The DOI matches its Crossref record; 213 of the 213 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 92 of the 289 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory
Open accessAbstract
Self-determination theory has shaped our understanding of what optimizes worker motivation by providing insights into how work context influences basic psychological needs for competence, autonomy and relatedness. As technological innovations change the nature of work, self-determination theory can provide insight into how the resulting uncertainty and interdependence might influence worker motivation, performance and well-being. In this Review, we summarize what self-determination theory has brought to the domain of work and how it is helping researchers and practitioners to shape the future of work. We consider how the experiences of job candidates are influenced by the new technologies used to assess and select them, and how self-determination theory can help to improve candidate attitudes and performance during selection assessments. We also discuss how technology transforms the design of work and its impact on worker motivation. We then describe three cases where technology is affecting work design and examine how this might influence needs satisfaction and motivation: remote work, virtual teamwork and algorithmic management. An understanding of how future work is likely to influence the satisfaction of the psychological needs of workers and how future work can be designed to satisfy such needs is of the utmost importance to worker performance and well-being. Technology is changing the nature of work by enabling new forms of automation and communication. In this Review, Gagné et al. describe how self-determination theory can help researchers and practitioners to shape the future of work to ensure that it meets the psychological needs of workers.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
70 No full text of the sources · 59 Own interpretation · 40 Partly supported · 20 Supported · 12 Sources not found · 7 Not checked yet · 5 No basis given · 4 Supported so far · 2 Couldn’t confirm · 1 Mixed support · accuracy not yet measured
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Satisfaction of the three psychological needs described above is significantly related to more self-determined motivation8.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [8] Van den Broeck, A., Ferris, D. L., Chang, C.-H. & Rosen, C. C. A review of self-determination theory’s basic psychological needs at work. J. Manag. 42, 1195–1229 (2016). source
The RW Analyses of the Three Needs (p. 19) report that each of the three needs uniquely predicts intrinsic motivation and, broadly, identified motivation—both more self-determined forms of motivation. The paper notes that the needs explain little variance in external or introjected motivation, but the citing sentence does not claim otherwise. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Historically, automation has replaced more routine physically demanding, dangerous or repetitive work in industries such as manufacturing, with little impact on professional and managerial occupations1.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Introduction
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [1] Parker, S. K. & Grote, G. Automation, algorithms, and beyond: why work design matters more than ever in a digital world. Appl. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12241 (2020). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The sections on Job Demands and Skill Variety and Use say automation replaces heavy manual work and can take over “dull, dirty, and dangerous” tasks. The Moderators section says high-skilled and non-routine jobs fare better under technological change, but the paper does not establish that automation historically had little impact on professional and managerial occupations specifically. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“However, since the mid-2010s, automation has replaced many repetitive error-prone administrative tasks such as processing legal documents, directing service queries and employee selection screening2,3.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Introduction
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [2] Jarrahi, M. H. et al. Algorithmic management in a work context. Big Data Soc. 8, https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211020332 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The ‘Algorithmic management as a sociotechnical concept’ section (p. 2) describes CV screening and algorithmic evaluations of interviews, supporting the employee-screening example. The copy does not substantiate the mid-2010s date or the examples of processing legal documents and directing service queries. It also describes organizational choices about whether processes are replaced or augmented, rather than saying automation has replaced all the tasks listed. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [3] Langer, M. & Landers, R. N. The future of artificial intelligence at work: a review on effects of decision automation and augmentation on workers targeted by algorithms and third-party observers. Comput. Hum. Behav. 123, 106878 (2021). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Meanwhile, technological developments, largely delivered online, have radically increased the reach, scalability and variety of selection methods available to employers69.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of employee selection
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [69] Woods, S. A., Ahmed, S., Nikolaou, I., Costa, A. C. & Anderson, N. R. Personnel selection in the digital age: a review of validity and applicant reactions, and future research challenges. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 29, 64–77 (2020). source
The section on Digital Selection Procedures says technology has had a significant impact on selection through new methods and digital adaptations of existing ones, and identifies five types of digital procedure. The Online Applications section reports shorter hiring cycles, lower costs and expanded applicant pools; the Critical Appraisal section likewise says digital technology reduces barriers of distance, cost and time. Together these support the paraphrase about greater variety, scalability and reach. (LLM, conf=0.90)
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Increased robotization increases the gender pay gap216”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Future work requirements
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [216] Aksoy, C. G., Özcan, B. & Philipp, J. Robots and the gender pay gap in Europe. Eur. Econ. Rev. 134, 103693 (2021). source
The paper’s Conclusions (Section 6) explicitly state that robotization increases the gender pay gap. The finding is based on data from 20 European countries from 2006 to 2014; the authors note that it is mostly driven by countries with high initial gender inequality and outsourcing destination countries. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Adaptive (coping with and responding to change) and proactive (initiating change) performance can be promoted by satisfying the needs for competence, autonomy and relatedness, and self-determined motivation4,58.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Future work requirements
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [4] Gagné, M., Parker, S. K. & Griffin, M. A. in Research Agenda for Employee Engagement in a Changing World of Work (eds Meyer, J. P. & Schneider, B.) 137–153 (Edward Elgar, 2021).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Partly supportedcites [58] Gagné, M., Forest, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Crevier-Braud, L. & Broeck, A. The multidimensional work motivation scale: validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 24, 178–196 (2015). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Work role performance section reports positive associations between autonomous motivation and adaptive and proactive performance, and between satisfaction of all three needs and autonomous motivation. The Discussion also describes a role for motivation in promoting performance. The paper does not establish that satisfying those needs promotes adaptive or proactive performance; the reported findings are correlations, not a tested intervention or causal pathway. (LLM, conf=0.83)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“For example, the perceived job-relatedness of an assessment is associated with whether or not candidates view the assessment positively69,80.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of employee selection
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [69] Woods, S. A., Ahmed, S., Nikolaou, I., Costa, A. C. & Anderson, N. R. Personnel selection in the digital age: a review of validity and applicant reactions, and future research challenges. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 29, 64–77 (2020). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Online Applications section says applicants’ perceptions relate to system design, content, and usability, but it does not link perceived job-relatedness to positive views of an assessment. Searches for job-relatedness, job relevance, and face validity did not locate that link in our copy; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.70)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [80] Hausknecht, J. P., Day, D. V. & Thomas, S. C. Applicant reactions to selection procedures: an updated model and meta-analysis. Pers. Psychol. 57, 639–683 (2004). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The rapid growth of networks enabled by communication technologies (for example, Microsoft Teams, Slack and Webex) has produced positive and negative effects on performance and well-being.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Future work requirements
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [61] Hislop, D. et al. Variability in the use of mobile ICTs by homeworkers and its consequences for boundary management and social isolation. Inf. Organ. 25, 222–232 (2015). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 2.1 describes both benefits and drawbacks of mobile ICTs for managing work–life boundaries, and section 5.1 reports flexibility alongside social isolation among homeworkers. The paper does not establish that rapid growth of communication-technology networks caused effects on performance and well-being generally, nor does it study the named platforms. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [62] Kellogg, K. C., Orlikowski, W. J. & Yates, J. Life in the trading zone: structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organ. Sci. 17, 22–44 (2006). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [63] Lisitsa, E. et al. Loneliness among young adults during covid-19 pandemic: the mediational roles of social media use and social support seeking. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 39, 708–726 (2020). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Technology-based assessments also afford candidates the autonomy to interact with prospective employers at times and locations of their choosing70,71.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of employee selection
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [70] Lukacik, E.-R., Bourdage, J. S. & Roulin, N. Into the void: a conceptual model and research agenda for the design and use of asynchronous video interviews. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 32, 100789 (2020).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Partly supportedcites [71] Dunlop, P. D., Holtrop, D. & Wee, S. How asynchronous video interviews are used in practice: a study of an Australian-based AVI vendor. Int. J. Sel. Assess. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12372 (2022). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (p. 3) says candidates can complete an asynchronous video interview at a time and place of their choosing. That supports the claim for AVIs, but the paper does not establish it for technology-based assessments generally. It also describes AVI responses as recorded for later evaluation, rather than direct interaction with an employer. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Furthermore, video-based, virtual, gamified and AI-based assessment technologies3,72–74 have improved the fidelity and immersion of the selection process.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of employee selection
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [3] Langer, M. & Landers, R. N. The future of artificial intelligence at work: a review on effects of decision automation and augmentation on workers targeted by algorithms and third-party observers. Comput. Hum. Behav. 123, 106878 (2021). source
- Partly supportedcites [72] Armstrong, M. B., Ferrell, J. Z., Collmus, A. B. & Landers, R. N. Correcting misconceptions about gamification of assessment: more than SJTs and badges. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 9, 671–677 (2016). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The passage labeled Abstract (page unavailable) says game elements were added to computer-based simulations to make assessment more immersive and engaging. It does not establish that these technologies improved selection fidelity, and it provides no comparable finding for AI-based or video-based assessment. The paper also says further research is needed to determine whether particular game elements improve outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [73] Armstrong, M. B. Landers, R. N. & Collmus, A. B. in Emerging Research and Trends in Gamification (eds Gangadharbatla, H. & Davis, D. Z.) 140–165 (IGI Global, 2016). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [74] Kotlyar, I. & Krasman, J. Virtual simulation: new method for assessing teamwork skills. Int. J. Sel. Assess. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12368 (2021). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Because technologies have changed rapidly, research on candidates’ reactions to these new selection methods has not kept up69.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of employee selection
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [69] Woods, S. A., Ahmed, S., Nikolaou, I., Costa, A. C. & Anderson, N. R. Personnel selection in the digital age: a review of validity and applicant reactions, and future research challenges. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 29, 64–77 (2020). source
The “Applicant Reactions to DSPs” section states that research has fallen behind organizations’ rapid adoption of digital selection procedures, particularly regarding applicant perspectives. This directly supports the citing sentence; the indexed passage has no page number. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Just as time pressure can stimulate proactivity104, we should expect that technology that creates poor work design will motivate job crafting and other proactive behaviours from workers seeking to meet their psychological needs better105.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [105] Wang, B., Liu, Y. & Parker, S. K. How does the use of information communication technology affect individuals? A work design perspective. Acad. Manag. Ann. 14, 695–725 (2020). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In “An Integrative Model” (page unavailable), the paper says employees can cope with ICT-related stressors through job crafting and self-regulation. It does not say that technology-induced poor work design will motivate job crafting or other proactive behaviours, or that workers do so to meet psychological needs. (LLM, conf=0.84)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“For example, in the aviation industry, manual flying skills can become degraded due to a lack of opportunity to practice when aircraft are highly automated99, decreasing the opportunity for pilots to meet their need for competence.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [99] Haslbeck, A. & Hoermann, H.-J. Flying the needles: flight deck automation erodes fine-motor flying skills among airline pilots. Hum. Factors 58, 533–545 (2016). source
In “Previous Work investigating Pilots’ Manual Flying Skills” (p. 4), the paper says increased automation can reduce opportunities to practise manual flying and degrade performance. It also reports agreement that manual flying skills tend to decline from lack of practice as automated systems are used more. The citation is attached to that aviation claim; the statement about meeting a need for competence is the citing authors’ framing. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“These moderating factors include individual aspects, such as the level of skill an individual has or the individual’s personality.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [1] Parker, S. K. & Grote, G. Automation, algorithms, and beyond: why work design matters more than ever in a digital world. Appl. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12241 (2020). source
Table 1, in the section “Effect of Technology on Job Autonomy and Control,” explicitly lists individual-level moderators of technology’s effects on work design, including personality and skill. The “Moderators” section also discusses how skill level affects who gains autonomy benefits from technology. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Highly skilled individuals or those with proactive personalities might actively shape the technology and/or craft their work design to better meet their needs and increase their motivation1.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [1] Parker, S. K. & Grote, G. Automation, algorithms, and beyond: why work design matters more than ever in a digital world. Appl. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12241 (2020). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Moderators section says highly skilled workers have greater bargaining power to demand better work designs, while the Conclusions and Intervention Strategies section describes job crafting as employees’ self-initiated efforts to change their jobs. The Introduction also advocates adapting technology and work design to human needs. These passages support the possibility of actively shaping work, but they do not specifically link proactive personalities to doing so or say that such individuals thereby increase their motivation. (LLM, conf=0.82)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“More generally, individuals proactively seek a better fit with their job through behaviours such as idiosyncratic deals (non-standard work arrangements negotiated between an employee and an employer) and job crafting (changing one’s work design to align one’s job with personal needs, goals and skills)39,40 (Box 2).”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [39] Tims, M., Bakker, A. B. & Derks, D. Development and validation of the job crafting scale. J. Vocat. Behav. 80, 173–186 (2012). source
- Supportedcites [40] Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K. & Strauss, K. Making things happen: a model of proactive motivation. J. Manag. 36, 827–856 (2010). source
In “Proactive Goal Generation” (p. 5), the paper describes people proactively seeking a better fit by negotiating changes to their jobs. Its table (p. 30, labelled “References” in our copy) gives negotiating an i-deal and crafting job duties as examples of such behaviour. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“However, new technologies can also undermine the design of motivating work, and thus reduce workers’ need satisfaction1.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [1] Parker, S. K. & Grote, G. Automation, algorithms, and beyond: why work design matters more than ever in a digital world. Appl. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12241 (2020). source
The sections on skill variety and use and on social and relational aspects of work describe ways technology can diminish meaningful, motivating work and hinder social connection. The latter section identifies social connection as a human need, supporting the claim that such changes can reduce need satisfaction. The paper also emphasizes that technology's effects vary with its design and use. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Thus, poor work design might negatively influence work motivation through poor need satisfaction, especially the need for competence, owing to the lack of opportunity to maintain one’s skills or gain new ones2.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [2] Jarrahi, M. H. et al. Algorithmic management in a work context. Big Data Soc. 8, https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211020332 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Shifting roles section says algorithmic work design can deskill workers, leave some without training, and assign repetitive work that produces no new learning. The Algorithmic competencies section links lack of competency to reduced autonomy. Neither passage establishes the claimed pathway through competence-need satisfaction to lower work motivation. (LLM, conf=0.84)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Indeed, ‘screen’ interactions are more stressful and effortful than face-to-face interactions.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [109] Bailenson, J. N. Nonverbal overload: a theoretical argument for the causes of Zoom fatigue. Technol. Mind Behav. https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000030 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Cognitive Load section says that, compared with face-to-face interaction, Zoom users must work harder to send and receive nonverbal signals. The paper also describes potentially uncomfortable aspects of Zoom, but its Conclusion says these proposed psychological effects are largely hypothetical and have rarely been directly tested. The claim presents a broad comparison of all screen interactions as an established fact, which the paper does not support. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [110] Jun, H. & Bailenson, J. N. in International Handbook of Emotions and Media (eds Döveling, K. & Konijn, E. A.) 303–315 (Routledge, 2021). source
