Cited by 31Muscle metabolism and nutritionMuscle Physiology and DisordersSports Performance and Training

Myofibrillar and mitochondrial protein synthesis rates do not differ in young men following the ingestion of carbohydrate with milk protein, whey, or micellar casein after concurrent resistance-and endurance-type exercise

Open access
Churchward-Venne, Tyler A, Pinckaers, Philippe JM, Smeets, Joey SJ, Peeters, Wouter M, Zorenc, Antoine H, Schierbeek, Henk, Rollo, Ian, Verdijk, Lex B +1 more·2019·The Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whey and micellar casein are high-quality dairy proteins that can stimulate postprandial muscle protein synthesis rates. How whey and casein compare with milk protein in their capacity to stimulate postprandial myofibrillar (MyoPS) and mitochondrial (MitoPS) protein synthesis rates during postexercise recovery is currently unknown. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare postprandial MyoPS and MitoPS rates after protein-carbohydrate co-ingestion with milk protein, whey, or micellar casein during recovery from a single bout of concurrent resistance- and endurance-type exercise in young healthy men. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group design, 48 healthy, young, recreationally active men (mean ± SEM age: 23 ± 0.3 y) received a primed continuous infusion of L-[ring-13C6]-phenylalanine and L-[ring-3,5-2H2]-tyrosine and ingested 45 g carbohydrate with 0 g protein (CHO), 20 g milk protein (MILK), 20 g whey protein (WHEY), or 20 g micellar casein protein (CASEIN) after a sequential bout of resistance- and endurance-type exercise (i.e., concurrent exercise). Blood and muscle biopsies were collected over 360 min during recovery from exercise to assess MyoPS and MitoPS rates and signaling through mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1). RESULTS: Despite temporal differences in postprandial plasma leucine concentrations between treatments (P < 0.001), MyoPS rates over 360 min of recovery did not differ between treatments (CHO: 0.049% ± 0.003%/h; MILK: 0.059% ± 0.003%/h; WHEY: 0.054% ± 0.002%/h; CASEIN: 0.059% ± 0.005%/h; P = 0.11). When MILK, WHEY, and CASEIN were pooled into a single group (PROTEIN), protein co-ingestion resulted in greater MyoPS rates compared with CHO (PROTEIN: 0.057% ± 0.002%/h; CHO: 0.049% ± 0.003%/h; P = 0.04). MitoPS rates and signaling through the mTORC1 pathway were similar between treatments. CONCLUSION: MyoPS and MitoPS rates do not differ after co-ingestion of either milk protein, whey protein, or micellar casein protein with carbohydrate during recovery from a single bout of concurrent resistance- and endurance-type exercise in recreationally active young men. Co-ingestion of protein with carbohydrate results in greater MyoPS, but not MitoPS rates, when compared with the ingestion of carbohydrate only during recovery from concurrent exercise. This trial was registered at Nederlands Trial Register: NTR5098.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jn/nxy244

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Muscle contraction in the form of resistance- or endurance-type exercise provides additional stimulus to upregulate MPS in both an additive and independent manner.

    “Muscle contraction in the form of resistance- or endurance-type exercise provides additional stimulus to upregulate MPS in both an additive and independent manner [[51], [52], [53]].”

    From Nutritional Considerations for the Vegan Athlete (2023) · cites this paper as [53]

  • Differences between animal- and plant-based protein sources are absent when higher doses of protein (approximately 30 g protein) are compared, though this is not always the case.

    “An emerging theme is that differences between animal- and plant- based sources are absent when higher doses of protein (presumably obviating any individual amino acid deficiencies) are compared (∼30 g protein), though this is not always the case [53,86].”

    From Nutritional Considerations for the Vegan Athlete (2023) · cites this paper as [53]

  • There is a growing number of studies that contradict, or at least obfuscate, the narrative that nonanimal proteins are inferior.

    “However, there is a growing number of studies that contradict, or at least obfuscate, this narrative [53,[88], [89], [90], [91]].”

    From Nutritional Considerations for the Vegan Athlete (2023) · cites this paper as [53]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Churchward-Venne, T. A., Pinckaers, P. J., Smeets, J. S., Peeters, W. M., Zorenc, A. H., Schierbeek, H., Rollo, I., Verdijk, L. B., & van Loon, L. J.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
The Journal of Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
149
Issue
2
Pages
198-209
ISSN
0022-3166 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2912493204
Cited by
31
References
53
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2019-06-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
PepsiCo/Gatorade Sports Science Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
myofibrillar protein synthesis, mitochondrial translation, whey protein, micellar casein, milk protein, post-exercise recovery, mTORC1 signaling, leucine, phenylalanine, tyrosine, muscle protein synthesis, young men, protein supplementation
MeSH terms
Whey, Caseins, Dietary Carbohydrates, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Male, Micelles, Milk Proteins, Mitochondria, Myofibrils, Physical Endurance, Resistance Training, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review