Cited by 101Cognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive Functions and MemoryAging and Gerontology Research

Benefits of training visuospatial working memory in young-old and old-old.

Borella, Erika, Carretti, Barbara, Cantarella, Alessandra, Riboldi, Francesco, Zavagnin, Michela, De Beni, Rossana·2014·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to test the efficacy of a visuospatial working memory (WM) training in terms of its transfer effects and maintenance effects, in the young-old and old-old. Forty young-old and 40 old-old adults took part in the study. Twenty participants in each age group received training with a visuospatial WM task, whereas the others served as active controls and completed alternative activities. Training benefits were examined, considering (a) the specific training-related gains in a visuospatial WM task (criterion); and (b) the transfer effects on measures of verbal WM, visuospatial short-term memory, inhibition, processing speed, and reasoning. Maintenance of training benefits was also assessed after 8 months. Results showed that the trained groups (both young-old and old-old), but not the control groups, performed better in the WM measures and preserved these gains after 8 months. Some transfer effects were found, but only in the young-old-trained participants, and they were not maintained at the follow-up. These results are discussed in terms of the efficacy of WM training for older adults when a visuospatial modality is used.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0034293

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Training effects generalize and transfer to non-trained tasks that involve the targeted training domain and the underlying trained brain areas (near transfer).

    “As a consequence, training effects would generalize and transfer to non-trained tasks that also involve the targeted training domain, and the underlying trained brain areas (near transfer) (Lee et al., 2007; Thorell et al., 2009; Borella et al., 2014; Beauchamp et al., 2016).”

    From Training on Working Memory and Inhibitory Control in Young Adults (2016) · cites this paper as Borella et al., 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Borella, E., Carretti, B., Cantarella, A., Riboldi, F., Zavagnin, M., & De Beni, R.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2014-03
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
714-727
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2157152243
Cited by
101
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 1
FWCI
9.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Padova (CPDA087750/08)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
visuospatial working memory, cognitive training, older adults, young-old, old-old, transfer effects, verbal working memory, visuospatial short-term memory, inhibition, processing speed, reasoning, cognitive aging
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Analysis of Variance, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Photic Stimulation, Serial Learning, Teaching, Transfer, Psychology, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review