Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 245

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stereolithographic Bone Scaffold Design Parameters: Osteogenic Differentiation and Signal Expression

Open access
Kim, Kyobum, Yeatts, Andrew, Dean, David, Fisher, John P.·2010·Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews
DOI 10.1089/ten.teb.2010.0171
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Scaffold design parameters including porosity, pore size, interconnectivity, and mechanical properties have a significant influence on osteogenic signal expression and differentiation. This review evaluates the influence of each of these parameters and then discusses the ability of stereolithography (SLA) to be used to tailor scaffold design to optimize these parameters. Scaffold porosity and pore size affect osteogenic cell signaling and ultimately in vivo bone tissue growth. Alternatively, scaffold interconnectivity has a great influence on in vivo bone growth but little work has been done to determine if interconnectivity causes changes in signaling levels. Osteogenic cell signaling could be also influenced by scaffold mechanical properties such as scaffold rigidity and dynamic relationships between the cells and their extracellular matrix. With knowledge of the effects of these parameters on cellular functions, an optimal tissue engineering scaffold can be designed, but a proper technology must exist to produce this design to specification in a repeatable manner. SLA has been shown to be capable of fabricating scaffolds with controlled architecture and micrometer-level resolution. Surgical implantation of these scaffolds is a promising clinical treatment for successful bone regeneration. By applying knowledge of how scaffold parameters influence osteogenic cell signaling to scaffold manufacturing using SLA, tissue engineers may move closer to creating the optimal tissue engineering scaffold.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/ten.teb.2010.0171

