Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 442Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Functions and MemoryCognitive Abilities and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A unified account of cognitive impairments following frontal lobe damage: The role of working memory in complex, organized behavior.

Kimberg, Daniel Y., Farah, Martha J.·1993·Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Abstract

A computer model is presented that performs 4 tasks sometimes impaired by frontal damage: motor sequencing, the Stroop task, the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, and a context memory task. In each task, patterns of performance typical of frontal-damaged patients are shown to result from the same type of damage to the model, specifically, weakening of associations among elements in working memory. The simulation shows how a single underlying type of damage could result in impairments on a variety of seemingly distinct tasks. Furthermore, the hypothesized damage affects the processing components that carry out the task rather than a distinct central executive.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0096-3445.122.4.411

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 61 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kimberg, D. Y., & Farah, M. J.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Published
1993
Volume
122
Issue
4
Pages
411-428
ISSN
  • 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2222
OpenAlex
W2081186295
Cited by
442
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
11.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1k04ns001405-01, 7r01mh048274-03)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH48274)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K04NS01405)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
frontal lobe damage, working memory, cognitive impairment, computer simulation, motor sequencing, Stroop task, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, contextual memory, central executive, executive function
MeSH terms
Brain Diseases, Cognition Disorders, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Male, Memory Disorders, Motor Skills, Task Performance and Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.