The DOI matches its Crossref record; 159 of the 159 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 76 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world
Open accessAbstract
The default mode network (DMN) is classically considered an ‘intrinsic’ system, specializing in internally oriented cognitive processes such as daydreaming, reminiscing and future planning. In this Perspective, we suggest that the DMN is an active and dynamic ‘sense-making’ network that integrates incoming extrinsic information with prior intrinsic information to form rich, context-dependent models of situations as they unfold over time. We review studies that relied on naturalistic stimuli, such as stories and movies, to demonstrate how an individual’s DMN neural responses are influenced both by external information accumulated as events unfold over time and by the individual’s idiosyncratic past memories and knowledge. The integration of extrinsic and intrinsic information over long timescales provides a space for negotiating a shared neural code, which is necessary for establishing shared meaning, shared communication tools, shared narratives and, above all, shared communities and social networks. The role of the default mode network (DMN) is unclear. In this Perspective, Yeshurun, Nguyen and Hasson review evidence that the DMN integrates extrinsic inputs with intrinsic information over long timescales, enabling it to represent meaning in a way that can be shared between individuals.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
41 Own interpretation · 38 Not checked yet · 1 Partly supported · 1 No basis given · accuracy not yet measured
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, the DMN should not be considered an intrinsic system active only during internally oriented or stimulus-independent processes.”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The DMN is sensitive to long-term memories.”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > Intrinsic responses of the DMN > The DMN is sensitive to long-term memories.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“to demonstrate how an individual’s DMN neural responses are influenced both by external information accumulated as events unfold over time and by the individual’s idiosyncratic past memories and knowledge.”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > Abstract
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The integration of extrinsic and intrinsic information over long timescales provides a space for negotiating a shared neural code, which is necessary for establishing shared meaning, shared communication tools, shared narratives and, above all, shared communities and social networks.”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, the DMN should not be considered an extrinsic system, sensitive only to incoming sensory information.”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Greater similarity in the interpretation of the ambiguous shape animation (as reported by each of the participants) was associated with greater similarity in neural response in DMN regions across participants.”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > Intrinsic responses of the DMN > The DMN is sensitive to individual differences in interpretation.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [37] Nguyen, M., Vanderwal, T. & Hasson, U. Shared understanding of narratives is correlated with shared neural responses. NeuroImage 184, 161–170 (2019). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This analysis, although effective in outlining the anatomical boundaries of the DMN, is unable to distinguish subtle task-related fluctuations in connectivity across various experimental conditions including, for example, lying at rest in a scanner, listening to a list of scrambled words and listening to an intact story several minutes long24–26”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > Extrinsic responses of the DMN > DMN connectivity is influenced by context and incoming inputs.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [24] Honey, C. J. et al. Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 2035–2040 (2009). source
- Not checked yetcites [25] Greicius, M. D., Supekar, K., Menon, V. & Dougherty, R. F. Resting-state functional connectivity reflects structural connectivity in the default mode network. Cereb. Cortex 19, 72–78 (2009). source
- Not checked yetcites [26] Simony, E. et al. Dynamic reconfiguration of the default mode network during narrative comprehension. Nat. Commun. 7, 12141 (2016). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Crucially, although attention can modulate responses in the DMN, it cannot, in isolation, account for the results described above.”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > Extrinsic responses of the DMN > Integration in the DMN is modulated by attention.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [46] Chen, J. et al. Shared memories reveal shared structure in neural activity across individuals. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 115–125 (2016). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“DMN responses are modulated by prior beliefs.”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > Intrinsic responses of the DMN > DMN responses are modulated by prior beliefs.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [47] Yeshurun, Y. et al. Same story, different story: the neural representation of interpretive frameworks. Psychological Sci. 28, 307–319 (2017). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Evidence suggests that the DMN is also modulated by attention.”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > Extrinsic responses of the DMN > Integration in the DMN is modulated by attention.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [42] Schmälzle, R., Häcker, F. E. K., Honey, C. J. & Hasson, U. Engaged listeners: shared neural processing of powerful political speeches. Soc. Cognit. Affect. Neurosci. 10, 1137–1143 (2015). source
- Not checked yetcites [43] Cohen, S. S. & Parra, L. C. Memorable audiovisual narratives synchronize sensory and supramodal neural responses. eNeuro https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0203-16.2016 (2016). source
- Not checked yetcites [44] Ki, J. J., Kelly, S. P. & Parra, L. C. Attention strongly modulates reliability of neural responses to naturalistic narrative stimuli. J. Neurosci. 36, 3092–3101 (2016). source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 17
- Probably not a substantial claim. 11
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Similar studies have reported that increased alignment in neural response across subjects in the DMN is correlated with the similarity in interpretation of spoken narratives69, similarity in emotional response over time during spoken narratives70, similarity in humour perception over time71, similarity in socio-sexual desire while watching erotic movies72 and similarity in moral decision-making73,”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > Intrinsic responses of the DMN > The DMN is sensitive to individual differences in interpretation.
