Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 18,745

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches

Open access
Caldas, Miguel Pinto·2003·Revista de Administração Contemporânea

Abstract

Nova edição do conhecido livro sobre metodologia de pesquisa de Creswell. Originalmente pensado no campo da Educação, o autor ficou muito conhecido também em Administração. Nesta nova edição, ele procura sair da dicotomia métodos quantitativos x qualitativos, com uma ótima discussão adicional sobre métodos mistos. Como um todo, é uma obra excelente de referência para cursos introdutórios de metodologia de pesquisa em programas de pós-graduação.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/s1415-65552003000100015

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Caldas, M. P.
Venue
Revista de Administração Contemporânea
Published
2003-03
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
223-223
ISSN
  • 1415-6555 (ISSN-L)
  • 1982-7849
OpenAlex
W2021365718
Cited by
18,745
References
0
FWCI
436.99
Type
journal article
Language
pt
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.