Cited by 598Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Automated Three‐Chambered Social Approach Task for Mice

Open access
Yang, Mu, Silverman, Jill L., Crawley, Jacqueline N.·2011·Current Protocols in Neuroscience

Abstract

Autism is diagnosed by three major symptom categories: unusual reciprocal social interactions, impaired communication, and repetitive behaviors with restricted interests. Direct social approach in mice has strong face validity to simple social approach behaviors in humans, which are frequently impaired in autism. This unit presents a basic protocol for a standardized, high‐throughput social approach test for assaying mouse sociability. Our automated three‐chambered social approach task quantifies direct social approach behaviors when a subject mouse is presented with the choice of spending time with either a novel mouse or a novel object. Sociability is defined as the subject mouse spending more time in the chamber containing the novel target mouse than in the chamber containing the inanimate novel object. The Basic Protocol describes procedures for testing one subject at a time in a single apparatus. A Support Protocol addresses data collection. Curr. Protoc. Neurosci . 56:8.26.1‐8.26.16. © 2011 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/0471142301.ns0826s56

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, M., Silverman, J. L., & Crawley, J. N.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Current Protocols in Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-07
Volume
56
Issue
1
Pages
Unit 8.26-Unit 8.26
ISSN
  • 1934-8576 (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-8584
OpenAlex
W1481250329
Cited by
598
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 21
FWCI
10.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Protocols in Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (Z99 MH999999)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (Z01MH002179)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U54HD079125)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
social approach behavior, autism spectrum disorder, automated behavioral testing, novel object preference, reciprocal social interaction, mouse models of autism
MeSH terms
Animals, Autistic Disorder, Behavior, Animal, Disease Models, Animal, Social Behavior, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review