Cited by 555
Cross-Cultural Software Production and Use: A Structurational Analysis1
Walsham, G. (2002) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/4132313 · Cited by 546
Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research
Goldkuhl, G. (2012) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2011.54 · Cited by 541
A Social Process Model of User-Analyst Relationships
Newman, M., & Robey, D. (1992) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249578 · Cited by 544
Duguid, P. (2005) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972240590925311 · Cited by 554
To Transfer is to Transform: The Circulation of Safety Knowledge
Gherardi, S., & Nicolini, D. (2000) · Organization · doi:10.1177/135050840072008 · Cited by 568
Introduction: The Critical Power of the `Practice Lens'
Gherardi, S. (2009) · Management Learning · doi:10.1177/1350507608101225 · Cited by 526
Corporate Intranet Implementation: Managing Emergent Technologies and Organizational Practices
Bansler, J. P., Damsgaard, J., Scheepers, R., Havn, E. C., & Thommesen, J. (2000) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00010 · Cited by 522
The Complexity of Context: A Service Ecosystems Approach for International Marketing
Akaka, M. A., Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2013) · Journal of International Marketing · doi:10.1509/jim.13.0032 · Cited by 560
Nardi, B. A. (2010) · University of Michigan Press eBooks · doi:10.3998/toi.8008655.0001.001 · Cited by 522
Strategy tools‐in‐use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice
Jarzabkowski, P. A., & Kaplan, S. (2014) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2270 · Cited by 518
Review: A Cognitive-Affective Model of Organizational Communication for Designing IT1,2
Te’eni, D. (2001) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250931 · Cited by 523
Dutton, J. E., Workman, K. M., & Hardin, A. E. (2014) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091221 · Cited by 513
Metadata
- Authors
- Orlikowski, W. J.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Orlikowski, Wanda J.
- ORCID
- Orlikowski, Wanda J.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 1992-08
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 398-427
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2101419153
- Cited by
- 4,957
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 248 · 2025: 144 · 2024: 108 · 2023: 123 · 2022: 157 · 2021: 175 · 2020: 180 · 2019: 195 · 2018: 164 · 2017: 123 · 2016: 167 · 2015: 198 · 2014: 237 · 2013: 220 · 2012: 211
- FWCI
- 105.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Organization Science (publishedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
- Keywords
- technology concepts, information technology, organizational structure, strategic choice, social action, dialectical understanding, organizational design, technological progress
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
