Cited by 369Muscle metabolism and nutritionNutritional Studies and DietNutrition and Health Studies

Current protein intake in America: analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003–2004

Open access
Fulgoni, Victor L·2008·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

In recent years there has been considerable interest in the benefits of high-protein diets. This study determined current usual intake of protein in America. Using the most recent data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003-2004, usual protein intake for Americans aged 2+ years was estimated. Usual protein intake was calculated on a grams per day, grams per kilogram ideal body weight, and a percentage of calories basis. Protein intake averaged 56 +/- 14 g/d in young children, increased to a high of approximately 91 +/- 22 g/d in adults aged 19-30 y, and decreased to approximately 66 +/- 17 g/d in the elderly. The percentage of the male population who consumed less than the estimated average requirement was very low. Our estimates indicated that 7.7% of adolescent females and 7.2-8.6% of older adult women reported consuming protein levels below their estimated average requirement. The median intake of protein on a percentage of calories basis ranged from 13.4% in children aged 4-8 y to 16.0% in men aged 51-70 y. Even the 95th percentile of protein intake did not approach the highest acceptable macronutrient distribution range of 35% for an age/sex group. The highest 95th percentile of protein intake was 20.8% of calories in men aged 51-70 y. Given the demonstrated benefits of higher protein intake on weight management, sarcopenia, and other physiologic functions, efforts should be undertaken to ensure that Americans consume the recommended amount of protein (17-21% of calories as expected from MyPyramid food patterns).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/87.5.1554s

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fulgoni, V. L.
Affiliations
Canadian Nutrition Society (CA)
Corresponding author
Fulgoni, Victor L
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-05
Volume
87
Issue
5
Pages
1554S-1557S
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1924042297
Cited by
369
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 17
FWCI
5.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
Keywords
protein intake, usual dietary intake, protein adequacy, estimated average requirement, age and sex differences, adolescents, older adults, children, high-protein diet
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Body Weight, Child, Child, Preschool, Dietary Proteins, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Nutrition Surveys, Nutritional Requirements, United States, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Muscle, Skeletal, Nutrition Policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review