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [69] Saalasti, S. et al. Inferior parietal lobule and early visual areas support elicitation of individualized meanings during narrative listening. Brain Behav. 9, e01288 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results report that subjects with more similar interpretations of a spoken narrative had more similar brain activity in the inferior parietal lobule and occipital pole. The paper does not identify this finding as alignment across the default mode network as a whole. The later examples in the citing sentence carry separate citations and are not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.83)
- Partly supportedcites [70] Smirnov, D. et al. Emotions amplify speaker–listener neural alignment. Hum. Brain Mapp. 40, 4777–4788 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (§3.3; page unavailable) link similarity in speakers’ and listeners’ emotional responses during narratives to increased neural synchronization, including in the ACC and precuneus. The paper reports effects in specific regions, however, rather than establishing increased alignment across the default mode network as a whole. The other activities in the citing sentence have separate citations and are not attributed to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Partly supportedcites [71] Jääskeläinen, I. P. et al. Brain hemodynamic activity during viewing and re-viewing of comedy movies explained by experienced humor. Sci. Rep. 6, 27741 (2016). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Citation 71 supports the humour-perception part of the sentence: the Results report that similarity in self-rated humorousness explained inter-subject correlation of hemodynamic activity in several brain regions. The paper does not identify that finding as an effect across the default mode network. The other experiences in the sentence are attached to other citations, not this one. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The finding that responses in the DMN are shaped by our long-term memories and beliefs raises the intriguing possibility that individual differences in the way we perceive the world can account for individual differences in DMN responses.”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > Intrinsic responses of the DMN > The DMN is sensitive to individual differences in interpretation.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, at the same time, our knowledge, memories and beliefs are shaped by the people we are connected to and the world in which we are immersed (Fig. 1b).”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The ability to integrate information over days is necessary for building schemas, a mental codification of experience.”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > Intrinsic responses of the DMN > The DMN represents acquired schemas.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As the activity in the DMN is shaped by our unique history, it is by nature idiosyncratic.”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This result suggests that the responses in the DMN can be shaped by information accumulated across many minutes during uninterrupted viewing (short-term context) as well as by information gathered over days (as in the long-term context group) — and, conceivably, even years.”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > Intrinsic responses of the DMN > The DMN is sensitive to long-term memories.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [55] Chen, J. et al. Accessing real-life episodic information from minutes versus hours earlier modulates hippocampal and high-order cortical dynamics. Cereb. Cortex 26, 3428–3441 (2015). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Inter-subject correlation in the DMN was greater among participants who had the background knowledge to interpret the clip than among participants who did not. Crucially, responses in the DMN were similar across the short-term context and the long-term context groups”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > Intrinsic responses of the DMN > The DMN is sensitive to long-term memories.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [55] Chen, J. et al. Accessing real-life episodic information from minutes versus hours earlier modulates hippocampal and high-order cortical dynamics. Cereb. Cortex 26, 3428–3441 (2015). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The DMN, which includes the posterior medial cortex, medial prefrontal cortex and temporoparietal junction1–3”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Buckner, R. L. & DiNicola, L. M. The brain’s default network: updated anatomy, physiology and evolving insights. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 593–608 (2019). source
- Not checked yetcites [2] Raichle, M. E. The brain’s default mode network. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 38, 433–447 (2015). source
- Not checked yetcites [3] Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Reidler, J. S., Sepulcre, J., Poulin, R. & Buckner, R. L. Functional-anatomic fractionation of the brain’s default network. Neuron 65, 550–562 (2010). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, we argue that activity in the DMN is nonetheless sensitive to intrinsic information (long-term memories, conditional responses, beliefs, emotions and so on), which influences and interacts with the interpretation and processing of incoming external information (bottom arrow in Fig. 1a).”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“within-brain functional connectivity patterns are heavily influenced by direct and indirect anatomical wiring, but are less sensitive for isolating spontaneous activity (for example, during rest) from stimulus-locked activity that propagates through the network as during processing of extrinsic information26,28.”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > Extrinsic responses of the DMN > DMN connectivity is influenced by context and incoming inputs.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [26] Simony, E. et al. Dynamic reconfiguration of the default mode network during narrative comprehension. Nat. Commun. 7, 12141 (2016). source
- Not checked yetcites [28] Nastase, S. A., Liu, Y.-F., Hillman, H., Norman, K. A. & Hasson, U. Leveraging shared connectivity to aggregate heterogeneous datasets into a common response space. NeuroImage 15, 116865 (2020). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we argue that the DMN provides a space for social ‘others’ (the extrinsic people we interact with) to shape the self (our set of intrinsic memories and beliefs), which in turn can enable us to shape the memories and beliefs of others.”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“DMN responses are locked to the content of the stimuli over long timescales. At the same time, they are relatively invariant to even dramatic changes in low-level stimulus properties that do not change the interpretation (meaning) of the stimuli.”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > Extrinsic responses of the DMN > Integration in the DMN depends on the content, not form, of external input.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Making sense of the world is a dynamic, ever-changing process requiring the integration of incoming information with prior knowledge about the situation over multiple timescales.”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Here, we propose that the shared representation in the DMN arises from dynamical social interaction between the self and others.”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > The DMN in social interaction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A later study using fNIRS identified conversational ‘leaders’ that emerge naturally in group discussions and used Granger causality analysis to show that the leader’s neural activity more strongly predicted the followers’ neural activity than vice versa101.”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > The DMN in social interaction > One-way versus two-way communication.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [101] Jiang, J. et al. Leader emergence through interpersonal neural synchronization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 4274–4279 (2015). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“this approach showed that face-to-face communication elicits greater brain–brain coupling than does back-to-back communication100, suggesting a role of non-verbal signals in enhancing communication and neural alignment.”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > The DMN in social interaction > One-way versus two-way communication.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [100] Jiang, J. et al. Neural synchronization during face-to-face communication. J. Neurosci. 32, 16064–16069 (2012). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Together, these findings suggest that that caregiver–child DMN coupling emerges early in development and likely plays a role in learning and language acquisition.”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > The DMN in social interaction > The emergence of shared understanding.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“By contrast, in language areas and the DMN, the responses in the listeners’ brains lagged behind the responses in the speaker’s brain, suggesting that responses in the speaker’s brain causally shaped the responses in the listeners’ brains.”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > The DMN in social interaction > Brain–brain coupling between speakers and listeners.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [86] Stephens, G. J., Silbert, L. J. & Hasson, U. Speaker–listener neural coupling underlies successful communication. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 14425–14430 (2010). source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Group-level differences in neural responses between cultures have also been observed during processing of culturally relevant stimuli, such as stories describing protected collectivist values, that may be related to the degree of identification with the culture120,121.”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > The DMN in social interaction > Social networks shape shared understanding.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [120] Kaplan, J. T. et al. Processing narratives concerning protected values: a cross-cultural investigation of neural correlates. Cereb. Cortex 27, 1428–1438 (2017).