- Partly supportedcites [111] Ratan, R., Miller, D. B. & Bailenson, J. N. Facial appearance dissatisfaction explains differences in zoom fatigue. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 25, 124–129 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s introductory passage (page unavailable) describes videoconferencing fatigue, increased cognitive load, and psychologically taxing self-video. It does not establish that screen interactions generally are more stressful or effortful than face-to-face interactions; its reported camera-on comparison is with camera-off virtual meetings, not in-person meetings. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Partly supportedcites [112] Riedl, R. On the stress potential of videoconferencing: definition and root causes of Zoom fatigue. Electron. Mark. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00501-3 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In Discussion > Implications for practice (page unavailable), the paper says videoconferencing may require more cognitive effort than face-to-face interaction. Root causes of Zoom fatigue > Unnatural interaction with multiple faces (page unavailable) describes a possible source of stress. The claim broadens these qualified points about videoconferencing to all screen interactions and states them as an unqualified comparison. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Technology can potentially influence work design and therefore employee motivation in positive ways1.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [1] Parker, S. K. & Grote, G. Automation, algorithms, and beyond: why work design matters more than ever in a digital world. Appl. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12241 (2020). source
In “A Central Role for Work Design” (page not supplied), the paper says technology can affect work design positively or negatively and identifies motivation as an outcome of work characteristics. It also says organizations can make choices that improve technology’s effect on work design and, consequently, on important outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.92)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“For example, within manufacturing, complex production systems in which cyber-machines are connected in a factory-wide information network require strategic human decision-makers operating in complex, varied and high-level autonomy jobs98.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [98] Waschull, S., Bokhorst, J. A. C., Molleman, E. & Wortmann, J. C. Work design in future industrial production: transforming towards cyber-physical systems. Comput. Ind. Eng. 139, 105679 (2020). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 4.1.1 says factory-scale cyber-physical systems can shift human work toward more complex, broader-scope decisions, and the Discussion says humans remain important for supervision of complex automated processes. But the Abstract and sections 4.1.3 and 4.2 say job autonomy and the grouping of tasks depend on technical design and management choices; they do not say such systems necessarily require all human decision-makers to hold complex, varied, high-autonomy jobs. The paper assigns strategic decisions about automation and job design to management. (LLM, conf=0.87)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Virtual work can also present challenges for meeting workers’ need for relatedness141.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [141] Charalampous, M., Grant, C. A., Tramontano, C. & Michailidis, E. Systematically reviewing remote e-workers’ well-being at work: a multidimensional approach. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 28, 51–73 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Social well-being dimension section identifies social isolation and reduced informal interaction with colleagues as concerns for remote e-workers. The Practical Implications section recommends support networks and face-to-face contact to address isolation. Together, these passages support the claim that virtual work can make relatedness harder to meet. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“For example, Israeli employees with autism who had to work from home during the COVID-19 pandemic experienced significantly lower competence and autonomy satisfaction than before the pandemic149.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [149] Goldfarb, Y., Gal, E. & Golan, O. Implications of employment changes caused by COVID-19 on mental health and work-related psychological need satisfaction of autistic employees: a mixed-methods longitudinal study. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 52, 89–102 (2022). source
The Abstract reports that Israeli autistic employees who transitioned to remote work from home had a significant decrease in satisfaction of the work-related needs for competence and autonomy. It describes a longitudinal comparison of survey responses before and during COVID-19. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Finally, reduced mobility from having to stay in the camera frame has been shown to reduce individual performance relative to face-to-face meetings109–112.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [109] Bailenson, J. N. Nonverbal overload: a theoretical argument for the causes of Zoom fatigue. Technol. Mind Behav. https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000030 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Reduced Mobility section says staying in camera view limits movement and cites studies linking movement to better performance. It does not report a study showing that this camera-related restriction reduces individual performance compared with face-to-face meetings; that is an inference from the evidence it discusses. The supplied passages do not give page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [110] Jun, H. & Bailenson, J. N. in International Handbook of Emotions and Media (eds Döveling, K. & Konijn, E. A.) 303–315 (Routledge, 2021). source
- Partly supportedcites [111] Ratan, R., Miller, D. B. & Bailenson, J. N. Facial appearance dissatisfaction explains differences in zoom fatigue. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 25, 124–129 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The introductory passage labeled Abstract (page unavailable) identifies reduced mobility as a theorized contributor to virtual-meeting fatigue and says that fatigue can harm productivity. It does not show that staying in camera frame reduces individual performance, or compare performance with face-to-face meetings. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Could not verifycites [112] Riedl, R. On the stress potential of videoconferencing: definition and root causes of Zoom fatigue. Electron. Mark. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00501-3 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Study context section says participants are typically visible only from the face or torso, and Implications for practice raises changes in body position as a question about stress. Neither passage says that staying in the camera frame restricts mobility or that such restriction reduces individual performance relative to face-to-face meetings. Searches for mobility, camera-frame restrictions, and individual performance found no passage addressing that link. (LLM, conf=0.74)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“However, managers and organizations might rob workers of this autonomy by closely monitoring them, for example by checking their computer or phone usage123.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [123] Parent-Rocheleau, X. & Parker, S. K. Algorithms as work designers: how algorithmic management influences the design of jobs. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100838 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The 'Algorithmic monitoring' section says monitoring can reduce workers' autonomy in choosing their work methods and lists internet browser history among the information systems can collect. This supports the general claim and a computer-use example, but the passages do not identify checking phone usage as an example. (LLM, conf=0.82)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“This can make it harder for employees to acquire and share information53.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [53] Yang, L. et al. The effects of remote work on collaboration among information workers. Nat. Hum. Behav. 6, 43–54 (2022). source
Section B states that remote work made collaboration networks more static and siloed and concludes that these effects may make it harder for employees to acquire and share new information. The citing sentence preserves that qualified conclusion. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“For example, the transition to working from home made employees question how and why they work234.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [234] Hopkins, J. C. & Figaro, K. A. The great resignation: an argument for hybrid leadership. Int. J. Bus. Manag. Res. 9, 393–400 (2021). source
The Abstract says that workers re-evaluated their lives and priorities after pandemic lockdowns and newfound freedoms, and that many no longer wanted to return to inflexible, in-person work. Read alongside its account of the shift to home working, this supports the claim as a paraphrase. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Moreover, the technical complexity and opacity of algorithmic systems187–189 deprives workers of the ability to understand and master the system that governs their work, which limits their voice and enpowerment172,185,190.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Algorithmic management
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [187] Anthony, C. When knowledge work and analytical technologies collide: the practices and consequences of black boxing algorithmic technologies. Adm. Sci. Q. 66, 1173–1212 (2021). source
- Partly supportedcites [188] Zednik, C. Solving the black box problem: a normative framework for explainable artificial intelligence. Phil. Technol. 34, 265–288 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 3.1 identifies bank employees as operators and decision-makers, and §3.2 says a lack of relevant knowledge can prevent them from performing those roles. The paper does not establish the broader claim that opaque systems governing workers’ work limit their voice or empowerment. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [189] Schlicker, N. et al. What to expect from opening up ‘black boxes’? Comparing perceptions of justice between human and automated agents. Comput. Hum. Behav. 122, 106837 (2021). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [172] Gal, U., Jensen, T. B. & Stein, M.-K. Breaking the vicious cycle of algorithmic management: a virtue ethics approach to people analytics. Inf. Organ. 30, 100301 (2020). source
- Partly supportedcites [185] Duggan, J., Sherman, U., Carbery, R. & McDonnell, A. Algorithmic management and app-work in the gig economy: a research agenda for employment relations and HRM. Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 30, 114–132 (2020). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 4.3 (Performance management; page unavailable) reports limited transparency about how work-assignment algorithms are changed. Section 4.1 (Employment relations; page unavailable) says workers in a power imbalance can struggle to have their voice heard, and section 4.2 describes constrained autonomy. The paper does not establish the claimed causal chain in which technical complexity prevents workers from understanding and mastering the system, thereby limiting their voice and empowerment. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Partly supportedcites [190] Terry, E., Marks, A., Dakessian, A. & Christopoulos, D. Emotional labour and the autonomy of dependent self-employed workers: the limitations of digital managerial control in the home credit sector. Work Employ. Soc. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017020979504 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In “Digitalisation and algorithmic management in home credit” (pp. 9–10), the paper reports that algorithmic lending decisions reduced agents’ input and autonomy, although agents could sometimes request a review. It does not attribute that reduction to technical complexity or opacity, or say that workers cannot understand or master the system; nor does it establish a resulting loss of voice or empowerment. (LLM, conf=0.85)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Specifically, whether algorithmic management systems consider human motivational factors in their design influences whether workers are given enough autonomy, skills usage, task variety, social contact, role clarity (including knowing the impact of one’s work) and a manageable workload123.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Algorithmic management
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [123] Parent-Rocheleau, X. & Parker, S. K. Algorithms as work designers: how algorithmic management influences the design of jobs. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100838 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The introduction and the section on job resources and demands describe how algorithmic-management design can shape autonomy, task variety, social support, role clarity and workload. The paper discusses job complexity and problem-solving opportunities, but does not specifically establish skills usage as an outcome. It also treats knowing the impact of one’s work as task significance, not as part of role clarity. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Algorithmic management tends to foster the ‘working-for-data’ phenomenon (or datafication of work)172,178,179, leading workers to focus their efforts on aspects of work that are being monitored and quantified at the expense of other tasks that might be more personally valued or meaningful.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Algorithmic management
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [172] Gal, U., Jensen, T. B. & Stein, M.-K. Breaking the vicious cycle of algorithmic management: a virtue ethics approach to people analytics. Inf. Organ. 30, 100301 (2020). source
- Partly supportedcites [178] Schafheitle, S. et al. No stone left unturned? Toward a framework for the impact of datafication technologies on organizational control. Acad. Manag. Discov. 6, 455–487 (2020). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The 'Framework on Datafication Technology Control Configurations' section (page unavailable) says tracking technologies can align employee behavior with prescribed patterns and performance targets. It does not say that workers consequently prioritize monitored, quantified tasks at the expense of other work, or describe that trade-off as 'working-for-data.' (LLM, conf=0.78)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [179] Norlander, P., Jukic, N., Varma, A. & Nestorov, S. The effects of technological supervision on gig workers: organizational control and motivation of Uber, taxi, and limousine drivers. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 32, 4053–4077 (2021). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Need-satisfying leadership, such as transformational leadership (charismatic or inspirational)15, can encourage job crafting and other proactive work behaviours198,199.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Summary and future directions
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [15] Hetland, H., Hetland, J., Andreassen, C. S., Pallessen, S. & Notelaers, G. Leadership and fulfillment of the three basic psychological needs at work. Career Dev. Int. 16, 507–523 (2011). source
- Supportedcites [198] Hetland, J., Hetland, H., Bakker, A. B. & Demerouti, E. Daily transformational leadership and employee job crafting: the role of promotion focus. Eur. Manag. J. 36, 746–756 (2018). source
Section 4.1 reports a positive relationship between transformational leadership and daily proactive job crafting, and describes transformational leaders as important to the initiation of proactive behaviour more generally. The Conclusion says leaders who inspire, stimulate and attend to followers’ individual needs encourage them to take responsibility for their working conditions; the job-crafting relationship was particularly strong among followers high in promotion focus. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [199] Schmitt, A., Den Hartog, D. N. & Belschak, F. D. Transformational leadership and proactive work behaviour: a moderated mediation model including work engagement and job strain. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 89, 588–610 (2016). source
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Workers’ typical response to the lack of transparency is to organize themselves on social media to share any insights they have on what the algorithm ‘wants’ as a way to gain back some control over their work183,191.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Algorithmic management
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [183] Goods, C., Veen, A. & Barratt, T. “Is your gig any good?” Analysing job quality in the Australian platform-based food-delivery sector. J. Ind. Relat. 61, 502–527 (2019). source
- Supportedcites [191] Gregory, K. ‘My life is more valuable than this’: understanding risk among on-demand food couriers in Edinburgh. Work Employ. Soc. 35, 316–331 (2021). source
In “Epistemic risks: Lack of transparency” (p. 13), the paper says riders turn to one another to explore how the platform works, including across social media and WhatsApp, and seek clarity to help navigate their work. The Conclusion (p. 14) likewise says workers turn to one another to fill gaps in their understanding. The claim describes this as a way to regain control, not as proof that they succeeded. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The evidence so far suggests that the mostly comparative feedback provided by algorithmic management is insufficiently informative because the value of the feedback is short-lived — continuously updating algorithms change what is required to perform well177,183,185.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Algorithmic management
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [177] Stark, D. & Pais, I. Algorithmic management in the platform economy. Sociologica 14, 47–72 (2020).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [183] Goods, C., Veen, A. & Barratt, T. “Is your gig any good?” Analysing job quality in the Australian platform-based food-delivery sector. J. Ind. Relat. 61, 502–527 (2019). source
- Partly supportedcites [185] Duggan, J., Sherman, U., Carbery, R. & McDonnell, A. Algorithmic management and app-work in the gig economy: a research agenda for employment relations and HRM. Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 30, 114–132 (2020). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“At the same time, linking rewards to this feedback could decrease intrinsic motivation, because the contingency between work behaviour and pay limits worker discretion and therefore reduces their autonomy26.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Algorithmic management
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [26] Deci, E. L., Koestner, R. & Ryan, R. M. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychol. Bull. 125, 627–668 (1999). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The discussion on pp. 628–629 says performance-contingent rewards can feel controlling and tend to undermine intrinsic motivation; the conclusion on pp. 658–659 says reward contingencies can forestall self-regulation. These passages support the proposed mechanism, but the paper does not establish that linking workers’ pay to feedback specifically limits their discretion or reduces their autonomy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Sociotechnical aspects of the system2,209 (such as transparency, privacy, accuracy, invasiveness and human control) and organizational policies surrounding their use could mitigate the motivational effects of algorithmic management.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Summary and future directions
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [2] Jarrahi, M. H. et al. Algorithmic management in a work context. Big Data Soc. 8, https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211020332 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The sections “Algorithmic management as a sociotechnical concept” and “Overcoming opacity” describe how organizational choices shape these systems and how policies and stakeholder participation can address opacity. The paper also reports that retaining control can reduce algorithm aversion. These passages support the relevance of system design and organizational policy, but they do not establish that those factors mitigate motivational effects specifically. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Partly supportedcites [209] Makarius, E. E., Mukherjee, D., Fox, J. D. & Fox, A. K. Rising with the machines: a sociotechnical framework for bringing artificial intelligence into the organization. J. Bus. Res. 120, 262–273 (2020). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Sections 4.1 and 4.4 say that informing employees and using a structured approach to AI integration may alleviate negative expectations and improve psychological outcomes. Section 2.3 also links acceptance of AI to system design and the implementing institution. The paper does not specifically say that transparency, privacy, accuracy, invasiveness, human control, or organizational policies mitigate the motivational effects of algorithmic management; pages are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“For example, giving autonomy and empowering virtual teams is crucial for good team performance206.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Summary and future directions
