Cited by 194Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorFace Recognition and PerceptionNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Oxytocin increases amygdala reactivity to threatening scenes in females

Lischke, Alexander, Gamer, Matthias, Berger, Christoph, Grossmann, Annette, Hauenstein, Karlheinz, Heinrichs, Markus, Herpertz, Sabine C., Domes, Gregor·2012·Psychoneuroendocrinology

Abstract

The neuropeptide oxytocin (OT) is well known for its profound effects on social behavior, which appear to be mediated by an OT-dependent modulation of amygdala activity in the context of social stimuli. In humans, OT decreases amygdala reactivity to threatening faces in males, but enhances amygdala reactivity to similar faces in females, suggesting sex-specific differences in OT-dependent threat-processing. To further explore whether OT generally enhances amygdala-dependent threat-processing in females, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in a randomized within-subject crossover design to measure amygdala activity in response to threatening and non-threatening scenes in 14 females following intranasal administration of OT or placebo. Participants' eye movements were recorded to investigate whether an OT-dependent modulation of amygdala activity is accompanied by enhanced exploration of salient scene features. Although OT had no effect on participants' gazing behavior, it increased amygdala reactivity to scenes depicting social and non-social threat. In females, OT may, thus, enhance the detection of threatening stimuli in the environment, potentially by interacting with gonadal steroids, such as progesterone and estrogen.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.01.011

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lischke, A., Gamer, M., Berger, C., Grossmann, A., Hauenstein, K., Heinrichs, M., Herpertz, S. C., & Domes, G.
Affiliations
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
  • University of Rostock (DE)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Lischke, Alexander
  • Domes, Gregor
Venue
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
37
Issue
9
Pages
1431-1438
ISSN
0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042669554
Cited by
194
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 9
FWCI
37.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
oxytocin, amygdala, threat processing, sex differences, female, intranasal administration, eye movements, social danger, sex steroids, progesterone, estrogen
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Adult, Amygdala, Double-Blind Method, Emotions, Eye Movements, Facial Expression, Fear, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Oxytocin, Cross-Over Studies, Functional Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review