- Not checked yetcites [121] Levy, J. et al. Adolescents growing up amidst intractable conflict attenuate brain response to pain of outgroup. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 13696–13701 (2016). source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this Perspective, we argue that we are able to shape and be shaped by others in part because activity in the DMN is capable of both shaping other brains’ responses and being shaped by the actions of other brains during social interaction.”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > Conclusions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Perhaps one of the most intriguing findings across these studies is the discovery of neural patterns in the DMN that are shared across participants and aligned to the abstract structure and interpretation of the external events.”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > An active sense-making network
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Rather, we suggest that the DMN is ‘default’ because it is central for integrating external and internal information, allowing for shared communication and alignment tools, shared meanings, shared narratives and, above all, shared communities and social networks.”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > Conclusions
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sharing stories and building collaborations further enhance such coupling.”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > Conclusions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Developing shared ways to understand and act in the world is an evolving communal effort in which we synthesize our intrinsic idiosyncratic perspectives and actions with the extrinsic perspectives and actions of others.”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > Conclusions
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this Perspective, we argue that the DMN is ‘default’ not because it is engaged when we are looking inward, nor because it is shaped by others.”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > Conclusions
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Naturalistic stimuli such as stories and movies engage the same default mode network processes that operate during real-world social interaction.
“These findings also highlight the importance of studying the brain’s dynamics under temporally extended, ecological conditions29.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Sensory areas produce shared neural activity because they tend to align with low-level perceptual features of external stimuli.
“Shared neural activity at the sensory level naturally arises from the tendency of these areas to align with the low-level perceptual properties of the external stimuli.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A given situation can be conveyed through speech, writing or abstract animated shapes.
“The same situation can be described using spoken words, written text or abstract animated shapes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Across contexts, the same situation can carry very different meanings tied to different actions.
“Conversely, the same situation can have markedly different meanings associated with different actions across different contexts.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In formal education, new and sometimes technical information has to pass from an expert's brain to novices' brains.
“In such contexts, novel, sometimes jargonized, information must be transmitted from an expert’s brain to novices’ brains.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A central feature of formal teaching and learning is the growth of shared understanding of concepts.
“The development of shared understanding of concepts is also the hallmark of teaching and learning in formal education.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The journey of Anonymized-MOOC-Platform-CL members through stimulating disruptions, resolving conflicts, and creating new operational models indeed reflects the core of Engeström's Activity Theory and even the novel discovery of neuro-alignment among team members through social interaction (Yeshurun et al., 2021).”
From Transforming Online Teacher Training Through Expansive Learning: A Case Study Applying Cultural-Historical Activity Theory and the Change Laboratory Method (2025) · cites this paper as Yeshurun et al., 2021
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“An innovative research direction using naturalistic stimuli has demonstrated that ongoing DMN activity of two individuals becomes synchronized when they process shared narratives, with DMN synchronization being particularly sensitive to social communicative cues. 47”
From 20 years of the default mode network: A review and synthesis. (2023) · cites this paper as [47]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In summary, the DMN consistently responds to various aspects of social content and context, encompassing the consideration of mental states, making inferences about others' mental states, and establishing shared meaning and narratives about the self in the world. 47”
From 20 years of the default mode network: A review and synthesis. (2023) · cites this paper as [47]
In the citing paper
“Rather, humans operate an online mechanism for accumulating information and integrating it into a broader contextual memory, which is changed and updated as the story unfolds17,18.”
From Incremental accumulation of linguistic context in artificial and biological neural networks (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > The DMN in social interaction > The emergence of shared understanding.
“between caregivers and infants as young as 9–10 months old1–3.”
§ The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world > References
“1. Buckner RL & DiNicola LM The brain’s default network: updated anatomy, physiology and evolving insights. Nat. Rev. Neurosci 20, 593– 608 (2019).”
Citations
Cites
Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 · Cited by 13,680
A default mode of brain function
Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.676 · Cited by 12,190
The Brain's Default Network: Anatomy, Function, and Relevance to Disease
Buckner, R. L., Andrews‐Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1440.011 · Cited by 9,761
LOSS OF RECENT MEMORY AFTER BILATERAL HIPPOCAMPAL LESIONS
Scoville, W. B., & Milner, B. (1957) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.20.1.11 · Cited by 7,322
Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis
Greicius, M. D., Krasnow, B., Reiss, A. L., & Menon, V. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0135058100 · Cited by 6,358
