Cited by 76Muscle metabolism and nutritionMuscle Physiology and DisordersProteins in Food Systems

No differences in muscle protein synthesis rates following ingestion of wheat protein, milk protein, and their protein blend in healthy, young males

Open access
Pinckaers, Philippe J.M., Kouw, Imre W.K., Hendriks, Floris K., van Kranenburg, Janneau M.X., de Groot, Lisette C.P.G.M., Verdijk, Lex. B., Snijders, Tim, van Loon, Luc J.C.·2021·British Journal Of Nutrition

Abstract

Plant-derived proteins have been suggested to have less anabolic properties when compared with animal-derived proteins. Whether blends of plant- and animal-derived proteins can compensate for their lesser anabolic potential has not been assessed. The present study compares post-prandial muscle protein synthesis rates following the ingestion of milk protein with wheat protein or a blend of wheat plus milk protein in healthy, young males. In a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group design, 36 males (23 (sd 3) years) received a primed continuous L-[ring-13C6]-phenylalanine infusion after which they ingested 30 g milk protein (MILK), 30 g wheat protein (WHEAT) or a 30 g blend combining 15 g wheat plus 15 g milk protein (WHEAT+MILK). Blood and muscle biopsies were collected frequently for 5 h to assess post-prandial plasma amino acid profiles and subsequent myofibrillar protein synthesis rates. Ingestion of protein increased myofibrillar protein synthesis rates in all treatments (P < 0·001). Post-prandial myofibrillar protein synthesis rates did not differ between MILK v. WHEAT (0·053 (sd 0·013) v. 0·056 (sd 0·012) %·h-1, respectively; t test P = 0·56) or between MILK v. WHEAT+MILK (0·053 (sd 0·013) v. 0·059 (sd 0·025) %·h-1, respectively; t test P = 0·46). In conclusion, ingestion of 30 g milk protein, 30 g wheat protein or a blend of 15 g wheat plus 15 g milk protein increases muscle protein synthesis rates in young males. Furthermore, muscle protein synthesis rates following the ingestion of 30 g milk protein do not differ from rates observed after ingesting 30 g wheat protein or a blend with 15 g milk plus 15 g wheat protein in healthy, young males.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0007114521000635

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • No differences in postprandial MPS rates were observed between isonitrogenous 30 g servings of milk and wheat protein in young men.

    “and no differences in postprandial MPS rates were observed between isonitrogenous (30 g) servings of milk and wheat protein in young men [89].”

    From Nutritional Considerations for the Vegan Athlete (2023) · cites this paper as [89]

  • A plant/animal protein blend or exclusively plant protein blend can stimulate an equivalent MPS response to an animal-based comparison.

    “A handful of studies have supported the blending theory by demonstrating that a plant/animal protein blend [89,90,92,93] or exclusively plant protein blend [88,94,95] can stimulate an equivalent MPS response to an animal-based comparison.”

    From Nutritional Considerations for the Vegan Athlete (2023) · cites this paper as [89]

  • There is a growing number of studies that contradict, or at least obfuscate, the narrative that nonanimal proteins are inferior.

    “However, there is a growing number of studies that contradict, or at least obfuscate, this narrative [53,[88], [89], [90], [91]].”

    From Nutritional Considerations for the Vegan Athlete (2023) · cites this paper as [89]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pinckaers, P. J. M., Kouw, I. W. K., Hendriks, F. K., van Kranenburg, J. M. X., de Groot, L. C. P. G. M., Verdijk, L. B., Snijders, T., & van Loon, L. J. C.
Affiliations
Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
Venue
British Journal Of Nutrition
Published
2021-02-18
Volume
126
Issue
12
Pages
1832-1842
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W3133100105
Cited by
76
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 5
FWCI
6.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
Keywords
muscle protein synthesis, wheat proteins, milk protein, protein blends, plant proteins, animal protein, myofibrillar protein synthesis, young men
MeSH terms
Dietary Proteins, Double-Blind Method, Eating, Humans, Male, Milk Proteins, Muscle Proteins, Triticum, Muscle, Skeletal, Postprandial Period, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review