Cited by 5Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Does early emotional responding to initial mindfulness training impact intervention outcomes?

Harel, Or, Hadash, Yuval, Levi-Belz, Yossi, Bernstein, Amit·2019·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-018-1018-9

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harel, O., Hadash, Y., Levi-Belz, Y., & Bernstein, A.
Affiliations
University of Haifa (IL)
Corresponding author
Bernstein, Amit
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2018-08-28
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
616-626
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2888871275
Cited by
5
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
Funders
Israel Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
mindfulness training, emotional responses, negative affect, positive affect, trait mindfulness, intervention dropout, iatrogenic disease, mindfulness-based interventions, intervention safety, well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review