The brain's default mode network
Raichle, M. E. (2015) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014030 · Cited by 3,904
Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition
Amodio, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1884 · Cited by 3,782
An Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior
Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1416950 · Cited by 3,340
Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity
Honey, C. J., Sporns, O., Cammoun, L., Gigandet, X., Thiran, J. P., Meuli, R., & Hagmann, P. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0811168106 · Cited by 3,307
Gusnard, D. A., Akbudak, E., Shulman, G. L., & Raichle, M. E. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.071043098 · Cited by 2,997
Self-referential processing in our brain—A meta-analysis of imaging studies on the self
Northoff, G., Heinzel, A., de Greck, M., Bermpohl, F., Dobrowolny, H., & Panksepp, J. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.002 · Cited by 2,792
Wandering minds: the default network and stimulus-independent thought
Mason, M. F., Norton, M. I., Van Horn, J. D., Wegner, D. M., Grafton, S. T., & Macrae, C. N. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1131295 · Cited by 2,792
Functional-anatomic fractionation of the brain’s default network
Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Reidler, J. S., Sepulcre, J., Poulin, R., & Buckner, R. L. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.02.005 · Cited by 2,767
Remembering the past to imagine the future: the prospective brain
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2213 · Cited by 2,394
Situating the default-mode network along a principal gradient of macroscale cortical organization
Margulies, D. S., Ghosh, S. S., Goulas, A., Falkiewicz, M., Huntenburg, J. M., Langs, G., Bezgin, G., Eickhoff, S. B., Castellanos, F. X., Petrides, M., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1608282113 · Cited by 2,321
Resting-State Functional Connectivity Reflects Structural Connectivity in the Default Mode Network
Greicius, M. D., Supekar, K., Menon, V., & Dougherty, R. F. (2009) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn059 · Cited by 2,175
Spreng, R. N., Mar, R. A., & Kim, A. S. N. (2009) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.21029 · Cited by 2,143
Efficient generation of mouse models of human diseases via ABE- and BE-mediated base editing
Liu, Z., Lu, Z., Yang, G., Huang, S., Li, G., Feng, S., Liu, Y., Li, J., Yu, W., Zhang, Y., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04768-7 · Cited by 2,103
Social Cognitive Neuroscience: A Review of Core Processes
Lieberman, M. D. (2007) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085654 · Cited by 2,010
Common blood flow changes across visual tasks: II. Decreases in cerebral cortex
Shulman, G. L., Fiez, J. A., Corbetta, M., Buckner, R. L., Miezin, F. M., Raichle, M. E., & Petersen, S. E. (1997) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1997.9.5.648 · Cited by 1,890
Evidence for a Frontoparietal Control System Revealed by Intrinsic Functional Connectivity
Vincent, J. L., Kahn, I., Snyder, A. Z., Raichle, M. E., & Buckner, R. L. (2008) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.90355.2008 · Cited by 1,869
The Social Brain: Neural Basis of Social Knowledge
Adolphs, R. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163514 · Cited by 1,827
The Science of Mind Wandering: Empirically Navigating the Stream of Consciousness
Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2015) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015331 · Cited by 1,685
Fractionating theory of mind: a meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies
Schurz, M., Radua, J., Aichhorn, M., Richlan, F., & Perner, J. (2014) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.01.009 · Cited by 1,656
Brain-to-brain coupling: a mechanism for creating and sharing a social world
Hasson, U., Ghazanfar, A. A., Galantucci, B., Garrod, S., & Keysers, C. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.007 · Cited by 1,140
Self-citationA Parametric Manipulation of Factors Affecting Task-induced Deactivation in Functional Neuroimaging
McKiernan, K. A., Kaufman, J. N., Kucera-Thompson, J., & Binder, J. R. (2003) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892903321593117 · Cited by 1,080
The brain’s default network: updated anatomy, physiology and evolving insights
Buckner, R. L., & DiNicola, L. M. (2019) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-019-0212-7 · Cited by 1,058
Speaker-listener neural coupling underlies successful communication
Stephens, G. J., Silbert, L. J., & Hasson, U. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1008662107 · Cited by 970
Self-citationDiscovering Event Structure in Continuous Narrative Perception and Memory
Baldassano, C., Chen, J., Zadbood, A., Pillow, J. W., Hasson, U., & Norman, K. A. (2017) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.041 · Cited by 952
Self-citationHow is our self related to midline regions and the default-mode network?
Qin, P., & Northoff, G. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.028 · Cited by 909
A hierarchy of temporal receptive windows in human cortex
Hasson, U., Yang, E., Vallines, I., Heeger, D. J., & Rubin, N. (2008) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5487-07.2008 · Cited by 874
Self-citationBrain-to-brain synchrony tracks real-world dynamic group interactions in the classroom
Dikker, S., Wan, L., Davidesco, I., Kaggen, L., Oostrik, M., McClintock, J., Rowland, J., Michalareas, G., Van Bavel, J. J., Ding, M., et al. (2017) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.002 · Cited by 871
Episodic Simulation of Future Events: Concepts, Data, and Applications
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1440.001 · Cited by 840
Topographic mapping of a hierarchy of temporal receptive windows using a narrated story
Lerner, Y., Honey, C. J., Silbert, L. J., & Hasson, U. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3684-10.2011 · Cited by 834
Self-citationHyperscanning: Simultaneous fMRI during Linked Social Interactions
Montague, P. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1150 · Cited by 833
It's the Thought That Counts: Specific Brain Regions for One Component of Theory of Mind
Saxe, R., & Powell, L. J. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01768.x · Cited by 815
On the relationship between the “default mode network” and the “social brain
Mars, R. B., Neubert, F.-X., Noonan, M. P., Sallet, J., Toni, I., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00189 · Cited by 766