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [206] Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P. E. & Gibson, C. B. The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: the moderating role of face-to-face interaction. Acad. Manage. J. 47, 175–192 (2004). source
In the discussion of the results, the authors recommend increasing team empowerment to improve virtual teams’ processes and customer satisfaction. The paper also identifies autonomy as a dimension of empowerment and calls empowerment a critical predictor of virtual team performance. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
In the paper
“Thus, work requirements for employees are increasingly encompassing tasks that cannot be readily automated, such as interpersonal negotiations and service innovations4: in other words, work that cannot be easily achieved through algorithms.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [4] Gagné, M., Parker, S. K. & Griffin, M. A. in Research Agenda for Employee Engagement in a Changing World of Work (eds Meyer, J. P. & Schneider, B.) 137–153 (Edward Elgar, 2021).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“According to self-determination theory5,6, three psychological needs must be fulfilled to adequately motivate workers and ensure that they perform optimally and experience well-being.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [5] Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. Intrinsic motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior (Plenum, 1985). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [6] Gagné, M. & Deci, E. L. Self-determination theory and work motivation. J. Organ. Behav. 26, 331–362 (2005). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“According to meta-analytic evidence, more self-determined (that is, intrinsic or more internalized) motivation is more positively associated with key attitudinal and performance outcomes, such as job satisfaction, organizational commitment, job performance and proactivity than more controlled motivation (that is, extrinsic or less internalized)10.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [10] Van den Broeck, A., Howard, J. L., Van Vaerenbergh, Y., Leroy, H. & Gagné, M. Beyond intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: a meta-analysis on self-determination theory’s multidimensional conceptualization of work motivation. Organ. Psychol. Rev. 11, 240–273 (2021). source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For example, initial research shows that people perceive fewer opportunities to demonstrate their strengths and capabilities in interviews they know will be evaluated by AI, compared to those evaluated by humans83.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of employee selection
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [83] Langer, M., König, C. J. & Hemsing, V. Is anybody listening? The impact of automatically evaluated job interviews on impression management and applicant reactions. J. Manag. Psychol. 35, 271–284 (2020). source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Moreover, technologies and automation can lead to the loss of human competencies as people stop using these skills64–67.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Future work requirements
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [64] Bhardwaj, S., Bhattacharya, S., Tang, L. & Howell, K. E. Technology introduction on ships: the tension between safety and economic rationality. Saf. Sci. 115, 329–338 (2019). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [65] Rani, U. & Furrer, M. Digital labour platforms and new forms of flexible work in developing countries: algorithmic management of work and workers. Compet. Change 25, 212–236 (2021). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [66] Schörpf, P., Flecker, J., Schönauer, A. & Eichmann, H. Triangular love–hate: management and control in creative crowdworking. N. Technol. Work Employ. 32, 43–58 (2017). source
- Not matchedcites [67] World Economic Forum. The future of jobs: employment, skills and workforce strategy for the fourth industrial revolution. WEF https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs (2016).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“First, the digital divide (unequal access to, and ability to use, information communication technologies)51 is likely to be exacerbated by technological advances that might become more costly and require more specialized skills.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Future work requirements
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [51] Van Dijk, J. The Digital Divide (Wiley, 2020).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“However, networking platforms lead some individuals to experience more isolation rather than more connectedness63.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Future work requirements
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [63] Lisitsa, E. et al. Loneliness among young adults during covid-19 pandemic: the mediational roles of social media use and social support seeking. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 39, 708–726 (2020). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We expect that it would be difficult for candidates to evaluate the job-relatedness of this information, unless provided with a rationale.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of employee selection
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Immersion is enhanced by richer media and gamified assessment elements75,76.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of employee selection
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [75] Alexander, A. L., Brunyé, T. T., Sidman, J. & Weil, S. A. From Gaming to Training: A Review of Studies on Fidelity, Immersion, Presence, and Buy-in and Their Effects on Transfer in PC-Based Simulations and Games (DARWARS Training Impact Group, 2005).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [76] Buil, I., Catalán, S. & Martínez, E. Understanding applicants’ reactions to gamified recruitment. J. Bus. Res. 110, 41–50 (2020). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Both uncertainty and interdependence will challenge people’s feelings of competence.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Future work requirements
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated work inequalities by providing better opportunities to those with digital access and skills210,211.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Future work requirements
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [210] Lythreatis, S., Singh, S. K. & El-Kassar, A.-N. The digital divide: a review and future research agenda. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 175, 121359 (2021). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [211] Lai, J. & Widmar, N. O. Revisiting the digital divide in the COVID-19 era. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 43, 458–464 (2021). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Candidates with a poor understanding of what data are being collected and how they are being used might experience a technology-based selection process as autonomy-thwarting.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of employee selection
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Both adaptivity and proactivity depend on individuals having sufficient autonomy to work differently, try new ideas and negotiate multiple pathways to success.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Future work requirements
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“However, with today’s technology, assessments that appear typical or basic (such as a test or short recorded interview response) might also involve the collection of additional ‘trace’ data such as mouse movements and clicks (in the case of tests), or ancillary information such as ‘micro-expressions’ or candidates’ video backdrops81.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of employee selection
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [81] Auer, E. M., Mersy, G., Marin, S., Blaik, J. & Landers, R. N. Using machine learning to model trace behavioral data from a game-based assessment. Int. J. Sel. Assess. 30, 82–102 (2021). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Future work is likely to exacerbate inequalities.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Future work requirements
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Furthermore, if candidates do not understand how technology-driven assessments work and are not able to receive feedback from assessment systems, their need for competence may be thwarted83.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of employee selection
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [83] Langer, M., König, C. J. & Hemsing, V. Is anybody listening? The impact of automatically evaluated job interviews on impression management and applicant reactions. J. Manag. Psychol. 35, 271–284 (2020). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Nonetheless, to the extent that test-related and technology-related anxiety influences motivation and performance when completing an online assessment or a video interview, the performance of applicants might be adversely affected85.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of employee selection
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [85] Vansteenkiste, M. et al. Autonomous and controlled regulation of performance-approach goals: their relations to perfectionism and educational outcomes. Motiv. Emot. 34, 333–353 (2010). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, because candidates are increasingly interacting with systems, rather than people, their opportunities to build relatedness with employers might be stifled.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of employee selection
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“and this gap is likely to be exacerbated as remote working becomes more common (as was shown during the pandemic)217.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Future work requirements
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [217] Madgavkar, A., White, O., Krishnan, M., Mahajan, D. & Azcue, X. COVID-19 and gender equality: countering the regressive effects. McKinseyhttps://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-work/covid-19-and-gender-equality-countering-the-regressive-effects (2020).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The nature of different communication technologies can both increase and decrease feelings of relatedness depending on the extent to which they promote meaningful interactions.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Future work requirements
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Hence, successful organizational functioning depends on people who can act autonomously to regulate their behaviour in response to a more unpredictable and changing environment31,54,59.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Future work requirements
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [31] Parker, S. K., Wall, T. D. & Jackson, P. R. ‘That’s not my job’: developing flexible employee work orientations. Acad. Manage. J. 40, 899–929 (1997). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [54] Griffin, M. A., Neal, A. & Parker, S. K. A new model of work role performance: positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Acad. Manage. J. 50, 327–347 (2007). source
- Not matchedcites [59] Wall, T. D. & Jackson, P. R. in The Changing Nature of Work (ed. Howard, A.) 139–174 (Jossey-Bass, 1995).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For example, one study found that salaries did not increase as much for women working flexibly compared to men218;”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Future work requirements
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [218] Glass, J. Blessing or curse? Work–family policies and mother’s wage growth over time. Work Occup. 31, 367–394 (2004). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“As another example, technology has enabled the introduction of ‘microwork’ in which jobs are broken down into small tasks that are then carried out via information communication technologies100.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [100] Lehdonvirta, V. & Ernkvist, M. Knowledge Map of the Virtual Economy: Converting the Virtual Economy into Development Potential (World Bank, 2011). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Core aspects of work design, including decision-making power, the opportunity to use skills and do a variety of tasks, the ability to ascertain the impact of one’s work, performance feedback90, social contact, time pressure, emotional demands and role conflict91 are important predictors of job satisfaction, job performance92 and work motivation93.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [90] Hackman, J. R. & Oldham, G. R. Development of the job diagnostics survey. J. Appl. Psychol. 60, 159–170 (1975). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [91] Parker, S. K., Wall, T. D. & Cordery, J. L. Future work design research and practice: towards an elaborated model of work design. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 74, 413–440 (2001). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [92] Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D. & Morgeson, F. P. Integrating motivational, social and contextual work design features: a meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. J. Appl. Psychol. 92, 1332–1356 (2007). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A more human-centred approach could have prevented the considerable negative outcomes that followed (including friction, reduced morale, loss of motivation, errors and impaired performance)107.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [107] Kadir, B. A. & Broberg, O. Human-centered design of work systems in the transition to industry 4.0. Appl. Ergon. 92, 103334 (2021). source
hedgedconditionalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, supporting psychological needs during training, development and career transitions is likely to assist people in crafting successful careers.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The consequence of this observation is that people will need to increasingly interact with machines as part of their jobs.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Some evidence suggests that these motivating characteristics (considered ‘job resources’ according to the jobs demands–resources model)94 are especially important for fostering motivation or reducing strain when job demands (aspects of a job that require sustained physical, emotional or mental effort) are high93,95.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [93] Gagné, M. & Panaccio, A. in Oxford Handbook of Employee Engagement, Motivation, and Self-Determination Theory (ed. Gagné, M.) 165–180 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2014). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [95] Bakker, A. B. & Demerouti, E. Job demands–resources theory: taking stock and looking forward. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 22, 273–285 (2017). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Leaving the less routine and more interesting tasks for people to do97 increases the opportunity for workers to fulfill their need for competence.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [97] Walsh, S. M. & Strano, M. S. Robotic Systems and Autonomous Platforms (Woodhead, 2019).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Employment stability is expected to continue to decline with the growth of gig work and continued technological developments219,220.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [219] Valletta, R. G. Declining job security. J. Labor. Econ. 17, S170–S197 (1999). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [220] Givord, P. & Maurin, E. Changes in job security and their causes: an empirical analysis for France, 1982–2002. Eur. Econ. Rev. 48, 595–615 (2004). source
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For example, in one case study107, several new digital technologies such as cobots and digital paper flow (systems that integrate and automate different organizational functions, such as sales and purchasing with accounting, inventory control and dispatch) were implemented following a strong technocentric approach (that is, highly focused on engineering solutions) with little worker participation,”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [107] Kadir, B. A. & Broberg, O. Human-centered design of work systems in the transition to industry 4.0. Appl. Ergon. 92, 103334 (2021). source
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For this reason, the concept of a protean career, whereby people have an adaptive and self-directed career, is likely to be increasingly important223.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [223] Gubler, M., Arnold, J. & Coombs, C. Reassessing the protean career concept: empirical findings, conceptual components, and measurement. J. Organ. Behav. 35, S23–S40 (2014). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, people have greater self-awareness when they feel autonomous.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For example, tech-savvy Uber drivers subject to algorithmic management sometimes resist or game the system, such as by cancelling rides to avoid negative ratings from passengers103.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [103] Mohlmann, M. & Zalmanson, L. in Proc. Int. Conf. Inf. Syst. 1–17 (ICIS, 2017).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nonetheless, career-related adaptive and proactive behaviours can be encouraged by satisfying psychological needs.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Virtual work engenders uncertainty because workplace and interpersonal cues are less available or reliable in providing virtual employees with role clarity and ensuring smooth interactions.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For example, autonomy and social support can reduce the effect of workload on negative outcomes such as exhaustion96.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [96] Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E. & Euwema, M. C. Job resources buffer the impact of job demands on burnout. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 10, 170–180 (2005). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, there are risks that technology that is needs-thwarting or is implemented in a needs-thwarting manner, will add to the uncertainty already inherent in competitive job applications.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of employee selection
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“However, the reality is that tasks within jobs are being influenced by digitalization rather than whole jobs being replaced87.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [87] Jesuthasan, R. & Boudreau, J. W. Reinventing Jobs: A Four-Step Approach for Applying Automation to Work (Harvard Business, 2018).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“The rise of more precarious work and new employment relationships (for example, in gig work) adds to these career challenges221.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [221] Baruch, Y. & Vardi, Y. A fresh look at the dark side of contemporary careers: toward a realistic discourse. Br. J. Manag. 27, 355–372 (2016). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In fact, protean careers tend to flourish in environments that provide autonomy and allow for proactivity, with support for competence and learning223,226.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [223] Gubler, M., Arnold, J. & Coombs, C. Reassessing the protean career concept: empirical findings, conceptual components, and measurement. J. Organ. Behav. 35, S23–S40 (2014). source
- Not matchedcites [226] Hall, D. T. & Mirvis, P. H. in The Career Is Dead — Long Live The Career: A Relational Approach To Careers (ed. Hall, D. T.) 15–45 (Jossey-Bass, 1996).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Technology (such as social media) can also enhance social contact and support in some jobs and under some circumstances86,87 (but see ref.63), increasing opportunities for meeting relatedness needs.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [86] McCarthy, J. M. et al. Applicant perspectives during selection: a review addressing “so what?,” “what’s new?,” and “where to next?” J. Manag. 43, 1693–1725 (2017). source
- Not matchedcites [87] Jesuthasan, R. & Boudreau, J. W. Reinventing Jobs: A Four-Step Approach for Applying Automation to Work (Harvard Business, 2018).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Information communication technology might satisfy competence needs by increasing access to global information and communication and the ability to analyse data136.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [136] Day, A., Barber, L. K. & Tonet, J. in The Cambridge Handbook of Technology and Employee Behavior (ed. Landers, R. N.) 580–607 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2019). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, it is likely that this balance will be affected by individual characteristics and desires, as well as by differences in work roles and goals.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This effect will probably be accentuated in the future: if the current trend for working from home continues, more people will be dissociated from office social environments more often and indefinitely.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The current trend for working from home will continue.
