Cited by 225Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

Neural Dynamics of Rejection Sensitivity

Kross, Ethan, Egner, Tobias, Ochsner, Kevin, Hirsch, Joy, Downey, Geraldine·2007·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Rejection sensitivity (RS) is the tendency to anxiously expect, readily perceive, and intensely react to rejection. This study used functional magnetic resonance imaging to explore whether individual differences in RS are mediated by differential recruitment of brain regions involved in emotional appraisal and/or cognitive control. High and low RS participants were scanned while viewing either representational paintings depicting themes of rejection and acceptance or nonrepresentational control paintings matched for positive or negative valence, arousal and interest level. Across all participants, rejection versus acceptance images activated regions of the brain involved in processing affective stimuli (posterior cingulate, insula), and cognitive control (dorsal anterior cingulate cortex; medial frontal cortex). Low and high RS individuals' responses to rejection versus acceptance images were not, however, identical. Low RS individuals displayed significantly more activity in left inferior and right dorsal frontal regions, and activity in these areas correlated negatively with participants' self-report distress ratings. In addition, control analyses revealed no effect of viewing negative versus positive images in any of the areas described above, suggesting that the aforementioned activations were involved in rejection-relevant processing rather than processing negatively valenced stimuli per se. Taken together, these findings suggest that responses in regions traditionally implicated in emotional processing and cognitive control are sensitive to rejection stimuli irrespective of RS, but that low RS individuals may activate prefrontal structures to regulate distress associated with viewing such images.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.6.945

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kross, E., Egner, T., Ochsner, K., Hirsch, J., & Downey, G.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Publisher
MIT Press
Published
2007-06-01
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
945-956
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2041524892
Cited by
225
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 20
FWCI
16.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH069703, R01MH076137)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
rejection sensitivity, rejection, anxiety, emotional appraisal, cognitive control, prefrontal cortex, distress, individual differences, figurative painting, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, medial frontal cortex, insula, posterior cingulate cortex
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Emotions, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Photic Stimulation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Rejection, Psychology, Statistics as Topic, Nonlinear Dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review