Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,121

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Validity of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) in screening for eating disorders in community samples

Open access
Mond, J.M, Hay, P.J, Rodgers, B, Owen, C, Beumont, P.J.V·2004·Behaviour Research and Therapy
DOI 10.1016/s0005-7967(03)00161-x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In order to examine the concurrent and criterion validity of the questionnaire version of the Eating Disorders Examination (EDE-Q), self-report and interview formats were administered to a community sample of women aged 18-45 (n = 208). Correlations between EDE-Q and EDE subscales ranged from 0.68 for Eating Concern to 0.78 for Shape Concern. Scores on the EDE-Q were significantly higher than those of the EDE for all subscales, with the mean difference ranging from 0.25 for Restraint to 0.85 for Shape Concern. Frequency of both objective bulimic episodes (OBEs) and subjective bulimic episodes (SBEs) was significantly correlated between measures. Chance-corrected agreement between EDE-Q and EDE ratings of the presence of OBEs was fair, while that for SBEs was poor. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, based on a sample of 13 cases, indicated that a score of 2.3 on the global scale of the EDE-Q in conjunction with the occurrence of any OBEs and/or use of exercise as a means of weight control, yielded optimal validity coefficients (sensitivity = 0.83, specificity = 0.96, positive predictive value = 0.56). A stepwise discriminant function analysis yielded eight EDE-Q items which best distinguished cases from non-cases, including frequency of OBEs, use of exercise as a means of weight control, use of self-induced vomiting, use of laxatives and guilt about eating. The EDE-Q has good concurrent validity and acceptable criterion validity. The measure appears well-suited to use in prospective epidemiological studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0005-7967(03)00161-x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Beglin, 1992, Evaluation of a new instrument for the detection of eating disorders in community samples, Psychiatry Research, 44, 191, 10.1016/0165-1781(92)90023-V · DOI
  2. Black, 1996, Assessment of eating disorders: interview versus questionnaire, International Journal of Eating Disorders, 20, 43, 10.1002/(SICI)1098-108X(199607)20:1<43::AID-EAT5>3.0.CO;2-4 · DOI
  3. Carter, 2001, Assessment of bulimia nervosa: a comparison of interview and self-report questionnaire methods, International Journal of Eating Disorders, 30, 187, 10.1002/eat.1071 · DOI
  4. Dunn, 1999, Two-phase epidemiological surveys in psychiatric research, British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 95, 10.1192/bjp.174.2.95 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Evans, 2002, An examination of willingness to self-disclose in women with bulimic symptoms considering the context of disclosure and negative affect levels, International Journal of Eating Disorders, 31, 344, 10.1002/eat.10020 · DOI
  6. Fairburn, 1994, Assessment of eating disorders: interview or self-report questionnaire?, International Journal of Eating Disorders, 16, 363, 10.1002/1098-108X(199412)16:4<363::AID-EAT2260160405>3.0.CO;2-# · DOI · Paper page
  7. Garfinkel, 1995, Bulimia nervosa in a Canadian community sample: prevalence and comparison of subgroups, American Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 1052, 10.1176/ajp.152.7.1052 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Garner, 1979, The Eating Attitudes Test: an index of the symptoms of anorexia nervosa, Psychological Medicine, 9, 273, 10.1017/S0033291700030762 · DOI
  9. Garner, 1982, The Eating Attitudes Test: psychometric features and clinical correlates, Psychological Medicine, 12, 871, 10.1017/S0033291700049163 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Garner, 1983, Development and validation of a multidimensional eating disorder inventory for anorexia nervosa and bulimia, International Journal of Eating Disorders, 2, 15, 10.1002/1098-108X(198321)2:2<15::AID-EAT2260020203>3.0.CO;2-6 · DOI
  11. Ghaderi, 2002, The preliminary reliability and validity of the survey for eating disorders (SEDs): a self-report questionnaire for diagnosing eating disorders, European Eating Disorders Review, 10, 61
  12. Grilo, 2001, A comparison of different methods for assessing the features of eating disorders in patients with binge eating disorder, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 317, 10.1037/0022-006X.69.2.317 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Grilo, 2001, Different methods for assessing the features of eating disorders in patients with binge eating disorder: a replication, Obesity Research, 9, 418, 10.1038/oby.2001.55 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Hay, 1998, The validity of the DSM-IV scheme for classifying bulimic eating disorders, International Journal of Eating Disorders, 23, 7, 10.1002/(SICI)1098-108X(199801)23:1<7::AID-EAT2>3.0.CO;2-Q · DOI