In the paper
“This calls for more self-regulation115 because employees must structure their daily work activities and remind themselves of their work priorities and goals, without relying on the physical presence of colleagues or managers.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [115] Raghuram, S., Wiesenfeld, B. & Garud, R. Technology enabled work: the role of self-efficacy in determining telecommuter adjustment and structuring behavior. J. Vocat. Behav. 63, 180–198 (2003). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Surveillance has been shown to decrease self-determined motivation127.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [127] Enzle, M. E. & Anderson, S. C. Surveillant intentions and intrinsic motivation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 64, 257–266 (1993). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Furthermore, the internet allows people to connect rapidly and asynchronously with experts around the world, who may be able to provide information needed to solve a work problem that local colleagues cannot help with136.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [136] Day, A., Barber, L. K. & Tonet, J. in The Cambridge Handbook of Technology and Employee Behavior (ed. Landers, R. N.) 580–607 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2019). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Lower-quality virtual communication between managers and colleagues can leave individuals unclear about their goals and priorities, and how they should achieve them114.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [114] Raghuram, S., Garud, R., Wiesenfeld, B. & Gupta, V. Factors contributing to virtual work adjustment. J. Manag. 27, 383–405 (2001). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The frustration of the need for competence can increase if individuals are constantly switching tasks to deal with overwhelming correspondence and failing to finish tasks in a timely manner.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This type of close monitoring reflects a lack of manager trust in individuals’ abilities or intentions to work effectively remotely.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition to affecting individual performance, need satisfaction within virtual teams can also influence collective-level team processes, such as coordination and trust, which ultimately affect team performance.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual teamwork
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, the combination of telling workers what to do to reach performance targets and how to get it done significantly limits their autonomy to make decisions based on their knowledge and skills.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Algorithmic management
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“This lack of need satisfaction might lead people to take advantage of the disruption to ‘cut their losses’ by reorienting their life priorities and career goals, leading to resignation from their current jobs237,238.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [237] Richer, S. F., Blanchard, C. & Vallerand, R. J. A motivational model of work turnover. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 32, 2089–2113 (2002). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [238] Gillet, N., Gagné, M., Sauvagère, S. & Fouquereau, E. The role of supervisor autonomy support, organizational support, and autonomous and controlled motivation in predicting employees’ satisfaction and turnover intentions. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 22, 450–460 (2013). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Notably, these dimensions are not completely independent because team members require technology to communicate and coordinate tasks when working in different locations156,157.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual teamwork
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [156] Lautsch, B. A. & Kossek, E. E. Managing a blended workforce: telecommuters and non-telecommuters. Organ. Dyn. 40, 10–17 (2011). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [157] Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., DeChurch, L. A., Jimenez-Rodriguez, M., Wildman, J. & Shuffler, M. A meta-analytic investigation of virtuality and information sharing in teams. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process 115, 214–225 (2011). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Career shocks can trigger a sensemaking process that can lead one to question how time is spent at work and the benefits one draws from it.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Although individual team members might react differently to working in a virtual team, multi-level theory suggests that team members collectively develop shared experiences, called team emergent states159,160.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual teamwork
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [159] Chen, G. & Kanfer, R. Toward a systems theory of motivated behavior in work teams. Res. Organ. Behav. 27, 223–267 (2006). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [160] Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E. & Zaccaro, S. J. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Acad. Manage. Rev. 26, 356–376 (2001). source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The constant updating of the algorithms as more data is collected and the opacity of this process makes algorithmic management unpredictable, which produces more uncertainty for workers177.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Algorithmic management
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [177] Stark, D. & Pais, I. Algorithmic management in the platform economy. Sociologica 14, 47–72 (2020).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, working in a virtual team might make it more difficult to feel meaningful connections because team members in different locations often have less contact than co-located team members.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual teamwork
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Team emergent states, particularly team trust, are critical for virtual team effectiveness because reliance on technology often brings uncertainties and fewer opportunities for social control165.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual teamwork
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [165] Breuer, C., Hüffmeier, J. & Hertel, G. Does trust matter more in virtual teams? A meta-analysis of trust and team effectiveness considering virtuality and documentation as moderators. J. Appl. Psychol. 101, 1151–1177 (2016). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Being stretched to the limit might influence the need for competence and relatedness when workers feel they have suboptimal ways to connect with colleagues and insufficient time to balance work with other life activities that connect them to family and friends128,236.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [128] Senécal, C., Vallerand, R. J. & Guay, F. Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict: toward a motivational model. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 27, 176–186 (2001). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [236] Warner, M. A. & Hausdorf, P. A. The positive interaction of work and family roles: using need theory to further understand the work–family interface. J. Manag. Psychol. 24, 372–385 (2009). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In sum, virtual team members might experience lower relatedness and competence need satisfaction.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual teamwork
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Team virtuality is likely to affect team functioning via its impact on psychological need satisfaction, in a fashion similar to remote work.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual teamwork
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Frustrations with electronic communication might diminish the psychological need for competence because team members might feel ineffective in mastering their environment.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual teamwork
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“So far, empirical evidence show that algorithmic management features predominantly reduce employees’ basic needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness because of how they influence work design (Fig. 4).”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Algorithmic management
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This tendency is reinforced by the fact that algorithms are updated with new incoming data, increasing the need for workers to pay close attention to what ‘pays off’ at any given moment.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Algorithmic management
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Yet remote workers high in emotional stability and job autonomy reported higher autonomy and relatedness satisfaction compared to those with low emotional stability120.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [120] Perry, S. J., Rubino, C. & Hunter, E. M. Stress in remote work: two studies testing the demand-control-person model. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 27, 577–593 (2018). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“However, it is rapidly spreading to traditional work settings. Examples include monitoring the productivity, activity and emotions of remote workers174, the algorithmic determination of truck drivers’ routes and time targets175, and automated schedule creation in retail settings176.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Algorithmic management
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [174] Charbonneau, É. & Doberstein, C. An empirical assessment of the intrusiveness and reasonableness of emerging work surveillance technologies in the public sector. Public Adm. Rev. 80, 780–791 (2020). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [175] Levy, K. E. C. The contexts of control: information, power, and truck-driving work. Inf. Soc. 31, 160–174 (2015). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [176] Vargas, T. L. Consumer redlining and the reproduction of inequality at dollar general. Qual. Sociol. 44, 205–229 (2021). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Increased competitive climates due to comparative feedback or displaying team members’ individual rankings175,196 can also hamper relatedness.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Algorithmic management
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [175] Levy, K. E. C. The contexts of control: information, power, and truck-driving work. Inf. Soc. 31, 160–174 (2015). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [196] Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A. An ethical perspective on emerging forms of ubiquitous IT-based control. J. Bus. Ethics 142, 139–154 (2017). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“However, gamification features on some platforms might increase intrinsic motivation179,183.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Algorithmic management
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [179] Norlander, P., Jukic, N., Varma, A. & Nestorov, S. The effects of technological supervision on gig workers: organizational control and motivation of Uber, taxi, and limousine drivers. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 32, 4053–4077 (2021). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [183] Goods, C., Veen, A. & Barratt, T. “Is your gig any good?” Analysing job quality in the Australian platform-based food-delivery sector. J. Ind. Relat. 61, 502–527 (2019). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Within non-virtual teams, need satisfaction is influenced by the extent to which team members exhibit need-supportive behaviours towards each other205.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Summary and future directions
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [205] Jungert, T., Van den Broeck, A., Schreurs, B. & Osterman, U. How colleagues can support each other’s needs and motivation: an intervention on employee work motivation. Appl. Psychol. 67, 3–29 (2018). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Indeed, when workers have to compete against each other to rank highly (which influences their chances of getting future work and the financial incentives they receive), they are less likely to develop trusting and supportive relationships.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Algorithmic management
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This short-lived feedback can undermine feelings of mastery or competence.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Algorithmic management
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In sum, it is not algorithms that shape workers’ motivation, but how organizations design and use them3.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Summary and future directions
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [3] Langer, M. & Landers, R. N. The future of artificial intelligence at work: a review on effects of decision automation and augmentation on workers targeted by algorithms and third-party observers. Comput. Hum. Behav. 123, 106878 (2021). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 38
- It may state two separate claims as one. 85
Some cited sources support this claim and some don’t — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Most research conceptualizes team virtuality as a construct with two dimensions: geographical dispersion and reliance on technology153,155.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual teamwork
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [153] Raghuram, S., Hill, N. S., Gibbs, J. L. & Maruping, L. M. Virtual work: bridging research clusters. Acad. Manag. Ann. 13, 308–341 (2019). source
The Conceptual Model section (page unavailable) identifies dispersion and technology dependence as two dimensions common to researchers’ conceptualizations of virtuality. The Virtual teams section (page unavailable) describes team research in terms of geographic dispersion and reliance on communication technology. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Disputedcites [155] Foster, M. K., Abbey, A., Callow, M. A., Zu, X. & Wilbon, A. D. Rethinking virtuality and its impact on teams. Small Group. Res. 46, 267–299 (2015). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In the “Rethinking Virtuality” section (page not provided), the paper’s review says that multidimensional definitions range from two to six dimensions, with the largest group—11 of 25—identifying three, not two. Its table includes geographic dispersion and technology mediation as one proposed two-dimensional definition, but does not present that definition as the one used by most research. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Meta-analytic evidence shows that satisfying these three needs is associated with better performance, reduced burnout, more organizational commitment and reduced turnover intentions8.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [8] Van den Broeck, A., Ferris, D. L., Chang, C.-H. & Rosen, C. C. A review of self-determination theory’s basic psychological needs at work. J. Manag. 42, 1195–1229 (2016). source
The meta-analytic summary in ‘Relations Between Needs and Outcome Variables’ (p. 16) reports that each need is positively related to performance and affective commitment and negatively related to turnover intentions; its burnout results (p. 17) show negative correlations. The separate RW analyses (p. 19) find a contrary pattern for competence on commitment and turnover intentions, but the claim accurately describes the reported meta-analytic associations. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“However, under conditions of uncertainty, individuals will benefit from showing cognitive flexibility, creativity and proactivity, all behaviours that are more likely to emerge when people have self-determined motivation40,41,44,46–49,57.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Future work requirements
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [40] Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K. & Strauss, K. Making things happen: a model of proactive motivation. J. Manag. 36, 827–856 (2010). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Reason To Motivation section (pp. 10–11) says intrinsic and other autonomous forms of motivation can encourage proactive goals. The paper also discusses proactive responses to uncertainty (Contextual Variables as Distal Antecedents of Proactivity, p. 17), but these passages do not establish that self-determined motivation makes cognitive flexibility or creativity more likely, or that all three behaviours benefit individuals under uncertainty. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [41] Amabile, T. M. Effects of external evaluations on artistic creativity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 37, 221–233 (1979). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [44] Boggiano, A. K., Flink, C., Shields, A., Seelbach, A. & Barrett, M. Use of techniques promoting students’ self-determination: effects on students’ analytic problem-solving skills. Motiv. Emot. 17, 319–336 (1993). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [46] Koestner, R., Ryan, R. M., Bernieri, F. & Holt, K. Setting limits on children’s behavior: the differential effects of controlling vs informational styles on intrinsic motivation and creativity. J. Pers. 52, 231–248 (1984). source
- Not matchedcites [47] McGraw, K. O. in The Hidden Costs of Reward (eds Lepper. M. R. & Greene, D.) 33–60 (Erlbaum, 1978).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [48] McGraw, K. O. & McCullers, J. C. Evidence of a detrimental effect of extrinsic incentives on breaking a mental set. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 15, 285–294 (1979). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [49] Utman, C. H. Performance effects of motivational state: a meta-analysis. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 1, 170–182 (1997). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [57] Amabile, T. M. The social psychology of creativity: a componential conceptualization. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 45, 357–376 (1983). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Importantly, the work tasks that people are more likely to do in future work will require high-level cognitive and emotional skills that are more likely to be developed, used, and sustained when underpinned by self-determined motivation40–50.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Introduction
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [40] Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K. & Strauss, K. Making things happen: a model of proactive motivation. J. Manag. 36, 827–856 (2010). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Reason To Motivation section (p. 10) links intrinsic motivation to setting and pursuing proactive work goals, supporting the claim's general connection between self-determined motivation and work behavior. It does not say that future work tasks will require high-level cognitive and emotional skills, or that such motivation develops, uses, and sustains those skills. The discussion of cognitive ability and skills (Individual Differences in Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities, p. 15) treats them as possible predictors of proactivity instead. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [41] Amabile, T. M. Effects of external evaluations on artistic creativity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 37, 221–233 (1979). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [42] Amabile, T. M. Motivation and creativity: effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 48, 393–399 (1985). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [43] Amabile, T. M., Hennessey, B. A. & Grossman, B. S. Social influences on creativity: the effects of contracted-for reward. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50, 14–23 (1986). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [44] Boggiano, A. K., Flink, C., Shields, A., Seelbach, A. & Barrett, M. Use of techniques promoting students’ self-determination: effects on students’ analytic problem-solving skills. Motiv. Emot. 17, 319–336 (1993). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [45] Fabes, R. A., Moran, J. D. & McCullers, J. C. The hidden costs of reward and WAIS subscale performance. Am. J. Psychol. 94, 387–398 (1981). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [46] Koestner, R., Ryan, R. M., Bernieri, F. & Holt, K. Setting limits on children’s behavior: the differential effects of controlling vs informational styles on intrinsic motivation and creativity. J. Pers. 52, 231–248 (1984). source