Hierarchical process memory: memory as an integral component of information processing
Hasson, U., Chen, J., & Honey, C. J. (2015) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.04.006 · Cited by 749
Self-citationNeurobiology of Schemas and Schema-Mediated Memory
Gilboa, A., & Marlatte, H. (2017) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2017.04.013 · Cited by 742
Functional neuroimaging of autobiographical memory
Cabeza, R., & St Jacques, P. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.02.005 · Cited by 736
Fox, K. C. R., Spreng, R. N., Ellamil, M., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., & Christoff, K. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.039 · Cited by 690
Evidence for the Default Network's Role in Spontaneous Cognition
Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Reidler, J. S., Huang, C., & Buckner, R. L. (2010) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00830.2009 · Cited by 685
Functional anatomical studies of explicit and implicit memory retrieval tasks
Buckner, R. L., Petersen, S., Ojemann, J. G., Miezin, F. M., Squire, L., & Raichle, M. E. (1995) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.15-01-00012.1995 · Cited by 678
Shared memories reveal shared structure in neural activity across individuals
Chen, J., Leong, Y. C., Honey, C. J., Yong, C. H., Norman, K. A., & Hasson, U. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4450 · Cited by 645
Self-citationSchilbach, L., Eickhoff, S. B., Rotarska-Jagiela, A., Fink, G. R., & Vogeley, K. (2008) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.013 · Cited by 615
Braga, R. M., & Buckner, R. L. (2017) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.038 · Cited by 602
Remembering the past: two facets of episodic memory explored with positron emission tomography
(1995) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.152.11.1576 · Cited by 593
Dynamic reconfiguration of the default mode network during narrative comprehension
Simony, E., Honey, C. J., Chen, J., Lositsky, O., Yeshurun, Y., Wiesel, A., & Hasson, U. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12141 · Cited by 588
Self-citationTheory of Mind: A Neural Prediction Problem
Koster-Hale, J., & Saxe, R. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.08.020 · Cited by 513
Neuroimaging studies of autobiographical event memory
Maguire, E. A. (2001) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2001.0944 · Cited by 513
Neural Synchronization during Face-to-Face Communication
Jiang, J., Dai, B., Peng, D., Zhu, C., Liu, L., & Lu, C. (2012) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2926-12.2012 · Cited by 489
The restless brain: How intrinsic activity organizes brain function
Raichle, M. E. (2015) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0172 · Cited by 433
Measuring shared responses across subjects using intersubject correlation
Nastase, S. A., Gazzola, V., Hasson, U., & Keysers, C. (2019) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsz037 · Cited by 419
Self-citationBrain-to-Brain Synchrony during Naturalistic Social Interactions
Kinreich, S., Djalovski, A., Kraus, L., Louzoun, Y., & Feldman, R. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-17339-5 · Cited by 402
Convergence of spoken and written language processing in the superior temporal sulcus
Wilson, S. M., Bautista, A., & McCarron, A. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.068 · Cited by 402
A cancer vaccine-mediated postoperative immunotherapy for recurrent and metastatic tumors
Wang, T., Wang, D., Yu, H., Feng, B., Zhou, F., Zhang, H., Zhou, L., Jiao, S., & Li, Y. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03915-4 · Cited by 394
Similar neural responses predict friendship
Parkinson, C., Kleinbaum, A. M., & Wheatley, T. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02722-7 · Cited by 388
Keep it real: rethinking the primacy of experimental control in cognitive neuroscience
Nastase, S. A., Goldstein, A., & Hasson, U. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117254 · Cited by 380
Self-citationMirroring and beyond: coupled dynamics as a generalized framework for modelling social interactions
Hasson, U., & Frith, C. D. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0366 · Cited by 371
Self-citationConsistency and functional specialization in the default mode brain network
Harrison, B. J., Pujol, J., López-Solà, M., Hernández-Ribas, R., Deus, J., Ortiz, H., Soriano-Mas, C., Yücel, M., Pantelis, C., & Cardoner, N. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0711791105 · Cited by 363
Learning-enhanced coupling between ripple oscillations in association cortices and hippocampus
Khodagholy, D., Gelinas, J. N., & Buzsáki, G. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aan6203 · Cited by 357
Coupled neural systems underlie the production and comprehension of naturalistic narrative speech
Silbert, L. J., Honey, C. J., Simony, E., Poeppel, D., & Hasson, U. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1323812111 · Cited by 352
Self-citationRepresentation of Real-World Event Schemas during Narrative Perception
Baldassano, C. A., Hasson, U., & Norman, K. A. (2018) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0251-18.2018 · Cited by 344
Self-citationLeader emergence through interpersonal neural synchronization.
Jiang, J., Chen, C., Dai, B., Shi, G., Ding, G., Liu, L., & Lu, C. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1422930112 · Cited by 341
Aggleton, J. P. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.09.005 · Cited by 339
Golland, Y., Bentin, S., Gelbard, H., Benjamini, Y., Heller, R., Nir, Y., Hasson, U., & Malach, R. (2007) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhk030 · Cited by 337
Self-citationMapping the information flow from one brain to another during gestural communication
Schippers, M. B., Roebroeck, A., Renken, R., Nanetti, L., & Keysers, C. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1001791107 · Cited by 323
Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Saxe, R., & Yarkoni, T. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.032 · Cited by 313
Bevilacqua, D., Davidesco, I., Wan, L., Chaloner, K., Rowland, J., Ding, M., Poeppel, D., & Dikker, S. (2019) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01274 · Cited by 312
Concept representation reflects multimodal abstraction: A framework for embodied semantics
Fernandino, L., Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Pendl, S. L., Humphries, C. J., Gross, W. L., Conant, L. L., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2016) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv020 · Cited by 305
