Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,455

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Subjective wellbeing, health, and ageing

Open access
Steptoe, Andrew, Deaton, Angus, Stone, Arthur A·2015·The Lancet

Abstract

Summary Psychological wellbeing and health are closely linked at older ages. Three aspects of psychological wellbeing can be distinguished: evaluative wellbeing (or life satisfaction), hedonic wellbeing (feelings of happiness, sadness, etc), and eudemonic wellbeing (sense of purpose and meaning in life). We review recent advances in this field, and present new analyses concerning the pattern of wellbeing across ages and the association between wellbeing and survival at older ages. The Gallup World Poll, an ongoing survey in more than 160 countries, shows a U-shaped relationship between evaluative wellbeing and age in rich, English speaking countries, with the lowest levels of wellbeing around ages 45-54. But this pattern is not universal: for example, respondents from the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe show a large progressive decline in wellbeing with age; Latin America also shows falling wellbeing with age, while wellbeing in sub-Saharan Africa shows little change with age. The relationship between physical health and subjective wellbeing is bidirectional. Older people suffering from illnesses such as coronary heart disease, arthritis and chronic lung disease show both raised levels of depressed mood and impaired hedonic and eudemonic wellbeing. Wellbeing may also have a protective role in health maintenance. In an illustrative analyses from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), we find that eudemonic wellbeing is associated with longer survival; 29.3% of people in the lowest wellbeing quartile died over the average follow-up period of 8.5 years compared with 9.3% of those in the highest quartile. Associations were independent of age, gender, demographic factors, and baseline mental and physical health. We conclude that the wellbeing of the elderly is an important objective for both economic and health policy. Current psychological and economic theories do not adequately account for the variations in pattern of wellbeing with age across different parts of the world. The apparent association between wellbeing and survival is consistent with a protective role of high wellbeing, but alternative explanations cannot be ruled out at this stage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61489-0

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Seaford, 2011, Policy: time to legislate for the good life, Nature, 477, 532, 10.1038/477532a · DOI
  2. Harter, 2008, Measuring health in the United States, APS Obs, 21, 23
  3. Sprangers, 2000, Which chronic conditions are associated with better or poorer quality of life?, J Clin Epidemiol, 53, 895, 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00204-3 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Dockray, 2010, A comparison of affect ratings obtained with ecological momentary assessment and the day reconstruction method, Soc Indicators Res, 99, 269, 10.1007/s11205-010-9578-7 · DOI
  5. Blanchflower, 2008, Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle?, Soc Sci Med, 66, 1733, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.030 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Weiss, 2012, Evidence for a midlife crisis in great apes consistent with the U-shape in human wellbeing, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 109, 19949, 10.1073/pnas.1212592109 · DOI
  7. Frijters, 2012, The mystery of the U-shaped relationship between happiness and age, J Econ Behav Organ, 82, 525, 10.1016/j.jebo.2012.03.008 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Stone, 2010, A snapshot of the age distribution of psychological well-being in the United States, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 107, 9985, 10.1073/pnas.1003744107 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Carstensen, 2000, Emotional experience in everyday life across the adult life span, J Pers Soc Psychol, 79, 644, 10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.644 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Löckenhoff, 2004, Socioemotional selectivity theory, aging, and health: the increasingly delicate balance between regulating emotions and making tough choices, J Pers, 72, 1395, 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00301.x · DOI · Paper page
  11. Steptoe, 2012, Enjoying life and living longer, Arch Intern Med, 172, 273, 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.1028 · DOI
  12. Steptoe, 2011, Positive affect measured using ecological momentary assessment and survival in older men and women, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 108, 18244, 10.1073/pnas.1110892108 · DOI
  13. Steptoe, 2012, Cohort profile: The English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, Int J Epidemiol
  14. Sloan, 2011, Virtue and vice in health and illness: the idea that wouldn't die, Lancet, 377, 896, 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60339-5 · DOI
  15. Windle, 2010, Is exercise effective in promoting mental well-being in older age? A systematic review, Aging Ment Health, 14, 652, 10.1080/13607861003713232 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Steptoe, 2005, Positive affect and health-related neuroendocrine, cardiovascular, and inflammatory processes, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 102, 6508, 10.1073/pnas.0409174102 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Steptoe, 2008, Neuroendocrine and inflammatory factors associated with positive affect in healthy men and women: the Whitehall II study, Am J Epidemiol, 167, 96, 10.1093/aje/kwm252 · DOI
  18. Steptoe, 2012, Distinctive biological correlates of positive psychological well-being in older men and women, Psychosom Med, 74, 501, 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31824f82c8 · DOI
  19. Steptoe, 2007, Neuroendocrine and cardiovascular correlates of positive affect measured by ecological momentary assessment and by questionnaire, Psychoneuroendocrinology, 32, 56, 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2006.10.001 · DOI
  20. Hedayati, 2010, Association between major depressive episodes in patients with chronic kidney disease and initiation of dialysis, hospitalization, or death, JAMA, 303, 1946, 10.1001/jama.2010.619 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Wikman, 2011, Quality of life and affective well-being in middle-aged and older people with chronic medical illnesses: a cross-sectional population based study, PLoS One, 6, e18952, 10.1371/journal.pone.0018952 · DOI
  22. Huskamp, 2011, The intersection of long-term care and end-of-life care, Med Care Res Rev, 69, 3, 10.1177/1077558711418518 · DOI
  23. Hales, 2008, The quality of dying and death, Arch Intern Med, 168, 912, 10.1001/archinte.168.9.912 · DOI
  24. Silveira, 2010, Advance directives and outcomes of surrogate decision making before death, N Engl J Med, 362, 1211, 10.1056/NEJMsa0907901 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Steptoe, A., Deaton, A., & Stone, A. A.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
385
Issue
9968
Pages
640-648
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W1970693737
Cited by
2,455
References
17
FWCI
117.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
  • US National Institute on Ageing (grants 2RO1AG7644–01A1 and 2RO1AG017644)
  • US National Institute on Aging through the National Bureau of Economic Research (grants 5R01AG040629–02 and P01 AG05842–14)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.