- Not matchedcites [47] McGraw, K. O. in The Hidden Costs of Reward (eds Lepper. M. R. & Greene, D.) 33–60 (Erlbaum, 1978).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [48] McGraw, K. O. & McCullers, J. C. Evidence of a detrimental effect of extrinsic incentives on breaking a mental set. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 15, 285–294 (1979). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [49] Utman, C. H. Performance effects of motivational state: a meta-analysis. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 1, 170–182 (1997). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“For example, these technologies can be a buffer against loneliness for remote workers or homeworkers61 and enable stronger connections among distributed workers62.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Future work requirements
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [61] Hislop, D. et al. Variability in the use of mobile ICTs by homeworkers and its consequences for boundary management and social isolation. Inf. Organ. 25, 222–232 (2015). source
Citation 61 supports the first part of the sentence, about buffering loneliness among homeworkers. The Discussion reports that mobile ICTs let self-employed homeworkers leave home to socialize while remaining contactable, reducing their general social isolation. The separate claim about stronger connections among distributed workers is attached to citation 62, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.92)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [62] Kellogg, K. C., Orlikowski, W. J. & Yates, J. Life in the trading zone: structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organ. Sci. 17, 22–44 (2006). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“This could decrease workforce diversity and strengthen negative stereotypes about mature workers (such as that they are not flexible, adaptable or motivated to keep up with changing times)214.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Future work requirements
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [214] Petery, G. A., Iles, L. J. & Parker, S. K. Putting successful aging into context. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 13, 377–382 (2020). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The 'Opportunity as a proximal antecedent (Path A)' section says age-biased practices can exclude older workers from the workforce, supporting the concern about reduced age diversity. It describes negative stereotypes as a cause of exclusion, but does not say that exclusion strengthens those stereotypes or identify the specific stereotypes about flexibility, adaptability, and motivation. (LLM, conf=0.83)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The digital divide now also includes ‘algorithm awareness’ (knowing what algorithms do) which influences whether and how people are influenced by technology. Indeed, the degree to which algorithms influence attitudes and behaviours is negatively associated with the degree to which people are aware of algorithms and understand how they work212.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Future work requirements
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [212] Gran, A.-B., Booth, P. & Bucher, T. To be or not to be algorithm aware: a question of a new digital divide? Inf. Commun. Soc. 24, 1779–1796 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion and conclusion (p. 14) treats algorithm awareness as a possible new dimension of the digital divide. The Awareness and attitudes findings (p. 11) associate awareness with attitudes toward algorithm-driven content, but do not show that people with greater awareness are less influenced by algorithms or measure an inverse relationship with behavioural influence. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The research shows that there is no deterministic relationship between technology and work design; instead, the effect of new technology on work design, and hence on motivation, depends on various moderating factors1.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [1] Parker, S. K. & Grote, G. Automation, algorithms, and beyond: why work design matters more than ever in a digital world. Appl. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12241 (2020). source
The Conclusions and Intervention Strategies section says there is no predetermined effect of technology on work design and identifies technological, organizational, and individual factors that shape it. A Central Role for Work Design links changes in work design to motivation-related outcomes, supporting the claim’s final link. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“It is more difficult to decipher and synchronize non-verbal behaviour on a screen than face-to-face, particularly given the lack of body language cues due to camera frame limitations, increasing the cognitive load for meeting attendees109–112.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [109] Bailenson, J. N. Nonverbal overload: a theoretical argument for the causes of Zoom fatigue. Technol. Mind Behav. https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000030 (2021). source
The Cognitive Load section says Zoom users work harder to send and receive nonverbal signals than people interacting face-to-face. It also identifies camera framing as a reason receivers get fewer body-language cues and describes the extra effort of monitoring and interpreting cues as a source of cognitive load. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [110] Jun, H. & Bailenson, J. N. in International Handbook of Emotions and Media (eds Döveling, K. & Konijn, E. A.) 303–315 (Routledge, 2021). source
- Partly supportedcites [111] Ratan, R., Miller, D. B. & Bailenson, J. N. Facial appearance dissatisfaction explains differences in zoom fatigue. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 25, 124–129 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s introductory discussion of VM fatigue (indexed under Abstract; no page supplied) lists unmet expectations about synchrony and nonverbal cues as a possible contributor. It separately attributes increased cognitive load to prolonged gaze, apparent closeness, and reduced mobility; it does not say that difficulty deciphering cues, or camera-frame limits on body language, increases cognitive load relative to face-to-face meetings. (LLM, conf=0.83)
- Supportedcites [112] Riedl, R. On the stress potential of videoconferencing: definition and root causes of Zoom fatigue. Electron. Mark. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00501-3 (2021). source
In “Lack of body language,” the paper says that seeing faces without full bodies can hamper emotion perception and increase cognitive effort. In “Conceptual framework and hypotheses,” it also says videoconferencing delays make restoring synchrony more cognitively effortful. These passages support the cited sentence’s two linked points. (LLM, conf=0.89)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The current generation of workers is likely to experience career shocks (disruptive events that trigger a sensemaking process regarding one’s career) caused by rapid technological changes, and indeed many workers have already experienced career shocks from the pandemic222.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [222] Akkermans, J., Richardson, J. & Kraimer, M. L. The Covid-19 crisis as a career shock: implications for careers and vocational behavior. J. Vocat. Behav. 119, 103434 (2020). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The “Covid-19 as a career shock” section defines a career shock, and the Conclusion argues that the pandemic can be considered one affecting people’s work and careers. Neither passage supports the prediction that the current generation of workers is likely to experience career shocks caused by rapid technological change. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Physical workplace cues that usually guide work behaviours and routines in the office do not exist in virtual work, consequently demanding more autonomous regulation of work behaviours116,117.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [116] Muraven, M. Autonomous self-control is less depleting. J. Res. Personal. 42, 763–770 (2008). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page unavailable) compares autonomous with compelled self-control in a cookie-resistance task. It does not address workplace cues, office routines, or virtual work; searches for those concepts and for environmental cues requiring self-regulation found no relevant passage. (LLM, conf=0.78)
- Could not verifycites [117] Muraven, M., Gagne, M. & Rosman, H. Helpful self-control: autonomy support, vitality, and depletion. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 44, 573–585 (2008). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Autonomy Support and General Discussion passages address how autonomy support affects self-control, not how workplace cues guide office routines. Searches for physical workplace cues and virtual or remote work found no passage saying that virtual work lacks those cues or consequently demands more autonomous regulation. (LLM, conf=0.76)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Virtual interactions involve ‘hyper gaze’ from seeing grids of staring faces, which the brain interprets as a threat109–112.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [109] Bailenson, J. N. Nonverbal overload: a theoretical argument for the causes of Zoom fatigue. Technol. Mind Behav. https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000030 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The “Eye Gaze at a Close Distance” section describes Zoom grids as giving participants continuous, front-on views of other faces and reports physiological arousal from being stared at. It does not say the brain interprets those faces as a threat; arousal alone does not establish that part of the claim. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [110] Jun, H. & Bailenson, J. N. in International Handbook of Emotions and Media (eds Döveling, K. & Konijn, E. A.) 303–315 (Routledge, 2021). source
- Partly supportedcites [111] Ratan, R., Miller, D. B. & Bailenson, J. N. Facial appearance dissatisfaction explains differences in zoom fatigue. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 25, 124–129 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s introductory discussion of virtual-meeting fatigue (section labeled Abstract; page unavailable) identifies prolonged gaze from others as a theorized source of increased cognitive load. It does not describe grids of staring faces or say that the brain interprets their gaze as a threat. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Supportedcites [112] Riedl, R. On the stress potential of videoconferencing: definition and root causes of Zoom fatigue. Electron. Mark. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00501-3 (2021). source
In “Unnatural interaction with multiple faces,” the paper says videoconference windows can create a feeling that many faces are staring at a participant. Its conceptual framework says this feeling can be perceived as an implicit threat and trigger a stress response, while noting that context can attenuate the effect. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“This lack of trust leads to decreased feelings of autonomy124, increased employee home–work conflict105 and distress125,126.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [124] Seppälä, T., Lipponen, J., Pirttila-Backman, A.-M. & Lipsanen, J. Reciprocity of trust in the supervisor–subordinate relationship: the mediating role of autonomy and the sense of power. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 20, 755–778 (2011). source
- Partly supportedcites [105] Wang, B., Liu, Y. & Parker, S. K. How does the use of information communication technology affect individuals? A work design perspective. Acad. Manag. Ann. 14, 695–725 (2020). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The “Managerial control-induced decreases in autonomy” section (page unavailable) reports that electronic monitoring can reduce employees’ autonomy, supporting the outcome cited to this paper. It does not identify lack of manager trust as the cause. The home–work conflict and distress clauses carry different citations and are not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Not matchedcites [125] Parker, S. K., Knight, C. & Keller, A. Remote Managers Are Having Trust Issues (Harvard Business, 2020).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [126] Staples, D. S. A study of remote workers and their differences from non-remote workers. J. End User Comput. 13, 3–14 (2001). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Seeing oneself on screen increases self-consciousness during social interactions, which can cause anxiety, especially in women and those from minoritized groups109–112.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [109] Bailenson, J. N. Nonverbal overload: a theoretical argument for the causes of Zoom fatigue. Technol. Mind Behav. https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000030 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In “An All Day Mirror” (page unavailable), the paper says seeing oneself can increase self-evaluation and negative affect, and reports stronger self-focused attention and negative affect among women. It does not report anxiety specifically from seeing oneself, or an especially strong effect in minoritized groups. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [110] Jun, H. & Bailenson, J. N. in International Handbook of Emotions and Media (eds Döveling, K. & Konijn, E. A.) 303–315 (Routledge, 2021). source
- Partly supportedcites [111] Ratan, R., Miller, D. B. & Bailenson, J. N. Facial appearance dissatisfaction explains differences in zoom fatigue. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 25, 124–129 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract and Discussion link viewing oneself during videoconferences to negative self-focused attention and discuss mirror anxiety. The study found greater Zoom fatigue among women and Asian participants, mediated by facial dissatisfaction, but did not measure anxiety; its findings do not establish anxiety across social interactions or minoritized groups generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Partly supportedcites [112] Riedl, R. On the stress potential of videoconferencing: definition and root causes of Zoom fatigue. Electron. Mark. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00501-3 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Self-awareness section (page not provided) says that seeing one’s own camera image increases self-awareness and reports that “mirror anxiety” helps explain why women experience more Zoom fatigue than men. The conceptual framework also proposes that displaying one’s own face increases self-awareness and stress. The passages do not support the added claim that this effect is especially pronounced in minoritized groups. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Remote workers can feel isolated from, and excluded by, colleagues and fail to gain the social support they might receive if co-located142,143, weakening their sense of belonging to a team or organization144 and their job performance145.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [142] Bloom, N. Don’t Let Employees Pick Their WFH Days (Harvard Business, 2021).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Partly supportedcites [143] Schade, H. M., Digutsch, J., Kleinsorge, T. & Fan, Y. Having to work from home: basic needs, well-being, and motivation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 1–18 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (section 3.1; page unavailable) report significantly lower relatedness to coworkers at home than in the office. The Discussion (section 4.1; page unavailable) says supportive colleagues made home workers feel less alone, but it does not establish that colleagues excluded them or that they failed to receive social support. The job-performance clause has a separate citation in the citing sentence and is not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [144] Morganson, V. J., Major, D. A., Oborn, K. L., Verive, J. M. & Heelan, M. P. Comparing telework locations and traditional work arrangements: differences in work–life balance support, job satisfaction, and inclusion. J. Manag. Psychol. 25, 578–595 (2010). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [145] Golden, T. D., Veiga, J. F. & Dino, R. N. The impact of professional isolation on teleworker job performance and turnover intentions: does time spent teleworking, interacting face-to-face, or having access to communication-enhancing technology matter? J. Appl. Psychol. 93, 1412–1421 (2008). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Non-verbal synchrony can be affected by the video streaming speed, which also increases cognitive load109–112.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [109] Bailenson, J. N. Nonverbal overload: a theoretical argument for the causes of Zoom fatigue. Technol. Mind Behav. https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000030 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Cognitive Load section links image and audio latency to the cognitive resources needed to manage videoconferencing, supporting the load portion of the claim. It mentions nonverbal synchrony but does not say that video streaming speed affects it. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [110] Jun, H. & Bailenson, J. N. in International Handbook of Emotions and Media (eds Döveling, K. & Konijn, E. A.) 303–315 (Routledge, 2021). source
- Could not verifycites [111] Ratan, R., Miller, D. B. & Bailenson, J. N. Facial appearance dissatisfaction explains differences in zoom fatigue. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 25, 124–129 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract discusses increased cognitive load and unmet expectations about synchrony and nonverbal cues as separate proposed contributors to videoconferencing fatigue. It does not say that video streaming speed affects synchrony or increases cognitive load; searches for streaming speed, latency, and delay found no passage addressing that relationship. (LLM, conf=0.74)
- Supportedcites [112] Riedl, R. On the stress potential of videoconferencing: definition and root causes of Zoom fatigue. Electron. Mark. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00501-3 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In “Asynchronicity of communication” (page unavailable), Riedl theorizes that videoconferencing delays disrupt synchrony and increase cognitive effort as the brain works to restore it. The section discusses precisely timed gestures and movements as part of communication, supporting the claim’s reference to non-verbal synchrony. The paper frames this as a proposed mechanism rather than a direct test of streaming speed. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In the healthcare profession, the shock consisted of an exponential increase in workload and the resulting exhaustion, coupled with the disorganization caused by lack of resources and compounded by health fears231.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [231] Sheather, J. & Slattery, D. The great resignation — how do we support and retain staff already stretched to the limit? BJM Opinionhttps://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/09/21/the-great-resignation-how-do-we-support-and-retain-staff-already-stretched-to-their-limit/ (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s main text (indexed under Abstract; page not specified) links workload and inability to rest with burnout, and describes chronic under-resourcing, systems failures, clinical risk, and inadequate PPE. It does not describe an exponential increase in workload or explicitly say that health fears compounded the strain. (LLM, conf=0.87)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Virtual team members predominantly interact via technology, which — as described in the previous section — might influence the quality of relationships they can develop with their team members141,167,168 and consequently the satisfaction of relatedness needs169.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual teamwork
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [141] Charalampous, M., Grant, C. A., Tramontano, C. & Michailidis, E. Systematically reviewing remote e-workers’ well-being at work: a multidimensional approach. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 28, 51–73 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Social well-being dimension section says reduced face-to-face contact can affect remote workers’ relationships, and the section on factors related to social well-being discusses connectedness and isolation. These passages support the possibility that remote interaction affects relationships, but they do not establish the further claim, attached to this citation, about satisfaction of relatedness needs. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [167] Sewell, G. & Taskin, L. Out of sight, out of mind in a new world of work? Autonomy, control, and spatiotemporal scaling in telework. Organ. Stud. 36, 1507–1529 (2015). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [168] Tietze, S. & Nadin, S. The psychological contract and the transition from office-based to home-based work. Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 21, 318–334 (2011). source
