Cited by 161Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory Processes and Influences

Selective early-acquired fear memories undergo temporary suppression during adolescence

Open access
Pattwell, Siobhan S., Bath, Kevin G., Casey, B. J., Ninan, Ipe, Lee, Francis S.·2011·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Highly conserved neural circuitry between rodents and humans has allowed for in-depth characterization of behavioral and molecular processes associated with emotional learning and memory. Despite increased prevalence of affective disorders in adolescent humans, few studies have characterized how associative-emotional learning changes during the transition through adolescence or identified mechanisms underlying such changes. By examining fear conditioning in mice, as they transitioned into and out of adolescence, we found that a suppression of contextual fear occurs during adolescence. Although contextual fear memories were not expressed during early adolescence, they could be retrieved and expressed as the mice transitioned out of adolescence. This temporary suppression of contextual fear was associated with blunted synaptic activity in the basal amygdala and decreased PI3K and MAPK signaling in the hippocampus. These findings reveal a unique form of brain plasticity in fear learning during early adolescence and may prove informative for understanding endogenous mechanisms to suppress unwanted fear memories.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1012975108

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adolescents have been reported to show either stronger or weaker aversive fear conditioning to the training context than adults, depending on the study.

    “adolescents have been varyingly reported to exhibit either stronger (Brasser & N. Spear, 2005; Esmoris et al, 2008; see also Barrett et al, 1984) or weaker (Pattwell et al, 2011) aversive (fear) conditioning to the training context than adults”
  • In classical conditioning, adolescents have been reported to show either stronger or weaker aversive fear conditioning to the training context than adults.

    “adolescents have been varyingly reported to exhibit either stronger (Brasser & N. Spear, 2005; Esmoris et al, 2008; see also Barrett et al, 1984) or weaker (Pattwell et al, 2011) aversive (fear) conditioning to the training context than adults”
  • Recent research with rodents and humans has shown distinctive developmental profiles of blunted threat extinction recall in adolescents relative to children and adults.

    “Recent research with rodents and humans has shown distinctive developmental profiles of blunted threat extinction recall in adolescents6–11, relative to children and adults.”
  • In vulnerable populations such as children and adolescents, sound stimuli are recommended over mild electric shocks in threat conditioning paradigms.

    “In vulnerable populations, such as children and adolescents, sound stimuli are recommended over mild electric shocks in threat conditioning paradigms7,8,13,43.”
  • During extinction over time, increased recruitment of the mPFC to CS+ vs. CS− occurred in early trials for older participants and in late trials for younger participants.

    “The analysis of extinction over time (Stimulus × Time × Age interaction), showed increased recruitment of the mPFC to CS+ vs. CS− in the early trials for older participants and in the late trials for younger participants (see Fig. 2 and Table 1).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pattwell, S. S., Bath, K. G., Casey, B. J., Ninan, I., & Lee, F. S.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychiatry,
  • Brown University (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2011-01-10
Volume
108
Issue
3
Pages
1182-1187
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2130394290
Cited by
161
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • New York Community Trust
  • International Mental Health Research Organization
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • Monique Weill-Caulier Trust
  • National Institutes of Health (MH079513)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH079513, MH079513, R25MH060478, MH060478)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS052819, R01NS052819)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD055177, T32HD055177)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
contextual fear conditioning, emotional learning, basal amygdala, hippocampus, PI3K signaling, MAPK signaling, synaptic plasticity, mood disorders, memory retrieval
MeSH terms
Psychology, Adolescent, Amygdala, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Association Learning, Conditioning, Psychological, Electrophysiology, Fear, Hippocampus, Memory, Blotting, Western, Signal Transduction, Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases, MAP Kinase Signaling System, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review