Cited by 615Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Microglial Remodeling of the Extracellular Matrix Promotes Synapse Plasticity

Open access
Nguyen, Phi T., Dorman, Leah C., Pan, Simon, Vainchtein, Ilia D., Han, Rafael T., Nakao-Inoue, Hiromi, Taloma, Sunrae E., Barron, Jerika J. +3 more·2020·Cell

Abstract

Synapse remodeling is essential to encode experiences into neuronal circuits. Here, we define a molecular interaction between neurons and microglia that drives experience-dependent synapse remodeling in the hippocampus. We find that the cytokine interleukin-33 (IL-33) is expressed by adult hippocampal neurons in an experience-dependent manner and defines a neuronal subset primed for synaptic plasticity. Loss of neuronal IL-33 or the microglial IL-33 receptor leads to impaired spine plasticity, reduced newborn neuron integration, and diminished precision of remote fear memories. Memory precision and neuronal IL-33 are decreased in aged mice, and IL-33 gain of function mitigates age-related decreases in spine plasticity. We find that neuronal IL-33 instructs microglial engulfment of the extracellular matrix (ECM) and that its loss leads to impaired ECM engulfment and a concomitant accumulation of ECM proteins in contact with synapses. These data define a cellular mechanism through which microglia regulate experience-dependent synapse remodeling and promote memory consolidation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.050

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ECM can be modified rapidly by the release of proteases, by microglial action and by internalization, all of which can be activated by memory events.

    “The ECM can be modified rapidly by the release of proteases [36], by microglial action and by internalization, all of which can be activated by memory events [37–39].”

    From The extracellular matrix and perineuronal nets in memory (2022) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Results section, “Neuronal IL-33 Drives Microglial Engulfment of the ECM” (page unavailable), shows microglial internalization of an ECM protein, and the Discussion links IL-33 signaling to experience-dependent microglial activation and memory. The paper does not establish that a memory event rapidly triggers ECM internalization or remodeling. Protease release is separately cited to [36], so it is not assessed against this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Microglia regulate axonal myelination, synaptic pruning, vasculature repair, and clearance of debris and toxic substances.

    “These cells not only regulate axonal myelination, but also contribute to synaptic pruning, vasculature repair, and clearance of debris and toxic substances, among other important physiological roles [23–28].”

    From Sex chromosomes and sex hormones differently shape microglial properties during normal physiological conditions in the adult mouse hippocampus (2025) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says microglia engulf synapse components, supporting their role in synaptic pruning. The Discussion, under “Microglia Remodel the Brain ECM” (page unavailable), asks whether microglia remodel myelin rather than establishing that they regulate myelination. The passages do not substantiate vasculature repair or clearance of debris and toxic substances. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Microglia promote and assist various processes within the CNS, closely interacting with neurons, other glial cells, the neurovascular unit and the extracellular matrix.

    “Microglia promote and assist with various processes within the CNS, closely interacting with neurons, other glial cells, the neurovascular unit and the extracellular matrix.”

    From Sex chromosomes and sex hormones differently shape microglial properties during normal physiological conditions in the adult mouse hippocampus (2025) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes microglial contact with neuronal spines and astrocyte-derived IL-33 driving microglial synapse engulfment. The Discussion (page unavailable) describes microglial remodeling of the extracellular matrix. These passages support several interactions in the claim, but our copy does not establish microglial interaction with the neurovascular unit. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Increased contacts with pre- and post-synaptic elements in the WT group might indicate enhanced synapse plasticity and maintenance.

    “Increased contacts with pre- and post-synaptic elements in the WT group might indicate enhanced synapse plasticity and maintenance, as microglia are known to constantly modulate synapses during normal physiological conditions [14, 24, 87].”
  • Microglial clearance of extracellular matrix in response to neuronal IL-33 promotes synaptic remodeling and plasticity in mice.

    “Recent work in mice shows that microglial clearance of ECM in response to neuronal IL-33 promotes synaptic remodeling and plasticity [89].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nguyen, P. T., Dorman, L. C., Pan, S., Vainchtein, I. D., Han, R. T., Nakao-Inoue, H., Taloma, S. E., Barron, J. J., Molofsky, A. B., Kheirbek, M. A., & Molofsky, A. V.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Molofsky, Anna V.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-07
Volume
182
Issue
2
Pages
388-403.e15
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3039508055
Cited by
615
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 70 · 2025: 124 · 2024: 101 · 2023: 99 · 2022: 108 · 2021: 88 · 2020: 23
FWCI
31.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Esther A. and Joseph Klingenstein Fund
  • Pew Charitable Trusts
  • McKnight Foundation
  • Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
microglia, extracellular matrix, synaptic plasticity, IL-33, hippocampus, dendritic spine plasticity, fear memory, memory precision, aging, memory consolidation
MeSH terms
Interleukin-33, Interleukin-1 Receptor-Like 1 Protein, Aging, Animals, Extracellular Matrix, Fear, Gene Expression Regulation, Hippocampus, Memory, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Signal Transduction, Microglia, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review