The serendipitous discovery of the brain's default network
Buckner, R. L. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.035 · Cited by 304
Shared understanding of narratives is correlated with shared neural responses
Nguyen, M., Vanderwal, T., & Hasson, U. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.010 · Cited by 304
Self-citationSame Story, Different Story: The Neural Representation of Interpretive Frameworks
Yeshurun, Y., Swanson, S., Simony, E., Chen, J., Lazaridi, C., Honey, C. J., & Hasson, U. (2017) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797616682029 · Cited by 300
Self-citationContour Saliency in Primary Visual Cortex
Li, W., Piëch, V., & Gilbert, C. D. (2006) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.04.035 · Cited by 285
Zadbood, A., Chen, J., Leong, Y. C., Norman, K. A., & Hasson, U. (2017) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhx202 · Cited by 281
Self-citationZadbood, A., Chen, J., Leong, Y. C., Norman, K. A., & Hasson, U. (2016) · doi:10.1101/081208 · Cited by 281
Self-citationIdiosynchrony: From shared responses to individual differences during naturalistic neuroimaging
Finn, E. S., Glerean, E., Khojandi, A., Nielson, D. M., Molfese, P. J., Handwerker, D. A., & Bandettini, P. A. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116828 · Cited by 277
Prose recall and amnesia: implications for the structure of working memory
Baddeley, A., & Wilson, B. A. (2002) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00146-4 · Cited by 270
Clan mentality: evidence that the medial prefrontal cortex responds to close others
Krienen, F. M., Tu, P.-C., & Buckner, R. L. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2180-10.2010 · Cited by 256
Attention Strongly Modulates Reliability of Neural Responses to Naturalistic Narrative Stimuli
Ki, J. J., Kelly, S. P., & Parra, L. C. (2016) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2942-15.2016 · Cited by 221
Infant and Adult Brains Are Coupled to the Dynamics of Natural Communication
Piazza, E. A., Hasenfratz, L., Hasson, U., & Lew‐Williams, C. (2019) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797619878698 · Cited by 221
Self-citationSelective and invariant neural responses to spoken and written narratives
Regev, M., Honey, C. J., Simony, E., & Hasson, U. (2013) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1580-13.2013 · Cited by 215
Self-citationDeniz, F., Nunez-Elizalde, A. O., Huth, A. G., & Gallant, J. L. (2019) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0675-19.2019 · Cited by 214
Social psychology as a natural kind
Mitchell, J. P. (2009) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.03.008 · Cited by 210
Flow of affective information between communicating brains
Anders, S., Heinzle, J., Weiskopf, N., Ethofer, T., & Haynes, J.-D. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.004 · Cited by 206
Spatial Organization and Magnitude of Orientation Contrast Interactions in Primate V1
Jones, H. E., Wang, W., & Sillito, A. M. (2002) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00403.2001 · Cited by 195
The role of the default mode network in component processes underlying the wandering mind
Poerio, G. L., Sormaz, M., Wang, H.-T., Margulies, D. S., Jefferies, E., & Smallwood, J. (2017) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsx041 · Cited by 195
Konishi, M., McLaren, D. G., Engen, H., & Smallwood, J. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132209 · Cited by 194
The computational and neural substrates of moral strategies in social decision-making
van Baar, J. M., Chang, L. J., & Sanfey, A. G. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09161-6 · Cited by 193
Not lost in translation: neural responses shared across languages
Honey, C. J., Thompson, C. R., Lerner, Y., & Hasson, U. (2012) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1800-12.2012 · Cited by 192
Self-citationDelamillieure, P., Doucet, G., Mazoyer, B., Turbelin, M.-R., Delcroix, N., Mellet, E., Zago, L., Crivello, F., Petit, L., Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., et al. (2010) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2009.11.014 · Cited by 190
Pan, Y., Dikker, S., Goldstein, P., Zhu, Y., Yang, C., & Hu, Y. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116657 · Cited by 187
Computing the Social Brain Connectome Across Systems and States
Alcalá-López, D., Smallwood, J., Jefferies, E., Overwalle, F. V., Vogeley, K. T., Mars, R. B., Turetsky, B. I., Laird, A. R., Fox, P. T., Eickhoff, S. B., et al. (2017) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhx121 · Cited by 183
Inter-brain synchrony in mother-child dyads during cooperation: An fNIRS hyperscanning study
Miller, J. G., Vrtička, P., Cui, X., Shrestha, S. B., Hosseini, S. M. H., Baker, J. M., & Reiss, A. L. (2018) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.12.021 · Cited by 181
Synchronous brain activity across individuals underlies shared psychological perspectives
Lahnakoski, J. M., Glerean, E., Jääskeläinen, I. P., Hyönä, J., Hari, R., Sams, M., & Nummenmaa, L. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.022 · Cited by 180
Enhancement of teaching outcome through neural prediction of the students' knowledge state
Zheng, L., Chen, C., Liu, W., Long, Y., Zhao, H., Bai, X., Zhang, Z., Han, Z., Liu, L., Guo, T., et al. (2018) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24059 · Cited by 180
Measuring speaker–listener neural coupling with functional near infrared spectroscopy
Liu, Y., Piazza, E. A., Simony, E., Shewokis, P. A., Onaral, B., Hasson, U., & Ayaz, H. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep43293 · Cited by 180
Self-citationTrait paranoia shapes inter-subject synchrony in brain activity during an ambiguous social narrative
Finn, E. S., Corlett, P. R., Chen, G., Bandettini, P. A., & Constable, R. T. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04387-2 · Cited by 179
Merged minds: Generalized shared reality in dyadic relationships.
Rossignac‐Milon, M., Bolger, N. P., Zee, K. S., Boothby, E. J., & Higgins, E. T. (2020) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000266 · Cited by 174
Dikker, S., Silbert, L. J., Hasson, U., & Zevin, J. D. (2014) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3796-13.2014 · Cited by 167
Self-citationWithin-group synchronization in the prefrontal cortex associates with intergroup conflict
Yang, J., Zhang, H., Ni, J., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Ma, Y. (2020) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-020-0630-x · Cited by 161
Beyond the Language Given: The Neural Correlates of Inferring Speaker Meaning