- Supportedcites [169] Orsini, C. & Rodrigues, V. Supporting motivation in teams working remotely: the role of basic psychological needs. Med. Teach. 42, 828–829 (2020). source
The paper (p. 4) says relatedness is the toughest need to address while working remotely because of physical isolation and the absence of non-verbal support. It also says close relationships can be particularly hard to establish in remote work, supporting the point attributed to citation 169 about relatedness need satisfaction. (LLM, conf=0.91)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Monitoring and quantifying worker behaviours might reduce autonomy because it is experienced as controlling and narrows goal focus to only quantifiable results127,180; there is some evidence that this is the case when algorithmic management systems are used to this end172,178,181.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Algorithmic management
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [127] Enzle, M. E. & Anderson, S. C. Surveillant intentions and intrinsic motivation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 64, 257–266 (1993). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [180] Carayon, P. Effects of electronic performance monitoring on job design and worker stress: results of two studies. Int. J. Human–Computer Interact. 6, 177–190 (1994). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [172] Gal, U., Jensen, T. B. & Stein, M.-K. Breaking the vicious cycle of algorithmic management: a virtue ethics approach to people analytics. Inf. Organ. 30, 100301 (2020). source
- Partly supportedcites [178] Schafheitle, S. et al. No stone left unturned? Toward a framework for the impact of datafication technologies on organizational control. Acad. Manag. Discov. 6, 455–487 (2020). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Employee Perceptions section says technology might restrict employees’ sense of autonomy. In Delineating configurations, the paper describes UPS’s algorithmic ORION system as potentially coercive because of low employee participation and monitoring-related function creep. These passages support the possibility described in the citing sentence, but they do not provide direct evidence that ORION reduced workers’ autonomy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Supportedcites [181] Moore, S. & Hayes, L. J. B. in Humans and Machines At Work: Dynamics of Virtual Work (eds. Moore, P. V., Upchurch, M. & Whittaker, X.) 101–124 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2018). source
The paper provides the evidence attributed to it: its Conclusions (p. 17) say that homecare workers perceived electronic monitoring as undermining autonomy and discretion and experienced it as managerial control. “Electronic Monitoring in Care” (p. 6) describes a computer-based system that tracks visits and makes real-time worker data available to managers, fitting the citing sentence’s use of this study as an example. (LLM, conf=0.88)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“This encourages workers to either overwork to the point of exhaustion, find ways to game the system184, or misbehave186.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Algorithmic management
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [184] Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V. & Hjorth, I. Good gig, bad gig: autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work Employ. Soc. 33, 56–75 (2019). source
Citation 184 follows “game the system,” while a separate citation follows “misbehave.” In “Autonomy in the shadow of algorithmic management,” the paper describes workers circumventing platform monitoring. Its Conclusions also state that algorithmic control can lead to overwork and exhaustion. The supplied passages do not give page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Supportedcites [186] Reid-Musson, E., MacEachen, E. & Bartel, E. ‘Don’t take a poo!’: worker misbehaviour in on-demand ride-hail carpooling. N. Technol. Work Employ. 35, 145–161 (2020). source
Citation 186 is attached to “misbehave,” not to the separate claims about exhaustion or gaming the system. The Conclusion (page unavailable in our copy) describes driver misbehaviour arising in the context of algorithm-driven management and says drivers reacted to management practices and frustrated expectations of independence. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“‘The great resignation’ refers to the massive wave of employee departures during the COVID-19 pandemic in several parts of the world, including North America, Europe and China229,230, that can be attributed in part to career shocks caused by the pandemic222.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [229] Klotz, A. The COVID vaccine means a return to work. And a wave of resignations. NBChttps://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/covid-vaccine-means-return-work-wave-resignations-ncna1269018 (2021).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [230] Tharoor, I. The ‘great resignation’ goes global. Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/10/18/labor-great-resignation-global/ (2021).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Partly supportedcites [222] Akkermans, J., Richardson, J. & Kraimer, M. L. The Covid-19 crisis as a career shock: implications for careers and vocational behavior. J. Vocat. Behav. 119, 103434 (2020). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Conclusion (page unavailable) argues that COVID-19 was a career shock with major effects on work and careers. Lesson 3 (page unavailable) suggests that it could prompt some people to re-evaluate their careers. The paper does not establish that career shocks contributed to the mass employee departures called the Great Resignation; the geographic description is attached to other citations in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Some algorithmic management platforms do not reveal all aspects of a given task (for example, not revealing the client destination before work is accepted) or penalize workers who decline jobs185, thereby severely restricting their choices.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Algorithmic management
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [185] Duggan, J., Sherman, U., Carbery, R. & McDonnell, A. Algorithmic management and app-work in the gig economy: a research agenda for employment relations and HRM. Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 30, 114–132 (2020). source
Section 4.2 (Work assignment) says ride-hailing platforms often withhold passengers’ destinations until drivers accept a trip, and that many platforms penalise workers who do not maintain high task-acceptance rates. It also states that workers’ autonomy in choosing which tasks to accept is more limited than often claimed. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Rigid rules about how to carry out work often determine performance ratings (for example, imposing a route to deliver goods or prescribing how equipment and materials must be used) and even future task assignments and firing decisions, with little to no opportunity for employee input182–184.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Algorithmic management
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [182] De Cremer, D. Leadership by Algorithm (Harriman House, 2020).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [183] Goods, C., Veen, A. & Barratt, T. “Is your gig any good?” Analysing job quality in the Australian platform-based food-delivery sector. J. Ind. Relat. 61, 502–527 (2019). source
- Partly supportedcites [184] Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V. & Hjorth, I. Good gig, bad gig: autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work Employ. Soc. 33, 56–75 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In ‘Autonomy in the shadow of algorithmic management’ (page unavailable), the paper says client ratings affect how much future work remote gig workers receive. But it says control operates at the end of a task, not through rigid rules for carrying it out; 74% of respondents said they could choose or change their methods. It mentions dismissal for low ratings at Uber, while distinguishing that practice from the online labour platforms it studied, and does not establish that workers had little opportunity for input. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“a human-centred approach to automation in which the worker has transparent influence over the technical system has frequently been recommended as the optimal way to achieve high performance and to avoid automation failures1,204.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Summary and future directions
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [1] Parker, S. K. & Grote, G. Automation, algorithms, and beyond: why work design matters more than ever in a digital world. Appl. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12241 (2020). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In “Decision-Making as Part of Work Processes” (page unavailable), the paper describes human-centred automation as making systems transparent and predictable while allowing workers to influence them; it also links loss of worker understanding and control to difficulty responding to failures. It does not establish this approach as the optimal way to achieve high performance and avoid failures in general, and notes that some authors favour full automation for very complex systems. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [204] Grote, G., Ryser, C., Wäfler, T., Windischer, A. & Weik, S. KOMPASS: a method for complementary function allocation in automated work systems. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 52, 267–287 (2000). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Because these types of quantified metric are often directly linked to performance scores, pay incentives and future allocation of tasks or schedules (that is, getting future work), algorithmic management reduces workers’ freedom in decision-making related to their work, which can significantly reduce their self-determined motivation123.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Algorithmic management
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [123] Parent-Rocheleau, X. & Parker, S. K. Algorithms as work designers: how algorithmic management influences the design of jobs. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100838 (2021). source
Split into 2 atoms — 2 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“For instance, after algorithms estimated normal time standards for each ‘act’, algorithmic tracking and case allocation systems forced homecare nurses to reduce the ‘social’ time spent with patients because they were assigned more patients per day, thereby limiting nurses’ autonomy to decide how to perform their work181.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Algorithmic management
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [181] Moore, S. & Hayes, L. J. B. in Humans and Machines At Work: Dynamics of Virtual Work (eds. Moore, P. V., Upchurch, M. & Whittaker, X.) 101–124 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2018). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The discussion on p. 13 says electronic monitoring undermines homecare workers’ autonomy, and the discussion on p. 16 describes pressure to move on to other clients rather than stay to chat. The paper discusses homecare workers, not specifically nurses; it does not say algorithms estimated time standards for each act or that workers were assigned more patients per day. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“‘App-workers’, who obtain work through gig-work platforms such as Uber, reportedly crave more social interactions and networking opportunities179,185,194 and often attempt to compensate for a lack of relatedness by creating support groups that connect virtually and physically183,191,195.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Algorithmic management
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [179] Norlander, P., Jukic, N., Varma, A. & Nestorov, S. The effects of technological supervision on gig workers: organizational control and motivation of Uber, taxi, and limousine drivers. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 32, 4053–4077 (2021). source
- Partly supportedcites [185] Duggan, J., Sherman, U., Carbery, R. & McDonnell, A. Algorithmic management and app-work in the gig economy: a research agenda for employment relations and HRM. Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 30, 114–132 (2020). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 4.1 (Employment relations; page unavailable) reports that app-workers seek social interaction and networking opportunities. It does not say they create virtual or physical support groups to compensate for a lack of relatedness; the support groups it mentions are described as provided by platform organisations. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Partly supportedcites [194] Duggan, J., Sherman, U., Carbery, R. & McDonnell, A. Boundaryless careers and algorithmic constraints in the gig economy. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1953565 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Rideshare workers section (p. 23) reports that participants wanted more connection with other drivers and platform representatives. The Food-delivery workers section (p. 22) describes attempts to form WhatsApp groups and use physical meeting points to overcome limited opportunities for connection. It characterizes these as efforts by some workers, however, and does not establish that workers often create such groups. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [183] Goods, C., Veen, A. & Barratt, T. “Is your gig any good?” Analysing job quality in the Australian platform-based food-delivery sector. J. Ind. Relat. 61, 502–527 (2019). source
- Partly supportedcites [191] Gregory, K. ‘My life is more valuable than this’: understanding risk among on-demand food couriers in Edinburgh. Work Employ. Soc. 35, 316–331 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (p. 3) and Conclusion (p. 14) say couriers turn to one another for support and have formed a solidarity network. The discussion of epistemic risks (p. 13) describes contact through social media, WhatsApp and formal organising. The paper does not establish that workers crave social interaction or form these networks to compensate for a lack of relatedness; it describes practical needs for information, safety and collective action instead. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Partly supportedcites [195] Timko, P. & van Melik, R. Being a Deliveroo rider: practices of platform labor in Nijmegen and Berlin. J. Contemp. Ethnogr. 50, 497–523 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In “Making the Roo: Distancing and Socializing Practices” (pp. 15, 17), the paper describes Deliveroo riders socializing in person and through WhatsApp groups that provide practical support. It does not establish that riders created those groups to compensate for a lack of relatedness, or that they generally craved more social interaction; those motivations go beyond what the passages say. (LLM, conf=0.83)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Finally, algorithmic management usually provides comparative feedback (comparing one’s results to other workers’) and is linked to incentive pay structures, both of which reduce self-determined motivation as they are experienced as more controlling26,192.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Algorithmic management
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [26] Deci, E. L., Koestner, R. & Ryan, R. M. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychol. Bull. 125, 627–668 (1999). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion reports that performance-contingent rewards decreased free-choice intrinsic motivation and describes rewards experienced as controlling as undermining it. Page 652 reports that controllingly administered positive feedback decreased intrinsic motivation, while page 658 says competition can undermine or enhance it depending on whether it is controlling or informational. The paper does not establish that algorithmic management usually gives workers comparative feedback or uses incentive pay, nor that comparative feedback invariably reduces motivation. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [192] Dweck, C. S. & Leggett, E. L. A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychol. Rev. 25, 109–116 (1988). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“In addition, algorithmic management is often associated with simplified tasks, and with lower problem-solving opportunities and job variety123.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Algorithmic management
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [123] Parent-Rocheleau, X. & Parker, S. K. Algorithms as work designers: how algorithmic management influences the design of jobs. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100838 (2021). source
The Algorithmic monitoring section (page unavailable) says monitoring can hamper task variety and that systems used in warehouses and parcel delivery are likely to simplify jobs and hamper problem-solving opportunities. These passages support the citing sentence’s broad association, though the paper describes possible effects rather than an inevitable outcome. (LLM, conf=0.89)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“For example, algorithmic management inevitably transforms or reduces (sometimes even eliminates) contact with a supervisor2,182,193, leading to the feeling that the organization does not care about the worker and provides little social support194,195.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Algorithmic management
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [2] Jarrahi, M. H. et al. Algorithmic management in a work context. Big Data Soc. 8, https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211020332 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion and conclusion says algorithmic management could transform relationships between managers and workers. The Decreased power to managers section (p. 5) says an empathetic relationship is almost impossible to develop with an algorithmic manager. Neither passage establishes that supervisor contact is inevitably reduced or eliminated; the claim about organizational care and social support is attached to different citations. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Not matchedcites [182] De Cremer, D. Leadership by Algorithm (Harriman House, 2020).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [193] Wesche, J. S. & Sonderegger, A. When computers take the lead: the automation of leadership. Comput. Hum. Behav. 101, 197–209 (2019). source
- Partly supportedcites [194] Duggan, J., Sherman, U., Carbery, R. & McDonnell, A. Boundaryless careers and algorithmic constraints in the gig economy. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1953565 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (p. 25) says algorithms limit interaction with management, and the Food-delivery workers section (p. 21) links technology replacing human interaction to workers feeling that platforms are disinterested in them. Rideshare workers also reported that platforms did not care about them and offered little guidance (p. 22). These findings support the described experience among app-workers, but not the sentence’s unqualified assertion that algorithmic management inevitably has this effect. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Partly supportedcites [195] Timko, P. & van Melik, R. Being a Deliveroo rider: practices of platform labor in Nijmegen and Berlin. J. Contemp. Ethnogr. 50, 497–523 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In 'Performing Deliveries' (p. 18), riders say Deliveroo gives their welfare low priority, supporting the claim that workers feel the organization does not care. The paper does not link that feeling to reduced supervisor contact under algorithmic management or establish that the organization provides little social support; 'Making the Roo' (p. 15) describes a Deliveroo-appointed rider liaison who helps workers. (LLM, conf=0.83)
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Research in behavioural health has examined how digital applications that encourage healthy behaviours can be designed to fulfill the needs for competence, autonomy and relatedness203.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Summary and future directions
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [203] Peters, D., Calvo, R. A. & Ryan, R. M. Designing for motivation, engagement and wellbeing in digital experience. Front. Psychol. 9, 797 (2018). source