  15. Hay, 1996, The classification of bulimic eating disorders: a community based cluster-analytic study, Psychological Medicine, 26, 801, 10.1017/S003329170003782X · DOI
  16. Hay, 1998, Covert eating disorders: the prevalence, characteristics and help-seeking of those with bulimic eating disorders in general practice, Primary Care Psychiatry, 4, 95
  17. Hubbard, 1998, Differences among women who exercise for ‘food related’ and ‘non-food related’ reasons, European Eating Disorders Review, 6, 255, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0968(199812)6:4<255::AID-ERV262>3.0.CO;2-G · DOI
  18. Johnson, 2001, Health problems, impairment and illnesses associated with bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder among primary care and obstetric gynaecology patients, Psychological Medicine, 31, 1455, 10.1017/S0033291701004640 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Kalarchian, 2000, Assessment of eating disorders in bariatric surgery candidates: self-report questionnaire versus interview, International Journal of Eating Disorders, 28, 465, 10.1002/1098-108X(200012)28:4<465::AID-EAT17>3.0.CO;2-2 · DOI
  20. King, M.B. (1989). Eating disorders in a general practice population. Prevalence, characteristics and follow-up at 12 to 18 months. Psychological Medicine Monograph Supplements, 14, 1–34. · DOI
  21. Luck, 2002, The SCOFF questionnaire and clinical interview for eating disorders in general practice: comparative study, British Medical Journal, 325, 755, 10.1136/bmj.325.7367.755 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Luce, 1999, The reliability of the eating disorder examination-self-report questionnaire version (EDE-Q), International Journal of Eating Disorders, 25, 349, 10.1002/(SICI)1098-108X(199904)25:3<349::AID-EAT15>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI
  23. Meadows, 1986, Eating attitudes and disorder in young women: a general practice based survey, Psychological Medicine, 16, 351, 10.1017/S003329170000917X · DOI
  24. Passi, 2002, Assessment of eating disorders in adolescents with anorexia nervosa: self-report questionnaire versus interview, International Journal of Eating Disorders, 33, 45, 10.1002/eat.10113 · DOI
  25. Pike, 2001, A comparison of black and white women with binge eating disorder, American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 1455, 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.9.1455 · DOI
  26. Pratt, 1998, Does the size of a binge matter?, International Journal of Eating Disorders, 24, 307, 10.1002/(SICI)1098-108X(199811)24:3<307::AID-EAT8>3.0.CO;2-Q · DOI
  27. Rosenvinge, 2001, A new instrument measuring disturbed eating patterns in a community populations: development and initial validation of a five-item scale (EDS-5), European Eating Disorders Review, 9, 123, 10.1002/erv.371 · DOI
  28. Steinhausen, 1997, Eating disorders in adolescence in a Swiss epidemiological study, International Journal of Eating Disorders, 22, 147, 10.1002/(SICI)1098-108X(199709)22:2<147::AID-EAT5>3.0.CO;2-F · DOI
  29. Stice, 2000, Development and validation of the eating disorder diagnostic scale: a brief self-report measure of anorexia, bulimia and binge-eating disorder, Psychological Assessment, 12, 123, 10.1037/1040-3590.12.2.123 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Szmukler, 1985, The epidemiology of anorexia nervosa and bulimia, Journal of Psychiatric Research, 19, 143, 10.1016/0022-3956(85)90010-X · DOI
  31. Vitousek, 1991, Reconstructing the internal world of the eating-disordered individual: overcoming denial and distortion in self-report, International Journal of Eating Disorders, 10, 647, 10.1002/1098-108X(199111)10:6<647::AID-EAT2260100604>3.0.CO;2-T · DOI
  32. Walters, 1995, Anorexia nervosa and anorexic-like symptoms in a population-based female twin sample, American Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 64, 10.1176/ajp.152.1.64 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Wilfley, 1997, Assessing the specific psychopathology of binge eating disorder patients: interview or self-report?, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 1151, 10.1016/S0005-7967(97)80010-1 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Williams, 1982, The problem of screening for uncommon disorders—a comment on the Eating Attitudes Test, Psychological Medicine, 12, 431, 10.1017/S003329170004678X · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Mond, J. M., Hay, P. J., Rodgers, B., Owen, C., & Beumont, P. J. V.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-05
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
551-567
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0005-7967(03)00161-x
OpenAlex
W1971374576
Cited by
1,121
References
2
FWCI
13.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.