Bašnáková, J., Weber, K., Petersson, K. M., Berkum, J. J. A. V., & Peter Hagoort, A. (2013) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bht112 · Cited by 159
Fishburn, F. A., Murty, V. P., Hlutkowsky, C. O., MacGillivray, C. E., Bemis, L. M., Murphy, M. E., Huppert, T. J., & Perlman, S. B. (2018) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsy060 · Cited by 144
Subspecialization within default mode nodes characterized in 10,000 UK Biobank participants
Kernbach, J. M., Yeo, B. T. T., Smallwood, J., Margulies, D. S., de Schotten, M. T., Walter, H., Sabuncu, M. R., Holmes, A. J., Gramfort, A., Varoquaux, G. P., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1804876115 · Cited by 142
A place for time: The spatiotemporal structure of neural dynamics during natural audition
Stephens, G. J., Honey, C. J., & Hasson, U. (2013) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00268.2013 · Cited by 141
Self-citationMemorable Audiovisual Narratives Synchronize Sensory and Supramodal Neural Responses
Cohen, S. S., & Parra, L. C. (2016) · eneuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0203-16.2016 · Cited by 138
Engaged listeners: shared neural processing of powerful political speeches
Schmälzle, R., Häcker, F. E. K., Honey, C. J., & Hasson, U. (2015) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsu168 · Cited by 135
Self-citationChen, J., Honey, C. J., Simony, E., Arcaro, M. J., Norman, K. A., & Hasson, U. (2016) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv155 · Cited by 135
Self-citationSharing the social world via intersubject neural synchronisation
Nummenmaa, L., Lahnakoski, J. M., & Glerean, E. (2018) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.02.021 · Cited by 124
Dark control: The default mode network as a reinforcement learning agent
Dohmatob, E., Dumas, G., & Bzdok, D. (2020) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.25019 · Cited by 121
Generative models, linguistic communication and active inference
Friston, K. J., Parr, T., Yufik, Y. M., Sajid, N., Price, C. J., & Holmes, E. (2020) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.07.005 · Cited by 120
Hippocampal Sharp-Wave Ripples Influence Selective Activation of the Default Mode Network
Kaplan, R., Adhikari, M. H., Hindriks, R., Mantini, D., Murayama, Y., Logothetis, N. K., & Deco, G. (2016) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.01.017 · Cited by 116
Cohen, S. S., Madsen, J., Touchan, G., Robles, D., Lima, S. F. A., Henin, S., & Parra, L. C. (2018) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2018.06.011 · Cited by 116
A cross-brain neural mechanism for human-to-human verbal communication
Hirsch, J., Adam Noah, J., Zhang, X., Dravida, S., & Ono, Y. (2018) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsy070 · Cited by 114
Chen, P.-H. A., Jolly, E., Cheong, J. H., & Chang, L. J. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116851 · Cited by 113
Uchiyama, H. T., Saito, D. N., Tanabe, H. C., Harada, T., Seki, A., Ohno, K., Koeda, T., & Sadato, N. (2011) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2011.01.004 · Cited by 110
Imaging the Social Brain by Simultaneous Hyperscanning during Subject Interaction
Astolfi, L., Toppi, J., De Vico Fallani, F., Vecchiato, G., Cincotti, F., Wilke, C., Yuan, H., Mattia, D., Salinari, S., He, B., et al. (2011) · IEEE Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/mis.2011.61 · Cited by 110
Adolescents growing up amidst intractable conflict attenuate brain response to pain of outgroup
Levy, J., Goldstein, A., Influs, M., Masalha, S., Zagoory-Sharon, O., & Feldman, R. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1612903113 · Cited by 108
The Default Mode of Human Brain Function Primes the Intentional Stance
Spunt, R. P., Meyer, M. L., & Lieberman, M. D. (2015) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00785 · Cited by 103
AbdulSabur, N. Y., Xu, Y., Liu, S., Chow, H. M., Baxter, M., Carson, J., & Braun, A. R. (2014) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.01.017 · Cited by 99
Amplification of local changes along the timescale processing hierarchy
Yeshurun, Y., Nguyen, M., & Hasson, U. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1701652114 · Cited by 94
Self-citationContent-specific coordination of listeners' to speakers' EEG during communication
Kuhlen, A. K., Allefeld, C., & Haynes, J. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00266 · Cited by 90
The Surprising Role of the Default Mode Network
Brandman, T., Malach, R., & Simony., E. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.05.18.101758 · Cited by 88
The surprising role of the default mode network in naturalistic perception
Brandman, T., Malach, R., & Simony, E. (2021) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-020-01602-z · Cited by 88
Davidesco, I., Laurent, E., Valk, H., West, T. V., Milne, C. E., Poeppel, D., & Dikker, S. (2023) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976231163872 · Cited by 88
Gruskin, D. C., Rosenberg, M. D., & Holmes, A. J. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116217 · Cited by 86
Meshulam, M., Hasenfratz, L., Hillman, H., Liu, Y., Nguyen, M., Norman, K. A., & Hasson, U. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22202-3 · Cited by 86
Self-citationMeshulam, M., Hasenfratz, L., Hillman, H., Liu, Y.-F., Nguyen, M., Norman, K. A., & Hasson, U. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.05.05.079384 · Cited by 85
Self-citationDecoding the neural representation of story meanings across languages
Dehghani, M., Boghrati, R., Man, K., Hoover, J., Gimbel, S. I., Vaswani, A., Zevin, J. D., Immordino‐Yang, M. H., Gordon, A. S., Damásio, A. R., et al. (2017) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23814 · Cited by 83
Teacher–student neural coupling during teaching and learning
Nguyen, M., Chang, A. E., Micciche, E. T., Meshulam, M., Nastase, S. A., & Hasson, U. (2021) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsab103 · Cited by 83
Self-citationSchippers, M. B., Gazzola, V., Goebel, R., & Keysers, C. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006801 · Cited by 78
Contextual Alignment of Cognitive and Neural Dynamics
Ames, D. L., Honey, C. J., Chow, M. A., Todorov, A., & Hasson, U. (2015) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00728 · Cited by 74
Self-citationGuo, C. C., Nguyen, V. T., Hyett, M. P., Parker, G. B., & Breakspear, M. J. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep11605 · Cited by 74
Regev, M., Simony, E., Lee, K. J., Tan, K. M., Chen, J., & Hasson, U. (2018) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhy282 · Cited by 74
Self-citationWhat can narratives tell us about the neural bases of human memory?