The Introduction describes designing and testing digital features to support competence, autonomy, and relatedness. The “BEHAVIOR” section identifies health apps as technologies intended to influence exercise, healthy eating, or meditation, and the motivation-type section discusses technologies that encourage healthy behaviors. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Specifically, people need to feel that they are effective and masters of their environment (need for competence), that they are agents of their own behaviour as opposed to a ‘pawn’ of external pressures (need for autonomy), and that they experience meaningful connections with other people (need for relatedness)5,7.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [5] Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. Intrinsic motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior (Plenum, 1985). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [7] Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol. Inq. 11, 227–268 (2000). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In stable and predictable environments, less self-determined forms of motivation might be sufficient to maintain the enactment of repetitive tasks and automation is more feasible as a replacement or support.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Future work requirements
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Reducing uncertainty is central to most theories of human adaptation55 and is a strong motivational basis for goals and behaviour56.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Future work requirements
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [55] Griffin, M. A. & Grote, G. When is more uncertainty better? A model of uncertainty regulation and effectiveness. Acad. Manage. Rev. 45, 745–765 (2020). source
- Not matchedcites [56] Van Den Bos, K. & Lind, E. A. in Handbook of the Uncertain Self (eds Arkin, R. M., Oleson, K. C. & Carroll, P. J.) 122–141 (Routledge, 2013).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Extrinsic motivation is subdivided according to the degree to which external influences are internalized (absorbed and transformed into internal tools to regulate activity engagement)5,9.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [5] Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. Intrinsic motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior (Plenum, 1985). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [9] Howard, J., Gagné, M. & Morin, A. J. S. Putting the pieces together: reviewing the structural conceptualization of motivation within SDT. Motiv. Emot. 44, 846–861 (2020). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Under higher levels of uncertainty, specific actions are difficult to define in advance. In contrast to action sequences that can be codified (for example, with algorithms) and repeated in predictable environments, the best action sequence is likely to involve flexibility and experimentation when the workplace is more uncertain.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Future work requirements
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Future work might be characterized by environmental uncertainty interdependence, complexity, volatility and ambiguity52.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Future work requirements
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [52] Latham, G. P. & Ernst, C. T. Keys to motivating tomorrow’s workforce. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 16, 181–198 (2006). source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Higher levels of uncertainty require more adaptive behaviours, whereas higher levels of interdependence require more social, team-oriented and network-oriented behaviours54.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Future work requirements
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [54] Griffin, M. A., Neal, A. & Parker, S. K. A new model of work role performance: positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Acad. Manage. J. 50, 327–347 (2007). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Self-determination theory also distinguishes between different types of motivation that workers might experience: intrinsic motivation (doing something for its own sake, out of interest and enjoyment), extrinsic motivation (doing something for an instrumental reason) and amotivation (lacking any reason to engage in an activity).”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [5] Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. Intrinsic motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior (Plenum, 1985). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [9] Howard, J., Gagné, M. & Morin, A. J. S. Putting the pieces together: reviewing the structural conceptualization of motivation within SDT. Motiv. Emot. 44, 846–861 (2020). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“For example, workforce inequalities between mature and younger workers are likely to increase owing to real or perceived differences in technology-related skills, with increased disparities in the type of jobs these workers engage in210,213.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Future work requirements
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [210] Lythreatis, S., Singh, S. K. & El-Kassar, A.-N. The digital divide: a review and future research agenda. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 175, 121359 (2021). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [213] Parker, S. K. & Andrei, D. M. Include, individualize, and integrate: organizational meta-strategies for mature workers. Work Aging Retire. 6, 1–7 (2019). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, technology developments offer clear opportunities to improve the satisfaction of candidates’ needs and to assess them in richer environments that more closely resemble work settings.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of employee selection
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“another study found that home workers tended to be employees with young children and these workers were 50% less likely to be promoted than those based in the office140.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Future work requirements
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [140] Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J. & Ying, Z. J. Does working from home work? evidence from a Chinese experiment. Q. J. Econ. 130, 165–218 (2014). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Older workers might miss out on opportunities to upskill or might choose to leave the workforce early rather than face reskilling.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Future work requirements
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, future work is likely to require new technical and communication skills, as well as adaptive and proactive skills. Thus, people with such skills are more likely to find work than those who do not or who have fewer opportunities (for example, education access) to develop them.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Future work requirements
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Furthermore, candidate experience can influence decisions to accept a job offer and how positively the candidate will talk about the organization to other potential candidates and even clients, thereby influencing brand reputation86.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of employee selection
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [86] McCarthy, J. M. et al. Applicant perspectives during selection: a review addressing “so what?,” “what’s new?,” and “where to next?” J. Manag. 43, 1693–1725 (2017). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Candidates may also feel increasing pressure to submit to employers’ requests to share personal information, such as social media profiles, which may further frustrate autonomy to the extent that candidates are reluctant to share this information82.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of employee selection
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [82] Cook, R., Jones-Chick, R., Roulin, N. & O’Rourke, K. Job seekers’ attitudes toward cybervetting: scale development, validation, and platform comparison. Int. J. Sel. Assess. 28, 383–398 (2020). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Absent any interventions, the use of asynchronous video interviews removes the opportunity for candidates to meet the employer and get a feel for what it might be like to work for the employer, or to ask questions of their own84.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of employee selection
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [84] Guchait, P., Ruetzler, T., Taylor, J. & Toldi, N. Video interviewing: a potential selection tool for hospitality managers — a study to understand applicant perspective. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 36, 90–100 (2014). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These future work issues are therefore likely to increase gaps between skilled and non-skilled segments of the population, and consequently to increase societal pay disparities and poverty.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Future work requirements
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Unlike a traditional or videoconference interview, candidates completing an asynchronous video interview do not interact directly with anyone from the employer organization, and they consequently often describe the experience as impersonal84.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of employee selection
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [84] Guchait, P., Ruetzler, T., Taylor, J. & Toldi, N. Video interviewing: a potential selection tool for hospitality managers — a study to understand applicant perspective. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 36, 90–100 (2014). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The second feature of the evolving workplace is an increasing level of interdependence among people, systems and technology.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Future work requirements
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“These benefits have driven the widespread adoption of technology in recruitment practices77, but they have also attracted criticism.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of employee selection
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [77] Basch, J. M. & Melchers, K. G. The use of technology-mediated interviews and their perception from the organization’s point of view. Int. J. Sel. Assess. 29, 495–502 (2021). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Changing economies are increasing demand for highly skilled labour, meaning that employers are forced to compete heavily for talent68.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of employee selection
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [68] World Economic Forum. The future of jobs report 2020. WEF https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2020 (2020).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Furthermore, inequalities in terms of pay have already been observed between men and women215.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Future work requirements
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [215] Graf, N., Brown, A. & Patten, E. The narrowing, but persistent, gender gap in pay. Pew Research Center http://www.www.pewresearch.org/ft_18-04-06_wage_gap/ (2018).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Virtual environments and video-based assessments can better reproduce working environments than traditional ‘paper and pencil’ assessments, and AI is being used to simulate social interactions in work or similar contexts74.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of employee selection
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [74] Kotlyar, I. & Krasman, J. Virtual simulation: new method for assessing teamwork skills. Int. J. Sel. Assess. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12368 (2021). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Indeed, people will more frequently be asked to change career paths as work is transformed by technology, to use and ‘sell’ their transferrable skills in creative ways, and to reskill.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In addition, overly frequent transitions might limit deep learning opportunities and achievements, and disrupt important support networks221.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [221] Baruch, Y. & Vardi, Y. A fresh look at the dark side of contemporary careers: toward a realistic discourse. Br. J. Manag. 27, 355–372 (2016). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Employment stability started to decline during the 1980s with the rise of public ownership and international trade, the increased use of performance-based incentives and contracts, and the introduction of new technologies.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, a protean career orientation might fit only a small segment of the labour market.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In an analysis of robots in surgery, technology designed purely for ‘efficiency’ reduced the opportunities for trainee surgeons to engage in challenging tasks and resulted in impaired skill development102, and therefore probably reduced competence need satisfaction.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [102] Beane, M. Shadow learning: building robotic surgical skill when approved means fail. Adm. Sci. Q. 64, 87–123 (2019). source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Indeed, self-awareness is a component of authenticity and mindfulness, both of which are linked to the satisfaction of the need for autonomy227,228.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [227] Kernis, M. H. & Goldman, B. M. A Multicomponent Conceptualization of Authenticity: Theory and Research Vol. 38 (Zana, M. P.) 283–357 (Academic, 2006). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [228] Ryan, W. S. & Ryan, R. M. Toward a social psychology of authenticity: exploring within-person variation in autonomy, congruence, and genuineness using self-determination theory. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 23, 99–112 (2019). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In short, the careers of the current and future workforce will be non-linear and will require people to be more adaptive and proactive in crafting their career.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As the above examples show, the impact of new technologies on work design, and hence on need satisfaction, is powerful — but also mixed. That is, digital technologies can increase or decrease motivational work characteristics and can thereby influence need satisfaction (Fig. 3).”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Most occupations in most industries have at least some tasks that could be replaced by AI, yet currently there is no occupation in which all tasks could be replaced88.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [88] Brynjolfsson, E., Mitchell, T. & Rock, D. What can machines learn, and what does it mean for occupations and the economy? AEA Pap. Proc. 108, 43–47 (2018). source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Change-averse individuals might regard protean careers as career-destructive and the identity changes associated with a protean career might be regarded as stressful.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, rapid technological change and increasing uncertainty pushes organizations to hire for skill sets rather than fitting people into set jobs, requiring people to be aware of their skills and to know how to market them.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the context of a globally competitive skills market, employers risk losing high-quality candidates.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of employee selection
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Understanding these moderating factors is important because they provide potential ‘levers’ for creating more motivating work while still capitalizing on the advantages of technologies.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Organizational implementation factors (for example, whether technology is selected, designed and implemented in a participatory way or how much training is given to support the introduction of technology) and technological design factors (for example, how much worker control is built into automated systems) are also fundamental in shaping the effect of technology on work design.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Work design theory is intimately connected to self-determination theory, with early scholars arguing that work arrangements should create jobs in which employees can satisfy their core psychological needs89.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [89] Hackman, J. R. & Lawler, E. E. Employee reactions to job characterisitics. J. Appl. Psychol. 55, 259–286 (1971). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Such jobs often lack variety, skill use and meaning101, again reducing the opportunity for the work to meet competence needs.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [101] Kittur, A. et al. in Proc. 2013 Conf. Comput. Support. Coop. Work 1301–1318 (ACM, 2013). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Consequently, although there is relatively little research on proactivity in work redesign through technology, it is important to recognize that individuals will not necessarily be passive in the face of negative technologies.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > The future of work design
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, online courses, training and webinars can improve workers’ knowledge, skills and abilities, and can therefore help workers to carry out their work tasks more proficiently, which increases self-efficacy and a sense of competence.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“other research has found no relationship between remote working and career prospects119.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [119] Gajendran, R. S. & Harrison, D. A. The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. J. Appl. Psychol. 92, 1524–1541 (2007). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Some remote workers experience an increased sense of control and autonomy over their work environment118–120 under these circumstances, resulting in lower family–work conflict, depression and turnover121,122.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [118] Feldman, D. C. & Gainey, T. W. Patterns of telecommuting and their consequences: framing the research agenda. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 7, 369–388 (1997). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [119] Gajendran, R. S. & Harrison, D. A. The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. J. Appl. Psychol. 92, 1524–1541 (2007). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [120] Perry, S. J., Rubino, C. & Hunter, E. M. Stress in remote work: two studies testing the demand-control-person model. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 27, 577–593 (2018). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [121] Kossek, E. E., Lautsch, B. A. & Eaton, S. C. Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work–family effectiveness. J. Vocat. Behav. 68, 347–367 (2006). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [122] Johnson, A. et al. A review and agenda for examining how technology-driven changes at work will impact workplace mental health and employee well-being. Aust. J. Manag. 45, 402–424 (2020). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Self-determination theory suggests that it will be critical to actively design hybrid and remote work that meets relatedness needs to prevent these long-term issues.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“At the same time, technology might thwart competence needs, and increase fatigue and stress.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [136] Day, A., Barber, L. K. & Tonet, J. in The Cambridge Handbook of Technology and Employee Behavior (ed. Landers, R. N.) 580–607 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2019). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For example, constant electronic messages (such as email or keeping track of online messaging platforms such as Slack or Microsoft Teams) are likely to increase in volume when working remotely, but can be distracting and prevent individuals from completing core tasks while they respond to incoming messages136.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [136] Day, A., Barber, L. K. & Tonet, J. in The Cambridge Handbook of Technology and Employee Behavior (ed. Landers, R. N.) 580–607 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2019). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Some research suggests that two remote workdays a week provides the optimum balance148.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [148] Golden, T. D. & Veiga, J. F. The impact of extent of telecommuting on job satisfaction: resolving inconsistent findings. J. Manag. 31, 301–318 (2005). source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This type of remote work is increasingly occurring whether or not individuals themselves are based remotely, and can potentially enhance performance.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hybrid work seems to offer the best of both worlds, providing opportunities for connection and collaboration while in the workplace, and affording autonomy in terms of flexible working.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Office social environments could be degraded permanently if fewer people frequent the office on a daily basis, such that workers may not be in the office at the same time as collaborators, and there might be fewer people to ask for help or talk with informally.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“If virtual workers must coordinate some of their work tasks with colleagues, it can be difficult to synchronize and coordinate actions, working schedules and breaks, motivate each other, and assist each other with timely information exchange115.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [115] Raghuram, S., Wiesenfeld, B. & Garud, R. Technology enabled work: the role of self-efficacy in determining telecommuter adjustment and structuring behavior. J. Vocat. Behav. 63, 180–198 (2003). source
