Cited by 144Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Sex differences in the regulation of social and anxiety-related behaviors: insights from vasopressin and oxytocin brain systems

Open access
Bredewold, Remco, Veenema, Alexa H·2018·Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract

To understand how the brain regulates behavior, many variables must be taken into account, with sex as a prominent variable. In this review, we will discuss recent human and rodent studies showing the sex-specific involvement of the neuropeptides vasopressin and oxytocin in social and anxiety-related behaviors. We discuss that sex differences can be evident at pre-pubertal ages as seen in the sex-specific regulation of social recognition, social play, and anxiety by the vasopressin system in juvenile rats. We further discuss that the oxytocin system in humans and rodents alters brain activation, anxiety, and sociosexual motivation in sex-specific ways. Finally, we propose that knowledge of vasopressin and oxytocin mediated sex-specific brain mechanisms can provide essential insights into how these neuropeptide systems contribute to sex-specific vulnerability as well as resilience to perturbations, with subsequent relevance to social and emotional disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conb.2018.02.011

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is little to no effect of manipulating oxytocin on play despite its widespread involvement in a myriad of social behaviors, implicating a sex-specific and region-specific role for vasopressin in promoting play.

    “Notably, there is little to no effect of manipulating oxytocin on play despite its widespread involvement in a myriad of social behaviors (Bredewold, et al., 2014; Bredewold & Veenema, 2018), implicating a sex-specific and region-specific role for vasopressin in promoting play.”

    From Developmental origins of sex differences in the neural circuitry of play (2020) · cites this paper as Bredewold & Veenema, 2018

    Section 2 reports that blocking vasopressin V1a receptors in the lateral septum changed social play in opposite directions in juvenile male and female rats, supporting a sex- and region-specific role. It says oxytocin or oxytocin-receptor manipulations produced different behavioral effects, but does not establish that manipulating oxytocin has little to no effect on play. Section 3 supports oxytocin’s broader involvement in social behavior. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The neurochemical underpinnings of motivated play appear to be distinct in each sex.

    “Moreover, the neurochemical underpinnings of motivated play appear to be distinct in each sex (Bredewold & Veenema, 2018), which is discussed further below.”

    From Developmental origins of sex differences in the neural circuitry of play (2020) · cites this paper as Bredewold & Veenema, 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [35]Risold PY Swanson LW 1997 Connections of the rat lateral septal complex Brain Res Brain Res Rev 24 2–3 115 95 9385454

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bredewold, R., & Veenema, A. H.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Veenema, Alexa H
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-04
Volume
49
Pages
132-140
ISSN
0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2793284717
Cited by
144
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurobiology (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • NSF (1253386)
  • NIMH (R15MH102807, R01MH102456)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
sex differences, vasopressin, oxytocin, social behavior, anxiety, neuropeptides, social recognition, social play, young rats, brain activation, resilience
MeSH terms
Animals, Anxiety, Brain, Female, Humans, Male, Oxytocin, Sex Characteristics, Social Behavior, Vasopressins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review