Lee, H., Bellana, B., & Chen, J. (2020) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.02.007 · Cited by 73
Emotions amplify speaker–listener neural alignment
Smirnov, D., Saarimäki, H., Glerean, E., Hari, R., Sams, M., & Nummenmaa, L. (2019) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24736 · Cited by 71
Kaplan, J., Gimbel, S. I., Dehghani, M., Immordino‐Yang, M. H., Sagae, K., Wong, J. D., Tipper, C. M., Damásio, H., Gordon, A. S., & Damásio, A. R. (2016) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv325 · Cited by 68
Teacher-student neural coupling during teaching and learning
Nguyen, M., Chang, A., Micciche, E., Meshulam, M., Nastase, S. A., & Hasson, U. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.05.07.082958 · Cited by 67
Self-citationSocial by Default: Characterizing the Social Functions of the Resting Brain
Meyer, M. L. (2019) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721419857759 · Cited by 63
Stimulus-free thoughts induce differential activation in the human default network
Preminger, S., Harmelech, T., & Malach, R. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.036 · Cited by 59
Jääskeläinen, I. P., Pajula, J., Tohka, J., Lee, H.-J., Kuo, W.-J., & Lin, F.-H. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep27741 · Cited by 52
Chang, C. H. C., Lazaridi, C., Yeshurun, Y., Norman, K. A., & Hasson, U. (2021) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01707 · Cited by 52
Self-citationSaalasti, S., Alho, J., Bar, M., Glerean, E., Honkela, T., Kauppila, M., Sams, M., & Jääskeläinen, I. P. (2019) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.1288 · Cited by 50
Brain-to-brain synchrony between students and teachers predicts learning outcomes
Davidesco, I., Laurent, E., Valk, H., West, T., Dikker, S., Milne, C., & Poeppel, D. (2019) · doi:10.1101/644047 · Cited by 50
Hyon, R., Kleinbaum, A. M., & Parkinson, C. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116492 · Cited by 49
Dai, R., Liu, R., Liu, T., Zong, Z., Xiao, X. N., Sun, P., Yu, X., Wang, D., & Zhu, C. (2018) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsy090 · Cited by 45
Individualized psychiatric imaging based on inter-subject neural synchronization in movie watching
Yang, Z., Wu, J., Xu, L., Deng, Z.-Z., Tang, Y., Gao, J., Hu, Y., Zhang, Y., Qin, S., Li, C., et al. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116227 · Cited by 44
Leveraging shared connectivity to aggregate heterogeneous datasets into a common response space
Nastase, S. A., Liu, Y.-F., Hillman, H., Norman, K. A., & Hasson, U. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116865 · Cited by 42
Self-citationA drama movie activates brains of holistic and analytical thinkers differentially
Bacha‐Trams, M., Alexandrov, Y. I., Broman, E., Glerean, E., Kauppila, M., Kauttonen, J., Ryyppö, E., Sams, M. E., & Jääskeläinen, I. P. (2018) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsy099 · Cited by 37
Interpretation-mediated changes in neural activity during language comprehension
Cooper, E. A., Hasson, U., & Small, S. L. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.003 · Cited by 31
Self-citationNarrative comprehension beyond language: Common brain networks activated by a movie and its script
Tikka, P., Kauttonen, J., & Hlushchuk, Y. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200134 · Cited by 30
Temporal integration of narrative information in a hippocampal amnesic patient
Zuo, X., Honey, C. J., Barense, M. D., Crombie, D., Norman, K. A., Hasson, U., & Chen, J. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116658 · Cited by 30
Self-citationModeling the neurodynamic organizations and interactions of teams
Stevens, R. H., & Galloway, T. L. (2016) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2015.1056883 · Cited by 29
Differential inter-subject correlation of brain activity when kinship is a variable in moral dilemma
Bacha‐Trams, M., Glerean, E., Dunbar, R., Lahnakoski, J. M., Ryyppö, E., Sams, M. E., & Jääskeläinen, I. P. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-14323-x · Cited by 28
Consensus-building conversation leads to neural alignment
Sievers, B., Welker, C., Hasson, U., Kleinbaum, A. M., & Wheatley, T. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/562z7 · Cited by 25
Self-citationTei, S., Kauppi, J., Fujino, J., Jankowski, K. F., Kawada, R., Murai, T., & Takahashi, H. (2018) · Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1016/j.neures.2018.07.006 · Cited by 22
Heidlmayr, K. D.-M., Weber, K., Takashima, A., & Peter Hagoort, A. (2020) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2020.04.035 · Cited by 11
Chang, C. H. C., Lazaridi, C., Yeshurun, Y., et al. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.01.16.908731 · Cited by 9
Self-citationMerged Minds: Generalized Shared Reality in Interpersonal Relationships
Rossignac‐Milon, M. (2019) · doi:10.7916/d8-0a39-k290 · Cited by 2
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Serre, T. in Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience (eds Jaeger, D. & Jung, R.) 1–12 (Springer, 2013).
- Dodel, S. et al. in Foundations of Augmented Cognition. Directing the Future of Adaptive Systems (eds Schmorrow, D. D. & Fidopiastis, C. M.) 288–297 (Springer, 2011).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
20 years of the default mode network: A review and synthesis.
Menon, V. (2023) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.04.023 · Cited by 934
“…98 with neural patterns that generalize across both internally and externally driven boundaries being most strongly observed in the PCC and RSC. 47,72,99 The mechanisms by which neural representations may be transmitted and integrated to create new global states in the human brain are not yet…”
BackgroundInfluentialA Synergistic Core for Human Brain Evolution and Cognition
Luppi, A. I., Mediano, P. A. M., Rosas, F. E., Holland, N., Fryer, T. D., O’Brien, J. T., Rowe, J. B., Menon, D. K., Bor, D., & Stamatakis, E. A. (2022) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-022-01070-0 · Cited by 314
Default Mode Network Modulation by Psychedelics: A Systematic Review
Gattuso, J. J., Perkins, D., Ruffell, S., Lawrence, A. J., Hoyer, D., Jacobson, L. H., Timmermann, C., Castle, D., Rossell, S. L., Downey, L. A., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1093/ijnp/pyac074 · Cited by 256
Intrinsic neural timescales: temporal integration and segregation
Wolff, A., Berberian, N., Golesorkhi, M., Gómez‐Pilar, J., Zilio, F., & Northoff, G. (2022) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2021.11.007 · Cited by 250
The brain and its time: intrinsic neural timescales are key for input processing
Golesorkhi, M., Gomez-Pilar, J., Zilio, F., Berberian, N., Wolff, A., Yagoub, M. C. E., & Northoff, G. (2021) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-021-02483-6 · Cited by 198
Metadata
- Authors
- Yeshurun, Y., Nguyen, M., & Hasson, U.
- Affiliations
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Yeshurun, Yaara
- Hasson, Uri
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Neuroscience
- Published
- 2021-01-22
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 181-192
- ISSN
- 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
- 1471-0048
- PMC
- PMC7959111
- OpenAlex
- W3124266865
- Semantic Scholar
- 8e557932685d74b99d485eb4e7caccac4dc1394a
- Cited by
- 682
- References
- 156
- Citations by year
- 2026: 94 · 2025: 141 · 2024: 148 · 2023: 125 · 2022: 127 · 2021: 44
- FWCI
- 16.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH112566)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (DP1HD091948)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- default mode network, extrinsic information, sensemaking, shared meaning, social cognition, memory integration, narrative comprehension, naturalistic stimuli, social networks
- MeSH terms
- Default Mode Network, Animals, Cognition, Communication, Ego, Humans, Nerve Net, Nervous System Physiological Phenomena, Neural Pathways
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-05, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-05 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