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Virtual work also affects work design and changes how psychological needs can be satisfied and frustrated (Table 1), which has implications for both managers and employees.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The negative effects of monitoring can also be reduced if monitoring is used constructively to help employees develop through feedback129–133, and when employees participate in the design and control of the monitoring systems134,135.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [129] Aiello, J. R. & Shao, Y. in Human–Computer Interaction: Applications and Case Studies (eds Smith, M. J. & Salvendy, G.) 1011–1016 (Elsevier Science, 1993).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [130] Griffith, T. L. Monitoring and performance: a comparison of computer and supervisor monitoring. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 23, 549–572 (1993). source
- Not matchedcites [131] Stone, E. F. & Stone, D. L. in Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management Vol. 8 (eds Ferris, G. R. & Rowland, K. M.) 349–411 (JAI, 1990).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [132] Wells, D. L., Moorman, R. H. & Werner, J. M. The impact of the perceived purpose of electronic performance monitoring on an array of attitudinal variables. Hum. Resour. Dev. Q. 18, 121–138 (2007). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [133] Ravid, D. M., Tomczak, D. L., White, J. C. & Behrend, T. S. EPM 20/20: a review, framework, and research agenda for electronic performance monitoring. J. Manag. 46, 100–126 (2020). source
- Not matchedcites [134] De Tienne, K. B. & Abbott, N. T. Developing an employee-centered electronic monitoring system. J. Syst. Manag. 44, 12–13 (1993).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [135] Stanton, J. M. & Barnes-Farrell, J. L. Effects of electronic performance monitoring on personal control, task satisfaction, and task performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 81, 738–745 (1996). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Individuals might also require training in the use of information communication technology, and even then, technology can malfunction, preventing workers from completing tasks, and causing frustration and distress136,137.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [136] Day, A., Barber, L. K. & Tonet, J. in The Cambridge Handbook of Technology and Employee Behavior (ed. Landers, R. N.) 580–607 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2019). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [137] Day, A., Scott, N. & Kevin Kelloway, E. in New Developments in Theoretical and Conceptual Approaches to Job Stress Vol. 8 (eds Perrewé, P. L. & Ganster, D. C.) 317–350 (Emerald, 2010). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Although some research suggests that those who work flexibly are viewed as less committed to their career139 and might be overlooked for career progression140”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [139] Coltrane, S., Miller, E. C., DeHaan, T. & Stewart, L. Fathers and the flexibility stigma. J. Soc. Issues 69, 279–302 (2013). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [140] Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J. & Ying, Z. J. Does working from home work? evidence from a Chinese experiment. Q. J. Econ. 130, 165–218 (2014). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Finally, remote workers can suffer from professional isolation because there are fewer opportunities to meet or be introduced to connections that enable career development and progression138, which could influence their feelings of competence in the long run.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [138] Cooper, C. D. & Kurland, N. B. Telecommuting, professional isolation, and employee development in public and private organizations. J. Organ. Behav. 23, 511–532 (2002). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, the need for coordination and information sharing to achieve team goals is likely to be enhanced by how team members support and satisfy each other’s psychological needs166, which might be more difficult under virtual work conditions.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual teamwork
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [166] Gagne, M. A model of knowledge-sharing motivation. Hum. Resour. Manage. 48, 571–589 (2009). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These emergent states arise out of individual psychological behaviours and states164 and are influenced by factors that are internal (for example, interactions between team members) and external (for example, organizational team rewards, organizational leadership and project deadlines) to the team, as well as team structure (for example, team size and composition).”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual teamwork
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [164] Waller, M. J., Okhuysen, G. A. & Saghafian, M. Conceptualizing emergent states: a strategy to advance the study of group dynamics. Acad. Manag. Ann. 10, 561–598 (2016). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Furthermore, virtual team members must master electronic communication technology (including virtual meeting and breakout rooms, internet connectivity issues, meeting across different time zones, and email overload), which can lead to frustrations and ‘technostress’170.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual teamwork
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [170] Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S. & Tu, Q. The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: conceptual development and empirical validation. Inf. Syst. Res. 19, 417–433 (2008). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Generally, this has meant getting better pay and seeking work that aligns better with individual values and that provides a better work–life balance: in other words, work that better meets psychological needs for competence, autonomy and relatedness.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, virtual team members can also develop shared collective experiences around their need satisfaction.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual teamwork
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Team emergent states include team cohesion (the bond among group members)161, team trust162, and team motivation and engagement159,163.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual teamwork
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [161] Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J. & McLendon, C. L. Cohesion and performance in groups: a meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. J. Appl. Psychol. 88, 989–1004 (2003). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [162] de Jong, B., Dirks, K. T. & Gillespie, N. M. Trust and team performance: a meta-analysis of main effects, moderators, and covariates. J. Appl. Psychol. 101, 1134–1150 (2016). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [159] Chen, G. & Kanfer, R. Toward a systems theory of motivated behavior in work teams. Res. Organ. Behav. 27, 223–267 (2006). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [163] Barrick, M. R., Thurgood, G. R., Smith, T. A. & Courtright, S. H. Collective organizational engagement: linking motivational antecedents, strategic implementation, and firm performance. Acad. Manage. J. 58, 111–135 (2015). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Uncertainty and interconnectedness make work more complex, increasing the need for teamwork across many industries150.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual teamwork
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [150] O’Neill, T. A. & Salas, E. Creating high performance teamwork in organizations. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 28, 325–331 (2018). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“This phenomenon first appeared on gig economy platforms such as Uber, Instacart and Upwork, where all management is automated173.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Algorithmic management
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [173] Rosenblat, A. Uberland: How Algorithms are Rewriting the Rules of Work (Univ. California Press, 2018). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Alternatively, the experiences gained from working differently during the COVID-19 pandemic might have made many workers aware of how work could be (for example, one does not have to commute), emboldening them to demand better work design and work conditions for themselves.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Virtuality differs between and within teams. Team members might be in different locations on some days and the same location on other days, which changes the level of team virtuality over time. Thus, teams are not strictly virtual or non-virtual.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual teamwork
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Team virtuality influences how team members coordinate tasks and share information130, which is critical for team effectiveness (usually assessed by a team’s tangible outputs, such as their productivity, and team member reactions, such as satisfaction with, or commitment to, the team)158.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual teamwork
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [130] Griffith, T. L. Monitoring and performance: a comparison of computer and supervisor monitoring. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 23, 549–572 (1993). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [158] Mathieu, J. & Gilson, L. in Oxford Handbook of Organizational Psychology Vol. 2 (ed. Kozlowski, S. W.) 910–930 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2012). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The sensemaking process that accompanies career shocks might highlight a lack of meaningful work that decreases the satisfaction of the need for autonomy.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Some have even renamed ‘the great resignation’ as ‘the great discontent’ to highlight that many people reported wanting to quit because of dissatisfaction with their work conditions235.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [235] Gandhi, V. & Robison, J. The ‘great resignation’ is really the ‘great discontent’. Galluphttps://www.gallup.com/workplace/351545/great-resignation-really-great-discontent.aspx (2021).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Not surprisingly, barely a year after ‘the great resignation’ many are now talking about ‘the great reshuffle’, suggesting that many people who quit their jobs used this time to rethink their careers and find more satisfying work239.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Virtual and remote work
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [239] Christian, A. How the great resignation is turning into the great reshuffle. BBC https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20211214-great-resignation-into-great-reshuffle (2021).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More self-determined motivation will be needed to deal with the uncertainty and interdependence that will characterize future work.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Summary and future directions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Self-determination theory can help predict the motivational consequences of future work and these motivational considerations should be taken into account when designing and implementing technology.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Summary and future directions
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Technology can greatly assist in recruiting and selecting workers; self-determination theory can inform guidelines on how to design and use such technologies.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Summary and future directions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Transactional leadership (focused on monitoring, rewarding and sanctioning) might promote self-determined motivation during organizational crises23.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Summary and future directions
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [23] Gagné, M. et al. Uncovering relations between leadership perceptions and motivation under different organizational contexts: a multilevel cross-lagged analysis. J. Bus. Psychol. 35, 713–732 (2020). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The nascent research on the effects of algorithmic management on workers’ motivation indicates mostly negative effects on self-determined forms of motivation, because the way it is designed decreases the satisfaction of competence, autonomy and relatedness needs.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Algorithmic management
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Algorithmic management also tends to individualize work, which affects the need for relatedness.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Algorithmic management
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“On the one hand, using quantified metrics, algorithmic management systems can provide more frequent, unambiguous and performance-related feedback, often in the form of ratings and rankings177, and simultaneously link this feedback to financial rewards.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Applications > Algorithmic management
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [177] Stark, D. & Pais, I. Algorithmic management in the platform economy. Sociologica 14, 47–72 (2020).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“self-determination theory can inform guidelines on how to design and use such technologies.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Summary and future directions
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, although most studies have shown negative effects of algorithmic management on workers’ motivation and work design characteristics, researchers should not view the effects of algorithmic management as predetermined and unchangeable.”
§ Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory > Summary and future directions
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Technology will continue to change the nature of work across many industries.
“The nature of work is changing as technology enables new forms of automation and communication across many industries.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Basic psychological needs for competence, autonomy, and relatedness are critical determinants of work motivation.
“However, these needs are critical determinants of work motivation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Informational feedback enhances intrinsic motivation because it provides information about one's competence.
“Informational feedback can enhance intrinsic motivation because it provides information about one’s competence.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The current trend for working from home will continue.
“if the current trend for working from home continues”
Citations
Cites
The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01 · Cited by 34,210
Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 · Cited by 26,772
The job demands-resources model of burnout.
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499 · Cited by 13,643
A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.256 · Cited by 9,745
Self‐determination theory and work motivation
Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.322 · Cited by 7,757
Self-citationDevelopment of the Job Diagnostic Survey.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076546 · Cited by 7,246
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627 · Cited by 7,176
Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward.
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/ocp0000056 · Cited by 6,979
The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.398 · Cited by 4,957
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- McGraw, K. O. in The Hidden Costs of Reward (eds Lepper. M. R. & Greene, D.) 33–60 (Erlbaum, 1978).
- Van Dijk, J. The Digital Divide (Wiley, 2020).
- Van Den Bos, K. & Lind, E. A. in Handbook of the Uncertain Self (eds Arkin, R. M., Oleson, K. C. & Carroll, P. J.) 122–141 (Routledge, 2013).
- Lukacik, E.-R., Bourdage, J. S. & Roulin, N. Into the void: a conceptual model and research agenda for the design and use of asynchronous video interviews. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 32, 100789 (2020).
- Alexander, A. L., Brunyé, T. T., Sidman, J. & Weil, S. A. From Gaming to Training: A Review of Studies on Fidelity, Immersion, Presence, and Buy-in and Their Effects on Transfer in PC-Based Simulations and Games (DARWARS Training Impact Group, 2005).
- Mohlmann, M. & Zalmanson, L. in Proc. Int. Conf. Inf. Syst. 1–17 (ICIS, 2017).
- Aiello, J. R. & Shao, Y. in Human–Computer Interaction: Applications and Case Studies (eds Smith, M. J. & Salvendy, G.) 1011–1016 (Elsevier Science, 1993).
- Stone, E. F. & Stone, D. L. in Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management Vol. 8 (eds Ferris, G. R. & Rowland, K. M.) 349–411 (JAI, 1990).
- De Tienne, K. B. & Abbott, N. T. Developing an employee-centered electronic monitoring system. J. Syst. Manag. 44, 12–13 (1993).
- Stark, D. & Pais, I. Algorithmic management in the platform economy. Sociologica 14, 47–72 (2020).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Creation of the algorithmic management questionnaire: A six‐phase scale development process
Parent‐Rocheleau, X., Parker, S. K., Bujold, A., & Gaudet, M. (2023) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.22185 · Cited by 177
Self-citationHuman-centred AI in industry 5.0: a systematic review
Passalacqua, M., Pellerin, R., Magnani, F., Doyon-Poulin, P., Del-Aguila, L., Boasen, J., & Léger, P. (2024) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2024.2406021 · Cited by 166
“Indeed, worker roles, responsibilities, perceptions, attitudes, and behaviours, introducing both opportunities and challenges within the workplace (European Agency for Health and Safety at Work 2022; Flores, Xu, and Lu 2020; Gagné et al. 2022).”
InfluentialSelf-Determination Theory and Workplace Outcomes: A Conceptual Review and Future Research Directions
McAnally, K., & Hagger, M. S. (2024) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs14060428 · Cited by 243
“…that interventions aimed at enhancing workplace leaders’ autonomy support can subsequently impact employees’ basic psychological need satisfaction, motivational orientation, and, ultimately, their persistence in adaptive work-place behaviors, resulting in more favorable workplace outcomes [90].”
BackgroundAI as an Artist? A Two-Wave Survey Study on Attitudes Toward Using Artificial Intelligence in Art
Latikka, R., Bergdahl, J., Savela, N., & Oksanen, A. (2023) · Poetics · doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2023.101839 · Cited by 108
Wu, S., Liu, Y., Ruan, M., Chen, S., & Xie, X. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-98385-2 · Cited by 116
“Emerging technologies, such as GenAI, can impact these motivational factors either positively or negatively 7 .”
Metadata
- Authors
- Gagné, M., Parker, S. K., Griffin, M. A., Dunlop, P. D., Knight, C., Klonek, F. E., & Parent-Rocheleau, X.
- Affiliations
- Curtin University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Gagné, Marylène
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Psychology
- Published
- 2022-05-10
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 378-392
- ISSN
- 2731-0574 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9088153
- OpenAlex
- W4229457720
- Semantic Scholar
- 8acb7f9453f96392e4dbc244f1f309c55db75d44
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 201
- Citations by year
- 2026: 151 · 2025: 139 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 8
- FWCI
- 11.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Reviews Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Behavior and Motivation
- Keywords
- self-determination theory, future of work, employee motivation, basic psychological needs, competence, autonomy, relatedness, job selection, remote work, virtual teamwork, algorithmic management, job design, employee well-being, workplace technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review