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 149

  1. 10.1016/j.mce.2008.02.017 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/term.74 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1002/term.63 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.gene.2005.10.011 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2009.05.006 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/term.41 · DOI
  7. 10.1182/blood-2007-07-103697 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1089/ten.2005.11.923 · DOI
  9. 10.1074/jbc.M109.035105 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.12.031 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.10.059 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2008.10.004 · DOI
  13. Patel M., J Tissue Eng Regen Med
  14. 10.1002/mabi.200400026 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1359/jbmr.081240 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/j.gene.2008.12.008 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1002/jcb.10369 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1002/jcb.22108 · DOI
  19. 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.8.061505.095721 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.05.017 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1152/ajpcell.00455.2005 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.10.003 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1002/jbm.a.20034 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00243-5 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00180-4 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.11.024 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1002/jbm.a.10582 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1038/nmat1421 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00030-9 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Yeatts A.B., Handbook of Intelligent Scaffolds for Regenerative Medicine
  31. 10.1007/978-0-387-68831-2_8 · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-68831-2_8
  32. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.05.005 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1016/S0890-6955(97)00137-5 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Mistry A.S., 2005, Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol, 94, 1
  36. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.063 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1021/bm900240k · DOI
  38. 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00148-5 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1002/jbm.a.31559 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1007/s10856-008-3506-2 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.05.017 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.03.017 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Betz M.W., 2010, Biomacromolecules
  45. 10.1177/10454411010120010501 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1089/107632701753337645 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Klawitter J.J., 1972, J Biomed Mater Res Biomed Mater Symp, 2, 161
  48. 10.1002/jbm.a.32015 · DOI
  49. 10.1002/jbm.a.32381 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1089/ten.tea.2007.0231 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1002/1097-4636(20000905)51:3<491::AID-JBM25>3.0.CO;2-1 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Kuboki Y., 2001, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 83, S105, 10.2106/00004623-200100002-00005 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1089/ten.2006.12.3417 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.012 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.08.018 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1002/jbm.a.31977 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.jcis.2009.10.079 · DOI
  58. 10.1023/A:1008973120918 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.10.056 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.01.046 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.08.013 · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.08.013
  62. 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00243-5 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.2174/1874325000802010103 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0114 · DOI
  65. 10.1167/iovs.07-0956 · DOI
  66. 10.1529/biophysj.105.070144 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1002/jcp.20974 · DOI
  68. 10.22203/eCM.v018a01 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1152/ajpcell.67.2008 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0055 · DOI
  71. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.02.005 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1016/S1534-5807(04)00075-9 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1007/s10856-006-6814-4 · DOI
  74. 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00178-3 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.046 · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.08.028 · DOI
  77. 10.1089/tea.2007.0077 · DOI
  78. 10.1002/smll.200901757 · DOI
  79. 10.1002/jbm.a.31991 · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.31991
  80. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.012 · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.012
  81. 10.1088/1748-6041/4/3/035002 · DOI
  82. 10.1089/107632703322066679 · doi:10.1089/107632703322066679
  83. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.03.040 · DOI · Paper page
  84. 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0011 · DOI
  85. 10.1016/j.bone.2008.03.028 · DOI
  86. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.08.007 · DOI · Paper page
  87. 10.1089/ten.2006.0443 · DOI
  88. 10.1097/00001665-200311000-00002 · doi:10.1097/00001665-200311000-00002
  89. 10.1007/978-3-540-39899-8_13 · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-39899-8_13
  90. Sachlos E., 2003, Eur Cell Mater, 5, 29, 10.22203/eCM.v005a03 · DOI · Paper page
  91. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.064 · DOI
  92. 10.1002/1097-4636(200105)55:2<203::AID-JBM1007>3.0.CO;2-7 · DOI · Paper page
  93. 10.1002/1439-2054(20001001)282:1<17::AID-MAME17>3.0.CO;2-8 · DOI · Paper page
  94. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.057 · DOI · Paper page
  95. 10.1002/jbm.a.31231 · DOI · Paper page
  96. 10.1002/jbm.a.20015 · DOI · Paper page
  97. 10.1002/jbm.a.31561 · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.31561
  98. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.027 · DOI · Paper page
  99. 10.1002/jbm.b.10485 · DOI · Paper page
  100. 10.1007/s10856-008-3567-2 · DOI
  101. 10.1002/jbm.b.31057 · DOI
  102. 10.1089/ten.2006.12.2801 · DOI
  103. Dean D., 2010, Innovative Developments in Design and Manufacturing: Advanced Research in Virtual and Rapid Prototyping, 37
  104. 10.1021/bm801001r · DOI
  105. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.03.055 · DOI · Paper page
  106. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.043 · DOI · Paper page
  107. 10.1002/jbm.a.32251 · DOI
  108. 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2008.10.005 · DOI
  109. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.05.004 · DOI · Paper page
  110. 10.1089/ten.2004.10.1316 · doi:10.1089/ten.2004.10.1316 · Paper page
  111. 10.1089/107632703768247377 · DOI · Paper page
  112. 10.1007/s10439-006-9156-y · DOI · Paper page
  113. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.08.017 · DOI · Paper page
  114. 10.1002/jbm.b.30325 · DOI · Paper page
  115. 10.1080/10611860701289818 · DOI
  116. 10.1023/A:1011203226053 · DOI
  117. 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.05.024 · DOI
  118. 10.1023/B:JMSM.0000011812.08185.2a · DOI
  119. 10.1002/jbm.a.30934 · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.30934
  120. 10.1002/jbm.a.30405 · DOI
  121. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.07.001 · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.07.001
  122. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.11.022 · DOI · Paper page
  123. 10.1016/j.actbio.2007.11.001 · DOI
  124. 10.1016/j.joms.2005.12.080 · doi:10.1016/j.joms.2005.12.080
  125. 10.1097/01.brs.0000190886.56895.3d · doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000190886.56895.3d
  126. 10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.104 · doi:10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.104
  127. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2009.01.004 · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2009.01.004
  128. 10.3109/10929080500389803 · DOI
  129. 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00069.x · DOI
  130. 10.1054/bjps.1999.3268 · doi:10.1054/bjps.1999.3268
  131. 10.1016/j.joms.2005.03.016 · DOI · Paper page
  132. 10.1117/12.595950 · doi:10.1117/12.595950
  133. 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.05.023 · doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.05.023
  134. 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90254-3 · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(99)90254-3
  135. 10.1016/j.joms.2003.10.011 · doi:10.1016/j.joms.2003.10.011
  136. 10.1109/42.552059 · DOI · Paper page
  137. 10.1016/S1010-5182(05)80007-1 · doi:10.1016/s1010-5182(05)80007-1
  138. 10.1016/j.jcms.2007.06.006 · doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2007.06.006
  139. 10.1016/j.jocn.2008.04.001 · doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2008.04.001
  140. 10.1016/j.joms.2008.08.032 · doi:10.1016/j.joms.2008.08.032
  141. 10.1186/1471-2474-8-91 · doi:10.1186/1471-2474-8-91
  142. 10.1080/17453670710014987 · doi:10.1080/17453670710014987
  143. 10.1007/s00402-008-0717-4 · doi:10.1007/s00402-008-0717-4
  144. 10.1097/01.prs.0000182386.78775.cd · DOI
  145. 10.1016/j.ocl.2008.03.002 · doi:10.1016/j.ocl.2008.03.002
  146. 10.3171/2008.11.SPI0817677 · DOI
  147. 10.3171/2008.9.SPI08229 · doi:10.3171/2008.9.spi08229
  148. 10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0449 · DOI
  149. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.063 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 245

Metadata

Authors
Kim, K., Yeatts, A., Dean, D., & Fisher, J. P.
Venue
Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2010-10
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
523-539
ISSN
  • 1937-3368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1937-3376
DOI
10.1089/ten.teb.2010.0171
OpenAlex
W2097030798
Cited by
245
References
3
FWCI
9.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.liebertpub.com/nv/resources-tools/text-and-data-mining-policy/121/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stereolithographic Bone Scaffold Design Parameters: Osteogenic Differentiation and Signal Expression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/ten.teb.2010.0171
The paper
Kim, K., Yeatts, A., Dean, D., & Fisher, J. P. (2010). Stereolithographic Bone Scaffold Design Parameters: Osteogenic Differentiation and Signal Expression. Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2010.0171

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.