Cited by 197Sleep and Work-Related FatigueCircadian rhythm and melatoninWorkplace Health and Well-being

The effects of shift work on body weight change − a systematic review of longitudinal studies

Open access
van Drongelen, Alwin, Boot, Cécile, Merkus, Suzanne, Smid, Tjabe, Beek, Allard J·2011·Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to summarize the available evidence to elucidate the effects of shift work, which includes night work, on body weight change. METHODS: A systematic search strategy using longitudinal studies was performed. Articles were included based on strict inclusion criteria; methodological quality was assessed by a standardized quality checklist. The results were summarized using a levels of evidence synthesis. RESULTS: The search strategy resulted in eight articles that met the inclusion criteria. Five of them were considered to be high- and three of them low-quality studies. Seven studies presented crude results for an association between shift work exposure and change in body weight: five high- and two low-quality studies. There was strong evidence for a crude relationship between shift work and body weight increase. Five studies presented weight-related outcomes adjusted for potentially relevant confounders (age, gender, bodyweight at baseline, and physical activity). Two studies found a significant difference between groups in the same direction. Consequently, the evidence for a confounders-adjusted relationship between shift work exposure and body weight was considered to be insufficient. CONCLUSIONS: Strong evidence for a crude association between shift work exposure and body weight increase was found. In order to further clarify the underlying mechanisms, more and better high quality studies about this subject are necessary.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5271/sjweh.3143

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sacket DL, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine. How to practice and teach EBM Second edition ed Edinburg, London, NY: Churchill Livingston 2000.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Drongelen, A., Boot, C., Merkus, S., Smid, T., & Beek, A. J.
Affiliations
Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
Published
2011-01-18
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
263-275
ISSN
  • 0355-3140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1795-990X
OpenAlex
W2094940755
Cited by
197
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
shift work, night work, weight change, weight gain, obesity, occupational health, confounding factors, physical activity
MeSH terms
Body Weight, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Work Schedule Tolerance, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review