Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 7,099

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder–Decoder Approaches

Open access
Cho, Kyunghyun, van Merrienboer, Bart, Bahdanau, Dzmitry, Bengio, Yoshua·2014·Proceedings of SSST-8, Eighth Workshop on Syntax, Semantics and Structure in Statistical Translation

Abstract

Neural machine translation is a relatively new approach to statistical machine translation based purely on neural networks.The neural machine translation models often consist of an encoder and a decoder.The encoder extracts a fixed-length representation from a variable-length input sentence, and the decoder generates a correct translation from this representation.In this paper, we focus on analyzing the properties of the neural machine translation using two models; RNN Encoder-Decoder and a newly proposed gated recursive convolutional neural network.We show that the neural machine translation performs relatively well on short sentences without unknown words, but its performance degrades rapidly as the length of the sentence and the number of unknown words increase.Furthermore, we find that the proposed gated recursive convolutional network learns a grammatical structure of a sentence automatically.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3115/v1/w14-4012

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Bahdanau, D., & Bengio, Y.
Venue
Proceedings of SSST-8, Eighth Workshop on Syntax, Semantics and Structure in Statistical Translation
Published
2014
Pages
103-111
OpenAlex
W2964199361
Cited by
7,099
References
1
FWCI
116.81
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.