Cited by 110Treatment of Major DepressionTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Cortical Control of Affective Networks

Open access
Kumar, Sunil, Black, Sherilynn J., Hultman, Rainbo, Szabo, Steven T., DeMaio, Kristine D., Du, Jeanette, Katz, Brittany M., Feng, Guoping +2 more·2013·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation and deep brain stimulation have emerged as therapeutic modalities for treatment refractory depression; however, little remains known regarding the circuitry that mediates the therapeutic effect of these approaches. Here we show that direct optogenetic stimulation of prefrontal cortex (PFC) descending projection neurons in mice engineered to express Chr2 in layer V pyramidal neurons (Thy1–Chr2 mice) models an antidepressant-like effect in mice subjected to a forced-swim test. Furthermore, we show that this PFC stimulation induces a long-lasting suppression of anxiety-like behavior (but not conditioned social avoidance) in socially stressed Thy1–Chr2 mice: an effect that is observed >10 d after the last stimulation. Finally, we use optogenetic stimulation and multicircuit recording techniques concurrently in Thy1–Chr2 mice to demonstrate that activation of cortical projection neurons entrains neural oscillatory activity and drives synchrony across limbic brain areas that regulate affect. Importantly, these neural oscillatory changes directly correlate with the temporally precise activation and suppression of limbic unit activity. Together, our findings show that the direct activation of cortical projection systems is sufficient to modulate activity across networks underlying affective regulation. They also suggest that optogenetic stimulation of cortical projection systems may serve as a viable therapeutic strategy for treating affective disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.0092-12.2013

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Optical stimulation of layer V pyramidal neurons in the PFC expressing channelrhodopsin-2 was sufficient to produce an antidepressant-like response in the forced swim test and suppress anxiety-like behavior in the elevated plus maze for over 10 days after the last optical stimulation session.

    “Dzirasa et al. demonstrated that optical stimulation of layer V pyramidal neurons in the PFC expressing channelrhodopsin-2 was sufficient to produce an antidepressant-like response in the forced swim test and suppress anxiety-like behavior in the elevated plus maze for over 10 days after the last optical stimulation session (180).”
  • PLc tends to promote active coping, while ILc promotes passive coping.

    “where these regions have been discriminated, regardless of the model, PLc tends to promote active coping [226,227] whilst ILc appears to have the opposite effect, promoting passive coping [228].”

    From Prefrontal cortex and depression (2022) · cites this paper as [227]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kumar, S., Black, S. J., Hultman, R., Szabo, S. T., DeMaio, K. D., Du, J., Katz, B. M., Feng, G., Covington, H. E., & Dzirasa, K.
Affiliations
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • McGovern Institute for Brain Research (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2013-01-16
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
1116-1129
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2002599599
Cited by
110
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9
FWCI
7.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (RC1MH088434, R37MH073853, P50MH060451)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
optogenetic stimulation, prefrontal cortex, cortical projection neurons, emotion regulation, anxiety-like behavior, social stress, forced swim test, neural oscillations, mood disorders, antidepressant effects, treatment-resistant depression
MeSH terms
Affect, Animals, Anxiety, Behavior, Animal, Cerebral Cortex, Male, Nerve Net, Neurons, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review