Cited by 48Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Cortical organization of inhibition-related functions and modulation by psychopathology

Open access
Warren, Stacie L., Crocker, Laura D., Spielberg, Jeffery M., Engels, Anna S., Banich, Marie T., Sutton, Bradley P., Miller, Gregory A., Heller, Wendy·2013·Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Abstract

Individual differences in inhibition-related functions have been implicated as risk factors for a broad range of psychopathology, including anxiety and depression. Delineating neural mechanisms of distinct inhibition-related functions may clarify their role in the development and maintenance of psychopathology. The present study tested the hypothesis that activity in common and distinct brain regions would be associated with an ecologically sensitive, self-report measure of inhibition and a laboratory performance measure of prepotent response inhibition. Results indicated that sub-regions of DLPFC distinguished measures of inhibition, whereas left inferior frontal gyrus and bilateral inferior parietal cortex were associated with both types of inhibition. Additionally, co-occurring anxiety and depression modulated neural activity in select brain regions associated with response inhibition. Results imply that specific combinations of anxiety and depression dimensions are associated with failure to implement top-down attentional control as reflected in inefficient recruitment of posterior DLPFC and increased activation in regions associated with threat (MTG) and worry (BA10). Present findings elucidate possible neural mechanisms of interference that could help explain executive control deficits in psychopathology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00271

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Andersson J. L. R. Jenkinson M. Smith S. (2007). Non-linear Optimization (Tech. Rep. TR07JA1). Oxford, UK: University of Oxford, FMRIB Centre
  2. Barlow D. H. (2002). Anxiety and Its Disorders: The Nature and Treatment of Anxiety and Panic, 2nd Edn. New York, NY: Guilford Press
  3. First M. B. Spitzer R. L. Gibbon M. Williams J. B. W. (1997). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders: Non-Patient Edition (SCID-I/NP, Version 2.0, 4/97 revision). New York, NY: Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute
  4. Jenkinson M. (2004). Improving the registration of B0-disorted EPI images using calculated cost function weights, in Paper presented at Tenth International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain. (Budapest).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Warren, S. L., Crocker, L. D., Spielberg, J. M., Engels, A. S., Banich, M. T., Sutton, B. P., Miller, G. A., & Heller, W.
Affiliations
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
Warren, Stacie L.
Venue
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Published
2013
Volume
7
Pages
271-271
ISSN
1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064173501
Cited by
48
References
73
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH-61358, MH61358, P50MH079485, T32MH019554, T32 MH-19554, MH19554, MH079485, R01MH061358)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
response inhibition, prepotent response inhibition, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, inferior parietal cortex, anxiety, depression, top-down attentional control, individual differences, threat processing, worry, medial temporal gyrus, brain-behavior relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review